Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

TGX.V ·

True North Gems Corporate Update

Corporate Updates

True North Gems Corporate Update

Vancouver – May 18, 2017 – True North Gems Inc. (TGX: TSX -V) (“True North” “ TGX” or the “Company”)

provided today, an update on the bankruptcy proceedings involving True North Gems Greenland A/S ( “TNGG”), the

Company's operating subsidiary in Greenland , with assets including the Aappaluttoq Ruby and Pink Sapphire deposit

and mine in S.W Greenland . The Company also announced the engagement Danish counsel, Skau Reipurth & Partners ,

to represent the Company in this process.

Update on the Bankruptcy Process:

TGX manage ment believes the bankruptcy process managed by court -appointed Trustees and supported by the

Greenland government was biased, unnecessarily expedited and potentially negligent . In reaction to these concerns the

Company has formed a Special Committee to investigate the process , and the decisions and actions of the Trustees and

the Greenland government, to determine if legal action is appropriate.

To adequately defend the interests of shareholders, the Company has engaged Danish counsel Skau Reipurth & Partners

to address the bankruptcy Trustees with respect to the TGX’s concerns and to formally solicit responses to unanswered

questions posed by the Company’s Board of Directors.

TGX specific concerns are:

• Conflict of interest of the court-appointed Trustees who have business relationships with LNSG , LNS and the

Greenland government;

• Lack of transparency with respect to the bidding process and the criteria upon which the decision to a ccept the

bid of LNSG was made, without consultation with the key creditors;

• Negligence of the Trustees in not fulfilling their duties to act in the best interest creditors by expediting the

bankruptcy process and not allowing a fair market to develop for TNGG’s assets; and

• A priori determination of the outcome of the bankruptcy process.

These concerns, and others, have been presented to the Trustees ; however, no sufficient response to the Company’s

requests for information have been provided to date . While the Trustees have not responded to TGX’s requests for

additional information, the bankruptcy process has advanced sufficiently to allow the government of Greenland to

transfer the assets of TNGG to LNSG, and operations at the Aappaluttoq mine site to be re -established. The Trustees

have not provided the Company any opportunity to review the decision of the Trustees, and neither has the impact of

this decision on the Company, as TNGG’s largest creditor, been addressed.

Chronology of Events:

• On August 30, 2016: The shareholders of TNGG voted to initiate voluntary bankruptcy to protect the assets of

TNGG and allow a transparent and fair bankruptcy process to go forward, in the best interests of all

stakeholders and creditors.

• September 4, 2016: The Court of Greenland was notified of the TNGG’s request for bankruptcy protection

and appointed Trustees.

• On September 7, 2016: TGX announced TNGG shareholders collectively agreed to intiate voluntary

bankruptcy proceedings under the Bankruptcy Act in Greenland. At that time, the Company was advised all

bids to acquire the assets of TNGG needed to be submitted by September 18, 2016.

• On September 11 2016: Trustees advised TGX all bids to acquire the assets of TNGG be submitted no later

than September 14, 2016, justifying the expedited process on the basis “it is in everyone’s interest to secure

that the final buyer can commence work as soon as possible and before the winter set s in”.

• On September 14, 2016: TGX submitted a bid to acquire the assets of TNGG, while at the same time

protesting the expedited process was unjustified and not conducive to maximizing value for existing creditors .

• On September 15, 2016: TGX became aware of media reports indicating the bankruptcy estate had reviewed

and considered the binding offers received and entered into a business transfer agreement with the successful

bidder.

• On October 5, 2016: TGX was advised the Greenlandic authorities published their consent to the transfer of

the exploitation and exploration licenses to LNSGG.

As of the date of the decision to enter voluntary bankruptcy, TGX owned 76% of the outstanding shares of TNGG, LNS

Denmark APS (together with its affiliates, the “ LNS Group”) own ed 17% of the outstanding shares of TNGG, and

Greenland Venture A/S (“Greenland Venture”) owned 7% of the outstanding shares of TNGG.

TGX was also the senior creditor of TNGG.

The Special Committee:

The Special Committee of the Board of Directors h as been created to provide oversight of the Greenland bankruptcy

process and allow TGX’s management and Board of Directors to discharge its duty of care and render informed

decisions, in the best interest of our shareholders.

While intended to protect TNGG’s assets from foreclosure by the government of Greenl and, and allow the TNGG’s

shareholders and partners the opportunity to address short falls in capitalization issues , the decision to initiate the

voluntary bankruptcy instead triggered an expedited process which ultimately resulted in the Aappaluttoq exploitation

license being withdrawn from jointly-owned TNGG and a 100% interest in the license awarded to LNSG, within ten-

days of the process being initiated.

TGX’s Board of Directors and management are of the opinion the Company and its shareholders have been unfairly

treated through a biased and expedited legal process that has resulted in the destruction of TGX shareholder value. The

Company’s concerns are related to potential conflicts of interest with the court -appointed Trustees and the expedited

process that limited competitive bidding from third parties , failed to allow True North , or any other third party,

sufficient time to develop a comprehensive bid, and worked contrary to the best interests of certain TNGG creditors,

specifically TGX and its shareholders.

It is also True North’s position that requests for additional information and clarification should be addressed by the

Trustees and the courts of Greenland prior to concluding what TGX believes is a flawed process that has failed to

deliver on the mandate of the Trustees and produce results in the best interests of the shareholders and the major

creditors of TNGG.

While the Company respects the laws of Greenland, and is fully willing to participate in a fair, transparent and unbiased

process, True North management and the Board of Directors do not intend to comply with any demand from the

Trustees that would indicate the acceptance of the decision to grant the assets to LNSG until such time as full disclosure

of the bankruptcy process and answers to questions sufficient to allow the Company to disclose the complete details of

the events and outcomes to our shareholders and the public markets, have been provided.

True North will provide further updates as information becomes available.

Andrew Lee Smith, Interim CEO

On behalf of the Board of Directors of True North Gems Inc.

For further information, contact:

Email: [email protected]

www.truenorthgems.com

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Ven ture Exchange) accepts

responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

This document contains “forward -looking information” and “forward -looking statements” (together, “forward -looking statements”) within the

meaning of applicable securities legislation, which are made as of the date of this doc ument or the document(s) referred to herein. Statements that

express predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (ofte n, but not always, using

words or phrases such as “expects”, “anticipa tes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives” or variations

thereof or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be a chieved, or the negative

of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward -looking statements. Forward -looking

statements include, without limitation, statements with respect to: the amount of mineral reserves and mineral resources; t he amount of future

production over any period; net present value and internal rates of return of the proposed mining operation; capital costs; o perating costs; strip

ratios and mining rates; and mine life. The forward -looking statements are made based upo n certain assumptions which, if untrue, could cause the

actual results, performances or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results, performances or a chievements expressed

or implied by the forward -looking statements. These a ssumptions include, without limitation: the price of gemstone products produced; anticipated

costs; the presence of and continuity of gemstones at modeled grades and values; the capacities of various machinery and equipment; the availability

of personnel, machinery and equipment at estimated prices; exchange rates; appropriate discount rates; tax rates applicable to the proposed mining

operation; financing structure and costs; anticipated mining losses and dilution; gemstone recovery rates; reasonable contingency requirements; and

receipt of regulatory approvals on acceptable terms. By their very nature, forward -looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties that

could cause actual results, performances or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward -looking statements. These include, without

limitation: price volatility, discrepancies between actual and estimated production, mineral reserves and resources and metal lurgical recoveries,

mining operational and development risks, regu latory restrictions (including environmental regulatory restrictions and liability), activities by

governmental authorities (including changes in taxation), currency fluctuations, the speculative nature of gemstone explorati on, the global economic

climate, dilution, share price volatility, competition, loss of key employees; additional funding requirements and defective title to mineral claims or

property]. This list is not exhaustive. See also, for example, the risks disclosed in the Company’s other disclosure documents filed at www.sedar.com,

including, without limitation, those disclosed in the Company’s management’s discussion & analysis. The Company expressly disclaims any intention

or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, except as otherwise required by applicable securities legislation.

The comments above are provided Without Prejudice.