Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

UGD.V ·

Status of Neita Exploration Concession Application

Corporate Updates

UNIGOLD INC.

P.O. Box 936, STN Adelaide, Toronto, Canada M5C 2K3

T. 416.866.8157

www.unigoldinc.com

PR No. 2017-02

Status of Neita Exploration Concession Application

Toronto, Ontario, February 17, 2017 – Unigold Inc. (“Unigold” or the “Company”) (TSX -V:UGD) would like to

update shareholders on the status of its exploration concession application in respect of its flagship Neita

Property in the Dominican Republic.

The current exploration concession on the Neita Property is due to expire on March 7, 2017. In February

2016, the Com pany was granted the second of two one -year extensions on the existing exploration

concession by the Ministry of Energy and Mines of the Dominican Republic (the “Ministry”). These extensions

are permitted under Articles 31 and 41 of the Dominican Republic Mining Law No. 146. The Company is

required to apply for a new exploration concession at the end of the current period but has the exclusive

right to apply in advance of the expiry of the current concession.

In October 2016, Joseph Del Campo, the Interim President and CEO of Unigold, met with representatives of

the Ministry to provide notice that the Company would be applying for a new exploration concession on the

Neita Property, which would be for a new three -year term with two optional extensions of one year each as

allowed under Mining Law No. 146. The Ministry requested that Unigold submit such application by the end

of 2016.

On November 21, 2016, the Company submitted to the Ministry a complete and valid application for the new

exploration concession, receipt of which has been acknowledged by the Ministry.

On January 23, 2017, members of Unigold's management and legal counsel met with representatives of the

Ministry to discuss the status of the application. In attendance from the Ministry were the Vi ce-Minister, a

legal consultant to the Ministry and the General Mines Director. At this meeting, there was a discussion as to

whether Unigold could again apply for an exploration concession or whether Unigold needed to apply for an

exploitation concession. Since neither a scoping study nor an economic analysis has been completed on the

Neita Property, Unigold is not in a position to apply for an exploitation concession.

The Vice-Minister requested that the General Mines Director proceed with the technical evaluation of the

application and provide input to the Ministry so that the Ministry could grant its decision. The ultimate

authority to grant the concession resides with the Minister of Energy and Mines.

2

On February 6, 2017, the Company directly received from the General Mines Director a letter stating

(translated into English from Spanish):

“The privilege of applying for a new mining concession within the terms of art icle 16 of Rule No. 207 -98 for

application of the Mining Law No. 147/71, has already been utilized by the company Unigold Resources, Inc. ,

when it applied for the “NEITA FASE I” on March 18th, 2011.

We hereby inform [Unigold] that the area occupied by the “NEITA FASE I ” concession will be freed once the

expiration date of the concession arrives... from that moment forth we will be able to receive or inscribe a

new concession application over said area.”

Since the receipt of this letter, Unigold has appeal ed the General Mines Director decision and has been

working with its legal counsel in the Dominican Republic to gain an understanding of the legal effect of the

letter received from the General Mines Director, including arranging a meeting this morning between its legal

counsel and the Vice -Minister. The Vice-Minister was unable to provide additional clarity on the legal effect

of the above -referenced letter but indicated that the Ministry was continuing to assess the application of

Unigold. As stated earlier, the Minister of Energy and Mines, not the General Mines Director, has the

authority to make the final decision regarding the granting of any concession.

The Company is awaiting the final decision from the Ministry. The Company believes it has complied with all

technical and legal aspects of applicable law relating to the application. Nevertheless, Unigold advises

investors to use caution in the trading of the Company’s securities until such time as notice is received from

the Ministry regarding the fin al status of the concession application for the Neita Property. The Company

anticipates receiving this final decision by mid-March, 2017.

For further information please visit www.unigoldinc.com or contact:

Mr. Joseph Del Campo,

Interim President & CEO

[email protected]

416.866.8157

Forward-looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this document, including statements regarding events and financial trends that may affect our future operating results,

financial position and cash flows, may constitute forward -looking statements within the meaning of the f ederal securities laws. These statements are

based on our assumptions and estimates and are subject to risk and uncertainties. You can identify these forward -looking statements by the use of

words like “strategy”, “expects”, “plans”, “believes”, “will”, “estimates”, “intends”, “projects”, “goals”, “targets”, and other words of similar

meaning. You can also identify them by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. We wish to c aution you that such

statements contained are just predictions or opinions and that actual events or results may differ materially. The forward -looking statements

contained in this document are made as of the date hereof and we assume no obligation to update the forward -looking statements, or to update th e

reasons why actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward -looking statements. Where applicable, we claim the protection

of the safe harbour for forward-looking statements provided by the (United States) Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts

responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.