Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

SGC.V ·

Solstice Field Work Supports 16km Extension of the Red Lake Gold Camp Drill Targets Developing for 2022 Exploration Program

Exploration Programs

Solstice Field Work Supports 16km Extension of the Red Lake Gold Camp

Drill Targets Developing for 2022 Exploration Program

VANCOUVER, British Columbia, March 14, 2022 - Solstice Gold Corp. (TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice”, “we”, “our” or the

“Company”) is pleased to announce results of airborne electroma gnetic (“EM”) surveys and soil sampling at our

RLX Gold Project (“RLX”), located in the northwestern extension of the prolific Red Lake Gold Camp (the “Camp”).

The 2021 field results have outlined four key target areas with gold in soil anomalies as well as geological,

geophysical, and geochemical settings that are consistent with other deposit areas in the Camp. The Company

plans to test these targets in 2022 starting with a 5,000 metre, permitted and fully funded drill program. Based on

a compilation of the new data, we have recently extended our land position f rom 5.5 km2 to 11 km2 with new

staking to secure additional prospective ground.

Summary of Results

• Combined EM, soil and geological data reveal approximately 16km of strike potential within a largely

unexplored extension of the Red Lake Gold Camp.

• Strongly elevated gold and spatially associated soil pathfinder elements combined with EM and structural

interpretations define numerous target areas in several settings.

• EM response within the project is widespread and variable with subdued conductivity in areas of elevated

soil geochemical responses. This may indicate alter ation of host conductive units by later processes

associated with mineralization. NE-trending conductors are present in several areas which correlate with

interpreted, and locally observed , NE-trending geological features which cut the regional NW trending

fabric. Areas of strong conductivity are present including some outside of known greenstone belts.

• NE-trending structures with an interpreted extensional component may provide support for the presence

of a major crustal fault (“E1”) as interpreted from seismic data1. In February 2021, the Ontario Geological

Survey (“OGS”) drew attention to regional seismic structures surfacing in the area of RLX noting that two

other similar structures are associated with important gold deposits in the Camp2.

Mike Timmins, Solstice’s Chief Executive Officer , stated, “Our goal in Red Lake is to make a discovery outside of

the traditional mine trend in areas of the Camp which are meaningfully underexplored. Last year’s fieldwork has

generated several exciting target areas which will now be drill tested systematically for the first time. We are

fortunate to be one of only a few groups with a significant land position, momentum building as we continue to

outline potential and an exciting exploration program about to begin . We look forward to releasing additional

detail on each of these prospective target areas in the coming weeks and prior to the commencement of drilling

in the spring.”

DETAILED REVIEW OF RESULTS OF TECHNICAL PROGRAMS

Background

As outlined in our news release dated January 10, 2022 , government and researchers , using seismic data have

pointed to the potential presence of major , crustal scale south-dipping normal or extension faults in the vicinity

of RLX denoted as E1 and E2 in the literature . In February 20212, the OGS drew attention to two other similar

features further south in the Camp that are associated with important gold deposits and /or mines. During 2021,

we carried out geological, soil (humus) sampling and magnetic/EM surveys. The integrated results of these

programs, detailed below, define numerous target areas over a combined 16km strike length.

David Adamson, Ph.D., Solstice’s Chairman, stated, “Our experience in Red Lake, including directly along strike

of RLX, gives us confidence that we control an essentially unexplored, extension of the prolific Red Lake Gold

Camp. Third party data suggest s major, deep-seated structures should be present in the area and we may be

seeing evidence for these locally. Systematic exploration at RLX, including geological mapping, magnetic, EM and

soil surveys, confirm the prospective setting for gold mineralization and the objective of our upcoming drill

program will be to confirm this. It should be noted that, further north, we also control the 11 km long New Frontier

property, where a second deep structure is inferred by the OGS and others. We will be carrying out field work in

this area in 2022 using experience gained from RLX.”

EM surveys outline extensive, variable conductivity and subsidiary NE-trending anomalies.

In November 2021, we carried out magnetic and EM surveys designed to support geological mapping over the

property due to limited surface rock exposure and to investigate the potential for mineralization associated with,

or near, conductive features. Our model is based on o ther gold occurrences in the district including the Sidace

Gold Deposit (Evolution Mining – 53.3% - Pacton Gold 46.7%), The PureGold Mine (Madsen) and other more recent

examples. In the Camp, conductive features themselves can be gold -bearing or can serve as markers to aid in

vectoring towards parallel or associated targets.

An example of the conductive response at 80 metres below surface, integrated with our structural modelling, is

provided in Figure 1 which shows the following:

• Regionally extensive conductors developed over a 16km strike length displaying variable conductivity and

interpreted to mark the widespread presence of Red Lake geology.

• Conspicuous NE-trending conductors are associated with NE-trending faults, e.g, South Target area (Figure

1). Faults in this area can be traced southwestwards to the Sidace Gold Deposit area. Many of the NE

structures are interpreted to be extensional and could be evidence supporting the regional E1 structure

interpreted by third parties from seismic data1,2.

• The conductive sequence lies adjacent to the regionally extensive Nungessor Shear Zone (“NSZ”), mapped

by the OGS. This feature, which can be traced northwards for at least 80km is also a candidate for the

surface expression of the seismically interpreted E1 feature although further north, on our New Frontier

project, the OGS interpret the NSZ as the second major seismic structure, E2 (News Release dated January

10, 2022).

Figure 1 shows historical diamond drill holes in the area ( Dome Exploration Canada – Placer Dome, 1980). These

holes were shallow and only sparsely sampled but out of twelve holes, two recorded elevated gold over narrow

widths (two intervals of 0.68g/t over 1.52m in hole B6 and 1.68g/t over 0.68m in hole B7 ). Four holes did not

adequately explain their geophysical target and one was sampled but did not report assays in filed assessment

work. Two drill holes reported sericite schist and/or skarn units whi ch are important hosts rocks at Sidace and

elsewhere in the Camp. As was the case in the Sidace area, which subsequently has seen more than 80,000 metres

of drilling, Placer Dome did not follow up on these early signs of prospectivity.

Figure 1. -80m conductivity slice of EM 3d voxel with fault interpretation on shadowed regional OGS magnetic base. Area

of new staking shown in yellow covering fault extensions. Nungessor Shear Zone from OGS mapping. Areas of potential

seismic structures shown as E1 and E2 on inset map.

Figure 2. Elevated Gold in soils (humus) plotted on the -80m conductivity slice with fault interpretation on

shadowed regional OGS magnetic base. Area of new staking shown in yellow covering fault extensions.

Soil Sampling outlines elevated gold and pathfinder elements in several areas.

In early summer 202 1, we carried out test humus soils sampling over selected parts of the property. This work

was successful in defining areas with anomalous gold plus specific pathfinder elements arsenic, molybdenum,

mercury, and antimony (News Release dated September 8, 2021). Based on these positive results, we expanded

soil sampling in late 202 1 to include other accessible parts of the property . Results for gold are summarized in

Figure 2 with further detail provided for three sub-areas in Figures 3 to 5.

Figure 3. Central Grid Ah (humus) gold -arsenic-molybdenum soils plotted on -80m conductivity slice fault interpretation on

shadowed regional OGS magnetic base (scale as in Figs 1 and 2). See text for further details.

Discussion of Soil Data

Three main areas of elevated gold and pathfinder elements are present in the Central, North and South grid areas

(see Figure 2). These are summarized below:

Central Grid – See Figure 3

• This is a 1.3km x 0.9km area containing elevated gold +/ - arsenic anomalies with flanking elevated

molybdenum. Other anomalous elements (not shown) include antimony and mercury.

• Numerous elevated gold samples in this area have values greater than the 95 th percentile of the data

(N=711). While it is not possible to directly compare th ese absolute values with other gold-bearing areas

outside of RLX, experience and third-party examples suggest that the 95th percentile value of >7.5ppb Au

is meaningful. Eight samples in this area contain >10ppb Au of which six have >15ppb (max = 19.2ppb Au).

Arsenic and molybdenum values in the central area range up to 30.3ppm and 1.78ppm, respectively.

Summary statistics for all elements described in this news release are presented in Table 1.

• Conductivity in the area, while present, is reduced in areas of elevated soils which may indicate alteration

of primary conductive units.

• Several E-NE-trending interpreted structures are visible in magnetic data in the vicinity of the elevated

soil data.

• The area lies immediately east of a “Sanukitoid” gabbro body mapped and sample by the OGS. This

intrusive rock type is diagnostic of a mantle derivation which suggests it tapped very deep structures and

as such is further supporting evidence for the presen ce of crustal scale faults in this area . East of the

elevated soil responses is an area of very elevated magnetic response of unknown origin.

Figure 4. North Grid Ah (humus) gold -arsenic-molybdenum data on -80m conductivity slice with fault interpretation on

shadowed regional OGS magnetic base. See text for further details.

Figure 5. South Grid Ah (humus) gold-arsenic-antimony-molybdenum soils on -80m conductivity slice of EM 3d voxel with

fault interpretation on shadowed regional OGS magnetic base. See text for details.

North Grid – See Figure 4

• This area shows t wo sub areas of gold -arsenic and, to its s outh, gold -arsenic-molybdenum anomal ies

which, collectively define a 1.7km x 0.9km area. Other anomalous pathfinder elements in this area include

antimony and mercury.

• The two areas referred to above are separated by a conspicuous NE-trending break in conductivity which

may correlate with a structure (fault).

• Notable soil samples in this area include gold, arsenic and antimony with maximum values of 19.7ppb,

48.6ppm and 24.6ppm, respectively. See Table 1 for complete summary statistics.

• Sampling does not extend to the northwest and where conductivity data suggest the geological trend

continues.

South Grid – See Figure 5

• This area of soils is marked by conspicuous NE -SW trending conductors which correlate with regional -

scale magnetic features interpreted as normal (extensional) faults. Unlike the rest of the property, this is

an area where a minor amount of outcrop exists and where NE-trending foliations are mapped defining a

NE-SW-trending F2 fold axis, oriented approximately 90 degrees to regional NW-trending (F1) structures.

• Multi-element soil anomalies are present in this area but are not as strong as in the central and north

target areas. However, 3D EM data suggest that near surface conductivity is low and that the EM

conductor in this area improves with depth. It is possible therefore that this area is exhibiting a muted soil

near surface response as a result.

There are other areas of elevated gold in soils not reviewed here and extensive parts of the property could not be

sampled due to lack of available humus or access issues. One notable example is the strong area of conductivity

in the NE area (Figure 1) which has only limited access for soil sampling, but remains a key target area.

Summary

1) Taken together, soils, EM and structural interpretations define numerous target areas. Gold in soils are

typically associated with other pathfinders which would be predicted by our exploration model (e.g.,

arsenic, molybdenum, antimony, mercury).

2) EM responses across the project are varied. Often, but not always, EM is reduced in areas of anomalous

soils compared to areas along strike which may indicate secondary alteration of host conductive units by

later processes. Several areas display NE-trending conductors which are correlated with interpreted and

locally mapped NE-trending geological features.

3) NE-trending structures are interpreted to have an extensional component and may provide support for

the presence of extensional features associated with the major E1 extensional structure identified from

seismic data2

Table 1. Summary statistics of selected elements

Statistic Au ppb As ppm Mo ppm Ag ppm Sb ppm Hg ppm

Nbr. of observations 711 711 711 711 711.00 711

Minimum 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.005 0.01 1

Maximum 19.70 48.60 5.22 0.975 24.60 420

1st Quartile 1.20 3.60 0.24 0.036 0.10 80

Median 2.00 5.30 0.36 0.066 0.17 120

3rd Quartile 3.30 7.80 0.51 0.127 0.29 190

Mean 2.66 6.28 0.46 0.098 0.25 135

Variance (n-1) 6.43 18.71 0.22 0.010 0.87 6197

Standard deviation (n-1) 2.53 4.33 0.47 0.102 0.93 79