Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

SOI.V ·

Sirios Announces Significant Increase in Cheechoo Open-Pit Gold Resources and Introduces Underground Resources

Resource Estimates

TSX-V: SOI July 10, 2025

Sirios Announces Significant Increase in Cheechoo Open-Pit

Gold Resources and Introduces Underground Resources

Montréal, Québec – Sirios Resources Inc. (TSX-V: SOI; OTCQB: SIREF) (“Sirios”) is pleased to report

an updated Mineral Resource Estimate (“ MRE”) for its 100% -owned Cheechoo Gold Project (the

“Project”), located in Eeyou Istchee James Bay , Québec, less than 15 km from Dhilmar Ltd. ’s

Éléonore gold mine.

Highlights of the 2025 MRE include:

• 1.3 million ounces at 1.12 g/t Au (Indicated Resources);

• 1.7 million ounces at 1.23 g/t Au (Inferred Resources);

o including 446,000 ounces in underground resources at 3.09 g/t Au

• Significant gold grade increase over the 2022 MRE:

o 19% increase of the open-pit indicated grade (from 0.94 g/t Au to 1.12 g/t Au);

o 38% increase of the open-pit inferred grade (from 0.73 g/t Au to 1.01 g/t Au);

• Low strip ratio of 2.9:1;

• Conceptual Exploration Target of 31 to 40 million tonnes of mineralization grading

between 1.27 to 1.45 g/t Au.

Dominique Doucet, President and CEO of Sirios Resources, commented: “The substantial increase

in gold resources at Cheechoo reflects the dedicated efforts of our team since the last mineral

resource estimate. The total resources now position the project as a highly compelling opportunity

for mining development —just a few k ilometers from a producing gold mine. Furthermore, we are

especially enthusiastic about the growth potential represented by our consultants’ conceptual

Exploration Target, which includes targets for underground resources —an exciting prospect given

that drilling to date has largely focused on near-surface zones. With this new MRE in hand, Sirios is

now outlining a strategy to fast-track additional resource growth and advance the project toward the

development stage. ”

Webinar

Sirios will host a webinar today to present the updated MRE and outline the next steps in advancing

the Project. A Q&A session will follow the presentation.

• French: July 10, 1:00 p.m. (EDT)

• English: July 10, 2:00 p.m. (EDT)

Cheechoo Project Mineral Resource Estimate

The updated Mineral Resource Estimate is based on 345 drill holes, totalling 82,717 meters, including

8,660 meters since 2022. This MRE introduces a new underground component and is based on a new

geological model that has revealed previously underestimated, higher -grade zones within the

deposit. An interactive 3D viewer of the new model is now available at sirios.com/en/cheechoo.

Table 1: Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources Estimate (MRE)

Pit

constrained

0.3 g/t Au Cut-off grade Tonnes (t) Au (g/t) Au (koz)

Indicated 34,993,000 1.12 1,262

Inferred 38,222,000 1.01 1,242

Stope

constrained

1.5 g/t Au Cut-off grade Tonnes (t) Au (g/t) Au (koz)

Inferred 4,493,000 3.09 446

TOTAL

0.3 & 1.5 g/t Au Cut-off grade Tonnes (t) Au (g/t) Au (koz)

Total Indicated 34,993,000 1.12 1,262

Total Inferred 42,715,000 1.23 1,688

1. The independent qualified person for the MRE, as defined by National Instrument (“NI”) 43 -101

guidelines, is Pierre Luc Richard, P .Geo., of PLR Resources Inc. with contributions from Alexandre

Burelle, P .Eng., of Evomine for cut -off values, open pit optimi zation solids and underground

optimization solids, and Christian Laroche, P .Eng., from Synectiq, for metallurgical parameters. The

effective date of the MRE is July 01, 2025.

2. These Mineral Resources are not mineral reserves as they have no demonstrated economic viability.

No economic evaluation of these Mineral Resource has been produced. The quantity and grade of

reported Inferred Resources in this MRE are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient drilling

to define these Inferred Resources as Indicated. However, it is reasonably expected that the majority

of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated category with continued drilling.

3. The Qualified Persons are not aware of any known environmental, permitting, legal, title -related,

taxation, socio -political, marketing or other relevant issues that could materially affect the Mineral

Resource Estimate.

4. Calculations used metric units (metres (m), tonnes (t), and g/t). Metal contents in the above table are

presented in troy ounces (metric tonne x grade / 31.103475). Values were rounded, and any

discrepancies in total amounts are due to rounding errors.

5. The Cheechoo Mineral Resource estimate follows the November 29, 2019, CIM Estimation of Mineral

Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines.

Figure 1: 2025 MRE Pit Shell and Block Model

Conceptual Exploration Target

A significant Exploration Target—with both open -pit and underground potential —was identified by

our consultant PLR Resources during the preparation of the MRE.

Highlights of the Exploration Target:

• Estimated total of 31 to 40 million tonnes of mineralization grading between 1.27 to 1.45 g/t

Au, including:

o Open-pit component:

25 to 32 million tonnes of mineralization grading between 0.90 to 1.05 g/t Au;

o Underground component:

6 to 8 million tonnes of mineralization grading between 2.80 to 3.05 g/t Au.

This conceptual Exploration Target is integrated into the litho-structural model used for the MRE, with

the aim of facilitating future targeting and drill hole planning. PLR Resources proposed a 20,000 m

drill hole program to provide infill drilling aiming at converting part of the Exploration Target into

Inferred Resources, test structural features and potentially increase the size of the Exploration Target.

Disclosure warnings in respect to an exploration target review

• An Exploration Target is not a National Instrument 43-101 compliant resource or reserve.

• The Exploration Target is confirmed only as a target for further exploration.

• Potential quantity and grades are conceptual in nature only.

• There has not been sufficient drilling to define any mineral resource on this Exploration Target; drilling

intercepts crosscut the Exploration Target but drill spacing is too scarce to classify these blocks as

Inferred Mineral Resources.

• There is no certainty that further drilling will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource.

• The assessment of the target for further exploration was completed by PLR Resources, a consultant

independent of the company. The estimation of the potential quantity and grade of the exploration

target was based on the same drill hole database used for th e Mineral Resource Estimate. With the

available drilling information, PLR developed conceptual gold mineralization volumes, constrained by

interpreted lithological and structural models. The original core samples were composited, and the

composited gold assays were capped (similarly to the Mineral Resource Estimate) after evaluating the

statistical distributions on probability plots. The gold values were interpolated into a three-dimensional

block model using Ordinary Kriging. To estimate a tonnage, PLR use d the same specific gravity values

used for the Mineral Resource Estimate.

• An open-pit scenario limited by the Project’s boundary as well as DSO stopes were run to constrain the

Exploration Target.

Parameters and criteria used for the Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)

Table 2: General pit and stope parameters used for the Mineral Resource Estimate

PARAMETER UNIT OPEN PIT UNDERGROUND

Revenue

Gold price USD/oz 2,500 2,500

Exchange rate CAD/USD 1.35 1.35

Operating costs

Mining cost CAD/t mined 4 75

Incremental bench cost CAD/t mined/10m bench 0.05 N/A

Processing cost CAD/t milled 17.5 17.5

General and administration cost CAD/t milled 5.5 5.5

Mineralized material based costs CAD/t milled 23 98

Mining

Selective mining unit m 5 x 5 x 5 N/A

Minimum mining width m N/A 2.5

Stope height m N/A 25

Minimum slope angle – overburden deg 25 N/A

Minimum slope angle – rock deg 50 N/A

Cut-off grade

Cut-off grade applied g/t milled 0.25 1.5

• Resources are presented as undiluted and in situ for the open-pit scenario and include internal dilution

for the underground scenario and are considered to have reasonable prospects for economic

extraction. The constraining pit shell was developed using overall pit slopes of 50 degrees in bedrock

and 25 degrees in overburden. The pit optimization to develop the mineral resource -constraining pit

shells was done using the pseudoflow algorithm in Deswik software. The stope optimization to develop

the underground mineral resource was done using Deswik.SO software.

• The MRE wireframe was prepared using Leapfrog Edge v.2024.1.3 and is based on 345 drill holes,

totalling 82,717 meters drilled and 56,337 assays. The cut-off date for the drill hole database was May

13, 2025.

• Composites of 1.5 metres were created inside the mineralization domains. High -grade capping was

done on the composited assay data. Based on individual statistical study for each zone, composites

were capped at 25.0 g/t Au for the HG zones, 2.0 g/t Au for t he corridors and 1.0 g/t for the tonalite

intrusion. A three-pass capping strategy defined by capping values decreasing as interpolation search

distances increase was used in the grade estimation for the HG zones.

• Pit constrained Mineral Resources for the base case are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au; DSO-

constrained Mineral Resources for the base case are reported at a cut -off grade of 1.5 g/t Au and

include internal dilution (must-take). The cut-off grades will be re-evaluated in light of future prevailing

market conditions and costs.

• Specific gravity values were estimated using data available in the drill hole database. Density values

between 2.64 and 2.76 were applied to the host rocks.

• Grade model resource estimation was calculated from drill hole data using an Ordinary Kriging

interpolation method in a sub-blocked model using blocks measuring 5 m x 5 m x 5 m in size and sub-

blocks down to 0.625m x 0.625m x 0.625m. Both ordinary kriging (OK) and inverse square distance

(ID2) interpolation methods were tested, resulting in no material difference in the Mineral Resource

Estimates.

• The Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource categories are constrained to areas where drill spacing

is less than 50m and 100 metres respectively and show reasonable geological and grade continuity.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Mineral Resources

The mineral resources disclosed in this press release conform to NI43-101 standards and guidelines and were

prepared by independent qualified persons. The above-mentioned mineral resources are not mineral reserves

as they do not have demonstrated economic viability. The quantity and grade of the reported Inferred Mineral

Resources are conceptual in nature and are estimated based on limited geological evidence and sampling.

Geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify geological grade and/or quality of continuity. An Inferred

Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence relative to a Measured or Indicated Mineral Resource and

constitutes an insufficient level of confidence to allow conversion to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably

expected, but not guaranteed, that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Measured

or Indicated Mineral Resources with additional drilling. The National Instrument 43 -101 Technical Report,

including the mineral resources for the Cheechoo Project contained in this news release, will be delivered and

filed on SEDAR by Sirios Resources Inc. within 45 days of the date of this news release.

Qualified persons

The Mineral Resource Estimate and other scientific and technical information in this news release

has been prepared and approved by independent qualified persons for purposes of NI 43-101: Pierre

Luc Richard, P .Geo., of PLR Resources Inc. with contributions from Alexandre Burelle, P .Eng., of

Evomine for cut-off values, open pit optimization solids and underground optimization solids, and

Christian Laroche, P .Eng., from Synectiq, for metallurgical parameters.

About the Cheechoo Gold Project

The Cheechoo Gold Project is a flagship asset of Sirios Resources Inc., located in the Eeyou Istchee

James Bay territory of Québec, less than 15 km from the Éléonore gold mine. The project is 100%

owned by Sirios and is recognized for its significant expansion and development potential, targeting

both large -scale open -pit and higher -grade underground mining scenarios. Learn more at

sirios.com/en/cheechoo.

About the Éléonore Gold Mine

The Éléonore Mine is an underground gold operation located in the Eeyou Istchee James Bay region

of Québec, directly adjacent to Sirios' Cheechoo Property. Commercial production at Éléonore

began in April 2015. In 2024, Dhilmar Ltd. acquired the mine from Newmont Corporation in a $795

million USD transaction and is now the current operator.

About PLR Resources

PLR Resources specializes in mineral resource estimates and project evaluations and offers a wide

variety of services, from grassroots exploration planning to feasibility studies and mining operation

optimization, serving clients that include juniors, major operators as well as financial experts seeking

reliable and realistic advice.

For more information, please contact:

Dominique Doucet, P .Eng., CEO

450-482-0603

[email protected]

www.sirios.com

Cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements

This news release contains “forward -looking information” within the meaning of applicable

Canadian securities legislation based on expectations. estimates and projections as at the date of

this news release. Forward -looking information involves risks, unce rtainties and other factors that

could cause actual events, results. Performance, prospects and opportunities to differ materially

from those expressed or implied by such forward -looking information. Factors that could cause

actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking information include, but are not limited

to, capital and operating costs varying significantly from estimates; the preliminary nature of

metallurgical test results; delays in obtaining or failures to obtain required governmen tal,

environmental or other project approvals; uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of

financing needed in the future; changes in equity markets; inflation; fluctuations in commodity

prices; delays in the development of projects; the other risks involved in the mineral exploration and

development industry; and those risks set out in the Company’s public documents filed on SEDAR at

www.sedar.com. Although the Company believes that the assumptions and factors used in preparing

the forward-looking information in this news release are reasonable, undue reliance should not be

placed on such information, which only applies as of the date of this news release, and no assurance

can be given that such events will occur in the disclosed time frames or at all. The Company

disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as

a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by law.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies

of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

-30 –