Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

SKE.TO ·

Skeena Intersects 33.82 g/t AuEq over 22.50 metres at Eskay Creek

Drill Results

Skeena Intersects 33.82 g/t AuEq over 22.50 metres at Eskay Creek

Vancouver, BC ( May 5, 20 20) Skeena Resources Limited (TSX.V: SKE, OTCQX: SKREF)

(“Skeena” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce final gold-silver drill results for the 4,327 metres

completed so far this year from the Company’s 2020 Phase I surface drilling program at the Eskay

Creek Project (“Eskay Creek”) located in the Golden Triangle of British Columbia. Four surface drill

rigs were utilized for the 2020 Phase I program in the 21A, 21B and 21C Zones to infill drill and enable

upgrading areas of Inferred resources to the Indicated classification. Reference images are presented

at the end of this release as well as on the Company’s website.

Phase I Eskay Creek Drilling Highlights

• 32.21 g/t Au, 121 g/t Ag (33.82 g/t AuEq) over 22.50 m (SK-20-270) – 21B Zone

Including 753.00 g/t Au, 445 g/t Ag (758.93 g/t AuEq) over 0.83 m

• 5.90 g/t Au, 14 g/t Ag (6.09 g/t AuEq) over 24.55 m (SK-20-271) – 21B Zone

Including 25.60 g/t Au, 56 g/t Ag (26.35 g/t AuEq) over 1.50 m

Gold Equivalent (AuE q) calculated via the formula: Au (g/t) + [Ag ( g/t) / 7 5]. Reported core lengths represent 80 -100% of true widths and are

supported by well-defined mineralization geometries derived from historical drilling. Grade capping of individual assays has not been applied to the

Au and Ag assays informing the length weighted AuEq composites. Processing recoveries have not been applied to the AuEq calculation and are

disclosed at 100%. Samples below detection limit are nulled to a value of zero.

21B Zone Continues to Demonstrate High Tenor

Infill drilling within the 21B Zone has intersected substantial high -grade mineralization as predicted

and demonstrated by adjacent intercepts of 32.21 g/t Au, 121 g/t Ag (33.82 g/t AuEq) over 22.50 m,

including 753.00 g/t Au, 445 g/t Ag (758.93 g/t AuEq) over 0.83 m (SK-20-270). This mineralization is

hosted within the contact mudstones as well as mudstone-rhyolite breccias and improves upon the

grades from the surrounding historical drill holes, including 4.94 g/t AuEq over 19.75 m (6636) and

0.73 g/t AuEq over 3.32 m and 0.88 g/t AuEq over 6.13 m (CA90-537).

Increased gold-silver tenor in the 21B Zone was established by an intersection in Phase I drilling of

5.90 g/t Au, 14 g/t Ag (6.09 g/t AuEq) over 24.55 m (SK-20-271) which is proximal to another historical

intercept from a 1997 surface drill hole which averaged 3.07 g/t AuEq over 18.26 m (C97853).

The Phase I infill drill program at Eskay Creek continues to predictably confirm the grades and spatial

limits of the resource model that was derived largely from the historical drilling database.

About Skeena

Skeena Resources Limited is a junior Canadian mining exploration company focused on developing

prospective precious metal properties in the Golden Triangle of northwest British Columbia, Canada.

The Company’s primary activities are the exploration and deve lopment of the past -producing Eskay

NR: 20-12

May 5, 2020

Creek gold-silver mine. The Company released a robust Preliminary Economic Assessment in late

2019 and is currently focused on infill and exploration drilling at Eskay Creek to advance the project

to Pre-feasibility. Skeena is also exploring the past-producing Snip gold mine.

On behalf of the Board of Directors of Skeena Resources Limited,

Walter Coles Jr.

President & CEO

Qualified Persons

Exploration activities at the Eskay Creek Project are administered on site by the Company’s

Exploration Managers, Colin Russell, P.Geo. and Adrian Newton, P.Geo. In accordance with National

Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, Paul Geddes, P.Geo. Vice President

Exploration and Resource Development, is the Qualified Person for the Company and has prepared,

validated and approved the technical and scientific content of this news release. The Company strictly

adheres to CIM Best Practices Guidelines in conducting, documenti ng, and reporting its exploration

activities on its exploration projects.

Quality Assurance – Quality Control

Once received from the drill and processed, all drill core samples are sawn in half, labelled and

bagged. The remaining drill core is subsequently securely stored on site. Numbered security tags are

applied to lab shipments for chain of custody requirements. The Company inserts quality control (QC)

samples at regular intervals in the sample stream, including blanks and reference materials with all

sample shipments to monitor laboratory performance. The QAQC program was designed and

approved by Lynda Bloom, P.Geo. of Analytical Solutions Ltd., and is overseen by the Company’s

Qualified Person, Paul Geddes, P.Geo, Vice President Exploration and Resource Development.

Drill core samples are submitted to ALS Geochemistry’s analytical facility in North Vancouver, British

Columbia for preparation and analysis. The ALS facility is accredited to the ISO/IEC 17025 standard

for gold assays and all analytical methods include quality control materials at set frequencies with

established data acceptance criteria. The entire sample is crushed and 1kg is pulverized. Analysis for

gold is by 50g fire assay fusion with atomic absorption (AAS) finish with a lower limit of 0.01 ppm and

upper limit of 100 ppm. Samples with gold assays greater than 100ppm are re -analyzed using a 50g

fire assay fusion with gravimetric finish. Analysis for silver is by 50g fire assay fusion with gravimetric

finish with a lower limit of 5ppm and upper limit of 10,000ppm. Samples with silver assays greater than

10,000ppm are re -analyzed using a gravimet ric silver concentrate method. A selected number of

samples are also analyzed using a 48 multi -elemental geochemical package by a 4 -acid digestion,

followed by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP -AES) and Inductively

Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy (ICP-MS) and also for mercury using an aqua regia digest with

Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP -AES) finish. Samples with sulfur

reporting greater than 10% from the multi -element analysis are re -analyzed for to tal sulfur by Leco

furnace and infrared spectroscopy.

Cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements

Certain statements made and information contained herein may constitute “forward looking information” and “forward

looking statements” within the meaning of applicable Canadian and United States securities legislation. These statements

and information are based on facts currently available to the Company and there is no assurance that actual results will

meet management’s expectations. Forward-looking statements and information may be identified by such terms as

“anticipates”, “believes”, “targets”, “estimates”, “plans”, “expects”, “may”, “will”, “could” or “would”. Forward -looking

statements and information contained herein are based on certain factors and assumptions regarding, among other things,

the estimation of mineral resources and reserves, the realization of resource and reserve estimates, metal prices, taxation,

the estimation, timing and amount of future exploration and develo pment, capital and operating costs, the availability of

financing, the receipt of regulatory approvals, environmental risks, title disputes and other matters. While the Company

considers its assumptions to be reasonable as of the date hereof, forward -looking statements and information are not

guarantees of future performance and readers should not place undue importance on such statements as actual events

and results may differ materially from those described herein. The Company does not undertake to updat e any forward-

looking statements or information except as may be required by applicable securities laws.

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada accepts responsibility for

the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Table 1: Eskay Creek Project 2020 Phase I length weighted drill hole gold and silver composites:

HOLE-ID FROM (M) TO (M) CORE LENGTH (M) AU (G/T) AG (G/T) AUEQ (G/T) ZONE

SK-20-265 149.62 169.00 19.38 2.68 27 3.05 21B

INCLUDING 158.42 159.19 0.77 19.15 550 26.48 21B

SK-20-266 141.92 169.85 27.93 1.67 5 1.74 21B

SK-20-267 ABANDONED 21B

SK-20-268 166.00 180.00 14.00 2.01 5 2.08 21B

SK-20-269 135.00 147.96 12.96 1.12 14 1.31 21B

SK-20-269 155.00 162.50 7.50 1.55 7 1.65 21B

SK-20-270 137.00 159.50 22.50 32.21 121 33.82 21B

INCLUDING 138.00 139.00 1.00 12.35 167 14.58 21B

AND 139.00 139.50 0.50 14.35 957 27.11 21B

AND 139.50 140.50 1.00 2.64 1,375 20.97 21B

AND 150.50 151.00 0.50 13.25 8 13.36 21B

AND 151.00 152.00 1.00 18.60 31 19.01 21B

AND 153.00 154.00 1.00 24.20 58 24.97 21B

AND 154.00 154.83 0.83 753.00 445 758.93 21B

SK-20-271 147.45 172.00 24.55 5.90 14 6.09 21B

INCLUDING 159.50 160.00 0.50 11.80 17 12.03 21B

AND 160.00 161.50 1.50 10.50 8 10.61 21B

AND 163.00 164.50 1.50 20.90 95 22.17 21B

AND 164.50 166.00 1.50 25.60 56 26.35 21B

AND 169.60 170.10 0.50 11.00 <5 11.00 21B

AND 170.10 171.00 0.90 18.95 6 19.03 21B

SK-20-272 ABANDONED 21A

SK-20-273 125.16 142.50 17.34 0.64 29 1.02 21A

SK-20-274 NOT YET DRILLED

SK-20-275 NOT YET DRILLED

SK-20-276 NOT YET DRILLED

SK-20-277 NOT YET DRILLED

SK-20-278 NOT YET DRILLED

SK-20-279 NOT YET DRILLED

SK-20-280 NOT YET DRILLED

SK-20-281 NOT YET DRILLED

SK-20-282 NOT YET DRILLED

SK-20-283 NOT YET DRILLED

HOLE-ID FROM (M) TO (M) CORE LENGTH (M) AU (G/T) AG (G/T) AUEQ (G/T) ZONE

SK-20-284 NOT YET DRILLED

SK-20-285 138.00 148.00 10.00 2.67 11 2.82 21B

SK-20-286 149.85 157.50 7.65 3.13 6 3.20 21B

SK-20-287 ABANDONED

SK-20-288 140.50 148.40 7.90 1.32 122 2.95 21A

Gold Equivalent (AuEq) calculated via the formula: Au ( g/t) + [Ag ( g/t) / 7 5]. Reported core lengths represent 80 -100% of true widths and are

supported by well -defined mineralization geometries derived from historical drilling. Length weighted AuE q composites were constrained by

geological considerations. Grade capping of individual assays has not been applied to the Au and Ag assays informing the length weighted AuE q

composites. Processing recoveries have not been applied to the AuEq calculation and are disclosed at 100%. Samples below detection limit were

nulled to a value of zero.

Table 2: Mine grid Phase I drill hole locations and orientations:

HOLE-ID EASTING NORTHING ELEVATION LENGTH (M) AZIMUTH DIP

SK-20-265 9813.4 10632.5 937.9 179.0 109.9 -60.0

SK-20-266 9813.4 10632.5 937.9 184.0 115.1 -66.0

SK-20-268 9788.9 10641.4 929.1 186.0 84.5 -59.2

SK-20-269 9789.0 10640.2 929.1 164.0 120.6 -74.1

SK-20-270 9788.4 10640.5 929.1 165.0 136.6 -73.4

SK-20-271 9828.7 10639.8 940.3 172.0 108.2 -76.7

SK-20-272 9756.4 10252.4 1010.5 5.0 151.8 -61.8

SK-20-273 9752.4 10253.9 1010.1 154.0 149.7 -74.1

SK-20-285 9842.7 10601.0 946.1 168.0 115.8 -69.2

SK-20-286 9828.3 10641.4 939.5 182.0 97.3 -68.2

SK-20-287 9753.2 10252.1 1010.2 13.6 150.2 -62.0

SK-20-288 9752.4 10253.9 1010.1 154.0 150.2 -62.0