Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

TK.V ·

Tinka Reports High Zinc Recoveries IN Metallurgical Tests from Ayawilca

Metallurgy & Processing

TINKA RESOURCES LIMITED

#1305 – 1090 WEST GEORGIA STREET

VANCOUVER, B.C. V6E 3V7

Tel: (604) 685 9316 Fax (604) 683 1585

Website: www.tinkaresources.com

TSXV & BVL: TK OTCPK: TKRFF

NEWS RELEASE June 5, 2019

TINKA REPORTS HIGH ZINC RECOVERIES IN METALLURGICAL TESTS FROM

AYAWILCA

Vancouver, Canada – Tinka Resources Limited (“Tinka” or the “ Company”) (TSXV & BVL: TK )

(OTCPK: TKRFF) is pleased to announce the results of metallurgical testwork on composite zinc sulfide

samples from the Company’s 100%- owned Ayawilca property in cent ral Peru. The metallurgical test

program was carried out by XPS Consulting and Testwork Services , Ontario, under the coordination of

Adam Johnston of Transmin Metallurgical Consultants.

Key Highlights

 The objective of the testwork was to develop a flowsheet using standard flotation for the zinc

mineralization at West and South Ayawilca, which was successfully achieved.

 Testwork results have demonstrated that recoveries of 92% zinc at a concentrate grade of 50% zinc

can be consistently achieved using a standard flotation process. Two locked cycle tests were carried

out on two different styles of mineralization and both tests produced similar zinc concentrates.

 Potentially deleterious elements in the zinc concentrates (incl uding silica, manganese, cadmium,

mercury, and arsenic) were well below standard smelter penalty levels. A small penalty is

anticipated for iron content in the concentrate.

 Indium in the two locked cycle zinc concentrates (719 ppm and 400 ppm, respectively) is very high

and potentially payable, subject to the smelter and commercial arrangements.

 Details of the processing flowsheet for zinc and lead concentra tes will be incorporated into the

upcoming Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA"). The Company expects to release the results

of the PEA for the Ayawilca zinc project before the end of June 2019.

Dr. Graham Carman, Tinka’s President and CEO, stated: “We are very pleased with the results of the

metallurgical testwork, which has been completed to a high standard, as it predicts very high zinc recoveries

from the mineralization at Ayawilca. We believe the Ay awilca zinc concentrate will be desirable for many

smelters due to the low levels of silica, manganese and other deleterious elements, as well as for the high

indium levels. We look forward to completing our PEA before the end of June 2019. As the project

progresses, we will continue to seek improvements in the zinc and lead metallurgy with additional testwork.”

Table 1 highlights final grades and recoveries of two locked cycle flotation tests (AEC-02 and AEC-03) and

a batch test (AEC-05) on drill core composite samples from West and South Ayawilca.

Table 1 – Summary of Ayawilca Flotation Test Results

Composite

Test Type Assays (% Zn) Recovery (% Zn)

Feed Concentrate

AEC-02 Locked cycle 10.8 50.9 92.5

AEC-03 Locked cycle 10.2 50.5 94.1

AEC-05 Batch cleaner 6.5 52.1 90.7

Methodology

A flotation development program was conducted to determine best conditions for high zinc recovery to a

high quality zinc concentrate. The program focused on the Sout h and West Ayawilca areas, which host

approximately 50% of the resource and most of the higher grade zinc zones that would be mined in the early

years. While the resulting composites were higher grade than the average diluted mining grades, it is believed

that the samples were representative of the different mineral t extures that will be encountered at Ayawilca,

and were spatially representative of the South and West Ayawilc a zinc zones, and therefore representative

2

with respect to flotation performance. The results were used to develop the proposed flowsheet and reagent

scheme that will be discussed in more detail in the upcoming PEA.

Detail of Sample Composites

 Composite AEC-02 was comprised of 11 quarter core samples from 11 drill holes at West and South

Ayawilca (91.6 m sampled). Comp osite AEC-02 had relatively high Zn/S ratios (i.e., low pyrite

content) and relatively coarse-grained sphalerite textures.

 Composite AEC-03 was comprised of 17 quarter core samples (all different to AEC-02) from 15

drill holes at West and South Ayawilca (129.7 m sampled). Composite AEC-03 had relatively low

Zn/S ratios (i.e., high pyrite content) and finer grained sphalerite textures.

 Composite AEC-05 was comprised of 4 quarter core samples (all used in AEC-03) from 4 drill holes

at West and South Ayawilca (39.5 m sampled). Composite AEC-05 had relatively low Zn/S ratios

(i.e., high pyrite content) and relatively fine grained sphalerite textures.

 Two high pyrrhotite quarter core samples were not included in t h e t e s t s . T h e p y r r h o t i t e

mineralization at Ayawilca is a minor and discrete geometallurg ical domain that will be studied in

future flotation development phases.

Detailed assays of the two locked cycle concentrates are presented in Table 2.

Table 2 – Detailed Analyses of Locked Cycle Concentrates AEC-02 and AEC-03 from Ayawilca

Analyte Unit

Detection

Limit AEC-02 AEC-03 Anal yte Unit

Detection

Limit AEC-02 AEC-03

Al % 0.01 0.03 0.03 S r ppm 3 16 21

As ppm 5 319 242 Ta ppm 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2

B ppm 10 < 10 < 10 Tb ppm 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Ba ppm 3 4 4 Te ppm 6 < 6 < 6

Be ppm 3 < 3 < 3 Th ppm 0.1 0.2 0.1

Bi ppm 2 26 22 Ti % 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

Ca % 0.01 0.05 0.05 Tl ppm 0.1 1.5 2.7

Cd ppm 2 1800 1650 Tm ppm 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Ce ppm 0.8 0.9 < 0.8 U ppm 0.1 1.1 1.2

Co ppm 0.2 8.5 11 V ppm 5 < 5 < 5

Cr ppm 30 90 90 W ppm 0.7 1.1 0.8

Cs ppm 0.1 1 0.9 Y ppm 0.1 1 0.9

Cu ppm 2 2280 1880 Yb ppm 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Dy ppm 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 Zn % 0.01 50.9 50.5

Er ppm 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Au ppb 2 60 21

Eu ppm 0.1 0.1 < 0.1 Pd ppb 5 < 5 < 5

Fe % 0.05 13.1 14 Pt ppb 5 < 5 11

Ga ppm 0.2 11.7 10.6 Ag ppm 3 52 51

Gd ppm 0.1 0.1 0.1 H g ppb 5 4570 4510

Ge ppm 0.7 0.9 1.5 C-Total % 0.01 0.15 0.21

Ho ppm 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 S-Total % 0.01 33.9 34.1

Hf ppm 10 < 10 < 10 Co3O4 % 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

In ppm 0.2 719 399 CuO % 0.005 0.303 0.253

K % 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 NiO % 0.003 0.008 0.006

La ppm 0.4 0.5 < 0.4 SiO2 % 0.01 0.74 0.46

Li ppm 3 24 24 Al2O3 % 0.01 0.08 0.1

Mg % 0.01 0.16 0.1 Fe2O3(T) % 0.01 16.94 18.32

Mn ppm 3 1190 1700 MnO % 0.001 0.144 0.206

Mo ppm 1 5 5 M gO % 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

Nb ppm 2.4 < 2.4 < 2.4 CaO % 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

Nd ppm 0.4 < 0.4 0.4 Na2O % 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01

Ni ppm 10 20 10 K2O % 0.01 0.01 0.01

Pb ppm 0.8 821 4830 TiO2 % 0.01 0.01 0.01

Pr ppm 0.1 0.1 0.1 P2O5 % 0.01 0.01 0.01

Rb ppm 0.4 0.7 0.4 Cr2O3 % 0.01 0.01 0.01

Sb ppm 2 25 34 V2O5 % 0.003 < 0.003 < 0.003

Se ppm 0.8 2.6 2.4 Cl % 0.01 0.03 0.02

Si % 0.01 0.39 0.26 F % 0.01 0.02 0.01

Sm ppm 0.1 0.1 0.2 CO3 (calc) % 0.01 0.25 0.59

Sn ppm 0.5 378 413 LOI % 15.26 15.52

Notes to Table 2. Assays were carried out by Activation Laboratories, Ancaster, Ontario

Elements (except precious metals, zinc) were analysed using peroxide fusion, ICP-OES and ICP-MS.

Zinc was analysed by peroxide fusion and ICP-OES.

Precious metals (Au, Pd, Pt, Ag) were analysed with fire assay and ICP-OES finish.

Hg was analysed by cold vapour FIMS.

C-Total and S-Total were analysed by infra-red techniques.

Oxides were analysed by whole rock analysis XRF.

3

Qualified Person

The results of the metallurgical tests have been reviewed and v erified by Mr Adam Johnston, FAusIMM,

CP (Metallurgy) of Transmin Metallurgical Consultants, Lima, a qualified person as defined by National

Instrument 43-101. Mr Johnston ha s 25 years of mineral processi ng experience and is a Fellow of the

Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

Dr. Graham Carman, Tinka’s President and CEO, reviewed, verified and compiled the technical contents of

this release. Dr Carman is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, and is a qualified

person as defined by National Instrument 43-101.

About Tinka Resources Limited

Tinka is an exploration and development company with its flagsh ip property being the 100%-owned

Ayawilca carbonate replacement deposit (CRD) in the zinc-lead-s ilver belt of central Peru, 200 kilometres

northeast of Lima. The Ayawilca Zinc Zone contains 11.7 Mt of I ndicated Resources grading 6.9% zinc,

0.2% lead, 15 g/t silver and 84 g/t indium and 45.0 Mt Inferred Resources grading 5.6% zinc, 0.2% lead, 17

g/t silver and 67 g/t indium. The Ayawilca Tin Zone contains a n Inferred Mineral Resource of 14.5 Mt at

0.63% tin, 0.21% copper & 18 g/t silver (November 26, 2018 release). A PEA is underway with results

anticipated by end of Q2 2019.

On behalf of the Board,

“Graham Carman”

Dr. Graham Carman, President & CEO

Investor Information:

www.tinkaresources.com

Rob Bruggeman 1.416.884.3556

[email protected]

Company Contact:

Mariana Bermudez 1.604.699.0202

[email protected]

Forward Looking Statements: Certain information in this news release contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking

information within the meaning of applicable securities laws (c ollectively "forward-looking statements"). All statements, other

t h a n s t a t e m e n t s o f h i s t o r i c a l f a c t a r e f o r w a r d - l o o k i n g s t a t e m e nts. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs and

expectations of Tinka as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to Tinka's management. Such statements

reflect the current risks, uncertainties and assumptions relate d to certain factors including, without limitations, drilling r esults, the

Company’s expectations regarding the Ayawilca Project PEA, capi tal and other costs varying significantly from estimates,

production rates varying from estimates, changes in world metal markets, changes in equity markets, uncertainties relating to the

availability and costs of financing needed in the future, equipment failure, unexpected geological conditions, imprecision in resource

estimates or metal recoveries, success of future development in itiatives, competition, operating performance, environmental an d

safety risks, delays in obtaining or failure to obtain necessar y permits and approvals from local authorities, community agree ments

and relations, and other development and operating risks. Shoul d any one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or

should any underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein. Although Tinka

believes that assumptions inherent in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, forward-looking statements are not guarantees

of future performance and accordingly undue reliance should not be put on such statements due to the inherent uncertainty ther ein.

Except as may be required by applicable securities laws, Tinka disclaims any intent or obligati on to update any forward-lookin g

statement. 

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture

Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release