Troilus Drills 1.15 G/T AuEq over 37 M, Including 3.84 G/T AuEq over 5 M, at Connector Zone, Extending High-Grade Mineralization Within Current MINE Plan Area *1.15 G/T AuEq (0.91 G/T Au, 3.23 G/T AG, 0.13 % Cu), Including 3.84 G/T AuEq (3.21 G/T Au, 9.76
TROILUS DRILLS 1.15 G/T AUEQ OVER 37 M, INCLUDING 3.84 G/T AUEQ OVER 5 M, AT
CONNECTOR ZONE, EXTENDING HIGH-GRADE MINERALIZATION WITHIN CURRENT MINE PLAN
AREA
*1.15 G/T AUEQ (0.91 G/T AU, 3.23 G/T AG, 0.13 % CU), INCLUDING 3.84 G/T AUEQ (3.21 G/T AU, 9.76
G/T AG, 0.34 % CU) OVER 5 M
June 16, 2026, Montreal, Quebec – Troilus Mining Corp. (“Troilus” or the “Company”, TSX: TLG; OTCQX:
CHXMF; FSE: CM5) is pleased to announce results from the Connector Zone (“Connector”) as part of its
ongoing 2026 Exploration Program (see March 31, 2026 press release) at its Troilus Project located in
north-central Quebec, Canada.
The now completed Connector drill program was designed to support mine plan optimization by targeting
inferred mineralization within the reserve pit areas and testing up -plunge extensions of previously
identified high-grade trends between the formerly mined Z87 and J open pits. The latest results continue
to demonstrate the presence of higher -grade mineralization within the Connector area and support the
Company’s objective of evaluating opportunities to improve future mine planning, including potential
resource conversion, pit sequencing, strip ratio optimization and early-year mill feed.
Connector Intercept Highlights (see Figure 1):
Hole J-26-359 intersected 1.15 g/t gold equivalent (“ AuEQ”) (0.91 g/t Au, 3.23 g/t Ag, 0. 13 % Cu)
over 37 m, including 3.84 g/t AuEQ (3.21 g/t Au, 9.76 g/t Ag, 0.34 % Cu) over 5 m starting at 66 m
downhole.
Hole J-26-360 intersected 0.78 g/t gold equivalent (“AuE Q”) (0.67 g/t Au, 1.2 1 g/t Ag, 0.0 6 % Cu)
over 54 m, including 3.03 g/t AuEQ (2.60 g/t Au, 5.5 g/t Ag, 0.24 % Cu) over 3.9 m and also including
2.02 g/t AuEQ (1.85 g/t Au, 2.28 g/t Ag, 0.10 % Cu) over 6 m starting at 72 m downhole.
Hole J-26-351 intersected 1.23 g/t gold equivalent (“AuE Q”) (1.08 g/t Au, 1. 59 g/t Ag, 0.0 9 % Cu)
over 28.7 m, including 25.53 g/t AuEQ (25.30 g/t Au, 10.10 g/t Ag, 0.0 8 % Cu) over 1 m and also
including 4.78 g/t AuEQ (2.68 g/t Au, 16.80 g/t Ag, 1.26 % Cu) over 1 m starting at 26.3 m downhole.
Justin Reid, CEO of Troilus, commented, “The Connector Zone continues to demonstrate the value of
targeted drilling within and around the current reserve pit designs. This program was designed with a very
specific mine-plan optimization objective: to test high-grade extensions toward surface and support the
conversion of inferred material within the pit areas to the indicated category. For a large-scale 50,000
tonne-per-day operation, upgrading material that is currently classified as inferred and therefore treated
as waste for reserve mine-planning purposes could be important for future sequencing, reduced strip ratio
and early-year mill feed. The latest results are encouraging not only because they continue to demonstrate
high grades and continuity in the Connector area, but because they are located in a part of the deposit
that is planned for early-stage mining activities.”
The Connector Zone has been a priority near-mine target since high-grade mineralization was first
identified between the Z87 and J pits in 2022, with subsequent drilling in 2023 further demonstrating
continuity along shallow high-grade structural trends. The 2026 program was designed to build on this
work by targeting mineralization in areas already incorporated into the current mine plan, where
successful upgrading of inferred material could positively impact future project economics.
All grades are uncut, and true thicknesses are approximately 75% to 90% of drilled length.
*The completed NI 43-101 technical report associated with the Troilus Project FS can be found on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca
under the Company’s issuer profile or on the Company’s website at www.troilusgold.com
Figure 1. Plan map with the reported drill hole locations from Connector Zone
Connector Drilling
Drillholes J-26-359 and J-26-360 targeted a high-grade surface extension that had not been fully tested in
previous drill campaigns. Hole J-26-359 returned 1.15 g/t AuEq over 37 metres, including 3.84 g/t AuEq
over 5 metres, while hole J-26-360 returned 0.78 g/t AuEq over 54 metres, including 3.03 g/t AuEq over
3.9 metres and 2.02 g/t AuEq over 6 metres. These results are expected to support grade continuity within
an area already largely classified as indicated in the current block model.
Mineralization is hosted within a strongly deformed intermediate volcanic breccia, exhibiting strong
albite, sericite and silica alteration with disseminated pyrite and chalcopyrite. Higher-grade intervals are
commonly associated with discordant pyrite veins typical of the Connector area.
Drillhole J-26-351 returned 1.23 g/t AuEq over 28.7 metres, including 25.53 g/t AuEq over 1 metre and
4.78 g/t AuEq over 1 metre, beginning at 26.3 metres downhole. This hole targeted an area currently
comprised entirely of inferred material in the block model. Drillhole J-26-349 also returned 0.75 g/t AuEq
over 35 metres, including 1.93 g/t AuEq over 7 metres, from the same inferred zone.
Because only measured and indicated mineral resources can be considered for conversion into mineral
reserves, inferred material within the current reserve pit design is treated as waste in the mine plan.
Targeted drilling that supports the conversion of inferred material to the indicated category has the
potential to improve the strip ratio and help achieve mill throughput rates during the critical early years
of production.
Table 1. Connector Drill Results
Hole From (m) To
(m) Interval (m) Au Grade
(g/t)
Cu Grade
(%)
Ag Grade
(g/t)
AuEq Grade
(g/t)
J-26-349 (-55° dip)
12 17 5 0.37 0.07 0.70 0.48
25 35 10 0.50 0.03 0.39 0.54
58 93 35 0.55 0.11 1.83 0.75
incl. 69 76 7 1.56 0.22 3.07 1.93
J-26-350 (-55° dip)
52 66 14 0.18 0.01 0.36 0.21
92 101 9 0.21 0.07 0.68 0.33
114.5 126 11.5 0.36 0.15 2.11 0.62
135 141 6 0.23 0.08 0.92 0.36
J-26-351 (-55° dip)
26.3 55 28.7 1.08 0.09 1.59 1.23
incl. 32 33 1 25.30 0.08 10.10 25.53
incl. 41.5 42.5 1 2.68 1.26 16.80 4.78
J-26-352 (-55° dip)
37 42 5 0.35 0.01 0.25 0.37
51.4 63.1 11.7 0.22 0.01 0.25 0.24
73 94 21 0.53 0.12 1.52 0.72
incl. 77.6 82 4.4 1.93 0.29 3.88 2.42
J-26-353 (-45° dip)
19 36 17 0.19 0.05 0.65 0.28
72 73 1 1.18 0.03 0.25 1.23
219 226 7 0.17 0.03 0.86 0.23
233 240 7 0.12 0.07 2.12 0.25
270 285 15 0.27 0.18 6.47 0.62
295 298 3 0.30 0.05 1.93 0.40
J-26-354 (-55° dip)
41.3 49 7.7 0.26 0.01 0.30 0.27
95 136 41 0.32 0.01 0.27 0.33
155 160 5 0.22 0.17 1.72 0.50
177 202 25 0.24 0.08 1.05 0.38
217 217.5 0.5 1.08 0.84 13.20 2.51
257.6 258.9 1.3 0.45 0.45 4.50 1.18
J-26-355 (-55° dip)
50.9 79 28.1 0.17 0.04 0.68 0.24
88 93.8 5.8 0.47 0.12 1.25 0.66
103 122 19 0.37 0.05 0.31 0.46
incl. 119 120 1 2.90 0.15 0.25 3.12
127.4 134 6.6 0.17 0.07 0.50 0.27
J-26-356 (-55° dip)
19 26.1 7.1 0.52 0.05 0.71 0.61
J-26-357 (-55° dip)
32 48 16 0.21 0.06 0.92 0.30
62.7 63.2 0.5 0.69 1.44 20.40 3.10
82 92.2 10.2 0.34 0.09 1.82 0.50
160 166.55 6.6 3.17 0.06 6.05 3.34
incl. 165.2 166.55 1.4 14.05 0.22 25.90 14.69
200 204 4 1.61 0.07 1.30 1.73
incl. 202 203 1 6.05 0.06 2.80 6.17
212 230 18 0.21 0.04 0.64 0.29
336 337 1 1.04 0.01 0.25 1.05
J-26-358 (-55° dip)
48 55 7 0.19 0.02 0.40 0.23
J-26-359 (-55° dip)
33 56 23 0.38 0.07 1.16 0.49
66 103 37 0.91 0.13 3.23 1.15
incl. 82 87 5 3.21 0.34 9.76 3.84
116 150 34 0.69 0.04 0.80 0.76
J-26-360 (-55° dip)
28.4 42 13.6 0.26 0.05 1.17 0.35
54 64 10 0.22 0.03 0.94 0.28
72 126 54 0.67 0.06 1.21 0.78
incl. 72 75.9 3.9 2.60 0.24 5.50 3.03
incl. 96 102 6 1.85 0.10 2.28 2.02
J-26-361 (-58° dip)
32 52 20 0.43 0.05 1.14 0.52
66 73 7 0.15 0.04 0.98 0.23
82 112 30 0.24 0.03 0.70 0.30
121 126 5 0.28 0.02 0.36 0.32
J-26-362 (-50° dip)
47.2 58 10.8 0.33 0.06 1.24 0.44
65 66.3 1.3 0.70 0.22 2.60 1.06
95 101 6 0.26 0.06 0.82 0.37
110 117 7 0.38 0.11 1.39 0.56
147 156.9 9.9 0.31 0.08 0.84 0.44
168 205 37 0.32 0.06 0.61 0.41
* AuEq = Au grade + 1.5107 * Cu grade + 0.0119 * Ag grade
Quality Assurance and Control
During the drill program, one meter assay samples were taken from NQ core and sawed in half. One-half
was sent for assaying at ALS Laboratory in Sudbury, Ontario, a certified commercial laboratory, and the
other half was retained for results, cross checks, and future reference. A strict QA/QC program was applied
to all samples; which included insertion of one certified mineralized standard and one blank sample in
each batch of 25 samples. Every sample was processed with standard crushing to 85% passing 75 microns
on 500 g splits. Samples were assayed by one-AT (30 g) fire assay with an AA finish and if results were
higher than 3.5 g/t Au, assays were redone with a gravimetric finish. For QA/QC samples, a 50 g fire assay
was done. In addition to gold, ALS laboratory carried out multi-element analysis for ME-ICP61 analysis of
33 elements four acid ICP-AES.
Qualified Person
The technical and scientific information in this press release has been reviewed and approved by Nicolas
Guest, P.Geo., Exploration Manager, who is a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101. Mr. Guest is an
employee of Troilus and is not independent of the Company under NI 43-101.
AuEq Disclosure
The formulas used to calculate equivalent values for resources are as follows, for 87 Pit AuEq = Au +
1.5628*Cu +0.0128 *Ag, for J Pit AuEq = Au + 1.5107*Cu +0.0119 *Ag, for SW Pit AuEq = Au + 1.6823*Cu
+0.0124 *Ag, for X22 Pit AuEq = Au + 1.5628*Cu +0.0128 *Ag. AuEq was calculated using metal prices of
$1,850/oz Au; $4.25/lb Cu and $23.00/oz Ag and recoveries of 93.1% for Au, 88.9% for Ag and 89.3% for
Cu in the J pit, 95.5% for Au, 98.2% for Ag and 94.7% for Cu in the 87 pit, 85.7% for Au, 85.6% for Ag and
91.5% for Cu in the SW pit and 95.5 % for Au, 98.2% for Ag and 94.7% for Cu in the X22 pit.
About Troilus Mining Corp.
Troilus Mining Corp. is a Canadian development -stage mining company focused on the systematic
advancement of the former gold and copper Troilus Mine towards production. Troilus is located in the
tier-one mining jurisdiction of Quebec, Canada, where it hold s a large land position of 435 km² in the
Frôtet-Evans Greenstone Belt. A Feasibility Study completed in May 2024 supports a large-scale 22-year,
50ktpd open-pit mining operation, positioning it as a cornerstone project in North America.
For more information:
Caroline Arsenault
VP Corporate Communications
+1 (647) 276-0050
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Information
This press release contains “forward- looking statements” within the meaning of applicable Canadian
securities legislation. Forward- looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding
the impact of the drill results on the Company, and the likelihood that these results will ultimately result in
the conversion of inferred material within the pit areas to the indicated category , the results of the FS,
including, without limitation various project economics, financial and operational parameters such as the
timing and amount of future production from the Project , expectations with respect to the IRR, NPV,
payback and costs of the Project , anticipated mining and processing methods of the Project; proposed
infrastructures, anticipated mine life of the Project , expected recoveries and grades , timing of future
studies including the environmental assessments (including the timing of an environmental impact study)
and development plans, opportunity to expand the scale of the project, the project becoming a cornerstone
mining project in Noth America; the development potential and timetable of the project; the estimation of
mineral resources and reserves; realization of mineral resource and reserve estimates; the timing and
amount of estimated future exploration; costs of future activities; capital and operating expenditures;
success of exploration activities; the anticipated ability of investors to continue benefiting from the
Company’s low discovery costs, technical expertise and support from local communities, the timing and
amount of estimated future exploration; and the anticipated results of the Company’s 2024 drill program
and their possible impact on the potential size of the mineral resource estimate. Generally, forward-
looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”
or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”,
“continue”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases
or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “will”, “might” or “will be
taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Forward-looking statements are made based upon certain assumptions
and other important facts that, if untrue, could cause the actual results, performances or achievements of
Troilus to be materially different from future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied
by such statements. Such statements and information are based on numerous assumptions regarding
present and future business strategies and the environment in which Troilus will operate in the future.
Certain important facto rs that could cause actual results, performances or achievements to differ
materially from those in the forward -looking statements include, amongst others, currency fluctuations,
the global economic climate, dilution, share price volatility and competition. Forward-looking statements
are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause the
actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of Troilus to be materially different from
those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to: there being
no assurance that the exploration program or programs of the Company will result in expanded mineral
resources; risks and uncertainties inherent to mineral resource and reserve estimates; the high degree of
uncertainties inherent to feasibility studies and other mining and economic studies which are based to a
significant extent on various assumptions; variations in gold prices and other metals, exchange rate
fluctuations; variations in cost of supplies and labour; receipt of necessary approvals; availability of
financing for project development; uncertainties and risks with respect to developing mining projects;
general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties; future gold and other metal
prices; accidents, labour disputes and shortages; environmental and other risks of the mining industry,
including without limitation, risks and uncertainties discussed in the Company’s latest Annual Information
Form, its technical reports and other continuous disclosure documents of the Company available under the
Company’s profile at www.sedarplus.ca. Although Troilus has attempted to identify important factors that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward- looking statements, there
may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or int ended. There can be no
assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ
materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance
on forward-looking statements. Troilus does not undertake to update any forward- looking statements,
except in accordance with applicable securities laws.