Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

SOMA.V ·

Para Resources Announces Positive Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Gold Road Mine Pre-Tax NPV of CAD $104m at US $1,200 per Ounce of Gold

Economic Studies

Para Resources Announces Positive Preliminary

Economic Assessment for the Gold Road Mine

Pre-Tax NPV of CAD $104m at US $1,200 per Ounce of Gold

Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - May 1, 2018) - Para Resources Inc. (the "Company" or "Para") (TSXV: PBR)

(WKN: A14YF1) (OTC Pink: PRSRF") is pleased to announce the results of an independent Preliminary Economic Assessment

study ("PEA") under National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101") by RPM Global on the Gold Road mine, in Oatman, Az. The PEA

report will be posted to SEDAR May 2

nd

, 2018.

Gold Road

PEA Highlights

2

Pre-tax Net Present Value ("NPV") at a 5% discount rate of US$81.3 million [CAD$104 million

1

] and Internal Rate of

Return ("IRR") of 238%

Post-Tax NPV at a 5% discount rate of US$56.7 million [CAD$ 73 million] and IRR of 174%

Pre-tax Net Cash Flow of US$104.0 million [CAD$133M

1

]

Undiscounted cash flow after income and mining tax of US$72.9 million

Payback period of 1.5 years

Initial capital of US$5.7 million

Life of Mine ("LOM") of 7 years with 1.1 million tons of potential mill feed at an average diluted grade of 0.19 ounces of

gold per ton [6.5 grams per tonne]

Initial mining rate of 250 tons per day increasing to 500 tons per day in year 3

Total All-in Sustaining Cost of US$632.79 per ounce of gold

Assumed long term price of gold is US$1,200 per ounce

The exchange rate used was US$1.00 equals CAD$1.28.

Geoff Hampson, Para's CEO states, "We are very pleased with the results of the Gold Road PEA and the validation of the

investment thesis we developed when we acquired it. The PEA quantifies the robust returns and strong cash-flow for this project.

The NPV of this project when compared to the current market capitalization of the whole company indicates that our

shareholders will be rewarded for their patience and belief in our business plan. In addition, we consider the analysis by RPM as

a base case and have already developed strategies to quickly ramp up production in 2019 to 500 TPD, increase the head-

grade by developing working faces in historically higher-grade rock and to take advantage of the currently higher price of gold

than was used in the study."

Ian Harris, Para's President states, "The PEA provides the green-light to move forward with a quick restart of the Gold Road

Mine.

Our near-term focus will be on finalizing our startup plan, mine contract bidding, and executing an exploration plan intended

to increase the resources at Gold Road and seek higher-grade material along the TrUe Vein. We plan to re-start operations at

Gold Road in September of 2018 and expect to achieve full production by mid-2019. The PEA reports that the mill and mine

infrastructure is in excellent shape and requires very little in the way of capex. The only major capex is required to install a shaft

and headframe to reduce the cost of extracting material from the mine. We can produce using 20-tonne underground haul trucks

up the 2-mile-long decline while the shaft is under construction."

The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to

have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves, and there is

no certainty that the results included in the PEA will be realized.

If the Company were to bring the Gold Road mine into

production without first establishing mineral reserves supported by a feasibility study, the Company cautions that this could result

in higher risk of economic or technical failure of the operation than if a feasibility study had been prepared demonstrating

economic and technical viability. There are no assurances that the Gold Road mine will be found to be economic.

Mineral Resource Estimate

Resources were supported by 14,768 channel samples. The database contains 19,400 assay data excluding the 16 drill holes

which were not used in the resource estimate. The channel samples were taken within the mined stopes and the development

workings. Channels are spaced every five feet along the drifts.

All the Inferred mineral resources are reported using a 0.1 ounces per ton (opT) Au cutoff, which is roughly the current economic

cutoff. In order to meet the international requirement of reasonable prospect for eventual economic extraction, the mineral

resources quoted in this report are constrained within a maximum vertical distance of 200 ft from a drift.

Table 1-1 Gold Road Mineral Resources at 0.1 op

T

Au cutoff

Distance (ft)

Au

(opT)

Tons

Ounces

<50

0.23

160,000

36,000

50-100

0.21

268,100

57,000

100-200

0.22

550,00

121,000

Total

0.22

978,000

214,000

Underground Mining

The underground mine historically used Shrinkage Stoping Mining (SSM). During the most recent mining phase, haulage of the

mineralized material and waste to the surface was with underground trucks. RPM Global reviewed the continued use of SSM for

the Gold Road Mine and has also reviewed an alternative mining method known as Raise Access Mining. Raise Access Mining

(RAM) incorporates an Alimak style raise climber to develop the access raise in materialized material from the sill level to the

top level. Once the raise is established, the climber is used to drill and blast horizontal production holes from the bottom of the

mineralized block up in retreat. The mineralized material is loaded from the bottom sill level using a mucker loading into nearby

muck bay, a truck for the haul up the decline or to the proposed new shaft loadout. Gold Road used a form of RAM in a test stope

in the past with mixed results. RPM advises that the use of RAM is the preferred method and has been used in the PEA as part

of the restart. RAM provides a safer mining process, with limited, to no exposure of the miners to unsupported ground, as well as

lower operating cost. Both mining methods are discussed in the PEA.

RPM also reviewed alternative haulage methods using the current truck haulage decline (11,000 ft. one way) as well as a

truck/shaft haulage scenario. As expected the truck/shaft method was the preferred alternative due to costs and efficiency.

Metallurgical Test

work and Mineral Processing

The processing parameters for Gold Road mineralized material have long been established by both actual processing over

many years and by metallurgical test work. The gold is present as very fine particles in extremely hard, chalcedonic quartz.

Processing requires grinding to 80% passing 325 mesh and 24-hour leaching which results in about 95% gold extraction.

Excluding the processing in the early-1900s, about one million tons of Gold Road mineralized material grading about 0.2 ounces

gold/ton have been processed by the following two plants:

A 400-ton/day counter-current-decantation/Merrill-Crowe plant, operated from 1937 to 1941

A 500-ton/day carbon-in-pulp (CIP) plant, operated from 1996 to 2016

The latter plant is still in existence and is in good condition. Tailings from the current plant are filtered and dry- stacked in a

tailings storage facility ("TSF") close to the plant.

Capital and Operating Costs

The total capital costs for the restart of the Gold Road Mine include US$5.2M for the restart, preliminary development and shaft /

hoist installation and purchase of the raise climbers completed in year 1. All other development and other capital cost are

considered to be sustaining capital for the remaining LOM.

Estimated capital cost to bring the processing plant into operational condition is US$0.5 million. No capital costs are anticipated

for the infrastructure.

The underground mine operating costs were developed on a per-foot of advance basis for the waste development. Other

operating costs includes raise mining (in mineralized material), production mining, contractor labor and management and Gold

Road site management for the underground mine. Total mining costs are US$66 per ton.

Estimated processing operating costs are US$27/ton. Estimated G&A costs are US$15/ton of mineralized material processed

or about US$2.5 million/year.

Economic Analysis

The total capital costs for the restart of the Gold Road Mine include US$5.2 M for the restart, preliminary development and shaft /

hoist installation and purchase of the raise climbers completed in Year 1 and 2. All other development and other capital, is

considered to be sustaining capital for the remaining LOM. The table below shows the economic assumptions and results.

Table 1-2 Economic Assumptions and Results

Gold Road

Units

LOM Value

Mineralized Material

Tons

1,110,274

Gold - Mined Grade

Gold oz. per ton

0.19

Gold Recovery

%

95%

Payable Gold

oz.

203,569

Gold Price

US$/oz.

$1,200

Net Revenue

US$ 000’s

$238,175

Capital Cost

US$ 000’s

$5,744

Sustaining Capital

US$ 000’s

$6,454

Total Capital

US$ 000’s

$12,198

Total Operating Cost

US$ 000’s

$110,362

Total All-in Sustaining Cost (AISC)

US$/oz. gold

$632.79

Total All in Cost

US$/oz. gold

$659.29

Payback Period

Year

1.5

Cumulative Net Cash flow

US$ 000’s

$103,964

Pre Tax NPV @ 5 %

US$ 000’s

$81,309

Pre Tax IRR

%

238%

Post Tax NPV @ 5 %

US$

000’s

$56,739

Post Tax IRR

%

175%

The NPV is still robust with changes of 10% and 20% in gold prices and capital and operating costs.

The table below shows the

sensitivities to these changes.

Table 1-3 Economic Sensitivities

Percent Change

from Base Case

Gold Price US$

NPV at 5%

Discount X

$1,000,000

Gold Price

Base Case

1200

58.2

-20.00%

960

28.7

-10.00%

1080

42.7

10.00%

1320

70.7

20.00%

1440

84.7

OPEX

Base Case

1200

58.2

-20.00%

1200

70.0

-10.00%

1200

63.3

10.00%

1200

50.1

20.00%

1200

43.5

CAPEX

Base Case

1200

58.2

-20.00%

1200

61.3

-10.00%

1200

59.7

10.00%

1200

56.6

20.00%

1200

55.0

Qualified Persons

The report was prepared under the direction of Mr. Richard Kehmeier. Mr. Kehmeier is a Qualified Person under NI 43-101 and

has reviewed and approved the technical information contained in this news release.

1

All Canadian Dollar amounts are for reference only and based on an April 29

th

, 2018 exchange rate of CAD$1.28 per $USD.

2

Cautionary statement NI 43-101: The PEA was prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 Standard of

Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101").

Note: The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources

that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to

be categorized as Mineral Reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA based will be realized.

Mineral Resources are not

Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrate economic viability.

Calendar years used are for illustrative purposes.

Some

figures may not sum exactly due to rounding.

Unless otherwise indicated the currency used is United States dollars.

ABOUT PARA RESOURCES:

Para is a junior producing gold mining company. Para owns approximately 80% of the El Limon project, in Colombia, which in

addition to its current underground operation is purchasing mineralized rock mined by small artisanal miners working on the

Company's property. The El Limon and OTU properties also have exploration and development upside. The Company also

owns 88% of the Gold Road Mine in the Oatman District of Arizona. The Company has hired RPMGlobal as consulting

engineers in order to produce a NI 43-101 Technical Report, which it expects, will establish a current Mineral Resource estimate

and anticipates that it will publish a NI 43-101 PEA thereafter.

Para will continue to take advantage of current market conditions

to acquire and develop additional highly economic, near-term production assets that have strong exploration and development

upside.

ABOUT RPMGLOBAL

RPMGlobal is an international mineral resources consulting and engineering company offering a full array of services to the

mining and environmental industries including all facets of mining, from exploration to site closure/remediation.

RPMGlobal has

gained worldwide recognition for its due diligence and independent engineer technical support work for financial institutions and

also offers expertise in engineering studies, planning, design, and management of mining industry projects for base and

precious metals, coal and energy, and industrial minerals.

Cautionary Notes:

This press release contains forward-looking information under Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking information.

Generally, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "plans", "expects" or

"does not expect", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or "does not

anticipate", or "believes", or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "may",

"could", "would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved". All information contained in this news release, other than

statements of current and historical fact, is forward looking information. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and

unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of

Para to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to

those risks described in the annual information form of Para and in its public documents filed on SEDAR from time to time.

Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made.

Although management of Para has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from

those contained in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated

or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could

differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-

looking statements. Para does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements, except in accordance with applicable

securities laws. Para's Readers should also review the risks and uncertainties sections of Para's annual and interim MD&As.

On behalf of the Board of Directors

"C. Geoffrey Hampson"

C. Geoffrey Hampson, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

For further information, please contact Andrea Laird, telephone: +1-604-259-0302

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX

Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.