Triumph Gold Releases Updated Mineral Resource Estimates for Nucleus, Revenue and Tinta Deposits on the Freegold Mountain Property, Yukon Territory
Triumph Gold Releases Updated Mineral Resource Estimates for Nucleus,
Revenue and Tinta Deposits on the Freegold Mountain Property, Yukon
Territory
VANCOUVER, British Columbia, Feb. 11, 2020 -- Triumph Gold Corp., (TSX-V: TIG) (OTCMKTS: TIGCF) (“Triumph Gold” or
the “Company”) is pleased to release updated mineral resource estimates for the three deposits (Nucleus, Revenue and Tinta)
on the Company’s 100% owned, 200 km2, road accessible Freegold Mountain Property in the Yukon Territory.
The new mineral resource estimates were generated by Robert Sim (P.Geo.) of SIM Geological Inc., an independent qualified
person and resource expert with over thirty five years of experience. A new NI43-101 technical report will be available on
SEDAR within 45 days. The new mineral resource estimates are effective as of February 11, 2020 and supersede the previous
mineral resource estimate (Campbell et. al, 2015. Technical report on the Freegold Mountain Project, Yukon Canada Resource
Estimates), which is available on SEDAR.
Triumph Gold President, Tony Barresi (Ph.D., P.Geo.), comments: “We are pleased to present three pit-constrained
resources, two of which also have high-grade underground resources. The new pit constraint, and other stringent economic
parameters applied to the three resource estimates demonstrate that the mineral deposits exhibit reasonable prospects for
eventual economic extraction as required under NI 43-101. Since 2016 Triumph has been dedicated to bringing shareholder
value by first focusing on grassroots exploration with resource definition to follow. This effort resulted in a number of new
discoveries, including the high-grade Blue Sky Porphyry Breccia, and the WAu Breccia, both located within the Revenue
deposit. While our attention will remain on discovery-focused exploration in the near term, we are pleased to provide updated
mineral resource estimates that we believe accurately assess the resources identified to date, which are contained on our
100% owned Freegold Mountain Property.”
Technical Highlights of Freegold Mountain Property Mineral Deposits:
• Three deposits (Figure 1) host open-pit constrained mineral resources, two of which also include deeper, high-grade,
additional mineral resources that are considered amenable to underground extraction methods.
• Combined Indicated Mineral Resources from Revenue and Nucleus deposits total 42.4 million tonnes at 0.58 grams per
tonne (g/t) gold (Au), 0.08% copper (Cu) and 1.2 g/t silver (Ag) for a total of 1 million contained gold equivalent (AuEq)
ounces (oz). Combined Inferred Mineral Resources at Revenue, Nucleus and Tinta total 39 million tonnes at 0.56 g/t
gold, 0.10% copper and 4.5 g/t silver for a total of 1.1 million contained gold equivalent ounces (see Tables 1,2, and 3
for details).
• Higher grade (>1.4 g/t AuEq) mineralization from the newly discovered Blue Sky Porphyry Breccia is now included in an
underground portion of the Revenue resource.
• Inclusion of tungsten (W) in the estimate of mineral resources at the Revenue deposit.
Triumph Gold’s Freegold Mountain Property hosts three road-accessible mineral deposits (Figure 1). Changes from the 2015
mineral resource estimates, which were unconstrained, are the result of a combination of new drilling and the application of
updated technical and economic parameters. The new estimates are either constrained within pit shells or, in the case of
underground mineral resources, show favourable geometry and continuity of grade and thickness so as to exhibit reasonable
prospects for eventual economic extraction.
TABLE 1: ESTIMATE OF MINERAL RESOURCE FOR THE NUCLEUS DEPOSIT
Class Tonnes
(million)
Average Grade Contained Metal
AuEq
(g/t)
Au
(g/t)
Cu
(%)
Ag
(g/t)
AuEq
koz
Au
koz
Cu
Mlbs
Ag
koz
Indicated 31.0 0.75 0.65 0.07 0.70 748 651 44 698
Inferred 9.4 0.63 0.56 0.04 0.72 189 169 9 217
Note: 0.30 g/t AuEq cut-off grade for pit constrained resources. Koz = thousands of ounces; Mlbs – millions of pounds
TABLE 2: ESTIMATE OF MINERAL RESOURCES FOR THE REVENUE DEPOSIT
Type Tonnes
(million)
Average Grade Contained Metal
AuEq
(g/t)
Au
(g/t)
Cu
(%)
Ag
(g/t)
Mo
(%)
W
(%)
AuEq
koz
Au
koz
Cu
Mlbs
Ag
koz
Mo
klbs
W
klbs
Indicated
Pit Constrained 11.4 0.69 0.38 0.12 2.4 0.016 0.008 252 140 30 895 4089 2082
Inferred
Pit Constrained 25.0 0.70 0.46 0.11 2.2 0.009 0.005 565 367 61 1786 4954 2807
Underground 2.5 1.40 0.99 0.22 5.2 0.010 0.001 112 79 12 417 525 60
Combined Inferred 27.5 0.77 0.51 0.12 2.5 0.009 0.005 677 446 73 2203 5478 2867
Note: 0.30 g/t AuEq cut-off grade for pit constrained resources and 1.0g/tAuEq cut-off grade for underground resources. Mo =
Molybdenum
TABLE 3: ESTIMATE OF INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCE AT THE TINTA DEPOSIT
Type Tonnes
(000)
Average grade: Contained Metal:
AuEq
(g/t)
Au
(g/t)
Cu
(%)
Ag
(g/t)
Pb
(%)
Zn
(%)
AuEq
koz
Au
koz
Cu
Mlbs
Ag
koz
Pb
Mlbs
Zn
Mlbs
Pit Constrained 908 3.01 1.09 0.18 42.5 0.72 1.47 88 32 4 1240 14 29
Underground 1313 3.13 1.43 0.16 46.3 0.56 1.17 132 60 5 1955 16 34
Combined 2221 3.08 1.29 0.17 44.7 0.63 1.29 220 92 8 3195 31 63
Note: 0.35 g/t AuEq cut-off grade for pit constrained resources and 1.8 g/t AuEq cut-off for underground resources.
TABLE 4: COMBINED ESTIMATE OF MINERAL RESOURCES ON THE FREEGOLD MOUNTAIN PROPERTY
Deposit Tonnes
(million)
Average Grade Contained Metal
CommentsAuEq
(g/t)
Au
(g/t)
Cu
(%)
Ag
(g/t)
Mo
(%)
W
(%)
Pb
(%)
Zn
(%)
AuEq
koz
Au
koz
Cu
Mlbs
Ag
koz
Mo
(klbs)
W
(klbs)
Pb
Mlbs
Zn
Mlbs
Indicated
Nucleus 31.0 0.75 0.65 0.07 0.7 n/a n/a n/a n/a 748 651 44 698 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Pit resources
0.3 g/tAuEq
cut-off grade
Revenue 11.4 0.69 0.38 0.12 2.4 0.016 0.008 n/a n/a 252 140 30 895 4089 2082 n/a n/a
Pit resources
0.3 g/tAuEq
cut-off grade
Total
Indicated 42.4 0.73 0.58 0.08 1.2 1000 791 74 1593 4089 2082
Inferred
Nucleus 9.4 0.63 0.56 0.04 0.7 n/a n/a n/a n/a 189 169 9 217 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Pit resources
0.3 g/tAuEq
cut-off grade
Revenue 27.5 0.77 0.51 0.12 2.5 0.009 0.005 n/a n/a 677 446 73 2203 5478 2867 n/a n/a
Pit resources
0.3 g/tAuEq
cut-off grade
and U/G
resources at
1.0 g/tAuEq
cut-off grade.
Tinta 2.2 3.08 1.29 0.17 44.7 n/a n/a 0.63 1.29 220 92 8 3195 n/a n/a 31 63
Pit resources
0.35 g/tAuEq
cut-off grade
and U/G
resources at
1.8 g/tAuEq
cut-off grade.
Total
Inferred 39.0 0.86 0.56 0.10 4.5 1085 707 90 5614 5499 3094 31 63
Note: U/G = underground; n/a = non applicable
Nucleus
The Nucleus deposit is an epithermal style gold-silver-copper deposit. Indicated mineral resources at Nucleus include 31 M
tonnes at 0.65 g/t Au, 0.7 g/t Ag and 0.07% Cu using a 0.3 g/t AuEq cut-off grade. Inferred mineral resources at Nucleus
include 9.4 M tonnes at 0.56 g/t Au, 0.7 g/t Ag and 0.04% Cu. The Nucleus deposit is open to the south and at depth.
The Nucleus deposit has been tested with a total of 359 drill holes with a cumulative length of 60,061m. The mineral resource
estimate was generated using drill hole sample assay results and the interpretation of a geological model which relates to the
spatial distribution of gold, copper and silver. Interpolation characteristics are defined based on the geology, drill hole spacing,
and geostatistical analysis of the data. The effects of potentially anomalous high-grade sample data, composited to 1.5 metre
intervals, are controlled using both traditional top-cutting as well as limiting the distance of influence during block grade
interpolation. Block grades are estimated into a three-dimensional block model with nominal block size measuring 10x10x5m
(LengthxWidthxHeight), using ordinary kriging and have been validated using a combination of visual and statistical methods.
Resources in the indicated category are delineated by drilling spaced at maximum 50 metre intervals. Resources in the
inferred mineral category are within a maximum distance of 150 metres from a drill hole. The estimate of the indicated and
inferred mineral resources is constrained within a limiting pit-shell derived using projected technical and economic
parameters*. The cut-off grade of the base case estimate of mineral resource is projected to be 0.30 g/t AuEq, calculated
using the formula AuEq=Au g/t + (Ag g/t x 0.012) + (Cu% x 1.371). The sensitivity of the Nucleus mineral resource to cut-off
grade, constrained by the $1500/oz gold pit shell, is shown in Tables 5 and 6.
TABLE 5: SENSITIVITY OF INDICATED MINERAL RESOURCE TO CUT-OFF GRADE FOR THE NUCLEUS DEPOSIT
Cut-off Grade
AuEq
(g/t)
Tonnes
(million)
Average Grade Contained Metal
AuEq
(g/t)
Au
(g/t)
Cu
(%)
Ag
(g/t)
AuEq
koz
Au
koz
Cu
Mlbs
Ag
koz
0.2 39.5 0.64 0.55 0.06 0.64 815 701 52 812
0.3 base case 31.0 0.75 0.65 0.07 0.70 748 651 44 698
0.4 23.2 0.88 0.78 0.07 0.75 661 583 35 560
0.5 17.0 1.04 0.93 0.07 0.82 571 510 28 448
Notes: Resources constrained within $1500/ozAu pit shell. Base case cut-off grade is 0.30 g/t AuEq for pit constrained
resources.
TABLE 6: SENSITIVITY OF INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCE TO CUT-OFF GRADE FOR THE NUCLEUS DEPOSIT
Cut-off Grade
AuEq
(g/t)
Tonnes
(million)
Average Grade Contained Metal
AuEq
(g/t)
Au
(g/t)
Cu
(%)
Ag
(g/t)
AuEq
koz
Au
koz
Cu
Mlbs
Ag
koz
0.2 11.5 0.56 0.50 0.04 0.66 206 183 10 243
0.3 base case 9.4 0.63 0.56 0.04 0.72 189 169 9 217
0.4 6.5 0.75 0.67 0.05 0.82 156 141 7 171
0.5 4.4 0.89 0.81 0.05 0.91 126 115 5 128
Note: Resources constrained within $1500/ozAu pit shell. Base case cut-off grade is 0.30 g/t AuEq for pit constrained
resources.
Revenue
Revenue is a gold-silver-copper-molybdenum-tungsten deposit located approximately 4 km to the southeast of the Nucleus
deposit. The new mineral resource estimate for Revenue improves upon the previous (2015) estimate with:
1) New drilling that has better delineated the higher grade WAu Breccia domain
2) Expansion of the resource to the northeast to include higher grade mineralization at the newly discovered Blue Sky
Porphyry Breccia
3) Inclusion of a >300 metre deep high grade (e.g. 1.4 g/t AuEq) portion of the Blue Sky Porphyry Breccia in an underground
resource
4) Upgrading a portion of the resource into an indicated category
5) Inclusion of tungsten in the resource estimate
Indicated mineral resources at Revenue include 11.4 M tonnes at 0.38 g/t Au, 2.4 g/t Ag, 0.12% Cu, 0.016% Mo and 0.008%
W. Combined open-pit constrained and underground inferred resources at Revenue include 27.5 M tonnes at 0.51 g/t Au, 2.5
g/t Ag, 0.12% Cu, 0.009% Mo, and 0.005% W. Some of the known zones of mineralization at Revenue remain open in
multiple directions and to depth; for example, the Blue Sky Porphyry Breccia is open to the east, west and to depth, and the
WAu breccia is open to depth. Triumph Gold believes there is significant potential in the immediate vicinity of Revenue for new
discoveries.
The Revenue deposit has been tested with a total of 324 drill holes with a cumulative length of 55,100m. The mineral resource
estimate was generated using drill hole sample assay results and the interpretation of a geological model which relates to the
spatial distribution of gold, copper, silver, molybdenum and tungsten. Interpolation characteristics are defined based on the
geology, drill hole spacing, and geostatistical analysis of the data. The effects of potentially anomalous high-grade sample
data, composited to 1.5 metre intervals, are controlled using both traditional top-cutting as well as limiting the distance of
influence during block grade interpolation. Block grades are estimated into the three-dimensional block model with nominal
block size measuring 10x10x5m (LengthxWidthxHeight), using ordinary kriging and have been validated using a combination of
visual and statistical methods. Resources in the indicated category are delineated by drilling spaced at maximum 50 metre
intervals. Resources in the inferred mineral category are within a maximum distance of 150 metres from a drill hole. The
estimate of the indicated and inferred mineral resources is constrained within a limiting pit shell derived using projected
technical and economic parameters*. The base case cut-off grade of the estimate of open pit constrained mineral resources is
projected to be 0.30 g/t AuEq calculated using the formula AuEq = Au g/t + (Ag g/t x 0.012) + (Cu% x 1.371) + (Mo% x 4.114)
+ (W% x 5.942). Resources below the pit shell that are considered potentially amenable to bulk underground extraction
methods are estimated at a cut-off grade of 1g/t AuEq. The sensitivity of the Revenue mineral resources to cut-off grade is
shown in Tables 7, 8 and 9.
TABLE 7: SENSITIVITY OF PIT CONSTRAINED INDICATED MINERAL RESOURCES TO CUT-OFF GRADE FOR THE
REVENUE DEPOSIT
Cut-Off Grade
AuEq
(g/t)
Tonnes
(million)
Average Grade Contained Metal
AuEq
(g/t)
Au
(g/t)
Cu
(%)
Ag
(g/t)
Mo
(%)
W
(%)
AuEq
koz
Au
koz
Cu
Mlbs
Ag
koz
Mo
klbs
W
klbs
0.2 12.6 0.65 0.36 0.11 2.3 0.015 0.008 262 145 31 928 4197 2196
0.3 base case 11.4 0.69 0.38 0.12 2.4 0.016 0.008 252 140 30 895 4089 2082
0.4 9.2 0.77 0.43 0.13 2.7 0.019 0.009 228 127 26 809 3754 1907
0.5 7.1 0.87 0.48 0.14 3.1 0.021 0.011 197 110 22 701 3282 1704
Notes: Resources constrained within $1500/ozAu pit shell. Base case cut-off grade is 0.30 g/t AuEq for pit constrained
resources.
TABLE 8: SENSITIVITY OF PIT CONSTRAINED INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCES TO CUT-OFF GRADE FOR THE
REVENUE DEPOSIT
Cut-Off Grade
AuEq
(g/t)
Tonnes
(million)
Average Grade Contained Metal
AuEq
(g/t)
Au
(g/t)
Cu
(%)
Ag
(g/t)
Mo
(%)
W
(%)
AuEq
koz
Au
koz
Cu
Mlbs
Ag
koz
Mo
Mlbs
W
Mlbs
0.2 36.1 0.56 0.36 0.09 1.8 0.007 0.004 653 419 72.4 2049 5807 3420
0.3 base case 25.0 0.70 0.46 0.11 2.2 0.009 0.005 565 367 61.1 1786 4954 2807
0.4 17.2 0.86 0.57 0.13 2.7 0.010 0.006 479 318 50.1 1516 3836 2203
0.5 13.2 0.99 0.67 0.15 3.1 0.011 0.006 422 285 43.4 1314 3176 1807
Notes: Resources constrained within $1500/ozAu pit shell. Base case cut-off grade is 0.30 g/t AuEq for pit constrained
resources.
TABLE 9: SENSITIVITY OF UNDERGROUND INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCES TO CUT-OFF GRADE FOR THE
REVENUE DEPOSIT
Cut-Off Grade
AuEq
(g/t)
Tonnes
(million)
Average Grade Contained Metal
AuEq
(g/t)
Au
(g/t)
Cu
(%)
Ag
(g/t)
Mo
(%)
W
(%)
AuEq
koz
Au
koz
Cu
Mlbs
Ag
koz
Mo
klbs
W
klbs
0.8 3.0 1.32 0.92 0.22 5.0 0.010 0.001 126 88 14 479 626 72
1.0 base case 2.5 1.40 0.99 0.22 5.2 0.010 0.001 112 79 12 417 525 60
1.2 1.8 1.53 1.09 0.24 5.6 0.010 0.001 86 61 9 313 367 43
1.4 1.1 1.66 1.20 0.25 6.0 0.009 0.001 60 43 6 215 225 27
1.6 0.6 1.81 1.34 0.26 6.4 0.009 0.001 34 25 3 118 108 14
1.8 0.2 1.99 1.51 0.27 7.2 0.007 0.001 15 12 1.4 56 36 6
Tinta
Tinta is a vein-hosted gold-silver-copper-lead-zinc deposit located on the southern portion of Triumph Gold’s Freegold Mountain
property that extends to depths approaching 400m below surface. Combined open-pit constrained and underground inferred
resources at Tinta include 2.2 M tonnes at 1.29 g/t Au, 44.7 g/t Ag, 0.17% Cu, 0.63% Pb and 1.29% Zn. The Tinta deposit
remains open at depth where a number of gold-rich drill intersections have not yet been followed up on with additional drilling.
Grassroots exploration along strike to the northwest of the Tinta vein identified a 1.8 km long coincident soil geochemistry and
geophysical anomaly. Seven trenches across the anomaly exposed quartz veins with precious and base metal mineralization
similar to the Tinta vein.
The Tinta deposit has been tested with a total of 74 drill holes with a cumulative length of 10,063m plus a total of 450m of
underground drifting in two locations. The mineral resource estimate was generated using drill hole and drift channel sample
assay results and the interpretation of a geological model which relates to the spatial distribution of gold, copper, silver, lead
and zinc. Interpolation characteristics are defined based on the geology, drill hole spacing, and geostatistical analysis of the
data. The effects of potentially anomalous high-grade sample data, composited to 1 metre intervals, are controlled by limiting
the distance of influence during block grade interpolation. Block grades are estimated into the three-dimensional block model
with nominal block size measuring 2x5x5m. The block model is rotated so the short axis (2m blocks) are perpendicular to the
strike of the deposit at an azimuth of 305 degrees and the larger block dimensions are oriented along strike and in the vertical
dimension. Grade estimates are made using ordinary kriging and have been validated using a combination of visual and
statistical methods. Resources in the inferred category are within a maximum distance of 50m from drilling or underground
channel samples. The base case cut-off grade of the open pit constrained mineral resource is projected to be 0.35 g/t AuEq
calculated using the formula AuEq = Au g/t + (Ag g/t x 0.012) + (Cu% x 1.371) + (Pb% x 0.457) + (Zn% x 0.571). Resources
below the pit shell that are considered potentially amenable to underground extraction methods are estimated at a cut-off
grade of 1.8 g/t AuEq. The sensitivity of the Tinta mineral resources to cut-off grade is shown in Tables 10 and 11.
TABLE 10: SENSITIVITY OF PIT CONSTRAINED INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCES TO CUT-OFF GRADE AT THE TINTA
DEPOSIT
Cut-Off Grade
AuEq
(g/t)
Tonnes
(000)
Average grade: Contained Metal:
AuEq
(g/t)
Au
(g/t)
Cu
(%)
Ag
(g/t)
Pb
(%)
Zn
(%)
AuEq
koz
Au
koz
Cu
Mlbs
Ag
koz
Pb
Mlbs
Zn
Mlbs
0.25 919 2.98 1.07 0.18 42.0 0.71 1.45 88 32 3.6 1241 14 29
0.3 913 2.99 1.08 0.18 42.2 0.72 1.46 88 32 3.6 1240 14 29
0.35 Base Case 908 3.01 1.09 0.18 42.5 0.72 1.47 88 32 3.6 1240 14 29
0.4 906 3.01 1.09 0.18 42.6 0.72 1.47 88 32 3.6 1240 14 29
0.45 901 3.03 1.09 0.18 42.8 0.73 1.48 88 32 3.6 1239 14 29
0.5 893 3.05 1.10 0.18 43.1 0.73 1.49 88 32 3.5 1238 14 29
Note: Resources constrained within $1500/ozAu pit shell.
TABLE 11: SENSITIVITY OF UNDERGROUND INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCES TO CUT-OFF GRADE AT THE TINTA
DEPOSIT
Cut-Off Grade
AuEq
(g/t)
Tonnes
(000)
Average grade: Contained Metal:
AuEq
(g/t)
Au
(g/t)
Cu
(%)
Ag
(g/t)
Pb
(%)
Zn
(%)
AuEq
koz
Au
koz
Cu
Mlbs
Ag
koz
Pb
Mlbs
Zn
Mlbs
1.4 1,646 2.82 1.26 0.15 41.7 0.53 1.07 149 67 5.4 2204 19 39
1.6 1,466 2.98 1.35 0.16 44.1 0.55 1.12 140 64 5.0 2080 18 36
1.8 Base Case 1,313 3.13 1.43 0.16 46.3 0.56 1.17 132 60 4.7 1955 16 34
2 1,177 3.27 1.49 0.17 48.5 0.58 1.23 124 57 4.3 1836 15 32
2.2 1,048 3.42 1.56 0.17 50.7 0.61 1.30 115 52 3.9 1709 14 30
2.4 905 3.59 1.63 0.18 53.8 0.64 1.37 104 47 3.5 1564 13 27
Note: Resources constrained below the $1500/ozAu pit shell.
Notes
* The economic viability of the mineral resources at the Freegold property were tested by constraining them within a floating
cone pit shells, or evaluating the viability of possible underground extraction using the following technical and economic
parameters:
• Mining Cost (open pit) $2.50/t
• Mining Cost (underground) $25/t at Revenue, $60/t at Tinta
• Process $11/t at Nucleus and Revenue, $12/t at Tinta
• G&A $1.50/t at Nucleus and Revenue, $2.50/t at Tinta
• Gold Price $1,500/oz
• Silver Price $18/oz
• Copper Price $3.00/lb
• Lead Price $1.00/lb
• Zinc Price $1.25/lb
• Molybdenum price $9.00/lb
• Tungsten price $13.00/lb
• Gold Process Recovery 85%
• Silver Process Recovery 60%
• Copper Process Recovery 75% (80% at Tinta)
• Lead Process Recovery 75% (Tinta only)
• Zinc Process Recovery 75% (Tinta Only)
• Mo Process Recovery 50% (Revenue Only)
• Tungsten Process Recovery 50% (Revenue Only)
• Pit Slope 45 degrees
There are no adjustments for mining recoveries or dilution. The open pit testing indicates that some of the deeper
mineralization may not be economic due to the increased waste stripping requirements. Underground mineral resources
exhibit continuity of thickness and grade and are considered to exhibit reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction
using underground extraction methods at the projected cut-off grades. It is important to recognize that these discussions of
surface and underground mining parameters are used solely to test the “reasonable prospects for eventual economic
extraction,” and that they do not represent an attempt to estimate mineral reserves. There are no mineral reserves calculated
for this Project. These preliminary evaluations are used to prepare the mineral resource estimates and to select appropriate
reporting assumptions.
Quality Assurance
All Triumph’s sample assay results have been independently monitored through a quality control / quality assurance (“QA/QC”)
program that includes the insertion of blind standards, blanks and pulp and reject duplicate samples. Logging and sampling
are completed at Triumph’s secure facility located at the Freegold project. Predominately NTW and HTW sized drill core is
sawn in half on site and half drill-core samples are securely transported to prep laboratories in Whitehorse for crushing and
pulverizing and then to geochemical laboratories located in Vancouver, Canada for analysis. Gold content is determined by fire
assay of a 30 gram charge and the additional elements are determined by four-acid, or historically aqua regia, digestion with
ICP finish. ALS and SGS Labs have been used and both are independent from Triumph.
Triumph is not aware of any drilling, sampling, recovery or other factors that could materially affect the accuracy or reliability of
the data referred to herein.
Qualified Persons
Robert Sim, P.Geo., a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101, is responsible for the estimate of mineral resources
presented in this news release and has reviewed, verified and approved the contents of this news release as they relate to the
mineral resource estimate, including the sampling, analytical, and test data underlying the mineral resource estimate. Mr. Sim
is independent from Triumph and confirms there were no limitations from the company in verifying the drilling and sample data
with site visit observations and monitoring of the QAQC program.
Tony Barresi, Ph.D., P.Geo., President of the Company, and qualified person as defined by NI 43-101 for the Freegold
Mountain project has reviewed, verified and approved the contents of this news release as they relate to the ongoing
exploration and development program at the Freegold Mountain project.
About Triumph Gold Corp.
Triumph Gold Corp. is a growth oriented Canadian-based precious metals exploration and development company. Triumph
Gold Corp. is focused on creating value through the advancement of the district scale Freegold Mountain Project in Yukon. For
maps and more information, please visit our website www.triumphgoldcorp.com
On behalf of the Board of Directors
Signed "Tony Barresi"
Tony Barresi, President
For further information please contact:
John Anderson, Executive Chairman
Triumph Gold Corp.
(604) 218-7400
Nancy Massicotte
IR Pro Communications Inc.
(604)-507-3377
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture
Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
This news release contains forward-looking information, which involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors that may cause actual events to differ materially from current expectations. Important factors - including the availability
of funds, the results of financing efforts, the completion of due diligence and the results of exploration activities - that could
cause actual results to differ materially from the Company's expectations are disclosed in the Company's documents filed from
time to time on SEDAR (see www.sedar.com). Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this press release. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation, except
to the extent required by law, to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
A photo accompanying this announcement is available
at: https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/09f34c67-f8c9-419c-9478-d89d003cce5e