Benchmark Metals Inc. Reports Maiden NI 43-101 Mineral Resource Estimate For the Lawyers Gold-Silver Project in British Columbia
Benchmark Metals Inc. Reports Maiden NI 43-101 Mineral Resource Estimate
For the Lawyers Gold-Silver Project in British Columbia
EDMONTON, Alberta, June 14, 2018 -- Benchmark Metals Inc. (formerly, Crystal Exploration Inc., the “ Company” or
“Benchmark”) (TSX-V:BNCH) (OTCQB:CYRTD) (WKN:A2JM2X) – is pleased to announce the release of a maiden inferred
mineral resource estimate for two spatially associated zones of epithermal gold-silver (Au-Ag) mineralization at the Lawyers
Project in the Toodoggone region of northern British Columbia, Canada.
Giroux Consultants Ltd. (“Giroux”) of North Vancouver, B.C., has estimated an inferred mineral resource of 550,000 tonnes
grading 4.51 g/t Au and 209.15 g/t Ag at a 4.0 g/t gold equivalent (“AuEQ”) lower cut-off at the Cliff Creek North zone,
which equates to a contained metal resource of 80,000 troy oz. Au and 3,700,000 oz. of Ag, along with an inferred mineral
resource of 58,000 tonnes grading 4.30 g/t Au and 139.13 g/t Ag (at a 4.0 g/t AuEQ lower cut-off) at the Duke’s Ridge
zone, which equates to a contained metal resource of 8,000 oz. of Au and 260,000 oz. of Ag (see Tables 1 and 2 below).
Benchmark will file a technical report on Sedar supporting the mineral resource estimate within 45 days of this news release.
CEO John Williamson commented on the maiden resource, “The results of the independent inferred mineral resource estimate
provide an initial platform on which we intend to grow the resource base with further work including drilling to infill and extend
the known mineralized zones along strike and at depth. Existing historic drill results along strike and at depth indicate the
expansion potential to be excellent.”
Mr. Williamson further commented on the potential of the Lawyers Project, “The Golden Triangle region of northwestern British
Columbia has been the focus of aggressive exploration in recent years with new mines being put into production, development
projects and high-grade results from multiple companies. The Lawyers Project brings together the past-producing Lawyers
gold-silver mine area and the extensive Silver Pond trend of precious metals occurrences within the northeast part of the
Golden Triangle. This large prospective land holding presents a unique opportunity for Benchmark to carry out further
exploration on a 'camp' scale. There remains excellent potential for the discovery of additional low and high-sulphidation
epithermal precious metal deposits like those that have been discovered and explored to date. In addition, there exists the
possibility for the discovery of near-surface or buried 'bulk tonnage' deposits which may offer the advantage of economies of
scale should future mine development occur.”
Table 1. Cliff Creek North Inferred Mineral Resource at a variety of lower cut-offs*
AuEQ** Cut-off Tonnes > Cut-off Grade>Cut-off Contained Metal***
(g/t) (tonnes) Au (g/t) Ag (g/t) AuEQ (g/t) Au (ozs) Ag (ozs)
1.00 1,460,000 2.89 121.70 4.16 136,000 5,710,000
2.00 1,260,000 3.16 134.94 4.57 128,000 5,470,000
3.00 840,000 3.79 171.54 5.58 102,000 4,630,000
3.50 690,000 4.12 190.08 6.10 91,000 4,220,000
4.00 550,000 4.51 209.15 6.69 80,000 3,700,000
4.50 440,000 4.90 230.48 7.30 69,000 3,260,000
5.00 350,000 5.30 253.88 7.94 60,000 2,860,000
6.00 260,000 5.88 290.09 8.91 49,000 2,420,000
Table 2. Dukes Ridge Inferred Mineral Resource at a variety of lower cut-offs*
AuEQ** Cut-off Tonnes > Cut-off Grade>Cut-off Contained Metal***
(g/t) (tonnes) Au (g/t) Ag (g/t) AuEQ (g/t) Au (ozs) Ag (ozs)
1.00 403,000 2.07 76.88 2.87 27,000 1,000,000
2.00 282,000 2.45 89.00 3.38 22,000 810,000
3.00 133,000 3.25 113.38 4.43 14,000 480,000
3.50 85,000 3.78 125.53 5.08 10,000 340,000
4.00 58,000 4.30 139.13 5.75 8,000 260,000
4.50 43,000 4.65 155.00 6.26 6,000 210,000
5.00 33,000 4.96 171.20 6.74 5,000 180,000
6.00 18,000 5.59 208.99 7.77 3,200 121,000
* Inferred mineral resources are not mineral reserves. Mineral resources, which are not mineral reserves, do not have
demonstrated economic viability. There has been insufficient exploration to allow for the classification of the inferred resources
tabulated above as an indicated or measured mineral resource, however, it is reasonably expected that the majority of the
inferred mineral resources could be upgraded to indicated mineral resources with continued exploration. There is no guarantee
that any part of the mineral resources discussed herein will be converted into a mineral reserve in the future.
**The following prices of metals and conversions are used to calculate AuEq; $US1,200/oz for Au and $US14.50/oz for Ag;
AuEQ = [(Au g/t * 1200 * 0.95 / 31.1035 g/oz) + ( Ag g/t * 14.50 * 0.82 /31.1035 g/oz)]/ (1200 * 0.95 / 31.1035).
***Contained ounces may not add due to rounding.
LAWYERS PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
At Lawyers, low sulphide epithermal alteration and mineralized zones are controlled mainly by northwest-trending, steeply
west-southwest dipping fault and fracture systems. Chalcedonic quartz veins, stockworks and multi-stage breccias host
precious metal mineralization; adularia occurs adjacent to metal bearing veins and is flanked by kaolinite-illite. Zones of
pervasive argillic alteration, with characteristic pyrite and chlorite, form envelopes to the mineralized fault and fracture systems
and give way to peripheral and widespread propylitic alteration. Principal ore minerals include: acanthite, native gold, electrum
and native silver with sphalerite, galena, chalcopyrite, bornite and covellite.
The Cliff Creek Zone, a north-northwest trending epithermal zone, has a strike length of at least 1,600 m and has been
explored to a depth of greater than 300 m. It consists of the Cliff Creek South, Cliff Creek Central and Cliff Creek North sub-
zones that form a continuous band of alteration and mineralization primarily contained in dilational structures along the West
fault, located between the northwest-trending Cliff Creek fault and the Ptarmigan fault. Mineralization at Cliff Creek North
ranges from narrow, massive sulphide veins, such as the P2 vein, located in the hangingwall of the main Cliff Creek North
zone, which graded 293.40 g/t Au and 7,622 g/t Ag over 0.70m core length in hole CC15-12, to broad low-grade intervals such
as a 51.99 m core length intersection in hole CC15-13 that averaged 1.71 g/t Au and 41.5 g/t Ag. The Duke’s Ridge zone,
located just southeast of the Cliff Creek North zone on the east side of the Cliff Creek fault, is a 1,200 m long zone that is
typically 2-4 m wide, and is sub-vertical to steeply west-dipping.
LAWYERS MAIDEN INFERRED* MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE
Giroux has estimated a maiden inferred mineral resource for the Cliff Creek North zone utilizing a total of 597 samples from 48
surface drill holes (including 15 holes drilled in 2015) and 4 trenches that have intersected mineralization. No underground data
was used in the estimate because location and assay data for the historic underground is incomplete. Giroux estimated a
maiden inferred mineral resource for the Duke’s Ridge zone utilizing a total of 321 samples from 37 surface drill holes
(including 7 holes drilled in 2015) and 22 surface trenches that intersect precious metal mineralization.
Modeled 3D geologic 'solids' were used to constrain mineralization in the block model and grades for gold and silver were
interpolated into blocks by Ordinary Kriging (OK). Geologic 3D solids were developed using cross-sections and level plans to
constrain the mineralization at the Cliff Creek North Zone and at the Dukes Ridge Zone. In both cases a rough AuEq value of ≥
1.0 g/t was used to define and wireframe the 3D solids.
Based upon statistical treatment of gold and silver data for each of the four established mineralized domains capping was
employed but had little effect on the overall estimate. A 2.0 m composite length was selected to approximate a potential
underground mining height for both the Cliff Creek North and Duke’s Ridge zones. In both zones, uniform down-hole
composites were formed honouring the domain boundaries. Variography on the composite data was used to model prominent
search directions for gold and silver in all domains. Within the Cliff Creek North mineralized domain both gold and silver were
modeled along strike (Azimuth 347° Dip 0°), down dip (Azimuth 257° Dip -65°) and across dip (Azimuth 77° Dip -25°). The
longest continuity for both Au and Ag was found along Azimuth 347° and Dip -60°. A similar exercise was completed for Au
and Ag at Dukes Ridge. Gold and silver were modelled along strike (Azimuth 308° Dip 0°), perpendicular to strike (Azimuth
218° Dip 0°) and in the vertical direction (Azimuth 0° Dip -90°).
Separate block models with blocks dimensioned at 5 x 5 x 5 m were created and fit to the mineralization solids for the Cliff
Creek North and Duke’s Ridge zones. For each block model the percentage below surface topography, percentage below
bedrock and the percentage within the mineralized solids were recorded, for each block. The percentage of waste within a
block was then calculated by subtracting the percentage of mineralized solid from the percentage below bedrock. Based on
available data on historic underground workings in the Cliff Creek North zone, if an estimated block contained any percentage
of underground workings, the workings were assumed to be within the mineralized zone and were subtracted from the
percentage of mineralized solid in that block.
Specific gravity measurements were done in the field using Archimedes methodology and resulted in 145 measurements in the
Cliff Creek North zone and 48 in the Duke’s Ridge zone. Blocks within the Cliff Creek North mineralized zone were assigned
an average specific gravity of 2.63, while blocks within the Duke’s Ridge mineralized zone were assigned an average specific
gravity of 2.58.
Grades for gold and silver were interpolated into blocks by OK using the search ellipsoid dimensions and orientation
established by variography. For both the Cliff Creek North and Duke’s Ridge block models the kriging was completed in a
series of passes with expanding search ellipsoids. As a verification tool for the block model, level plans were produced for the
Cliff Creek North mineralized Zone and the Duke’s Ridge mineralized Zone showing both estimated gold grades in blocks and
in 2 m drill hole composites from 10 m above the level to 10 m below. Block grades matched the composite grades with no
bias indicated in either zone.
No economic evaluations have been completed on the Cliff Creek North and Duke's Ridge zones, and as a result an economic
cut-off for them is unknown. However, for the purposes of reporting mineral resources on the Project, current gold and silver
metal prices and current US$-CDN$ exchange rate where compared to historic metal prices (adjusted for both inflation and
historic exchange rates) for the 4-year period of past production on the Lawyers Project. It was found that the average gold and
silver grades corresponding to cut-off grades of 4.00, 4.50 and 5.00 g/t AuEq, after being adjusted for comparison purposes,
and compare favourably with historic mined grades at Lawyers. It was concluded that it is reasonable to select a 4.0 g/t AuEq
cut-off for reporting purposes for the Lawyers Project.The AuEq grade was determined for each estimated block utilizing,
US$1200/oz. Au price and 95% recovery, along with US$ 14.50/oz. silver price and 82% recovery.
CLIFF CREEK NORTH ZONE
The Cliff Creek North Zone resource (Table 1) is classified as inferred due to drill hole density, uncertainty of the precise
locations and full extent of underground workings and a limited number of blocks estimated in Pass 1 and 2 Kriging.
DUKE’S RIDGE ZONE
The Duke's Ridge Zone resource (Table 2) is classified as inferred due to drill hole density and the limited number of blocks
estimated in Pass 1 and 2 Kriging.
About Benchmark Metals Inc.
Benchmark is a Canadian gold, silver and diamond exploration company with its common shares listed for trading on the TSX
Venture Exchange in Canada, the OTCQB Venture Market in the United States and the Frankfurt Stock Exchange in
Germany. Benchmark is managed by proven resource sector professionals, who have a track record of advancing exploration
projects from grassroots scenarios through to production.
The technical content of this news release and the Company’s technical disclosure has been reviewed and approved by
Michael B. Dufresne, M.Sc., P.Geol., P.Geo., who is a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 Standards
of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
s/ “John Williamson”
John Williamson ,
Chief Executive Officer
For further information, please contact:
Jim Greig, President
Tel: (604) 260-6977
NEITHER TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE
POLICIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF
THIS RELEASE.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
CERTAIN STATEMENTS MADE AND INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN MAY CONSTITUTE “FORWARD-LOOKING
INFORMATION” AND “FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF APPLICABLE CANADIAN AND
UNITED STATES SECURITIES LEGISLATION. THESE STATEMENTS AND INFORMATION ARE BASED ON FACTS
CURRENTLY AVAILABLE TO THE COMPANY AND THERE IS NO ASSURANCE THAT ACTUAL RESULTS WILL MEET
MANAGEMENT’S EXPECTATIONS. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INFORMATION MAY BE IDENTIFIED BY
SUCH TERMS AS “ANTICIPATES”, “BELIEVES”, “TARGETS”, “ESTIMATES”, “PLANS”, “EXPECTS”, “MAY”, “WILL”,
“COULD” OR “WOULD”.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN ARE BASED ON CERTAIN FACTORS
AND ASSUMPTIONS REGARDING, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE ESTIMATION OF MINERAL RESOURCES AND
RESERVES, THE REALIZATION OF RESOURCE AND RESERVE ESTIMATES, METAL PRICES, TAXATION, THE
ESTIMATION, TIMING AND AMOUNT OF FUTURE EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT, CAPITAL AND OPERATING
COSTS, THE AVAILABILITY OF FINANCING, THE RECEIPT OF REGULATORY APPROVALS, ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS,
TITLE DISPUTES AND OTHER MATTERS. WHILE THE COMPANY CONSIDERS ITS ASSUMPTIONS TO BE
REASONABLE AS OF THE DATE HEREOF, FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INFORMATION ARE NOT
GUARANTEES OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE AND READERS SHOULD NOT PLACE UNDUE IMPORTANCE ON SUCH
STATEMENTS AS ACTUAL EVENTS AND RESULTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE DESCRIBED HEREIN.
THE COMPANY DOES NOT UNDERTAKE TO UPDATE ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS OR INFORMATION
EXCEPT AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS.