Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

TLO.TO ·

Talon Metals Announces Initial NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Tamarack South Project The drilling at the Tamarack South Project has shown that the magmatic layering of the FGO (Fine Grain Olivine) intrusive ( original sulphi

Resource Estimates Technical Reports (NI 43-101)

Talon Metals Announces Initial NI 43-101 Technical

Report for the Tamarack South Project

The drilling at

the

Tamarack South

Project

has shown

that the magmatic layering of the FGO

(Fine Grain

Olivine) intrusive (

original sulphi

de bearing peridotite)

is consistent with the magmatic layering at the Tamarack

North Project.

Massive sulphide intersections proximal to the FGO footwall contact, similar to

the

Tamarack North

Project

,

have been encountered in three

of

seven

drill holes spaced 300

m

and

200 m

apart

within the Neck Zone

(see

Figure 3)

.

Five

of seven

holes within the Neck Zone have shown between 15.2 m and up to 520.8 m of trace to blebby

sulphides within the

FGO

intrusive

(see Figure 3)

.

Only l

imited drilling

(27 holes)

ha

s

been completed

over a 7,400 acre (30 km

2

)

area

comprising the

Tamarack South Project

.

"

With respect to the Tamarack South Project

,

t

he

zone of entry of the FGO into the Bowl becomes highly

prospective for sul

ph

ides that have settled out

o

f the FGO magma as its rate of intrusion likely

slowed on entering

into the wider chamber. The Eastern Deeps ore body at

Voisey's

Bay occurs

precisely along the zone within

whic

h

a feeder dyke enters the upper chamber

,"

said Dr. Anthony J. Naldrett

[1]

, University Professor Emeritus, University

of Toronto and author of the book Magmatic Sulphide Deposits, Geology, Geochemistry and Exploration.

Road Town, British Virgin Islands--(Newsfile Corp. - November 29, 2018) - Talon Metals Corp.

(TSX:TLO) ("

Talon

" or the

"

Company

") is pleased to announce the results of the National Instrument 43-101 technical report (the "

Technical Report

"

) in

respect to the Tamarack South Nickel-Copper-Cobalt (the "

Tamarack

South

Project

") located in Minnesota, USA.

Tamarack South Technical Report Summary

Located within Aitkin and Carlton Counties, Minnesota, USA (see Figure 1) the Tamarack South Project represents the southern

part of the extensive Tamarack Intrusive Complex (the "

TIC

"), an ultramafic to mafic intrusive complex that hosts Ni-Cu sulphide

mineralization with associated Co, Pt, Pd (PGEs) and Au (see Figure 2). The Tamarack South Project contains extensive

portions of the TIC intrusion, however, to date, most of the exploration and activity has been focused and reported for the

Tamarack North Project. The limited drilling that has been conducted has demonstrated the future potential at the Tamarack

South Project.

Figure

1

: Location of Tamarack South Project

(

Talon, 20

18)

To view an enhanced version of Figure 1, please visit:

https://orders.newsfilecorp.com/files/2443/41360_3c74ba2564833928_002full.jpg

The geometry of the TIC, as outlined by a well-defined aeromagnetic anomaly, consists of a curved, elongated intrusion striking

NS to SE over 18 km and is related to the early evolution of the approximately 1.1 Ga Midcontinent Rift (MCR).

To date, exploration by Kennecott Exploration Company (

"

Kennecott

"

) has included a wide range of geophysical surveys

including:

airborne magnetic and electromagnetic (EM-MEGATEM and AeroTEM), ground magnetic, surface EM and MT, IP,

gravity, seismic, MALM and DHEM. Kennecott has conducted limited reconnaissance style drilling at the Tamarack South

Project since 2002. This drilling is comprised of 27 diamond drill holes totalling 17,314 m with drill holes between 97.5 m and

over 1,230 m depth. The Tamarack South Project has been divided into the Neck and Bowl Zones, reflecting analogous shapes

of the intrusive geology (see Figure 2).

The Tamarack South Project drill hole geochemical data indicates that the FGO intrusive is consistent with the mineral bearing

FGO found within the Tamarack North Project. As well, the magmatic layering found in the Tamarack North Project appears to

continue into the Tamarack South Project (see Figure 2). Limited exploration drilling in the Bowl portion of the intrusion has also

confirmed the presence of Norite and Dunite layering.

Figure

2

: Geology of Tamarack Intrusive Complex (Tamarack South

Project P

ortion)

based on Geologic logs

and 3d Inversion of Gravity and Mag data

(Talon, 2018)

To view an enhanced version of Figure 2, please visit:

https://orders.newsfilecorp.com/files/2443/41360_3c74ba2564833928_003full.jpg

Figure

3

: Section looking

North

-

East

summari

z

ing drill hole results in the Neck Zone

.

(

modified from

Talon Press Release

dated

Dec 13, 2016)

To view an enhanced version of Figure 3, please visit:

https://orders.newsfilecorp.com/files/2443/41360_3c74ba2564833928_004full.jpg

Currently, at the Tamarack South Project there are two prospective exploration areas at:

1)

The Neck Zone, which has demonstrated widespread, anomalous, low grade Ni-Cu-Co sulphide mineralization at

depth and also provided

three massive sulphide intersections within the lower FGO layers (see Figure 3) (See

Annex A for drill intercept details). Evidently, a result of the winnowing out of droplets of dense sulphide liquid from an

overlying flow of sulphide-bearing silicate magma, the conceptual analogous model would be typical of a Norilsk

style deposit (i.e. Talnakh).

2)

The drill results from the Neck Zone have also established that the FGO plunges to the south and potentially

underlies the Bowl as a possible feeder (see Figure 2). This

presents the potential for future exploration targeting

based on Talon's current conceptual model proposed by Professor Naldrett (see Figure 4) and analogous to his

previous work at Voisey's Bay (Eastern Deeps) (see Figure 5).

Figure

4

:

Prospective Mineralization Zones in the

FGO

Neck

-

Bowl

Geologic Model

(Modified from Naldrett 2014)

To view an enhanced version of Figure 4, please visit:

https://orders.newsfilecorp.com/files/2443/41360_3c74ba2564833928_005full.jpg

Figure

5

: Schematic demonstrating

Voisey's

Bay Eastern Deeps Depositional Model (from Naldrett

, 2004

)

To view an enhanced version Figure 5, please visit:

https://orders.newsfilecorp.com/files/2443/41360_3c74ba2564833928_006full.jpg

Next Steps

The Tamarack South Project, given its size and favourable geologic environment, has the potential for hosting Ni-Cu-Co

massive sulphide deposit(s).

Talon intends to further investigate these prospective areas using ground geophysics as a means

of leveraging low cost high value targeting information prior to any drilling program.

Quality Assurance, Quality Control and Qualified Persons

The Tamarack South Project has a consistent QA/QC program of analysing duplicates of pulps, coarse rejects, and core, as well

as the routine insertion of quality control reference standards and blanks.

The Technical Report and the technical information contained in this press release was prepared by or under the supervision of

Mr. James McDonald (B.Sc, P.Geo,) who is the Vice President, Resource Geology at Talon.

Mr. McDonald is a "Qualified

Person" pursuant to NI 43-101. Mr. McDonald has visited the site, reviewed the drilling, logging, and sampling and is satisfied

that the analytical and testing procedures used are standard industry operating procedures and methodologies

The Technical report entitled "First Technical Report on the Tamarack South Project" will be available under the company's

profile at

www.sedar.com

and on the company's website at

www.talonmetals.com

within 45 days of the publication date of this

press release.

Drill intersections have been individually selected by Talon. Drill composites have been calculated by Talon. The geological

interpretations in this news release are solely those of the Company

About Talon

Talon is a TSX-listed company focused on the exploration and development of the Tamarack Nickel-Copper-Cobalt Project in

Minnesota, USA (which comprises the Tamarack North Project and the Tamarack South Project). The Company has a well-

qualified exploration and mine management team with extensive experience in project management.

For additional information on Talon, please visit the Company's website at

www.talonmetals.com

or contact:

Sean Werger

President

Talon Metals Corp.

Tel: (416) 361-9636 x102

Email:

[email protected]

[1]

Dr. Anthony J. Naldrett is a Talon Metals Corp. Board Member

Forward-Looking Statements

This news release contains certain "forward-looking statements". All statements, other than statements of historical fact that

address activities, events or developments that the Company believes, expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future are

forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect the current expectations or beliefs of the Company based

on information currently available to the Company. Such forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements

relating to the Tamarack South Project with respect to potential deposit types, similarities to the Tamarack North Project,

analogies to other projects such as Norilsk (Talnakh) and Voisey's Bay (Eastern Deeps), the future exploration potential of the

Tamarack South Project, including to potentially host Ni-Cu-Co sulphide deposits,

the form and extent of any mineralization,

targets, goals, objectives and plans, including plans for follow-up exploration work and the timing thereof at the Tamarack South

Project. Forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause the

actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements, and even if such actual results are

realized or substantially realized, there can be no assurance that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on the

Company. Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not

limited to: failure to establish estimated mineral resources, the grade, quality and recovery of mineral resources varying from

estimates, the uncertainties involved in interpreting drilling results and other geological data, inaccurate geological and

metallurgical assumptions (including with respect to the size, grade and recoverability) uncertainties relating to the financing

needed to further explore and develop the properties.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made and, except as may be required by applicable

securities laws, the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of

new information, future events or results or otherwise. Although the Company believes that the assumptions inherent in the

forward-looking statements are reasonable, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and

accordingly undue reliance should not be put on such statements due to the inherent uncertainty therein.

Annex 1

Table 1: Collar Locations for Drill Holes in Neck Zone

HOLE ID

Easting

(m)

Northing

(m)

Elevation

(masl)

Wedge depth

(m)

Azm

Dip

End Depth

15TK0218

492028.0

5164542.1

388.4

127.5

-86.2

1134.0

15TK0218A

492028.0

5164542.1

388.4

495.0

184.7

-78.0

1195.7

15TK0218B

492028.0

5164542.1

388.4

705.0

174.9

-75.6

959.5

15TK0218C

492028.0

5164542.1

388.4

800.0

172.0

-76.2

1230.5

16TK0236

491856.4

5164785.3

388.0

178.3

-83.7

1216.8

16TK0236A

491856.4

5164785.3

388.0

486.0

174.4

-75.6

1236.0

16TK0240

491614.0

5164531.0

388.0

40.0

-80.0

1080.0

Collar coordinates are UTM Zone 15N, NAD83.

Azimith and Dip are downhole survey averages for the hole.

For daughter holes; collar coordinates and elevations are same as mother hole; approximate wedge depth given; azimith and

dip are the survey averages below the wedge.

Table

2

:

Assay Results for Drill Holes in Neck Zone

ZONE

BHID

Host Min

FROM (m)

To

(m)

LENGTH

(m)

%

Ni

%

Cu

%

Co

Pt

g/t

Pd

g/t

Au

g/t

Neck

15TK0218

FGO

NSM

NSM

NSM

NSM

NSM

NSM

15TK0218A

FGO

1095.34

1127.00

31.66

0.46

0.19

0.02

0.27

0.17

0.11

including

FGO

1095.34

1096.33

0.99

0.73

0.19

0.02

0.33

0.19

0.11

including

FGO

1115.50

1123.49

7.99

0.70

0.33

0.02

0.38

0.25

0.18

15TK0218B

NSM

NSM

NSM

NSM

NSM

NSM

15TK0218C

FGO

1121.25

1121.75

0.50

3.70

1.51

0.07

0.49

0.62

0.11

16TK0236

FGO-

METASED

1039.50

1042.28

2.78

1.04

0.80

0.01

0.56

0.38

0.42

16TK0236

METASED

1044.45

1045.55

1.10

2.55

4.32

0.04

2.72

0.87

0.82

16TK0236

METASED

1053.85

1054.73

0.88

2.47

2.19

0.02

2.34

1.43

0.64

16TK0236A

FGO

958.00

987.00

29.00

0.35

0.14

0.02

0.08

0.05

0.04

16TK0236A

METASED

1037.00

1038.00

1.00

0.65

0.39

0.02

0.03

0.02

0.02

16TK0240

MI

919.63

919.93

0.3

2.11

0.73

0.07

0.0818

0.05

0.03

Length: refers to borehole length and not True Width. True Width is unknown at the time of Publication.

NSM: No Significant Mineralization

All samples were analysed by ALS Minerals. Nickel, copper, and cobalt grades were first analysed by a 4 acid digestion and

ICP AES (ME-MS61).Grades reporting greater than 0.25% Ni and/or 0.1% Cu, using ME-MS61, trigger a sodium peroxide

fusion with ICP-AES finish (ICP81). Platinum, palladium and gold are initially analyzed by a 50g fire assay with an ICP-MS

finish (PGM-MS24). Any samples reporting >1g/t Pt or Pd trigger an over-limit analysis by ICP-AES finish (PGM-ICP27) and

any samples reporting >1g/t Au trigger an over-limit analysis by AAS (Au-AA26).