Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

SVM.TO ·

Silvercorp Reports Results of Its 2017-2018 Exploration Tunneling and Drilling Programs at the Tlp and LME Mines

Exploration Programs

1

NEWS RELEASE

Trading Symbol: TSX: SVM

NYSE American: SVM

SILVERCORP REPORTS RESULTS OF ITS 2017-2018 EXPLORATION TUNNELING AND

DRILLING PROGRAMS AT THE TLP and LME MINES, YING MINING DISTRICT, CHINA

VANCOUVER, British Columbia – June 18, 2018 – Silvercorp Metals Inc. ("Silvercorp” or the

“Company”) (TSX:SVM ; NYSE American: SVM) is pleased to repo rt results of its exploration

programs from July 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018 at the TLP and LME mines, Ying Mining District,

Henan Province, China. Results over the same period for the SGX mine in the Ying Mining District

were reported on June 8, 2018.

During the nine month period, t he Company completed 27,687 meters (“m”) of underground

diamond drilling with 6 underground rigs from current production levels and 9,832m of

exploration tunneling between elevation Levels 500m and 1,070 m. Results of underground

drilling continuously extended the major mineralized vein structures along strike and downdip

and exploration tunneling exposed high grade mineralization zones within major production

vein structures.

Highlights of selected mineralization zones exposed in exploration drift tunnels:

 Drift Tunnel PD820-T16E-795-3SYM exposed mineralization of 40m long and 0.87 m wide

(true width) grading 941 grams per tonne (“g/t”) silver (“Ag”), 4.85% lead (“Pb”) and 0.64%

zinc (“Zn”) within vein structure T16E on the 795m level at the TLP mine;

 Drift Tunnel PD820-T11-650-4SYM exposed mineralization of 55m long and 0.74 m wide

(true width) grading 518g/t Ag, 4.76% Pb and 0.35 % Zn within vein structure T11 on the

650m level at the TLP mine; and

 Drift Tunnel PD900-LM5E1-500-51NSYM exposed mineralization of 55m long and 0.61 m

wide (true width) grading 913g/t Ag, 1.60% Pb and 0.59 % Zn within vein structure LM5E1

on the 500m level at the LME mine.

The exploration tunneling, comprising drifting, crosscutting and r aising, was driven along and

across major mineralized vein structures to upgrade drill defined mineral resources and test for

new parallel and splay structures.

The tunneling program s from July 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018 at TLP and LME mines are briefly

summarized in the following table:

2

Major Target Veins

Target

Levels

(m)

Total

Tunneling

(m)

Channel

Samples

Collected

Drift

Tunneling

Included

(m)

Total Mineralization* Exposed by Drift Tunneling

Length

(m)

Average

True

Width

(m)

Ag

(g/t) Pb (%) Zn (%)

TLP Mine

T1, T2, T3, T5, T11,

T14, T16, T21, T22,

T27E, T33W2

510-1070 7,957 2,775 5,031 1,713 0.77 298 3.61 0.39

LME Mine

LM2, LM3, LM5,

LM5E 500-915 1,875 881 1,351 289 0.63 513 1.41 0.48

*Mineralization is defined by silver equivalent value (AgEq) greater than or equal to 120 g/t at TLP and 125 g/t at LME. (Formulae

used for AgEq calculation: TLP=34.1401*Pb%+Ag g/t; LME=34.0436*Pb%+Ag g/t)

Highlights of selected intersections of drill holes:

 Hole ZKGA2202 intersected a 0.59m interval from 24.43m to 25.02m, 0.56m true width, of

vein T14W grading 1022g/t Ag, 1.70% Pb and 0.95% Zn at the 821m elevation at the TLP

mine;

 Hole ZKT2543 intersected a 0.41m interval from 217.91m to 218.32m, 0.41m true wi dth, of

vein T39 grading 402 g/t Ag, 1.81% Pb and 0.39% Zn at the 749m elevation , and a 1.16m

interval from 361.64m to 362.80m, 1.10m true width, of vein T16 at the 691m elevation at

the TLP mine; and

 Hole ZKG0405 intersected a 0.68m interval from 343.32m to 344.00m, 0.60m true width, of

vein LM3 grading 484g/t Ag, 6.38% Pb and 3.20% Zn at the 708m elevation at the LME mine.

The underground drilling program is mainly conducted from the current production lev els to

delineate the downdip and along -strike extensions of known mineralized vein structures in the

production area and test for new veins in the previous less-explored areas.

The d rilling program s from July 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018 at TLP and LME mines are briefly

summarized in the following table:

Major Target Veins

Target

Elevation

(m)

Meters

Drilled

Holes

Completed

Samples

Collected

Holes

with

Assay

Received

Holes

Intercepted

Vein

Structures

Holes

Intercepted

Mineralization

T11, T14, T15, T16,

T16W, T17, T17W,

T22, T39

270-

1,000 19,256 61 962 60* 60 24

LM1, LM2, LM3,

LM5, LM6, LM8,

IM18

0-990 8,431 27 423 27** 27 11

*Including 7 holes completed in the first half of 2017; 8 holes drilled in the first quarter of 2018 with assay pending

**Including 3 holes completed in the first half of 2017; 3 holes drilled in the first quarter of 2018 with assay pending

3

Tables 1 and 2 below list the assay results of some selected mineralized intersections in drill

holes and mineralized zones exposed in drift tunnels in the exploration programs from July 1,

2017 to March 31, 2018.

Table 1: Selected drilling results from the drilling programs at the TLP and LME mines

Hole ID From

(m) To (m) Elevation

(m)

Sample

Length

(m)

True

Width

(m)

Ag (g/t) Pb

(%)

Zn

(%) Vein Remarks

TLP MINE:

ZKT0622 2.17 2.55 955 0.38 0.25 165 1.00 0.47 T16branch Test

ZKT0622 196.58 197.82 905 1.24 0.80 130 0.86 0.21 T11E Test

ZKGA1412 120.00 120.47 839 0.47 0.42 403 0.23 0.22 T16W Test

ZKT1022 78.07 78.39 988 0.32 0.20 1,368 5.58 0.76 T16 Stepout

ZKT1023 148.48 149.06 898 0.58 0.58 100 1.03 0.32 T11E Test

ZKG0426 74.73 75.06 636 0.33 0.30 254 0.97 0.09 T17 Test

ZKT2914 167.37 168.33 773 0.96 0.95 132 1.34 0.49 T39W Test

ZKG0626 242.32 242.73 429 0.41 0.38 14 3.72 1.30 T15W Test

248.59 249.09 423 0.50 0.45 32 8.38 0.83 T11 Stepout

ZKT2915 203.89 204.50 713 0.61 0.58 70 20.80 0.43 T39 Test

248.08 249.08 686 1.00 0.95 67 1.54 0.58 T39E Test

ZKG0224 212.42 213.00 512 0.58 0.43 20 4.01 0.68 T11 Stepout

ZKT0623 51.63 52.28 954 0.65 0.59 156 2.14 1.05 T5E Test

ZKT0824 29.72 30.07 969 0.35 0.35 210 3.89 0.12 T5E2 Test

ZKT2916 570.50 571.39 412 0.89 0.79 196 4.64 0.02 T15W Test

ZKT2543 217.91 218.32 749 0.41 0.41 402 1.81 0.39 T39 Test

361.64 362.80 691 1.16 1.10 130 8.98 0.05 T16 Stepout

ZKG0225 238.81 239.23 451 0.42 0.30 42 4.36 0.59 T11 Stepout

ZKT2544 306.48 307.37 648 0.89 0.81 176 4.57 0.32 T16W Test

ZKTA2101 37.57 38.01 918 0.44 0.41 97 2.45 0.72 T22E3 Test

ZKG0228 73.78 74.38 632 0.60 0.48 33 3.94 0.28 T17 Test

ZKG0229 122.49 122.99 585 0.50 0.33 408 7.17 0.69 T17W Test

ZKG0427 132.53 133.51 544 0.98 0.65 115 0.41 0.03 T17 Stepout

ZKT3324 213.69 214.06 716 0.37 0.33 149 0.04 0.13 T39 Test

ZKG0230 207.47 207.89 592 0.42 0.20 31 2.44 0.08 T17W Test

ZKG0628 30.36 30.69 634 0.33 0.25 321 1.01 0.15 T16Wbranch Test

111.51 112.05 581 0.54 0.41 135 6.54 0.17 T17 Stepout

ZKGA2202 24.43 25.02 821 0.59 0.56 1,022 1.70 0.95 T14W Test

LME MINE

ZKL5423 296.00 296.34 226 0.34 0.24 24 1.55 2.74 LM6E Test

497.66 498.30 39 0.64 0.44 192 1.35 1.45 LM5E2 Test

ZKG0405 343.32 344.00 708 0.68 0.60 484 6.38 3.20 LM3 Test

ZKG1431 328.63 330.09 635 1.46 0.54 76 2.34 0.30 LM1 Test

360.50 361.01 617 0.51 0.27 1,655 6.32 2.66 LM18 Test

ZKL6803 250.15 250.56 447 0.41 0.35 52 1.64 0.61 LM5 Stepout

274.20 275.14 428 0.94 0.79 186 0.70 0.29 LM5E Stepout

ZKL7202 218.32 218.71 494 0.39 0.33 277 1.52 0.73 LM5 Stepout

248.46 248.95 472 0.49 0.42 99 1.03 0.12 LM5E Stepout

4

ZKL7203 48.97 50.13 614 1.16 1.88 133 1.39 0.09 LM6W Test

250.79 251.73 443 0.94 0.73 88 0.44 0.24 LM5 Stepout

274.78 275.40 422 0.62 0.48 69 1.49 0.30 LM5E Stepout

ZKL1201 73.05 73.57 637 0.52 0.52 471 0.14 0.04 LM2_2 Test

110.12 110.50 627 0.38 0.38 17 2.22 2.68 LM2branch Test

ZKL6804 420.80 421.18 275 0.38 0.29 80 5.76 1.82 LM5E2 Test

ZKL1202 88.30 88.75 612 0.45 0.44 686 1.06 0.09 LM2_2 Test

178.40 178.80 566 0.40 0.39 51 12.94 0.69 LM2 Test

ZKL5951 190.03 193.84 691 3.81 3.40 69 3.85 0.18 LM3 Test

*Test: intersections in open areas without known mineralization for new resource delineation

**Stepout: intersections adjacent to existing resource blocks for resource expansion

Table 2: Selected mineralized zones exposed by drift tunneling at the TLP and LME mines

Tunnel ID Target

Vein

Level

(m)

Length

(m)

True Width

(m) Ag (g/t) Pb (%) Zn (%)

TLP MINE PD1070-T2-1070-4SYM T2 1070 40 1.17 151 1.97 0.10

PD930-T2W1-930-S1-Extension T2 930 42 1.02 372 2.23 0.29

PD730-T2-610-31NYM T2 610 154 0.64 130 3.91 0.17

PD800-T3-800-35SNYM T3 800 30 1.12 181 2.34 0.14

PD800-T3-800-35NYM T3 800 30 0.53 112 3.62 0.32

PD730-T3-665-21SYM T3 665 45 0.67 14 4.63 0.16

PD1070-T5-1070-5NYM T5 1070 35 0.72 128 5.28 0.12

PD820-T11-650-4NYM T11 650 85 1.06 199 5.36 0.66

PD820-T11-650-4SYM T11 650 55 0.74 518 4.76 0.35

PD820-T14-755-2NYM T14 755 45 0.59 105 3.00 0.23

PD820-T14-755-1NYM T14 755 65 0.96 357 3.85 0.60

PD820-T14-755-2SYM T14 755 70 0.44 173 4.28 0.24

PD840-T14E-840-15SYM T14E 840 45 0.75 165 7.49 0.58

PD800-T14E-800-23SYM T14E 800 35 0.66 160 3.51 0.27

PD960-T16E-960-8NSYM T16 960 98 0.50 356 3.12 0.39

PD820-T16-795-3NYM T16 795 30 0.58 392 1.65 0.68

PD820-T16-755-3NYM T16 755 50 0.93 610 1.59 1.03

PD846-T16E-846-7SNYM T16E 846 35 0.50 1,012 2.93 0.43

PD820-T16E-795-3SYM T16E 795 40 0.87 941 4.85 0.64

PD820-T16-755-3NYM T16E 755 30 1.02 372 4.43 0.67

PD960-T27E-990-14NYM T27E 990 38 0.60 89 2.92 0.12

PD960-T27E-960-12NYM T27E 960 30 0.67 117 4.84 0.27

PD960-T27E-960-12SYM T27E 960 45 0.62 48 4.87 0.16

PD800-T31-800-A23SNYM T31 800 45 0.91 129 2.85 0.24

PD960-T33W1-990-N1MW T33W 990 45 0.29 244 1.20 0.11

PD960-T33W2-990-17SYM T33W2 990 72 1.09 435 2.12 0.23

LME MINE

PD900-LM5-615-58NYM LM5 600 24 1.54 271 1.82 0.48

PD900-LM5-500-50SYM LM5 500 60 0.53 423 1.16 0.58

PD900-LM5-750-66NYM LM5E 750 25 0.58 363 0.51 0.19

5

PD900-LM5E1-500-51NSYM LM5E1 500 55 0.61 913 1.60 0.59

PD838-LM6-845-50SYM LM6 845 35 0.44 207 0.80 0.25

Quality Control

Drill cores are NQ size. Drill core samples, limited by apparent mineralization contact or

shear/alteration contact, were split into halves by saw cutting. The half cores are stored in the

Company's core shacks for future reference and checking, and the ot her half core samples are

shipped in security sealed bags to the Chengde Huakan 514 Geology and Minerals Test and

Research Institute in Chengde, Hebei Province, China, 226 km northeast of Beijing, a nd the

Zhengzhou Nonferrous Exploration Institute Lab in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China. Both labs

are ISO9000 certified analytical labs. For analysis the sample is dried and crushed to minus 1mm

and then split to a 200 -300g subsample which is further pulverized to minus 200 mesh. Two

subsamples are prepared from the pulverized sample. One is digested with aqua regia for gold

analysis with AAS, and the other is digested with two -acids for analysis of silver, lead, zinc and

copper with AAS.

Channel samples are collected along sample lines perpendicular to the mineralized vein

structure in exploration tunnels. Spacing between sampling lines is typically 5m along strike.

Both the mineralized vein and the altered wall rocks are cut with continuous chis el chipping.

Sample length ranges from 0.2m to more than 1m, depending on the width of the mineralized

vein and the mineralization type. Channel samples are prepared and assayed with AAS at

Silvercorp’s mine laboratory (Ying Lab) located at the mill comple x in Luoning County, Henan

Province, China. The Ying lab is officially accredited by the Quality and Technology Monitoring

Bureau of Henan Province and is qualified to provide analytical service. The channel samples are

dried, crushed and pulverized. A 200 g sample of minus 160 mesh is prepared for assay. A

duplicate sample of minus 1mm is made and kept at the laboratory archives. Gold is analysed by

fire assay with AAS finish, and silver, lead, zinc and copper are assayed by two-acid digestion

with AAS finish.

A routine quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedure is adopted to monitor the

analytical quality at each lab. Certified reference materials (CRM s), pulp duplicates and blanks

are inserted into each lab batch of samples. QA/QC data at the lab are attached to the assay

certificates for each batch of samples.

The Company maintains its own comprehensive QA/QC program to ensure best practice s in

sample preparation and analysis of the exploration samples. Project geologists regularly insert

CRM, field duplicates and blanks to each batch of 30 core samples to monitor the sample

preparation and analysis procedures at the labs. The analytical quality of the labs is further

evaluated with external checks by sending about 3-5% of the pulp samples to higher level labs to

check for lab bias.

Data from both the Company's and the labs' QA/QC programs are reviewed on a timely basis by

project geologists.

6

Ruijin Jiang, P. Geo, reviewed the exploration data and prepared t he scientific and technical

information regarding exploration results contained herein . Guoliang Ma, P. Geo., Manager of

Exploration and Resource of the Company, is the Qualified Person for Silvercorp under NI 43-101

and has reviewed and given consent to the technical information contained in this news release.

About Silvercorp

Silvercorp is a low-cost silver-producing Canadian mining company with multiple mines in China.

The Company’s vision is to deliver shareholder value by focusing on the acquisition of under

developed projects with resource potential and the ability to grow organically. For more

information, please visit our website at www.silvercorp.ca.

For further information

Lorne Waldman

Senior Vice President

Silvercorp Metals Inc.

Phone: (604) 669-9397

Toll Free: 1(888) 224-1881

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.silvercorp.ca

CAUTIONARY DISCLAIMER - FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain of the statements and information in this press release constitute “forward -looking

statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of

1995 and “forward -looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian provincial

securities laws. Any statements or information that express or involve discussions with respect

to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events

or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”,

“anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes ”, “intends”, “strategies”,

“targets”, “goals”, “forecasts”, “objectives”, “budgets”, “schedules”, “potential” or variations

thereof or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or

“will” be taken, occur or be achieve d, or the negative of any of these terms and similar

expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward -looking statements or

information. Forward -looking statements or information relate to, among other things: the

price of silver and other metals; the accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates

at the Company’s material properties; the sufficiency of the Company’s capital to finance the

Company’s operations; estimates of the Company’s revenues and capital expenditures;

estimated production from the Company’s mines in the Ying Mining District; timing of receipt of

permits and regulatory approvals; availability of funds from production to finance the

Company’s operations; and access to and availability of funding for future construction, use of

proceeds from any financing and development of the Company’s properties.

Forward-looking statements or information are subject to a variety of known and unknown

risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from

7

those reflected in the forward -looking statements or information, including, without limitation,

risks relating to: fluctuating commodity prices; calculation of resources, reserves and

mineralization and precious and base metal recov ery; interpretations and assumptions of

mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates; exploration and development programs;

feasibility and engineering reports; permits an d licenses; title to properties; property interests;

joint venture partners; acqui sition of commercially mineable mineral rights; financing; recent

market events and conditions; economic factors affecting the Company; timing, estimated

amount, capital and operating expenditures and economic returns of future production;

integration of f uture acquisitions into the Company’s existing operations; competition;

operations and political conditions; regulatory environment in China and Canada;

environmental risks; foreign exchange rate fluctuations; insurance; risks and hazards of mining

operations; key personnel; conflicts of interest; dependence on management; internal control

over financial reporting as per the requirements of the Sarbanes -Oxley Act; and bringing actions

and enforcing judgments under U.S. securities laws.

This list is not e xhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward -looking

statements or information. Forward -looking statements or information are statements about

the future and are inherently uncertain, and actual achievements of the Company or other

future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward -looking

statements or information due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including,

without limitation, those referred to in the Company’s Annual In formation Form for the year

ended March 31, 2017 under the heading “Risk Factors”. Although the Company has attempted

to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be

other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated, described or intended.

Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward -looking statements or

information.

The Company’s forward -looking statements and information are based on the assumptions,

beliefs, expectations and opinions of management as of the date of this press release, and other

than as required by applicable securities laws, the Company does not assume any obligation to

update forward -looking statements and information if circumstances or manageme nt’s

assumptions, beliefs, expectations or opinions should change, or changes in any other events

affecting such statements or information. For the reasons set forth above, investors should not

place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and information.