Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

SGLD.V ·

Scorpio Gold Announces Positive Feasibility Study for Processing the Heap Leach Mineral Resource at Mineral Ridge

Economic Studies Metallurgy & Processing

TSX-V: SGN

1462 de la Québécoise

Val-d’Or, QC, J9P 5H4

T: 604- 678-9639

www.scorpiogold.com

News Release No. 247

Scorpio Gold Announces Positive Feasibility Study for Processing the Heap

Leach Mineral Resource at Mineral Ridge

Vancouver, October 10, 2017 - Scorpio Gold Corporation ( “Scorpio Gold ” or the “Company”) (TSX

V:SGN) is pleased to announce the results of a positive feasibility study ( “the Project”) to reprocess the

heap leach residual material at its Mineral Ridge property, located in Esmeralda County, Nevada. Scorpio

Gold holds a 70% interest in the project with joint venture partner Elevon, LLC (30%).

Brian Lock, Interim CEO comments, “I would first like to take this opportunity to thank Novus Engineering

Inc. (“Novus”), Mine Technical Services ( “MTS”), NewFields and our Scorpio Gold employees for their

dedicated effort in completing this study. The combined effort of all parties involved produced a very

thorough study of our Mineral Ridge heap leach resource and proposed milling facility. This economically

positive study provides the foundation for recovering a substantial portion of the 122 ,000 ounces of gold

resources contained on the heap leach pad. This project, when completed, will provide Mineral Ridge with

five years of additional of mine life. Additionally, due to higher expected recovery rates provided by the

new milling circuit, the Company is proceeding with a third -party analysis of its ot her known mineral

resources. When complete, and if determined economically viable, this study should add additional reserves

and further extend the Mineral Ridge life of mine. Further exploration at Mineral Ridge may also add

additional resources.”

Feasibility Study Description

About 68% recovery of gold was realized from the previous heap leach operations at Mineral Ridge. Sonic

core drilling was completed to create a mineral resource estimate from the heap pad, which was previously

issued by MTS on July 12, 2017. Independent testing of the residual heap leach material indicates 91%

recovery by further grinding the heap material and reprocessing using the carbon-in-leach (“CIL”) process.

Novus was engaged by Scorpio Gold to design a processing facility an d develop capital expenditure

(“CAPEX”) and operating expenditure ( “OPEX”) estimates related to the new processing facility.

NewFields developed the methodology for “mining” the heap residual material and for returning the tailings

material from the processing facility to the lined pad. NewFields also provided the CAPEX and OPEX

estimates related to the mining and filtered-tailings placement activities. Scorpio Gold provided information

on the balance of project costs and general and administrative cost estimates. The economic highlights of

the project are presented in Table 1 below.

Scorpio Gold Corporation | 2

Table 1: Economic Highlights

Defined terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them under the heading “Units of Measure” in this

news release.

Drilling

A total of 3,671 ft (1,119 m) of drilling in 34 sonic core drill holes was completed to test the grade of the

leach pad material. Sonic drill core was placed in plastic bags in nominal 2.5 ft (0.76 m) intervals at the

drill rig by the drillers and transferred to the Mineral Ridge assay laboratory on site after the completion of

each drill hole by Mineral Ridge, LLC (“Mineral Ridge”) geologists. At the Mineral Ridge assay laboratory,

the material from the sample bags was composited into 10 ft (3 m) intervals, dried, disaggrega ted, split to

250 g, and sent to Florin Analytical Services (“Florin”) in Reno for gold and silver assay. At Florin, the

entire sample was pulverized to 80% passing 75 microns, homogenized, and gold determined by one-assay

ton fire assay and AAS finish and silver determined by four-acid digestion and AAS finish.

Blanks, standards, and duplicates were inserted into the sample sequence by Mineral Ridge prior to sending

the samples to Florin for analysis to determine the quality of the Florin gold assays. Standards and blanks

indicate that Florin assays are acceptably accurate and there is no significant carryover contamination.

Duplicate pairs returned poor precision and screen fire assays indicate that coarse gold is likely a

contributing factor in the poor precision of the duplicate results. The 2017 Florin gold assay data ar e

sufficiently accurate and precise for use in mineral resource estimation.

Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves

There has been no change to the mineral resource estimate as disclosed in the press release dated August

14, 2017.

The mineral resources are comprised of material contained entirely within the leach pad as of June 29, 2017.

While newly mined material from the available open -pit resource will continue to be placed on the heap

leach pad through October 2017, the material added in this time per iod is not included as it has not been

validated as part of the current mineral resource estimate.

It is assumed that as the leach pad is mined, there will be no selectivity of the material to be processed, and

therefore, the mineral resources presented represent a global estimate of the tonnage and grade.

Unit Total / Avg

Construction period y 1

Operating period y 4.7

Total pad material milled t 6,854,993

Average gold grade opt 0.0171

Recovery, after process and refine % 90.5%

Life of project gold sold k oz 106.0

Avg annual gold sold k oz/y 22.6

Realized gold price $/oz $ 1,249.50

Average silver grade opt 0.0169

Avg annual silver sold k oz/y 5.9

Total cash cost $/oz 716.54$

Initial capital expenditures M 34.9$

Total after-tax net cash flow M 25.4$

Salvage value, net M 4.5$

NPV of net cash flow

discounted at 5%

Payback from end of

construction 2.9 years

16.5$ million

IRR

9.4%

22.5%

IRR at $1,100 / oz gold

Scorpio Gold Corporation | 3

Ordinary Kriging was used for the gold resource estimation with Inverse Distance, Inverse Distance

Squared and Nearest Neighbor estimates serving as validation models. Silver estimates were run using a

single Inverse Distance model and a Nearest Neighbor estimate as a validation model.

For reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction, the gold price used is the 3-year trailing average

gold price through June 2017. The process recovery is that obtained by Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

(“KCA”) test-work using reasonable mill -scenario. The processing cost was provided by M ineral Ridge

using actual Mineral Ridge Mine labor costs, and conceptual mill processing costs estimated by Novus for

a 4,000 tpd mill operation.

Table 2: Mineral Ridge Mineral Resource Statement

Mineral Resource Classification Tons

(kt)

Au

(opt)

Ag

(opt)

Contained

Au (koz)

Contained

Ag (koz)

Measured 2,895 0.017 0.016 48.5 46.4

Indicated 4,220 0.017 0.018 73.2 74.1

Measured & Indicated 7,115 0.017 0.017 121.7 120.4

Inferred 76 0.016 0.027 1.2 2.0

Notes:

1. The effective date of the Mineral Resource estimate is June 29, 2017.

2. The Qualified Person for the estimate is Mr Ian Crundwell, P.Geo.

3. Mineral Resources are quoted only for the Mineralized Leach Pad.

4. Mineral Resources are contained within the Mineral Ridge leach pad facility with the following assumptions:

a. A long-term gold price of US$1,216/oz.

b. Assumed process costs are US$11/t.

c. Metallurgical recovery for gold is 91%.

5. Rounding may result in apparent differences between when summing tons, grade and contained metal content.

6. Tonnage and grade measurements are in Imperial units. Grades are reported in opt.

7. The resource estimate was prepared with reference to CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral

Reserves (2014) and CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines (2003).

8. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

Conversion from Mineral Resources to Mineral Reserves is relatively straightforward. Given the nature of

the reclaimed material on the heap leach pad and the method of mining, the assumption is that all material

will be mined and processed, less any material left in place due to permit restrictions and facility location.

Allowance has been made for facility location which excludes 260,000 tons, which must remain in place,

according to the heap material mining and tailings placement design completed by Newfields.

Based on the criteria above, the Mineral Reserve Estimate is provided in Table 3 below. Given the positive

economic analysis of the Project, the mill feed material can in fact be considered a Mineral Reserve.

Table 3: Mineral Ridge Mineral Reserve Estimate

Mineral Reserve Classification Tons

(kt)

Au

(opt)

Ag

(opt)

Contained

Au (koz)

Contained

Ag (koz)

Proven 2,895 0.017 0.016 48.5 46.4

Probable 4,220 0.017 0.018 73.2 74.1

Less Material Remaining in Place (260) 0.017 0.017 (4.5) (4.6)

Total Proven & Probable 6,855 0.017 0.017 117.2 115.9

Notes:

1. Mineral Resources are contained within the Mineral Ridge leach pad facility with the following assumptions:

a. A long-term gold price of US$1,216/oz.

Scorpio Gold Corporation | 4

b. Assumed process costs are US$11/t.

c. Metallurgical recovery for gold is 91%.

2. Rounding may result in apparent differences between when summing tons, grade and contained metal content.

3. Tonnage and grade measurements are in Imperial units. Grades are reported in opt.

Mineral Processing

The proposed processing plant will be conventional and will re -process gold heap leach residual material

at a rate of 4,000 tpd with an equipment availability of 92% (365 d/a). The process flowsheet developed for

the Mineral Ridge heap leach residues is a combination of conventional comminution using ball-mills, and

CIL cyanidation to recover gold and silver. The process plant will produce a gold and silver loaded activated

carbon product from the CIL circuit. Based on the annual average throughput, and le aching and refinery

recoveries, the process plant is estimated to produce approximately 22,583 oz of gold and 5,886 oz of silver

from the mill feed grading 0.0171 opt gold and 0.0169 opt silver. The estimated gold and silver recoveries

in the CIL circuit a re 91% and 24% respectively. The loaded carbon will be shipped off -site to a refinery

to recover the gold and silver. Refinery recovery is estimated in 99.4%.

The process plant will consist of:

• Reclaiming area including mixing and holding tanks

• Grinding circuit consisting of two parallel ball mills

• A Pre-leach thickener

• Carbon in leach cyanidation

• Tailings thickening and filtration

The process flowsheet was developed based on parameters established from test work conducted by KCA

mainly from 2014 to 201 7, as well as Novus ’ engineering experience. The size selection of the grinding

mills was based on the amenability of the reclaimed ore to grinding determined through test programs

performed by laboratories. The CIL tank sizing was based on leaching times determined by test work and

using scale-up factors and experience.

Test programs evaluated several options for treating the reclaimed Mineral Ridge heap leach material.

Samples showed regular to poor responses to conventional flotation. The CIL process w as chosen as the

best available alternative due to higher gold recoveries. As part of the study, several areas for optimization

and simplification were identified in the process plant design, which reduced operational and capital

requirements.

The major criteria used in the plant design to process 4,000 tpd equivalent to 1,460,000 tpa is outlined in

Table 4.

Table 4: Major Design Criteria

Criteria Unit Value

Daily Processing Rate tpd 4,000

Operating Days per Year d/a 365

Operating Schedule - two shifts/day; 12 hours/shift

Mill Feed Grade – Average opt 0.0171

Metal Recovery - CIL % Au 91

Metal Recovery - CIL % Ag 24

Refining Recovery - Au & Ag % 99.4

Reclaimed Ore Particle Size, 80% passing in 0.14

Grinding / CIL Availability % 92

Scorpio Gold Corporation | 5

Criteria Unit Value

Milling and CIL Process Rate tph 181.2

Ball Mill Grinding Particle Size, 80% passing mesh 200

Ball Mill Circulating Load % 300

Bond Ball Mill Work Index kWh/t 15.3

CIL slurry feed density % 45

CIL residence time h 36

Final tailings cake moisture % 15

The grinding plant will receive material from the previous heap leaching operation. This material will be

reclaimed, scalped to remove trash, and mixed with water to form slurry of approximately 55% solids. The

slurry will then be transferred to a holding tank and pumped to the ball mill pump box. The design

contemplates two ball mills operating in parallel, with a shared pump box for both mills and dedicated

cyclone clusters for each ball mill. The cyclone overflow has a design 80% passing size of 200 mesh (74

microns) and feeds a pre-leach linear trash screen. The cyclone underflow will return to the two ball mills.

The mills are designed to process 2,000 tpd each. The linear trash screen undersize reports by gravity to the

pre-leach high-rate thickener where the slurry is flocculated and thickened to a density of 60% solids. The

thickener overflow is recycled to the process water pond for reuse and the thickener underflow reports to

the leaching circuit.

The leaching circuit will consist of four tanks ope rating in series with a total residence time of 36 hours.

The slurry density will be adjusted by recycling the overflow from the tailings thickener for the CIL circuit

to operate at 45% solids. It is expected that the slurry will arrive at the CIL circuit at a pH of 10.5;

adjustments will be made to maintain the required pH level, as necessary. Slurry will flow by gravity to

each tank. Dissolved gold and silver in the slurry will be adsorbed onto activated carbon and discharged

from the circuit at a designe d rate of two tons per day. Every 14 days bagged loaded carbon will be

transported to an external facility for final gold and silver recovery, and carbon regeneration and recycling.

The current operation at Mineral Ridge is a heap-leach operation, which uses reactivated carbon to adsorb

gold from the pregnant leach solution. The existing carbon handling infrastructure, which includes carbon

receiving, attritioning, sizing, sampling, and loading is suitable for the new process.

The CIL tailings will pass through a carbon safety screen to capture fugitive loaded carbon, and will report

to a tailings thickener for cyanide solution recovery. The tailings thickener overflow will be recycled to the

leach feed while the underflow will be sent to the tailings filters, where additional cyanide solution will be

recovered. The filter cake at a designed moisture of 15% will be transported by existing grasshopper

conveyors to the tailings pad. The tailings filter cake will be placed on the lined heap leach pad.

Infrastructure

The existing site infrastructure at the Mineral Ridge property is in good repair and is deemed suitable to

support the envisioned operations in the feasibility study. The following items were reviewed and found

suitable for use for the project.

Substation and power distribution: additional distribution costs were considered in the CAPEX estimate.

The main substation was found suitable to support ongoing activities.

• Maintenance facilities: no expansion necessary.

• Fuel storage: suitable as is.

• Roads: suitable as is.

• Water Supply and Management: suitable as is.

• Assay Lab: suitable as is.

• Offices: suitable as is.

Scorpio Gold Corporation | 6

• Lined pad for tailings storage: expansion required and included in the CAPEX estimate.

• Carbon handling facility: suitable as is.

Economic Analysis

The economic viability of the project has been evaluated using constant dollar, unleveraged (no financing),

after-tax discounted cash flow (DCF) methodology. This valuation method requires projecting material

balances estimated from operations and calculating resulting economics. Economic value is calculated from

sales of metal plus net equipment salvage value and bond collateral less cash outflows such as operating

costs, management fees, capital costs, working capital changes, any applicable taxes and reclamation costs.

Resulting annual cash flows are used to calculate the net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return

(IRR) of the project.

The NPV 5 is $16.5 million and the IRR is 22.5%, with payback 2.9 year s from the end of cons truction.

The project’s economic metrics are most sensitive to changes in grade and metals price, and less sensitive

to changes in operating and capital costs.

Permitting and duration of construction timetables are such that first production is scheduled to commence

start of third quarter 2019. Table 5 sets for the production schedule, grades and recoveries that result in

salable metal.

Table 5: Production Schedule

Gold prices for all project years are forecast at $1,250/oz, less $0.50/oz. of gold per contract with buyer.

Forecast silver prices are from a June 30, 2017 CIBC Global Mining Group, Analyst Consensus Commodity

Price Forecasts study, less $0.01/oz. of silver per contract wit h buyer. The price of silver varies year over

year between $19.28/oz to $19.82/oz, with an average price over the project life of $19.76/oz. Table 6

shows ounces of metal for sale, prices and resulting revenues. Given the terms of the selling agreement

(payment five days following placement for sale) and production inventory time due to shipping from the

mill to the stripper and then to the refinery (stripping time is 16 days and refining 7 days, inclusive of

transport time), receipt of payment for revenues is delayed by 28 days. The cash impact of these timing

differences is noted in the last two lines of Table 6 and, combined with accounts payable changes is noted

as working capital in Table 9: Cash Flow.

Scorpio Gold Corporation | 7

Table 6: Salable Ounces, Price and Revenue and Working Capital Changes

Operating costs are summarized in Table 7.

Table 7: Operating Costs

Capital costs, reclamation bond collateral, reclamation costs and recovery of bond collateral are

summarized in Table 8.

Table 8: Capital, Bond and Reclamation Costs

Scorpio Gold Corporation | 8

Table 9: Cash Flow

Figure 1: Cash Flow Chart