Skeena Intersects 16.02 g/t Gold Over 12.25 Metres at Snip
Skeena Intersects 16.02 g/t Gold Over 12.25 Metres at Snip
Vancouver, BC ( July 11 , 2018) Skeena Resources Limited (TSX.V: SKE, OTCQX: SKREF)
(“Skeena” or the “Company”) is pleased to report additional assay results from the Phase II
underground drilling program at the Company’s 100% owned Snip Gold Project (“Snip”) located in the
Golden Triangle of British Columbia.
The Phase II drilling program totaling 11,000 metres is being performed from surface and underground
utilizing two drill rig s. Building upon the data gathered from the Phase I campaign, the Phase II
program is designed to expand newly modelled zones via widely spaced e xploratory drill step outs,
further delineate known mineralization in areas of low drilling density and validate the historical data
in preparation for a maiden resource estimate at Snip. Reference mine sections are presented at the
end of this release, and on the Company’s website.
Phase II Drilling Highlights:
• 16.02 g/t Au over 12.25 m (UG18-097)
• 11.81 g/t Au over 12.20 m (UG18-096)
• 18.90 g/t Au over 2.29 m (UG18-095)
• 5.26 g/t Au over 10.60 m (UG18-094)
• 5.23 g/t Au over 13.70 m (UG18-095)
Phase II Delineation Drilling Continues to Enhance Grades and Widths
The ongoing Phase II drilling on the Eastern Twin Zone continues to encounter gold grades and vein
thicknesses which are significantly better than historical drilling programs. These improved results are
in-part a result of a more comprehensive sampling protocol which does not rely on selective sampling
and instead samples the entir ety of the drillhole. The protocol is intended to provide a complete
database to support economic analyses using current gold prices and modern cut-off grades.
A significant intercept in this zone includes 16.02 g/t Au over 12.25 m (UG18-097) hosted within a
thicker mineralized envelope grading 12.37 g/t Au over 20.75 m. Continuity of the zone was further
demonstrated 30 metres down-dip in UG18-096 which intersected 11.81 g/t Au over 12.20 m . The
recent intercept in UG18-097 occurs only five metres down-dip of historical drill hole UG-1706 which
returned assays of 36.8 g/t Au but over only 0.40 m, either because of incomplete and selective
sampling or geological and grade variability within the same mineralized zone of interest.
Paul Geddes, Skeena’s VP of Exploration & Resource Development commented, “The Company’s
short-term goal of releasing a maiden resource for Snip is underway and we continue to validate and
upgrade resource confidence in areas of historically poorly delineated mineralization. The mindset of
historic operators with respect to resource delineation and expansion was limited by the stringent
economic constraints that existed in the 1990s. Today, with the vastly improved infrastructure available
in the Golden Triangle and the marked increase in gold price, the potential to mine one of the highest-
NR: 18-16
July 11, 2018
grade, past-producing deposits in Canada at modern cut-off grades dramatically improves the
economic viability at Snip.”
Discussion of Historical Data and Practices
During the historic operation from 1991 -1999, the Sn ip Mine produced 1,106,511 oz Au from ore
averaging 27.53 g/t Au with a cut-off grade ranging from 12 - 24 g/t Au. The mine was burdened with
the high cost structure related to its geographic isolation, limited supporting infrastructure and
significantly lower historical gold prices . These factors combined, necessitated a high gold cut -off
grade for the historic Snip Mine to remain economic. As such, mineralization in the Eastern Twin Zone
did not meet the required historic cut -off grades of up to 24 g/t Au and so the zone was never drilled
at spacings necessary for resource delineation and mine planning.
Regrettably, prior to the implementation of National Instrument 43-101 standards, reclamation of the
mine in 1999 included disposal of all historical drill core, resulting in the inability to now validate any
prior operators’ databases to modern standards. This lack of historic drill core and supporting drilling
documentation, paired with the wide spacing of historical drilling in undeveloped areas necessitates
that Skeena devote a perc entage of its drilling campaign to validate the historical data. Aside from
validating historic results, exploratory drilling will also expand areas of known mineralization with low
drilling density and demonstrate additional tonnage potential.
About Skeena
Skeena Resources Limited is a junior Canadian mining exploration company focused on developing
prospective precious and base metal properties in the Golden Triangle of northwest British Columbia,
Canada. The Company’s primary activities are the exploration and development of the past-producing
Snip mine and the recently optioned Eskay Cre ek mine, both acquired from Barrick. In addition, the
Company has completed a Preliminary Economic Assessment on the GJ copper -gold porphyry
project.
On behalf of the Board of Directors of Skeena Resources Limited,
Walter Coles Jr.
President & CEO
Qualified Persons
Exploration activities at the Snip Gold Project are administered on site by the Company’s Exploration
Managers, Colin Russell, P.Geo. and Adrian Newton, P.Geo. In accordance with National Instrument
43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, Paul Geddes, P.Geo. Vice President Exploration
and Resource Development, is the Qualified Person for the Company and has prepared, validated
and approved the technical and scientific content of this news release. The Company strictly adheres
to CIM Best Practices Guidelines in conducting, documenting, and reporting its exploration activities
on its exploration projects.
Quality Assurance – Quality Control
Once received from the drill and processed, all drill core samples are sawn in half, labelled and
bagged. The remaining drill core is subsequently securely stored on site. Numbered security tags
are applied to lab shipments for chain of custody requirements. The Company inserts quality control
(QC) samples at regular intervals in the sample stream, including blanks and reference materials with
all sample shipments to monitor laboratory performance. The QAQC program was designed and
approved by Lynda Bloo m, P.Geo. of Analytical Solutions Ltd., and is overseen by the Company’s
Qualified Person, Paul Geddes, P.Geo, Vice President Exploration and Resource Development.
Drill core samples are submitted to ALS Geochemistry’s analytical facility in North Vancou ver, British
Columbia for preparation and analysis. The ALS facility is accredited to the ISO/IEC 17025 standard
for gold assays and all analytical methods include quality control materials at set frequencies with
established data acceptance criteria. The entire sample is crushed and 250 grams is pulverized.
Analysis for gold is by 50g fire assay fusion with atomic absorption (AAS) finish with a lower limit of
0.01 ppm and upper limit of 100 ppm. Samples with gold assays greater than 10 ppm are re-analyzed
using a 1,000g screen metallic fire assay. A selected number of samples are also analyzed using a
48 multi -elemental geochemical package by a 4 -acid digestion, followed by Inductively Coupled
Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP -AES) and Inductively Co upled Plasma Mass
Spectroscopy (ICP-MS).
Cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements
Certain statements made and information contained herein may constitute “forward looking information” and “forward
looking statements” within the meaning of applicable Canadian and United States securities legislation. These statements
and information are based on facts currently available to the Company and there is no assurance that actual results will
meet management’s expectations. Forward -looking statements and information may be identified by such terms as
“anticipates”, “believes”, “targets”, “estimates”, “plans”, “expects”, “may”, “will”, “could” or “would”. Forward -looking
statements and information contained herein are based on certain factors and assumptions regarding, among other things,
the estimation of mineral resources and reserves, the realization of resource and reserve estimates, metal prices, taxation,
the estimation, timing and amount of future exploration and development, capital and operatin g costs, the availability of
financing, the receipt of regulatory approvals, environmental risks, title disputes and other matters. While the Company
considers its assumptions to be reasonable as of the date hereof, forward -looking statements and informat ion are not
guarantees of future performance and readers should not place undue importance on such statements as actual events
and results may differ materially from those described herein. The Company does not undertake to update any forward -
looking statements or information except as may be required by applicable securities laws.
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada accepts responsibility for
the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
Table 1: Snip Project Phase II length weighted drillhole gold composites:
HOLE-ID FROM (M) TO (M) CORE LENGTH (M) AU (G/T) AREA
UG18-094 129.50 131.30 1.80 8.44 412
INCLUDING 130.30 131.30 1.00 13.25 412
UG18-094 159.00 160.00 1.00 9.08 412
UG18-094 172.80 183.40 10.60 5.26 EASTERN TWIN
INCLUDING 179.80 183.40 3.60 11.94 EASTERN TWIN
INCLUDING 180.30 180.80 0.50 41.10 EASTERN TWIN
AND 181.80 182.30 0.50 22.40 EASTERN TWIN
UG18-094 248.00 248.50 0.50 39.80 EASTERN TWIN
UG18-095 101.50 115.20 13.70 5.23 EASTERN TWIN
INCLUDING 112.70 115.20 2.50 18.82 EASTERN TWIN
INCLUDING 113.70 114.20 0.50 12.40 EASTERN TWIN
AND 114.20 114.70 0.50 67.70 EASTERN TWIN
UG18-095 148.13 150.42 2.29 18.90 EASTERN TWIN
UG18-095 155.00 155.50 0.50 38.60 EASTERN TWIN
UG18-095 170.50 171.00 0.50 23.40 HW EASTERN TWIN
HOLE-ID FROM (M) TO (M) CORE LENGTH (M) AU (G/T) AREA
UG18-095 232.05 232.85 0.80 10.90 HW EASTERN TWIN
UG18-096 137.00 149.20 12.20 11.81 EASTERN TWIN
INCLUDING 138.00 138.50 0.50 10.00 EASTERN TWIN
AND 140.00 140.50 0.50 16.20 EASTERN TWIN
INCLUDING 145.25 148.70 3.45 32.25 EASTERN TWIN
INCLUDING 145.75 146.45 0.70 24.90 EASTERN TWIN
AND 148.20 148.70 0.50 0.46 EASTERN TWIN
UG18-097 136.25 136.75 0.50 14.20 412
UG18-097 144.15 164.90 20.75 12.37 EASTERN TWIN
INCLUDING 145.15 157.40 12.25 16.02 EASTERN TWIN
INCLUDING 145.15 146.75 1.60 25.33 EASTERN TWIN
INCLUDING 145.65 146.15 0.50 57.50 EASTERN TWIN
AND 149.30 157.40 8.10 19.06 EASTERN TWIN
INCLUDING 149.84 150.35 0.51 141.50 EASTERN TWIN
AND 154.90 155.40 0.50 114.50 EASTERN TWIN
AND 161.80 164.90 3.10 19.05 EASTERN TWIN
INCLUDING 162.80 163.40 0.60 31.80 EASTERN TWIN
AND 164.40 164.90 0.50 24.20 EASTERN TWIN
UG18-098 7.50 9.00 1.50 3.31 130 VEIN EXTENSION
UG18-098 93.00 93.50 0.50 3.10 200 FW
True widths cannot be accurately determined from the information available therefore core lengths are reported. Top
cuts have not been applied to high grade assays.
Table 2: Mine grid Phase II underground drillhole locations and orientations.
HOLE-ID EASTING NORTHING ELEVATION LENGTH (M) AZIMUTH DIP
UG18-094 4962.1 2371.1 551.2 303.6 170.4 -18.9
UG18-095 4962.1 2370.9 552.1 251.5 177.0 9.4
UG18-096 4962.9 2370.3 553.1 264.0 167.0 42.0
UG18-097 4962.2 2372.8 553.3 209.1 170.0 53.0
UG18-098 4625.1 2224.9 381.9 159.7 339.1 24.3