Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

SVM.TO ·

Silvercorp Reports Intersection of 4.48 Meters True Width Grading 1,050 Grams PER Tonne Silver and 15.92% Lead at the Sgx MINE

Drill Results

1

NEWS RELEASE

Trading Symbol: TSX: SVM

NYSE AMERICAN: SVM

SILVERCORP REPORTS INTERSECTION OF 4.48 METERS TRUE WIDTH GRADING 1,050

GRAMS PER TONNE SILVER AND 15.92% LEAD AT THE SGX MINE, YING MINING DISTRICT,

CHINA

VANCOUVER, British Columbia – August 15, 2017 – Silvercorp Metals Inc. ("Silvercorp” or the

“Company”) (TSX:SVM / NYSE AMERICAN: SVM) is pleased to repo rt the results of the first half

of its 2017 exploration program at the SGX mine, Ying Mining District, Henan Province, China.

The 2017 exploration program at the SGX mine consists of underground drilling and tunneling.

As of June 30, 2017, t he Company completed 13,201 meters (“m”) of underground diamond

drilling with 7 underground rigs and 10,531m of exploration tunneling . Results of the

underground drilling and drift tunneling continuously extended the major mineralized vein

structures along strike and downdip.

Highlights of selected intersections of drill holes:

 Hole ZK13AS7-1004 intersected a 5.85m interval from 78.36m to 84.21m, 4.48m true width,

of vein S19 W grading 1,050 grams per tonne (“g/t”) silver (“Ag”) , 15.92% lead (“Pb”) and

0.55% zinc (“Zn”) at the 212m elevation , including a n 1.22m interval from 81.91m to

83.13m, 0.93m true width grading 4,678g/t Ag, 63.12% Pb and 1.02% Zn;

 Hole ZK11AS7-1002 intersected a 0.90m interval from 78.88m to 79.78m, 0.78m true width,

of vein S19 grading 2,017g/t Ag, 7.78% Pb and 1.30% Zn at the 243m elevation, and a 0.41m

interval from 148.21m to 148.62m, 0.36m true width, of vein S7-1 grading 185g/t Ag, 36.63%

Pb and 12.07% Zn at the 221m elevation; and

 Hole ZK 15S18005 intersected a n 1.29m interval from 119.40m to 120.69m, 1.02m true

width, of vein S7-2 grading 1,049g/t Ag, 4.53% Pb and 3.12% Zn at the 221m elevation.

Highlights of selected mineralization zones exposed in exploration drift tunnels:

 Drift Tunnel PD16-S31-210-8NSYM exposed mineralization of 150m long and 0.86 m wide

(true width) grading 640 g/t Ag, 7.66 % Pb and 2.08% Zn within vein structure S31 on the

210m level;

2

 Drift Tunnel XPD-S7-1-210-9NYM exposed mineralization of 100m long and 1.01 m wide

(true width) grading 455g/t Ag, 11.84% Pb and 3.25 % Zn within vein structure S7-1 on the

210m level; and

 Drift Tunnel CM105-S2W2-300-74SNYM exposed mineralization of 60m long and 0.70 m

wide (true width) grading 609g/t Ag, 6.53% Pb and 2.79% Zn within vein structure S2W2 on

the 300m level.

The 2017 underground drilling program is mainly conducted from the current production lev els

to delineate the downdip and along -strike extensions of known mineralized vein structures in

the production area and test for new veins in the previous less-explored areas.

The first half of 2017 drilling program at SGX is briefly summarized in the following table:

Major Target Veins

Target

Elevation

(m)

Meters

Drilled

Holes

Completed

Samples

Collected

Holes with

Assay

Received

Holes

Intercepted

Vein

Structures

Holes

Intercepted

Mineralization

S1, S2, S4, S6, S7,

S7-1, S8, S14, S16W,

S18, S19, S30

-102 to 640 13,201 44 1,096 47 47 21

The 2017 e xploration tunneling, comprising drifting, crosscutting and r aising, was driven along

and across major mineralized vein structures to upgrade drill defined mineral resources and test

for new parallel and splay structures.

The first half of 2017 tunneling program at SGX is briefly summarized in the following table:

Major Target Veins

Target

Levels

(m)

Total

Tunneling

(m)

Channel

Samples

Collected

Drift

Tunneling

Included

(m)

Total Mineralization Exposed by Drift

Tunneling

Length

(m)

Average

True Width

(m)

Ag

(g/t)

Pb

(%)

Zn

(%)

S2, S2W, S7, S7-1, S8,

S14, S16W, S19, S21,

S22, S28, S31, S32

120-680 10,531 2,810 4,242 2,059 0.68 372 7.00 2.45

Tables 1 and 2 below list the assay results of some selected mineralized intersections in drill

holes and mineralized zones exposed in drift tunnels in the first half of 2017 exploration

program.

3

Table 1: Selected drilling results from the 2017 drilling program at the SGX mine

Hole ID From

(m) To (m) Elevation

(m)

Interval

(m)

True

Width

(m)

Ag (g/t) Pb

(%)

Zn

(%) Veins Remarks

ZK13S18002 81.43 81.99 656 0.56 0.39 155 1.39 3.46 S19Branch Test*

ZK13S8008 288.93 289.78 102 0.85 0.59 125 1.83 0.45 S8 Test

ZK13AS7-1002 66.937 69.262 249 2.33 2.13 462 15.02 0.28 S19 Infill**

90.268 91.093 242 0.83 0.76 152 0.15 1.63 S7_3 Test

ZK11AS18003 108.73 110.73 636 2.00 1.31 402 2.54 2.42 S19 Infill

ZK10AS19002 2.46 3.15 262 0.69 0.38 1,300 2.68 2.19 S22 Infill

175.16 176.45 129 1.29 0.77 155 1.46 1.45 S16W1 Test

ZK13S7-1002 55.07 56.67 240 1.60 1.45 558 12.07 0.28 S19W Test

71.64 72.27 232 0.63 0.58 144 1.24 0.11 S19Branch Test

76.42 78.68 230 2.26 2.05 168 1.41 0.04 S19 Stepout***

ZK13AS7-1004 78.36 84.21 212 5.85 4.48 1,050 15.92 0.55 S19W Test

Including 81.91 83.13 210 1.22 0.93 4,678 63.12 1.02

88.33 94.02 205 5.69 4.35 113 0.57 0.31 S19 Stepout

ZK51S29004 79.35 80.50 593 1.15 0.70 110 0.31 0.99

Test

ZK13S7-1004 77.03 80.43 205 3.40 2.20 363 12.18 0.17 S19W Test

Including 78.91 79.41 203 0.50 0.32 2,594 61.56 0.24

ZK4AS19002 211.09 213.70 138 2.61 1.84 162 10.10 0.31 S19 Test

ZK14AS6002 18.99 19.35 170 0.36 0.27 296 0.17 0.39 S1W2Branch Test

228.73 229.06 13 0.33 0.25 175 0.28 1.00 S2W Test

275.47 275.91 -21 0.44 0.36 645 1.75 1.32 S4 Stepout

ZK11AS7-1002 78.88 79.78 243 0.90 0.78 2,017 7.78 1.30 S19 Stepout

145.22 145.49 222 0.27 0.24 369 6.45 7.72 S7_2 Test

148.21 148.62 221 0.41 0.36 185 36.63 12.07 S7_1 Infill

ZK18AS2002 226.32 226.71 232 0.39 0.37 254 0.42 1.74 S6 Test

ZK16S2W203 243.30 243.95 70 0.65 0.51 596 6.94 3.86 S2 Infill

ZK14502 25.07 25.67 168 0.60 0.55 360 0.63 0.51 S1W2 Test

263.57 264.00 19 0.43 0.38 152 8.69 0.35 S2 Stepout

275.16 276.50 11 1.34 1.12 183 3.91 0.19 S4 Test

ZK15S18005 119.40 120.69 221 1.29 1.02 1,049 4.53 3.12 S7_2 Test

*Test: intersections in open areas without known mineralization for new resource delineation ;

**Infill: intersections within known resource blocks for resource upgrade;

***Stepout: intersections adjacent to existing resource blocks for resource expansion;

Table 2: Selected mineralized zones exposed by drift tunneling at the SGX mine

Tunnel ID Target

Vein

Level

(m)

Length

(m)

True

Width

(m)

Ag

(g/t)

Pb

(%)

Zn

(%)

CM105-S2-220-12ASYM S2 220 60 0.63 507 2.68 0.50

CM105-S2-180-12ASYM(Sublevel) S2 180 106 1.05 497 8.60 0.78

PD16-S2W-450-2ANYM S2W 450 37 0.49 284 8.29 1.68

CM105-S2W-300-10SNYM S2W 300 50 0.62 566 9.07 1.92

CM105-S2W2-300-74SNYM S2W2 300 60 0.70 609 6.53 2.79

CM101-S7-1-350-7ASYM S7_1 350 75 0.90 392 11.79 4.58

XPD-S7-1-260-1BSNYM S7_1 260 45 0.49 281 4.81 3.26

XPD-S7-1-210-9SYM S7_1 210 35 0.58 148 2.47 9.42

XPD-S7-1-210-9NYN S7_1 210 100 1.01 455 11.84 3.25

XPD-S8-360-SYM-30TJ(Sublevel) S8 370 35 0.58 39 4.93 0.49

XPD-S8-360-30ANYM S8 360 50 0.58 72 5.87 1.21

YPD02-S8-350-30ASYM S8 350 85 0.59 83 4.39 3.24

PD16-S14-160-4ANYM S14 160 110 0.59 334 4.31 1.05

CM105-S14E-260-16ASNYM S14E 260 50 0.32 76 2.49 2.00

4

CM102-S16E2-570-59SYM S16E2 570 50 0.72 116 1.61 5.49

CM105-S16E2-350-66SYM S16E3 350 45 0.36 492 9.78 0.60

CM105-S16W-260-64NYM S16W 260 35 0.72 171 1.56 2.00

CM105-S16W-210-70SYM S16W 210 30 0.89 66 2.08 2.29

CM101-S22-300-6NYM S22 300 40 0.55 215 11.30 0.30

PD700-S28-450-79SYM S28 450 35 0.64 332 9.53 2.12

PD16-S31-210-8NSYM S31 210 150 0.86 640 7.66 2.08

PD16-S31-160-8NSYM S31 160 91 0.70 369 8.51 1.67

CM108-S32-680-67SYM S32 680 75 0.58 251 3.65 1.40

CM102-S32-570-59SYM S32 570 85 0.78 287 2.21 4.09

CM105-S33E-260-14SYM S33E 260 80 0.45 166 4.30 1.24

Quality Control

Drill cores are NQ size. Drill core samples, limited by apparent mineralization contact or

shear/alteration contact, were split into halves by saw cutting. The half cores are stored in the

Company's core shacks for future reference and checking, and the ot her half core samples are

shipped in security sealed bags to the Chengde Huakan 514 Geology and Minerals Test and

Research Institute in Chengde, Hebei Province, China, 226 km northeast of Beijing, a nd the

Zhenzhou Nonferrous Exploration Institute Lab in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China, and both

labs are ISO9000 certified analytical lab. For analysis the sample is dried and crushed to minus

1mm and then split to a 200 -300g subsample which is further pulverized to minus 200 mesh.

Two subsamples are prepared from the pulverized sample. One is digested with aqua regia for

gold analysis with AAS, and the other is digested with two -acids for analysis of silver, lead, zinc

and copper with AAS.

Channel samples are collected along sample lines perpendicular to the mineralized vein

structure in exploration tunnels. Spacing between sampling lines is typically 5m along strike.

Both the mineralized vein and the altered wall rocks are cut with continuous chisel chipping.

Sample length ranges from 0.2m to more than 1m, depending on the width of the mineralized

vein and the mineralization type. Channel samples are prepared and assayed with AAS at

Silvercorp’s mine laboratory (Ying Lab) located at the mill complex in Luoning County, Henan

Province, China. The Ying lab is officially accredited by the Quality and Technology Monitoring

Bureau of Henan Province and is qualified to provide analytical service. The channel samples are

dried, crushed and pulverized. A 200g sample of minus 160 mesh is prepared for assay. A

duplicate sample of minus 1mm is made and kept at the laboratory archives. Gold is analysed by

fire assay with AAS finish, and silver, lead, zinc and copper are assayed by two-acid digestion

with AAS finish.

A routine quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedure is adopted to monitor the

analytical quality at the lab. Certified reference materials (CRMs), pulp duplicates and blanks are

inserted into each lab batch of samples. QA/QC data at the lab are attached to the assay

certificates for each batch of samples.

The Company maintains its own comprehensive QA/QC program to ensure best practice s in

sample preparation and analysis of the exploration samples. Project geologists regularly insert

CRM, field duplicates and blanks to each batch of core samples to monitor the sample

5

preparation and analysis procedures at the labs. The analytical quality of the labs is further

evaluated with external checks by sending about 3-5% of the pulp samples to higher level labs to

check for lab bias.

Data from both the Company's and the labs' QA/QC programs are reviewed on a timely basis by

project geologists.

Ruijin Jiang, P. Geo , reviewed the exploration data and prepared t he scientific and technical

information regarding exploration results contained herein . Alex Zhang, P. Geo, VP exploration

of the Company, is the Qualified Person on the project as defined under National Instrument 43-

101 and he has verified and approved the contents of this news release.

About Silvercorp

Silvercorp is a low-cost silver-producing Canadian mining company with multiple mines in China.

The Company’s vision is to deliver shareholder value by focusing on the acquisition of under

developed projects with resource potential and the ability to grow organically. For more

information, please visit our website at www.silvercorp.ca.

For further information

Gordon Neal

Vice President, Corporate Development

Silvercorp Metals Inc.

Phone: (604) 669-9397

Toll Free: 1(888) 224-1881

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.silvercorpmetals.com

CAUTIONARY DISCLAIMER - FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain of the statements and information in this press release constitute “forward -looking

statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of

1995 and “forward -looking information” within the meaning of applica ble Canadian provincial

securities laws. Any statements or information that express or involve discussions with respect

to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events

or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”,

“anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategies”,

“targets”, “goals”, “forecasts”, “objectives”, “budgets”, “schedules”, “potential” or variations

thereof or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or

“will” be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and similar

expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward -looking statements or

information. Forward -looking statements or information relate to, among other things: the

price of silver and other metals; the accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates

at the Company’s material properties; the sufficie ncy of the Company’s capital to finance the

Company’s operations; estimates of the Company’s revenues and capital expenditures;

estimated production from the Company’s mines in the Ying Mining District; timing of receipt of

6

permits and regulatory approvals ; availability of funds from production to finance the

Company’s operations; and access to and availability of funding for future construction, use of

proceeds from any financing and development of the Company’s properties.

Forward-looking statements or in formation are subject to a variety of known and unknown

risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from

those reflected in the forward -looking statements or information, including, without limitation,

risks r elating to: fluctuating commodity prices; calculation of resources, reserves and

mineralization and precious and base metal recovery; interpretations and assumptions of

mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates; exploration and development programs;

feasibility and engineering reports; permits an d licenses; title to properties; property interests;

joint venture partners; acquisition of commercially mineable mineral rights; financing; recent

market events and conditions; economic factors affecting the Company; timing, estimated

amount, capital and operating expenditures and economic returns of future production;

integration of future acquisitions into the Company’s existing operations; competition;

operations and political conditions; regulatory envir onment in China and Canada;

environmental risks; foreign exchange rate fluctuations; insurance; risks and hazards of mining

operations; key personnel; conflicts of interest; dependence on management; internal control

over financial reporting as per the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; and bringing actions

and enforcing judgments under U.S. securities laws.

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward -looking

statements or information. Forward -looking statements or information are statements about

the future and are inherently uncertain, and actual achievements of th e Company or other

future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward -looking

statements or information due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including,

without limitation, those referred to in the C ompany’s Annual Information Form for the year

ended March 31, 2017 under the heading “Risk Factors”. Although the Company has attempted

to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be

other factors that cau se results not to be as anticipated, estimated, described or intended.

Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward -looking statements or

information.

The Company’s forward -looking statements and information are based on the assumpti ons,

beliefs, expectations and opinions of management as of the date of this press release, and other

than as required by applicable securities laws, the Company does not assume any obligation to

update forward -looking statements and information if circums tances or management’s

assumptions, beliefs, expectations or opinions should change, or changes in any other events

affecting such statements or information. For the reasons set forth above, investors should not

place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and information.