Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

SVRS.V ·

Silver Storm Announces 107% Increase IN Indicated Mineral Resources at LA Parrilla

Resource Estimates

NEWS RELEASE

SILVER STORM ANNOUNCES

107% INCREASE IN INDICATED MINERAL RESOURCES AT LA PARRILLA

Toronto, Ontario, February 11, 2025: Silver Storm Mining Ltd. (“ Silver Storm” or the " Company")

(TSX.V: SVRS | OTC: SVRSF | FSE: SVR), is pleased to announce the results of an updated Mineral

Resource estimate (“ Updated Mineral Resource Estimate ”) reported in compliance with National

Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) for the Company’s 100%

owned La Parrilla Silver Mine Complex, located in Durango Mexico. The Updated Mineral Resource

Estimate was completed by David F. Machuca -Mory, PhD, PEng, of SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.

(“SRK”).

Highlights of the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate include:

• 107% increase in Indicated Mineral Resources, from 5.2 Moz Ag.Eq1,2 in the 2023 Mineral

Resource Statement to 10.8 Moz Ag.Eq

• 58% increase of Inferred Mineral Resources , from 10.3 Moz Ag.Eq in the 2023 Mineral

Resource Statement to 16.3 Moz Ag.Eq

• Approximately 90% of the Indicated and 85% of the Inferred Mineral Resource tonnage

is sulphide mineralization; 10% of the Indicated and 15% of the Inferred Mineral

Resource tonnage is oxide mineralization

• Silver dominant: 66% of the Indicated and 69% of the Inferred Updated Mineral Resource

gross metal value is derived from silver

• 23 additional mineralized structures have been modelled, including several that were

previously mined by the former operator, with significant upside potential

• Total all-in exploration cost of US$0.22/oz Ag.Eq discovered

Greg McKenzie, President and CEO, commented, “We are incredibly pleased with this latest

resource update. We achieved a material 107% increase in Indicated Resources and there was also

a significant increase in Inferred Resources at La Parrilla . With further drilling, we would expect to

maintain a continued conversion rate. The Company is now very well positioned , having a fully

permitted silver mine complex, with a sizable Mineral Resource endowment that could potentially feed

the La Parrilla processing plant for several years.

Our sizable Mineral Resource growth in both classification categories is a testament to the hard work

and dedication of the team including Will Ansley, COO and Bruce Robbins , P.Geo, our exploration

personnel, operating employees and drilling contractor. Silver Storm completed 18,626 metres (“m”)

of underground drilling, demonstrating that the previously mined zones continue down plunge and in

certain cases even show improved grade and thickness at depth. This significant growth in Mineral

Resources enhances the potential of our project , supports our goal to restart the mine and join the

exclusive rank of silver producers.”

The wireframe models of the veins contributing to the updated Mineral Resource Estimate of Rosarios

and Quebradillas mines are presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively.

Figure 1: Plan View of Mineral Resource Estimate Vein Wireframes at the Rosarios Mine

Figure 2: Plan View of Mineral Resource Estimate Vein Wireframes at the Quebradillas Mine

Mineral Resources Summary

Indicated Mineral Resources are estimated at 1,197,000 tonnes (“t”) grading 280 g/t Ag.Eq* (187 g/t

Ag, 0.10 g/t Au, 1.56% Pb, 1.69% Zn) which equates to 7.2 million ounces (“ Moz”) Ag, 3,900 ounces

(“oz”) Au, 18,600 t Pb, and 20,300 t Zn or 10.8 Moz Ag.Eq.

Inferred Mineral Resources are estimated at 1,988,000 t grading 255 g/t Ag.Eq (175 g/t Ag, 0.12 g/t

Au, 1.27% Pb, 1.42% Zn) which equates to 11.2 Moz Ag, 7,700 oz Au, 25,300 t Pb, and 28,200 t Zn

or 16.3 Moz Ag.Eq.

The Updated Mineral Resource Estimate includes an additional 138 core boreholes, totaling 18,626

m, as well as an exhaustive reinterpretation of the mineralized structures, completed after the

acquisition of La Parrilla in August 2023. The increased inform ation and understanding of the

geological framework resulted in an increase of 74% of the interpreted mineralization volume, which

includes 23 additional mineralized structures to the 22 reported mineralized structures in 2023 (Figures

1 & 2).

The Mineral Resource estimation process at La Parrilla is aligned with generally accepted CIM

Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practices Guidelines (November 2019) .

The Independent qualified person ( QP) has applied particular care in the incorporation of the

reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction (“RPEEE”) to Mineral Resources. The QP used

a stope optimizer to identify those portions of the block model that can be reasonably expected to be

extracted using selective underground mining methods.

Table 1 represents the Mineral Resource Statement for the La Parrilla Mine , effective December 31,

2024.

Figure 3 summarizes the contained metal (Ag.Eq) changes in the Mineral Resources Statement from

2023 to 2024. Additional drilling in 2023 and 2024 confirmed the continuity of vein mineralization,

increasing the Indicated Resources Ag.Eq metal content by 107% and increasing Inferred Resources

by 22%. respectively. The 23 newly interpreted mineralized structures, enhanced by new drilling and

a thorough review of the legacy First Majestic Silver Mineral Resources database, contributed an

additional 22% and 44% to the Ag.Eq metal content in Indicated and Inferred Resources, respectively.

Since 2023, the Company has collected significant specific gravity (SG) data, improving confidence in

the in-situ density of mineralization in oxidized and sulphide materials, distinct from host rock density.

This update has increased the estimated Ag -Eq metal content by over 10%, though these gains are

largely offset by updated cut -off grades. Refreshed RPEEE criteria, with revised costs, metal prices

and optimization parameters, led to slight reduction of 15% and 10% in the Ag -Eq metal content of

Indicated and Inferred Resources, respectively.

Table 1 : Mineral Resource Statement *, La Parrilla Mine, Durango, Mexico. SRK Consulting

(Canada) Inc., December 31, 2024.

Category &

Mineral

Type Mine

Quantity

(kt)

Grade Contained Metal

Silver Gold Lead Zinc Ag-Eq Silver Gold Lead Zinc Ag.Eq

(g/t) (g/t) (%) (%) (g/t) (koz) (koz) (kt) (kt) (koz)

Indicated Mineral Resource

Oxides

Rosarios 17 636 0.07 0.00 0.00 643 341 0.0 0.0 0.0 345

San Marcos 100 253 0.16 0.00 0.00 269 818 0.5 0.0 0.0 867

Quebradillas 0.4 188 0.10 0.00 0.00 197 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 3

Subtotal Indicated

Oxides 117 308 0.15 0.00 0.00 322 1,162 0.6 0.0 0.0 1,215

Sulphides

Rosarios 476 157 0.13 1.53 1.38 243 2,403 2.1 7.3 6.6 3,723

San Marcos 73 302 0.17 1.13 0.83 367 708 0.4 0.8 0.6 861

Quebradillas 531 172 0.05 1.99 2.47 291 2,926 0.9 10.5 13.1 4,966

Subtotal Indicated

Sulphides 1,079 174 0.10 1.73 1.88 275 6,037 3.4 18.6 20.3 9,550

Total Indicated

Resources 1,197 187 0.10 1.56 1.69 280 7,199 3.9 18.6 20.3 10,765

Inferred Mineral Resource

Oxides

Rosarios 22 297 0.08 0.00 0.00 304 207 0.1 0.0 0.0 212

San Marcos 220 281 0.14 0.00 0.00 294 1,988 1.0 0.0 0.0 2,080

Quebradillas 17 221 0.09 0.00 0.00 229 123 0.0 0.0 0.0 128

Subtotal Inferred Oxides 259 278 0.13 0.00 0.00 290 2,318 1.1 0.0 0.0 2,419

Sulphides

Rosarios 864 144 0.13 1.46 1.33 228 4,009 3.7 12.6 11.5 6,319

San Marcos 151 220 0.22 1.09 0.69 284 1,071 1.1 1.7 1.0 1,383

Quebradillas 714 164 0.08 1.54 2.20 268 3,772 1.9 11.0 15.7 6,149

Subtotal Inferred

Sulphides 1,729 159 0.12 1.46 1.63 249 8,852 6.7 25.3 28.2 13,850

Total Inferred

Resources 1,988 175 0.12 1.27 1.42 255 11,169 7.7 25.3 28.2 16,269

*(1) Block model estimates audited by David F. Machuca -Mory, PhD, PEng, Principal Consultant (Geostatistics), SRK

Consulting Canada Inc.

(2) Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.

(3) Mineral Resources have been classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and

Petroleum ("CIM") Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves.

(4) All figures rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates.

(5) Reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction were considered by applying appropriate cut -off grades,

removing unrecoverable portions of the estimates, and reporting within potentially mineable shapes.

(6) Metal prices considered were US$24.00 /oz Ag, US$2,000 /oz Au, US$1.00 /lb Pb and US$1.35 /lb zinc.

(7) Cut-off grade considered for oxide and sulphide block model estimates were, respectively 165 g/t Ag -Eq and 145 g/t

Ag-Eq. They are based on 2017 costs adjusted by the inflation rate and include sustaining costs.

(8) Metallurgical recovery used for oxides based on weighted 2015-2017 actuals was 70.1% for silver and 82.8% for gold

(9) Metallurgical recovery used for sulphides based on weighted 2015-2017 actuals was 79.6% for silver, 80.1% for gold,

74.7% for lead and 58.8% for zinc.

(10) Metal payable applied was 99.6% for silver and 95% for gold in doré produced from oxides.

(11) Metal payable applied was 95% for silver, gold, and lead and 85% for zinc in concentrates produced from sulphides

(12) Silver equivalent grade is estimated as: Ag.Eq = Ag Grade + [ (Au Grade x Au Recovery x Au Payable x Au Price /

31.1035) + (Pb Grade x Pb Recovery x Pb Payable x Pb Price x 2204.62) + (Zn Grade x Zn Recovery x Zn Payable

x Zn Price x 2204.62)] / (Ag Recovery x Ag Payable x Ag Price / 31.1035)

(13) Tonnage is expressed in thousands of tonnes; metal content is expressed in thousands of ounces or thousands of

tonnes

(14) Totals may not add up due to rounding

Figure 3: Reconciliation between the 2023 and 2024 Mineral Resources Statements of the La

Parrilla Mine

Sensitivity Analysis

In addition to the base case scenario presented in Table 1, Table s 2 through Table 5 below, provide

sensitivity analyses which demonstrate the variation in grade, tonnage and contained metal for the

Updated Mineral Resource estimate at various cut-off grades for both sulphide and oxide material at

La Parrilla. The sensitivity analysis shows the resiliency of the Mineral Resource to changes in the cut-

off grade, which reflect the operating cost and metal pricing environment.

Table 2: La Parrilla Silver Mine – Block Model Quantities and Grade Estimates(*) at Various Cut-

Off Grades for Indicated Oxide Material (SRK, 2024)

Cut-off

Grade

Ag.Eq (g/t)

Quantity

(kt)

Grade Metal Content

Silver

(g/t)

Gold

(g/t)

Ag.Eq

(g/t)

Silver

(koz)

Gold

(koz)

Ag.Eq

(koz)

135 163 263 0.15 277 1,379 0.8 1,454

140 155 270 0.15 284 1,343 0.7 1,414

145 148 276 0.15 290 1,311 0.7 1,379

150 140 283 0.15 297 1,274 0.7 1,339

160 124 300 0.15 314 1,196 0.6 1,252

165 117 308 0.15 322 1,162 0.6 1,215

170 110 317 0.15 331 1,125 0.5 1,174

180 98 336 0.14 349 1,054 0.5 1,096

190 86 356 0.14 370 984 0.4 1,020

200 78 373 0.14 386 934 0.4 967

210 69 394 0.14 407 873 0.3 901

(*) Figures in this table should not be misconstrued for a Mineral Resource Statement. The figures are only presented to show the

sensitivity of the block model estimates to the selection of a cut-off grade.

Table 3: La Parrilla Silver Mine – Block Model Quantities and Grade Estimates(*) at Various Cut-

Off Grades for Indicated Sulphide Material (SRK, 2024)

Cut-off

Grade

Ag.Eq

(g/t)

Quantity

(kt)

Grade Metal Content

Silver

(g/t)

Gold

(g/t)

Lead

(%)

Zinc

(%)

Ag.Eq

(g/t)

Silver

(koz)

Gold

(koz)

Lead

(kt)

Zinc

(kt)

Ag.Eq

(kozt)

120 1,255 161 0.10 1.60 1.74 255 6,494 3.9 20.1 21.9 10,303

125 1,219 164 0.10 1.62 1.77 259 6,411 3.8 19.8 21.5 10,159

130 1,185 166 0.10 1.65 1.79 263 6,327 3.7 19.5 21.2 10,022

135 1,151 169 0.10 1.67 1.82 267 6,235 3.6 19.3 20.9 9,873

140 1,115 171 0.10 1.70 1.85 271 6,142 3.5 18.9 20.6 9,715

145 1,079 174 0.10 1.73 1.88 275 6,037 3.4 18.6 20.3 9,550

150 1,044 177 0.10 1.75 1.91 279 5,933 3.2 18.3 19.9 9,383

160 979 182 0.10 1.81 1.96 288 5,734 3.1 17.7 19.2 9,057

165 946 185 0.10 1.84 1.99 292 5,622 3.0 17.4 18.9 8,880

170 906 189 0.10 1.87 2.03 298 5,489 2.8 16.9 18.4 8,664

180 842 195 0.10 1.93 2.09 307 5,268 2.6 16.3 17.6 8,301

(*) Figures in this table should not be misconstrued for a Mineral Resource Statement. The figures are only presented to show the

sensitivity of the block model estimates to the selection of a cut-off grade.

Table 4: La Parrilla Silver Mine – Block Model Quantities and Grade Estimates(*) at Various Cut-

Off Grades for Inferred Oxide Material (SRK, 2024)

Cut-off

Grade

Ag.Eq (g/t)

Quantity

(kt)

Grade Metal Content

Silver

(g/t)

Gold

(g/t)

Ag.Eq

(g/t)

Silver

(koz)

Gold

(koz)

Ag.Eq

(koz)

135 376 235 0.12 246 2,843 1.5 2,983

140 355 241 0.12 253 2,756 1.4 2,889

145 334 248 0.12 260 2,667 1.3 2,793

150 315 255 0.13 267 2,584 1.3 2,704

160 277 270 0.13 282 2,406 1.1 2,514

165 259 278 0.13 290 2,318 1.1 2,419

170 238 289 0.13 301 2,210 1.0 2,305

180 209 306 0.13 319 2,059 0.9 2,141

190 187 322 0.13 334 1,938 0.8 2,010

200 166 340 0.13 352 1,816 0.7 1,881

210 147 359 0.13 371 1,699 0.6 1,754

(*) Figures in this table should not be misconstrued for a Mineral Resource Statement. The figures are only presented to show the

sensitivity of the block model estimates to the selection of a cut-off grade.

Table 5: La Parrilla Silver Mine – Block Model Quantities and Grade Estimates(*) at Various Cut-

Off Grades for Inferred Sulphide Material (SRK, 2024)

Cut-off

Grade

Ag.Eq

(g/t)

Quantity

(kt)

Grade Metal Content

Silver

(g/t)

Gold

(g/t)

Lead

(%)

Zinc

(%)

Ag.Eq

(g/t)

Silver

(koz)

Gold

(koz)

Lead

(kt)

Zinc

(kt)

Ag.Eq

(kozt)

120 2,112 145 0.12 1.34 1.49 228 9,867 8.0 28.2 31.4 15,493

125 2,030 148 0.12 1.36 1.52 232 9,669 7.7 27.6 30.8 15,171

130 1,955 151 0.12 1.38 1.54 236 9,479 7.5 27.1 30.2 14,859

135 1,884 153 0.12 1.41 1.57 240 9,283 7.2 26.5 29.6 14,551

140 1,799 157 0.12 1.44 1.60 245 9,057 6.9 25.8 28.8 14,175

145 1,729 159 0.12 1.46 1.63 249 8,852 6.7 25.3 28.2 13,850

150 1,649 163 0.12 1.49 1.66 254 8,620 6.4 24.6 27.3 13,465

160 1,501 169 0.12 1.54 1.71 264 8,169 5.9 23.2 25.7 12,724

165 1,431 173 0.12 1.57 1.74 269 7,944 5.6 22.5 24.9 12,351

170 1,368 176 0.12 1.60 1.77 273 7,733 5.4 21.9 24.2 12,012

180 1,227 184 0.12 1.66 1.83 284 7,253 4.8 20.3 22.5 11,211

(*) Figures in this table should not be misconstrued for a Mineral Resource Statement. The figures are only presented to show the

sensitivity of the block model estimates to the selection of a cut-off grade.

A technical report is being prepared to support the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate in accordance

with NI 43-101 and will be available on the Company's website and SEDAR within 45 days of the date

of this release

Quality Assurance / Quality Control

Silver Storm uses a quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program that monitors the chain of

custody of samples and includes the insertion of blanks, duplicates, and reference standards in each

batch of samples sent for analysis. The drill core is phot ographed, logged, and cut in half, with one

half retained in a secured location for verification purposes and one half shipped for analysis. Sample

preparation (crushing and pulverizing) is performed at ALS Geochemistry, an independent ISO

9001:2001 certif ied laboratory, in Zacatecas, Mexico and pulps are sent to ALS Geochemistry in

Vancouver, Canada for analysis. The entire sample is crushed to 70% passing -2 mm, and a riffle split

of 250 grams is taken and pulverized to better than 85% passing 75 microns. Samples are analyzed

for gold using a standard fire assay with Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) (Au-AA23) from a 30-

gram pulp. Gold assays greater than 10 g/t are re -analyzed on a 30 -gram pulp by fire assay with a

gravimetric finish (Au -GRA21). Samples are also analyzed using a 34 element inductively coupled

plasma (ICP) method with atomic emission spectroscopy (AES) on a pulp digested by four acids (ME-

ICP61). Overlimit sample values for silver (>100 g/t), lead (>1%), zinc (>1%), and copper (>1%) are

re-assayed using a four-acid digestion overlimit method with ICP -AES (ME-OG62). For silver values

greater than 1,500 g/t, samples are re-assayed using a fire assay with gravimetric finish on a 30-gram

pulp (Ag-GRA21). Samples with lead values over 20% are re-assayed using volumetric titration with

EDTA on a 1-gram pulp (Pb-VOL70). No QA/QC issues were noted with the 2023-24 drill results.

From 2007 to 2012, First Majestic Silver (“ FMS”) implemented a quality control program to evaluate

silver assay results from La Parrilla Laboratory for chip and core samples by submitting one core

sample for every 20 original samples to Inspectorate in Reno, Nevada for duplicate check assaying.

Check assays of channel samples were performed by SGS Durango. From 2013 to 2014, quality

control samples included duplicates, in-house standard reference materials (SRMs) and blanks, with

an overall quality control insertion rate of about 5%. The quality control procedure was updated in

2015 to include quarter core field duplicates, coarse and pulp duplicates, certified reference materials

(CRMs) and blanks, with an overall quality control insertion rate of about 16%.

In the opinion of the Independent QP, the quality of the analytical data collected for silver, gold, lead

and zinc from San Marcos, Rosarios, and Quebradillas resource areas is sufficiently reliable to support

Mineral Resource estimation. Sample preparatio n, analysis, and security by Silver Storm and FMS

are generally performed in accordance with industry best practice standards.

In the opinion of the Independent QP, a reasonable level of verification has been completed and no

material issues would have been left unidentified from the verification programs undertaken. Drill data

are typically verified prior to Mineral Resource esti mation through software program checks,

comparison to original hard copy data, and peer review. The quality of the drill data is sufficiently

reliable to support Mineral Resource estimation.

Qualified Person

The Independent Qualified Person for the Mineral Resource Estimate disclosure is Dr. David

Machuca-Mory, PEng, of SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., who has reviewed and approved the contents

of this release. In accordance with NI 43 -101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, Bruce

Robbins, PGeo, is the Qualified Person for the Company and has validated and approved the technical

and scientific content of this news release.

Information Concerning Estimates of Mineral Resources

The scientific and technical information in this news release was prepared in accordance with NI 43 -

101 which differs significantly from the requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

(the “SEC”). The terms "Measured Mineral Resource", "Indicated Mineral Resource" and "Inferred

Mineral Resource" used in this news release are in reference to the mining terms defined in the

Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Standards (the “CIM Definition Standards”),

which definitions hav e been adopted by NI 43 -101. Accordingly, information contained in this news

release providing descriptions of our mineral deposits in accordance with NI 43 -101 may not be

comparable to similar information made public by other U.S. companies subject to the United States

federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

You are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of Mineral Resources will ever be converted into

Reserves. Pursuant to CIM Definition Standards, “Inferred Mineral Resources” are that part of a

Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality a re estimated on the basis of limited

geological evidence and sampling. Such geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify

geological and grade or quality continuity. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of

confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and can not be converted to a Mineral

Reserve. However, it is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be

upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration. Under Canadian reporting

guidelines, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre -

feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of

an Inferred Mineral Resource is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of “contained ounces” in

a Mineral Resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC normally

only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute “Reserves” by SEC standards as

in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures.

Canadian standards, including the CIM Definition Standards and NI 43 -101, differ significantly from

standards in the SEC Industry Guide 7. Effective February 25, 2019, the SEC adopted new mining

disclosure rules under subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as

amended (the “SEC Modernization Rules”), with compliance required for the first fiscal year beginning

on or after January 1, 2021. The SEC Modernization Rules replace the historical property disclosure

requirements included in SEC Industry Guide 7. As a result of the adoption of the SEC Modernization

Rules, the SEC now recognizes estimates of “Measured Mineral Resources”, “Indicated Mineral

Resources” and “Inferred Mineral Resources”. Information regarding Mineral Resources contained or