Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

TAU.V ·

Thesis Gold Announces a Combined Measured & Indicated Mineral Resource of 4.0 Moz and an Inferred Mineral Resource of 727 koz at the Lawyers-Ranch Project

Resource Estimates

Thesis Gold Announces a Combined Measured

& Indicated Mineral Resource of 4.0 Moz and

an Inferred Mineral Resource of 727 koz at the

Lawyers-Ranch Project

Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - May 1, 2024) - Thesis Gold Inc. (TSXV: TAU) (FSE:

A3EP87) (OTCQX: THSGF) ("

Thesis

" or the "

Company

") is pleased to report an updated Mineral

Resource Estimate ("MRE") at the Company's newly combined 100% owned Lawyers-Ranch Project.

The Project now boasts a combined Measured & Indicated Mineral Resource of 4.0 Moz and an Inferred

Mineral Resource of 727 koz, at respective grades of 1.51 and 1.82 g/t AuEq*, hitting an important

milestone for project scale.

The Lawyers-Ranch Project is road-accessible and together the projects

form a contiguous, 495 km

2

land package in the prolific Toodoggone Mining District in northern British

Columbia.

Highlights: 2024 Updated Mineral Resource Estimate

Significant Mineral Resource Growth

Measured & Indicated Mineral Resource

4.0 million ounces (Moz) grading 1.51 grams per tonne (g/t) gold equivalent

(AuEq*)

contained within 82.0 million tonnes; AuEq* calculated using 80:1 Ag:Au ratio

(with Au US$1,850/ounce [oz], Ag US$24/oz, and recoveries at 92 and 88%

respectively).

Representing

over 85% of the total Mineral Resource ounces and a 27%

increase in AuEq* ounces

(Figure 1).

Inferred Mineral Resource

727 thousand ounces grading 1.82 AuEq*

contained within 12.4 million tonnes.

An increase of 76% AuEq* ounces.

Total tonnage

94.4 million tonnes at 1.55 g/t AuEq*

a 32% increase in tonnes.

This MRE outlines both pit-constrained resources—defined by a conceptual pit at a cut-off

grade of 0.4 g/t AuEq* and out-of-pit Mineral Resources that have a cut-off grade of 1.5 g/t

AuEq*, which demonstrate excellent continuity.

Substantial Silver Value

At an 80:1 Ag:Au ratio,

silver represents 25% of the Mineral Resource value for AuEq*

.

Measured & Indicated Mineral Resources contain

84.0 million silver ounces

, and Inferred

Mineral Resources contain

8.3 million silver ounces

, respectively, an increase of 58% and

34 %.

Potential for Continued Growth

In 2023, the drilling program at Ranch was strategically aimed at defining near-surface, high-

grade zones. This focus was specifically designed to maximize the impact on the upcoming

PEA update (Q3 2024) and establish an initial Mineral Resource.

All zones remain open for

significant expansion potential.

Ranch has >20 drill ready targets for potential new discoveries and multiple additional gold-

silver mineralization targets generated for follow-up.

Ewan Webster, President and CEO, commented, "Today's combined Mineral Resource is a major

milestone for the project and a key step in our strategic plan to unlock the full potential of these

outstanding assets. This process began in 2023 when we launched a targeted drilling campaign focused

on the highest-impact areas of Lawyers and Ranch. The drill results supported two key 2024 catalysts:

today's updated global resource for both Lawyers and Ranch, and its integration into an improved PEA.

We're on track, with a 32% increase in gold equivalent ounces, identification of higher-grade zones, and

a revised mine plan that positions the project to deliver substantial improvements on already strong

economics. We foresee this materializing in a significant underground potentially mineable Mineral

Resource and secondly as you can see in the sensitivity table for Ranch, there is the opportunity to

develop much higher-grade starter pits to jump-start production and reduce the pay-back period. I see

today's resource as just the beginning, with substantial growth ahead, particularly at Ranch, where we

have only scratched the surface."

The updated Mineral Resource Estimate is a key component in the upcoming update to the Preliminary

Economic Assessment, slated for completion in Q3 2024. This MRE outlines both pit-constrained

resources—defined by a conceptual pit shell with Mineral Resources at a lower cut-off grade of 0.4 g/t

AuEq*—and out-of-pit Mineral Resources, with a lower cut-off grade of 1.5 g/t AuEq* and that

demonstrate excellent continuity utilizing an industry standard conceptual stope optimizer software. While

they are indicative of the potentially mineable Mineral Resources through conceptual open-pit and

underground mining methods, this will be determined through a cross-over analysis in the upcoming

updated PEA. The cross-over analysis will assess the most advantageous depths for transitioning from

open-pit to underground mining methods to enhance economic efficiency, and overall conversion of

Mineral Resources to potentially mineable Mineral Resources. At the Lawyers area drilling suggests that

higher grade material is situated at the bottom of the conceptual pit-constrained Mineral Resource and

extends below into the out-of-pit zone at both Cliffs Creek and Dukes Ridge, where underground mining

could allow production earlier in the mine life. Moreover, the cut-off grade sensitivity analysis of the MRE

at the Ranch project, shows a clear opportunity of near-surface, high-grade material by initiating

production from higher-grade starter pits. These options will be evaluated in the updated PEA, with a

strategy to integrate high-grade underground Mineral Resources and starter pits from Ranch early on to

establish an optimized mining schedule to reduce the payback period. In addition, given the location and

grade of the defined additional ounces and the revised mine plan contemplated in the upcoming PEA,

there is an expectation that there will be a higher conversion of ounces in the MRE (M&I and Inferred) into

potentially mineable ounces in the updated PEA relative to the previous PEA on only the Lawyers

Project.

Table 1:

Summary of Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources on the Lawyers-Ranch

Project

Mineral

Cut-off

Classification

Tonnes

Au

Ag

Cu

AuEq*

Au

Ag

Cu

AuEq*

Resource

AuEq*

(k)

(g/t)

(g/t)

(%)

(g/t)

(koz)

(Moz)

(kt)

(koz)

Area

(g/t)

Pit-Constrained Mineral Resource Estimate

Lawyers

0.4

Measured

35,987

1.1

38.5

-

1.58

1,268

44.5

-

1,825

Indicated

40,406

0.99

26.8

-

1.32

1,285

34.8

-

1,721

M&I

76,393

1.04

32.3

-

1.44

2,554

79.4

-

3,546

Inferred

5,291

0.93

26.9

-

1.26

158

4.6

-

215

Ranch

0.4

Indicated

4,259

2.01

9.5

0.06

2.21

275

1.3

3

303

Inferred

5,207

1.79

5.3

0.12

2.03

300

0.9

6

339

Total

0.4

Measured

35,987

1.1

38.5

0

1.58

1,268

44.5

0

1,825

Indicated

44,665

1.09

25.2

0.01

1.41

1,561

36.1

3

2,023

M&I

80,652

1.09

31.1

0

1.48

2,829

80.7

3

3,848

Inferred

10,498

1.36

16.2

0.06

1.64

458

5.5

6

554

Out-of-Pit Mineral Resource Estimate

Lawyers

1.5

Indicated

1,359

2.01

77.4

-

2.98

88

3.4

-

130

Inferred

1,325

2.33

65.5

-

3.15

99

2.8

-

134

Ranch

1.5

Inferred

579

1.76

4.9

0.19

2.07

33

0.1

1

39

Total

1.5

Indicated

1,359

2.01

77.4

0

2.98

88

3.4

0

130

Inferred

1,903

2.16

47.14

0.06

2.82

132

2.9

1

173

Total Mineral Resource Estimate

All

Combined

Measured

35,987

1.1

38.5

0

1.58

1,268

44.5

0

1,825

Indicated

46,023

1.11

26.7

0.01

1.46

1,648

39.5

3

2,153

M&I

82,010

1.11

31.9

0

1.51

2,917

84.0

3

3,978

Inferred

12,401

1.48

20.9

0.06

1.82

590

8.3

8

727

Notes:

1

.

Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

2

.

The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political,

marketing, or other relevant issues.

3

.

The Inferred Mineral Resource in this estimate has a lower level of confidence than that applied to an Indicated Mineral Resource and

must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of the Inferred Mineral Resource could potentially

be upgraded to an Indicated Mineral Resource with continued exploration.

4

.

The Mineral Resources were estimated in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), CIM

Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions (2014) and Best Practices Guidelines (2019) prepared by the CIM Standing

Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by the CIM Council.

5

.

Historical mined areas were removed from the block-modelled Mineral Resources.

6

.

Economic assumptions used include US$1,850/oz Au, US$24/oz Ag, 0.76 US$:CDN$ FX, process recoveries of 90% and 92% Au for

Lawyers and Ranch, respectively, 88% Ag for both projects, 85% Cu for Ranch, a C$15/t processing cost, and a G&A cost of C$5/t. The

resulting gold equivalency ratio of Au:Ag ratio was 1:80 and Au:Cu was 1:7315.

7

.

The constraining pit optimization parameters were C$3.25/t mineralized and waste material mining cost and 52° pit slopes. Pit-

constrained Mineral Resources are reported at an AuEq cut-off of 0.4 g/t.

8

.

The Out-of-Pit Mineral Resources include blocks below the constraining pit shell within underground mining shapes. A mining cost of

C$85/t mineralized, in addition to the economic assumptions above, results in an underground (UG) AuEq cut-off of 1.5 g/t. Mining shapes

are generated using stope optimization with an objective of maximizing the total metal above the cut-off with a minimum dimension of 1.5

m (W) by 15 m (H) by 15 m (L). All "take all" material within the mining shapes is reported, regardless of whether the estimated grades are

above the optimized cut-off grade.

9

.

Details of the MRE will be provided in a Technical Report with an effective date of April 26, 2024, prepared in accordance with NI 43-101

standards, which will be filed under the Company's SEDAR+ profile within 45 days of this news release.

Table 2:

Measured, Indicated and Inferred Ranch Project Pit-Constrained Sensitivity Table

Measured and Indicated

Cut-off

Tonnes

Au

Ag

Cu

AuEq*

Au

Ag

Cu

AuEq*

AuEq*

(k)

(g/t)

(g/t)

(%)

(g/t)

(koz)

(Moz)

(kt)

(koz)

(g/t)

1.5

2,272

3.01

14.9

0.09

3.32

220

1.1

2

243

1

3,150

2.49

12

0.07

2.74

252

1.2

2

278

0.9

3,328

2.4

11.5

0.07

2.65

257

1.2

2

283

0.8

3,511

2.32

11

0.07

2.55

262

1.2

2

288

0.7

3,696

2.24

10.6

0.07

2.46

266

1.3

2

293

0.6

3,895

2.15

10.2

0.06

2.37

270

1.3

2

297

0.5

4,097

2.07

9.8

0.06

2.28

273

1.3

3

300

0.4

4,259

2.01

9.5

0.06

2.21

275

1.3

3

303

0.3

4,384

1.96

9.2

0.06

2.16

277

1.3

3

304

Inferred

Cut-off

Tonnes

Au

Ag

Cu

AuEq*

Au

Ag

Cu

AuEq*

AuEq*

(k)

(g/t)

(g/t)

(%)

(g/t)

(koz)

(Moz)

(kt)

(koz)

(g/t)

1.5

2,530

2.8

6.9

0.21

3.17

228

0.6

5

258

1.0

3,662

2.28

6.1

0.16

2.57

268

0.7

6

303

0.9

3,999

2.15

6

0.15

2.44

277

0.8

6

313

0.8

4,279

2.06

5.8

0.15

2.33

284

0.8

6

321

0.7

4,519

1.99

5.7

0.14

2.25

289

0.8

6

327

0.6

4,773

1.91

5.6

0.13

2.16

293

0.9

6

332

0.5

5,008

1.84

5.4

0.13

2.09

297

0.9

6

336

0.4

5,207

1.79

5.3

0.12

2.03

300

0.9

6

339

0.3

5,366

1.75

5.2

0.12

1.98

301

0.9

7

341

Table 3:

Measured, Indicated and Inferred Lawyers-Ranch Combined Project Pit-Constrained

Sensitivity Table

Measured and Indicated

Cut-off

Tonnes

Au

Ag

Cu

AuEq*

Au

Ag

Cu

AuEq*

AuEq*

(k)

(g/t)

(g/t)

(%)

(g/t)

(koz)

(Moz)

(kt)

(koz)

(g/t)

1.5

20,831

2.61

72.4

0.01

3.53

1,748

48.5

2

2,363

1.0

34,493

1.93

54.1

0.01

2.61

2,139

60

2

2,899

0.9

38,822

1.79

50.3

0.01

2.43

2,235

62.8

2

3,031

0.8

44,097

1.65

46.5

0.01

2.24

2,340

66

2

3,175

0.7

50,665

1.51

42.6

0

2.05

2,455

69.4

2

3,333

0.6

58,580

1.37

38.7

0

1.86

2,575

73

2

3,498

0.5

68,485

1.23

34.9

0

1.67

2,702

76.8

3

3,673

0.4

80,652

1.09

31.1

0

1.48

2,829

80.7

3

3,848

0.3

96,170

0.96

27.3

0

1.3

2,955

84.5

3

4,022

Inferred

Cut-off

Tonnes

Au

Ag

Cu

AuEq*

Au

Ag

Cu

AuEq*

AuEq*

(k)

(g/t)

(g/t)

(%)

(g/t)

(koz)

(Moz)

(kt)

(koz)

(g/t)

1.5

3,565

2.73

26.3

0.15

3.26

313

3

5

374

1.0

5,452

2.14

21.9

0.11

2.56

375

3.8

6

448

0.9

6,013

2.01

20.8

0.1

2.41

388

4

6

465

0.8

6,637

1.88

19.9

0.09

2.26

402

4.3

6

483

0.7

7,381

1.75

19.2

0.09

2.11

416

4.5

6

500

0.6

8,223

1.62

18.3

0.08

1.96

430

4.8

6

518

0.5

9,261

1.49

17.2

0.07

1.8

444

5.1

6

536

0.4

10,498

1.36

16.2

0.06

1.64

458

5.5

6

554

0.3

12,318

1.19

14.8

0.05

1.45

472

5.9

7

574

For an in-depth look at the updated Mineral Resource Estimate and its potential impact, please view the

video (

link

), showcasing the developments and prospects at Thesis Gold.

Figure 1: Resource growth

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:

https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/6169/207447_aa18991ce4d6cb37_001full.jpg

Quality Assurance and Control

Results from samples were analyzed at ALS Global Laboratories (Geochemistry Division) in Vancouver,

Canada (an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited facility). The sampling program was undertaken by

Company personnel under the direction of Rob L'Heureux, P.Geol. A secure chain of custody is

maintained in transporting and storing of all samples. Gold was assayed using a fire assay with atomic

emission spectrometry and gravimetric finish when required (+10 g/t Au). Drill intervals with visible gold

were assayed using metallic screening. Rock chip samples from outcrop/bedrock are selective by

nature and may not be representative of the mineralization hosted on the Project.

The technical content of this news release has been reviewed and approved by Michael Dufresne, M.Sc,

P.Geol., P.Geo., and Eugene Puritch, P.Eng., FEC, CET both Qualified Persons as defined by National

Instrument 43-101. Mr. Puritch, President of P&E Mining Consultants Inc., is independent of Thesis Gold.

On behalf of the Board of Directors

Thesis Gold Inc.

"Ewan Webster"

Ewan Webster Ph.D., P.Geo.

President, CEO, and Director

About Thesis Gold Inc.

Thesis Gold is unlocking the combined potential of the Lawyers-Ranch Gold-Silver Project in the

Toodoggone mining district of north central British Columbia, Canada. A 2022 Preliminary Economic

Assessment for the Lawyers project alone projected an open-pit mining operation yielding an average of

163,000 gold equivalent ounces annually over a 12-year span

1

. By integrating the Ranch Project, the

Company aims to enhance the economics and bolster the overall project's potential. Central to this

ambition was the expansive 2023 drill program, which continues to define a high-grade out-of-pit Mineral

Resource at Lawyers and augment the near-surface high-grade deposits at Ranch. The project now

boasts a combined Measured & Indicated Mineral Resource of 4.0 Moz and an Inferred Mineral

Resource of 727 koz, at respective grades of 1.51 and 1.82 g/t AuEq. The Company roadmap includes,

new metallurgical work, a robust 2024 exploration and drill program and a combined updated

Preliminary Economic Assessment slated for Q3 2024. Through these strategic moves, Thesis Gold

intends to elevate the Ranch-Lawyers Project to the forefront of global precious metals ventures.

1

Preliminary Economic Assessment: Lawyers Gold & Silver Project (2022). JDS Energy & Mining.

For further information or investor relations inquiries, please contact:

Dave Burwell

Vice President Corporate Development

Email:

[email protected]

Tel: 403-410-7907

Toll Free: 1-888-221-0915

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is

defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy

or accuracy of this press release.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This press release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian

securities legislation. Forward-looking information includes, without limitation, statements regarding

the use of proceeds from the Company's recently completed financings and the future plans or

prospects of the Company. Generally, forward-looking information can be identified by the use of

forward-looking terminology such as "plans", "expects" or "does not expect", "is expected", "budget",

"scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate", or "believes", or

variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results "may", "could",

"would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved". Forward-looking statements are

necessarily based upon a number of assumptions that, while considered reasonable by management,

are inherently subject to business, market, and economic risks, uncertainties, and contingencies that

may cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those

expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. Although the Company has attempted to identify

important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-

looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated,

or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual

results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.

Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Other factors

which could materially affect such forward-looking information are described in the risk factors in the

Company's most recent annual management's discussion and analysis, which is available on the

Company's profile on SEDAR at

www.sedarplus.com

. The Company does not undertake to update

any forward-looking information, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit

https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/207447