Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

UGD.V ·

Unigold Inc. Delivers Positive PEA FOR Candelones Oxide Project

Economic Studies

UNIGOLD INC.

Ste 2704, 401 Bay Street,

P.O. Box 4, Toronto, ON M5H 2Y4

T. (416) 866-8157

www.unigoldinc.com

PR No. 2021-06

UNIGOLD INC. DELIVERS POSITIVE PEA FOR CANDELONES OXIDE PROJECT

Highlights

• PEA assumes 5,000 tonnes per day (“tpd”) run-of-mine heap leach operation

• Average annual payable gold production of 31,000 oz

• 50% Pre-Tax Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”), 35% After-Tax IRR

• US$50 Million Pre-Tax Net Present Value (“NPV”), US$34 Million After-Tax NPV

• After-Tax Payback Period 1.8 years from start of production

• Average annual after-tax free cash flow of US$23 Million

• Initial capital expenditure (“Capex”) of US$36 Million (includes US$5 Million for EPCM and

indirect costs in addition to US$5 Million as contingency)

• AISC of US$744/oz Au

• Average gold recovery of 75%; total cash operating cost of US$13/tonne

• Creation of approximately 100 direct jobs and 50 indirect jobs during operation

• Direct taxes payable to Government of $24 million over life of mine

Toronto, Ontario, April 26 2021 – Unigold Inc. (“Unigold” or the “Company”) (TSX -V:UGD; OTCQX:

UGDIF; FSE:UG B1) is pleased to provide the results from the independent Preliminary Economic

Assessment (“PEA”) prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43 -101 – Standards of

Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43 -101") on its 100% owned Candelones Oxide Project in the

Dominican Republic.

Joseph Hamilton, Chairman and CEO of Unigold notes: “The Candelones Oxide project has been designed

as a small footprint, environmentally friendly operation that will establish the Company in the local area of

the Dominican Republic. The economics are compelling enough that this is being considered as a stand-

alone operation providing near term cash flow as the Company continues to expand and evaluate the larger

sulphide resource which the Company believes offers a longer -term development opportunity. The

Company will move to rapidly develop both projects over the next few years as it concurrently moves the

oxide project through required community consultation, environmental studies, detailed engineering and

Unigold Inc. Press Release: PR2021-06 April 26, 2021 Page: 2

permitting while completing metallurgy, preliminary design and market studies for the sulphide project.

Recent exploration drilling at the Candelones Extension identified additional po tential for oxide resource

expansion to the east of the known deposit while continuing to expand the available sulphide resource.

The resource mined in this PEA includes inferred mineral resources which contribute approximately 27% to

the life of mine production schedule. The Company intends to complete the additional drilling

recommended by our lead consultant, Micon, to rapidly upgrade this inferred resource to measured and

indicated status, allowing it to be included in the planned Feasibility Study. The Company intends to

transition directly into a Feasibility Study on the oxide project as soon as possible. Additional oxide material

has been collected and is being shipped to Canada for large diameter, run of mine column tests to confirm

the recovery assumptions used in the PEA. We are targeting the end of 2021 to have all materials and studies

assembled to allow the Government to proceed with permitting of this project.”

This independent study was prepared by Micon International Limited under the supervision of Mr.

Richard Gowans, B.Sc. P.Eng., President and Principal Metallurgist, Micon International Limited

(“Micon”) and included contributions from the geological and engineering teams at Micon and Halyard

Inc. (Toronto ). These firms provided the mineral resource estimates, design parameters and

operating and capital cost estimates for mine operations, process facilities, major equipment

selection, infrastructure, and project economic analysis . A full technical report will be filed on

www.sedar.com, and will be available on the Company’s website, within 45 days.

The pertinent input parameters and results of the Candelones Oxide PEA Study (Base Case) are

presented in Table 1 to Table 4. Table 5 presents the NPV and IRR sensitivity to variability in gold price,

capital cost, and operating cost. Mineral resources for the Candelones project are shown in Table 6.

Resource Estimate

The PEA is based on the measured, indicated and inferred oxide mineral resource estimated by Mr.

W. Lewis, P.Geo. and Mr. A. San Martin, MAusIMM (CP) of Micon International Limited with an effective

date of August 17, 2020 and is included with a NI43-101F1 Technical Report titled “UPDATED MINERAL

RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR THE CANDELONES PROJECT NEITA CONCESSION DOMINICAN REPUBLIC”

which is available at www.sedar.com and on the Company’s website. Micon is independent of Unigold

and Messrs. Lewis and San Martin meet the requirements of a “Qualified Person” as established by

the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Definition Standards for Mineral

Resources and Mineral Reserves (May, 2014).

Cautionary Statement: The reader is advised that the PEA summarized in this news release is intended to

provide only an initial, high-level review of the project potential and design options. The PEA mine plan and

economic model include numerous assumptions and the use of inferred mineral resources. Inferred

mineral resources are considered to be too speculative to be used in an economic analysis except as allowed

for by NI 43-101 in PEA studies. There is no guarantee that inferred mineral resources can be converted to

indicated or measure d mineral resources, and as such, there is no guarantee the project economics

described herein will be achieved.

Unigold Inc. Press Release: PR2021-06 April 26, 2021 Page: 3

Table 1: PEA Summary (reported in US$)

Total mineralized material mined (000 t) 5,275

Total waste (000 t) 963

Average grade (Au g/t) 0.75

Total gold contained (oz) 126,995

Total gold produced (oz) 95,587

Average Gold recovery (%) 75%

Average annual gold produced (oz) 31,040

Total initial Capex (US$M) $36.5

Sustaining capital (US$M) $0.4

Unit Operating Cost (per tonne)

Mining (US$/t) $3.22

Processing (US$/t) $5.97

General & administration (US$/t) $1.93

Refining, delivery, royalty (US$/t) $1.64

Total operating cost per tonne processed (US$/t) $12.76

Table 2: Capital Cost Summary (US$ million)

Capital Costs (US$M) Pre-Production Sustaining Total

Mining 1.84 0.43 2.27

ADR Processing Plant 11.84 11.84

Infrastructure 12.86 12.86

EPCM, Indirects, Owners Costs 5.18 5.18

Subtotal 31.72 0.43 32.15

Contingency 4.76 4.76

Total Capital Costs 36.48 0.43 36.90

Closure and Rehabilitation 3.40

Notes: Totals may differ due to rounding.

Table 3: Summary Economics at US$1,650 gold per oz (US$ million)

LOM Net Smelter Return Revenue (US$M) $150

Total LOM Pre-Tax Cash Flow (US$M) $90

Average Annual Pre-Tax Cash Flow (US$M) $29

LOM Income Taxes (US$M) $17

Total LOM After-Tax Free Cash Flow after Capital Expenditures (US$M) $34

Average Annual After-Tax Free Cash Flow from Operations (US$M) $23

Discount Rate (%) 5%

Pre-Tax 5% NPV (US$M) $41

Pre-Tax IRR 50.3 %

After-Tax 5% NPV (US$M) $26

After-Tax IRR 34.9 %

After-Tax Payback after start of production (Months) 22

Unigold Inc. Press Release: PR2021-06 April 26, 2021 Page: 4

Table 4: All-In Sustaining Cost (US$million)

Mining Cost (US$M) $17.0

Processing Cost (US$M) $31.5

General & Administrative (US$M) $10.2

Refining & Smelting (US$M) $0.8

Royalties (US$M) $7.9

Adjusted Operating Costs $67.3

Sustaining (US$M) $0.4

Closure cost (US$M) $3.4

Total (US$M) $71.2

All-in Sustaining Cost (US$/oz) $744

All-in Sustaining Costs are presented as defined by the World Gold Council less Corporate G&A

Table 5: NPV & IRR Sensitivities (Base Case1 in bold): 5% Discount Rate

75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 105% 110% 115% 120% 125%

Gold

Price

NPV (US$M) -$ 0.1 $ 5.2 $ 10.5 $ 15.7 $ 21.0 $ 26.3 $ 31.6 $ 36.9 $ 42.2 $ 47.4 $ 52.7

IRR 4.9% 11.2% 17.4% 23.4% 29.2% 34.9% 40.5% 46.0% 51.4% 56.8% 62.0%

Operating

Cost

NPV (US$M) $ 36.0 $ 34.1 $ 32.1 $ 30.2 $ 28.3 $ 26.3 $ 24.4 $ 22.4 $ 20.5 $ 18.5 $ 16.6

IRR 45.3% 43.3% 41.2% 39.1% 37.0% 34.9% 32.8% 30.7% 28.5% 26.4% 24.2%

Capital

Cost

NPV (US$M) $ 35.5 $ 33.7 $ 31.8 $ 30.0 $ 28.2 $ 26.3 $ 24.5 $ 22.6 $ 20.8 $ 18.9 $ 17.1

IRR 55.0% 50.2% 45.9% 41.9% 38.3% 34.9% 31.8% 29.0% 26.3% 23.8% 21.4%

1 – Base Case: US$1,650 gold per oz; CAPEX US$36.90 Million; Operating Cost US$12.76/ tonne processed

Mining

The mineral resources used in the mine plan for this PEA outcrop on surface and are contained within

a pit with a maximum depth of approximately 30 metres. The mine has a production rate of 5,000

tonnes per day. Contract mining is assumed using a local, established construction contractor in the

Dominican Republic. The material is free -dig at surface. No drilling or blasting is contemplated in

this study. Approximately 27% of the production is estimated to be transition material.

Processing

A total of 150,000 tpm of material will be extracted and hauled approximately 3 km onto a Run -of-

Mine Heap leach pad. Gold and silver will be recovered in an adsorption-desorption-recovery circuit

and electrowinning cells, with gold room recovery and production of bullion bars. Silver credits are

not included in the financial modelling. No tailings facility is required. Gold recovery estimates for

oxide and transition mineralization are based on a column leach testwork currently ongoing at

Bureau Veritas Commodit ies Canada Ltd. Metallurgical test laboratories, Vancouver, where

preliminary results indicate 87% gold extraction in 30 days for -19 mm oxide mineralization and over

60% gold extraction in 43 days for -12.5 mm transition mineralization. This study uses an average

75% leach recovery with a 10-week leach cycle.

Unigold Inc. Press Release: PR2021-06 April 26, 2021 Page: 5

Table 6.0 – Mineral Resource Estimate – Candelones Project

Description Mineralization Classification Deposit Tonnes Au Au ozs Strip

Type (x 1,000) (g/t) (x 1,000) Ratio

Pit

Constrained

OXIDE MEASURED Main & Connector 1,835 0.84 49 0.2

INDICATED Main & Connector 1,595 0.83 43 0.2

SUBTOTAL M & I Main & Connector 3,430 0.84 92 0.2

OXIDE INFERRED Main & Connector 1,069 0.62 21 0.2

TRANSITION INFERRED Main & Connector 545 0.97 17 0.2

SUBTOTAL INFERRED Main & Connector 1,614 0.74 38 0.2

Pit

Constrained

SULPHIDE INFERRED Main & Connector 4,622 1.26 188 1.1

Extension 24,822 1.67 1,330 9.2

SUBTOTAL INFERRED 29,444 1.61 1,518 7.9

Underground SULPHIDE INFERRED Main & Connector 598 2.25 43 NA

Extension 3,247 2.42 252 NA

SUBTOTAL INFERRED 3,845 2.39 295 NA

Notes relating to Mineral Resource Estimate

Mineral resources were estimated by Mr. W. Lewis, P.Geo. and Mr. A. San Martin, MAusIMM(CP) of Micon International Limited. ( “Micon”), a Toronto based

consulting company, independent of Unigold. Both Mr. Lewis and Mr. San Martin meet the requirements of a “Qualified Person” as established by the Canadian

Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (May 2014 ) (“the CIM Standards”). The

estimate is based on a long-term gold price of US$ 1,500 per ounce and economic cut -off grades 0.30 g/t Au (OXIDE), 0.60 g/t (TRANSITION AND SULPHIDE)

and 1.30 g/t (UNDERGROUND SULPHIDE). Pit constrained resources are reported within an optimized pit shell; unde rground resources are reported within

continuous and contiguous shapes which lie adjacent to and below the ultimate open pit shell and interpreted to be recoverabl e utilizing standard

underground mining methods.

The mineral resource estimate has an effective date of August 17, 2020. The mineral resource estimate is based on a long term gold price of US$ 1,500 per

ounce and economic cut-off grades of 0.30 g/t Au (OXIDE PIT CONSTRAINED), 0.60 g/t (TRANSITION AND SULPHIDE - PIT CONSTRAINED) and 1.30 g/t (SULPHIDE

- UNDERGROUND). Pit constrained resources are reported within an optimized pit shell; underground resources are reported withi n continuous and

contiguous shapes which lie adjacent to and below the ultimate open pit shell and interpreted to be r ecoverable utilizing standard underground mining

methods.

The estimate assumes the following metallurgical recoveries that are based on completed test work to date: Oxide 90%, Transition 50%, and Sulphide 84%. The

estimate assumes the following costs: Mini ng (Pit) US$ 2.50/tonne, Mining (Underground) US$ 30.00 Oxide Processing (Heap Leach) US$7.00 / t, Transition

Processing (Heap Leach) US$ 7.00/t, Sulphide Processing US$ 18.00/t ((Leach) and G&A US$ 5.00/t. The pit constrained resource is reported within an optimized

pit shell that assumed a maximum slope angle of 45 degrees. Open pit mining recovery was assumed to be 100%. Open pit dilutio n was assumed to be

0%.Underground mining recovery was assumed to be 100%. Underground dilution was assumed to be 0%.

Micon has not identified any legal, political, environmental, or other risks that could materially affect the potential development of the mineral resource

estimate.

The mineral resource estimates are classified according to the CIM Standards which defin e a Mineral Resource as “a concentration or occurrence of solid

material of economic interest in or on the earth's crust in such form, grade or quality and quantity that there are reasonabl e prospects for eventual economic

extraction. The location, quantity, grade or quality, continuity and other characteristics of a mineral resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific

geological evidence and knowledge including sampling. Mineral resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence, into inferred, indicated

and measured categories. An inferred mineral resource has a lower level of confidence than an indicated mineral resource. An indicated mineral resource has

a higher level of confidence than an inferred mineral resource but has a lower level of confidence than a measured mineral resource."

The CIM Standards define an inferred mineral resource as: "that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or qu ality are estimated on the basis

of limited geological evide nce and sampling. Geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify geological and grade or quality continuity. An in ferred

mineral resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an indicated mineral resource. It is reasonably expec ted that the majority of inferred

mineral resources could be upgraded to indicated mineral resources with continued exploration."

All procedures, methodology and key assumptions supporting this mineral resource estimate are included in a NI43 -101F1 Technical Report titled “UPDATED

MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR THE CANDELONES PROJECT NEITA CONCESSION DOMINICAN REPUBLIC” which is available at www.sedar.com and on the

Company’s website. The reader is reminded that mineral resources are not mineral reserves a nd therefore do not have demonstrated economic viability.

Unigold Inc. Press Release: PR2021-06 April 26, 2021 Page: 6

Surface Infrastructure and Indirect Costs

The mining and processing infrastructure will be located at the Candelones site . Site power is

assumed to be supplied by generators under contract. The mine site is accessible by an International

Highway. No off -site infrastructure is expected to be required. Process Water is available in the

immediate area. Surface water management includes ditches, ponds and pumping stations.

Indirect costs including owner’s costs, engineering, procurement and construction management,

temporary facilities for construction and other related items are estimated at US$ 5.18 million. An

additional US$4.76 million (pre-production) has been budgeted as contingency for specific direct and

indirect costs.

Royalties

A 5.0% net smelter return (“NSR”) royalty on all metals produced from the Candelones Project has

been applied in the PEA. This royalty is pay able to the Government of the Dominican Republic and

forms a minimum tax. The royalty payments are credited against the 27% tax on Net Income.

Environment and Closure

The Candelones Project is located almost entirely on land owned by the Dominican Government. The

project requires the submittal of an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (“ESIA”) . The

Company will engage the Government through the Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Recursos

Naturales to develop the framework for the ESIA over the coming months. Environmental baseline

data collection has been initiated and all collected baseline data will inform the ESIA, which will

commence once the framework is finalized. Community consultations have started and will

accelerate over the rest of this year.

In addition to ESIA approval, the project will require permits and authorizations prior to construction

and operation of the mine. Requests for these approvals will be submitted following the E SIA

approval.

A closure plan for the Candelones project will be developed in consultation with the Government and

the local communities as part of the ESIA. Closure costs are estimated at US$3.4 million. The objective

of site closure is to return the site to a fully satisfactory state that includes eliminating all unacceptable

health hazards and ensuring public safety, eliminating the production and spread of contaminants

that could damage the environment and in returning the site to an environmentally sound condition

without the need for maintenance or continuous monitoring.

Stakeholder Engagement

The Candelones Project is located south of the town of Restaura ćion in the northwes tern Dajabon

Province of the Dominican Republic, within a border area that has been designated for preferential

development by the government of the Dominican Republic. Unigold has been proactive in

community engagement for the past twenty years. Project consultations were initiated in 2020 and

will accelerate in 2021. Numerous stakeholders have expressed an interest in learning about the

project. Surveys conducted by Unigold in 2020 allowed members of the community to voice concerns

Unigold Inc. Press Release: PR2021-06 April 26, 2021 Page: 7

about water quality, land disturbance, blasting operations, dust control and impacts to wildlife.

Unigold is committed to addressing concerns and continuing the dialogue with potentially affected

stakeholders through the detailed engineering and environmental assessment process.

The local community has expressed strong support for the proje ct. The main interest in the project

has a focus on employment and entrepreneurial opportunities . In 2020 more than 80 community

members worked at the Company’s projects in the Candelones area.

Independent Qualified Persons

This PEA was prepared for Unigold by Micon International Limited and other industry consultants,

with each being a “qualified person” under NI 43-101. Micon has reviewed and approved the content

of this news release. The following persons are independent for the purposes of NI 43-101:

• Richard Gowans, P.Eng. President & Principal Metallurgist, Micon International Limited

• Chris Jacobs C.Eng., MIMMM, Vice-President & Mining Economist, Micon International Limited

• Nigel Fung, P.Eng., Vice-President of Mining and Director, Micon International Limited

• Bill Lewis, P.Geo., Senior Geologist, Micon International Limited

• Alan J. San Martin, MAusIMM (CP) Mineral Resource Specialist, Micon International Limited

About Unigold Inc. – Discovering Gold in the Caribbean

Unigold is a Canadian based mineral exploration company traded on the TSX Venture Exchange under the

symbol UGD, the OTCQX exchange under the symbol UGDIF, and on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the

symbol UGB1. The Company is focused primarily on exploring and developing its gold assets in the Dominican

Republic. The Candelones oxide gold deposit is within the 100% owned Neita Fase II exploration concession

located in Dajabón province, in the northwest part of the Dominican Republic. The Candelones project area is

about 20 kilometers south of the town of Restauraćion. The oxide deposit occurs at surface as a result of the

tropical weathering of underlying mineralization. Unigold has been active in the Dominican Republic since 2002

and remains the most active e xploration Company in the country. The Neita Fase II exploration concession is

the largest single exploration concession covering volcanic rocks of the Cretaceous Tireo Formation. This island

arc terrain is host to Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide deposits, Intermediate and High Sulphidation Epithermal

Systems and Copper-gold porphyry systems. Unigold has identified over 20 areas within the concession area

that host surface expressions of gold systems. Unigold has been concentrating on the Candelones

mineralization and continues to expand the deeper sulphide resources with on-going drilling.

For further information please visit www.unigoldinc.com or contact:

Mr. Joseph Hamilton

Chairman & CEO

[email protected]

416.866.8157

Forward-looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this document, including statements regarding events and financial trends that may affect our future operating results,

financial position, rates of return, and cash flows, may constitute forward -looking statements within th e meaning of the federal securities laws. These

statements are based on our assumptions and estimates and are subject to risk and uncertainties. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the

use of words like “estimate”, “strategy”, “expects”, “plans”, “believes”, “will”, “intends”, “projects”, “goals”, “targets”, and other words of similar meaning.

You can also identify them by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. We wish to caution you that such statements contained are

just predictions or opinions and that actual events or results may differ materially. The forward-looking statements contained in this document are made as

of the date hereof and we assume no obligation to update the forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ materially

from those projected in the forward -looking statements. Where applicable, we claim the protection of the safe harbour for forward -looking statements

provided by the (United States) Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 .Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that

term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.