Sandfire Resources America Announces Results of Updated Pre-Feasibility Study for the Johnny Lee Deposit and Updated Mineral Resource for the Lowry Deposit at the Black Butte Copper Project Updated PFS for the Johnny Lee Deposit and new Mineral Resource estimate for the nearby
1
17 E Main Street
PO Box 431
White Sulphur Springs, MT 59645
Tel: (406) 547-3466
Fax: (406) 547-3719
Web: www.sandfireamerica.com
Email: [email protected]
Sandfire Resources America Announces Results of Updated
Pre-Feasibility Study for the Johnny Lee Deposit and Updated
Mineral Resource for the Lowry Deposit at the Black Butte
Copper Project
Updated PFS for the Johnny Lee Deposit and new Mineral Resource estimate for the nearby
Lowry Deposit underline the high-grade underground copper potential, with a Probable
Mineral Reserve for the Johnny Lee Deposit of 9.5Mt at 2.9% Cu for 270,000t of copper and
an 8-year life at the Black Butte Copper Project in Montana, USA, that aligns with the
stringent Mine Operating Permit conditions.
White Sulphur Springs, Montana – December 16, 2025 – Sandfire Resources America Inc.
(“Sandfire America” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce its updated Mineral Resource and
Reserve and the results of the Preliminary Feasibility Study Update (the “Study Update” or “PFS”)
for the Johnny Lee deposit at its Black Butte Copper Project in White Sulphur Springs, Montana,
USA, pursuant to National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI
43-101”).
The Study Update relates to Mineral Resources and Reserves associated with the Johnny Lee copper
deposit, the cornerstone deposit at the Black Butte Copper Project (the " Johnny Lee Deposit" or
the “Project”).
The Company is also pleased to announce an updated Mineral Resource for the Lowry copper deposit
(the "Lowry Deposit"), which is located approximately 3km south-east of the Johnny Lee Deposit.
Study Update Highlights:
• Average annual post-tax cashflows of US$78 million per annum for the first five years
of operations.
• The Project is forecast to generate US$2.3 billion in gross revenue and US$1.0 billion in
pre-tax net cashflow during mine operations, based on a copper price of US$4.70/lb.
• Updated Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource of 18.9 million tonnes at 2.4% copper
for 462,000 tonnes of contained copper and Inferred Mineral Resource of 3.4 million
tonnes at 1.9% copper for 64,000 tonnes of contained copper completed for the Johnny Lee
Deposit.
• Using a Net Smelter Return cut off value of US$110/t, the Probable Mineral Reserves have
increased from 8.8Mt at 2.6% Cu for 230,000 tonnes of contained copper in 2020 to 9.5
million tonnes at 2.9% copper for 270,000 tonnes of contained copper for the 2025 PFS,
defined for the Johnny Lee Upper and Lower Copper Zones.
• The Project has been designed in accordance with all standards and obligations
required under the Project’s stringent Mine Operating Permit conditions.
• The Johnny Lee Deposit underpins an 8-year mine life and is designed to be mined at 1.2
million tonnes of ore per annum, with the processing plant producing ~35,000 tonnes per
annum of contained copper in the initial four years of operation.
• Forecast production totaling 1,039,000 dry metric tonnes of copper concentrate containing
2
234,000 tonnes of copper metal over the life of the mine.
• Average annual production of ~29,000 tonnes of copper metal over an initial 8 year
mine life at a direct operating cash cost (C1) of US$2.56/lb.
• The Project has a pre-tax NPV8% of US$143 million (IRR=13.6%) and a post-tax NPV8% of
US$99 million (IRR=11.3%).
• With a 10% movement in copper price, which is close to the current spot price for copper,
pre-tax NPV 8% increases to US$288 million (IRR=19.4%) with a post -tax NPV 8% of
US$217 million (IRR=16.0%).
Construction capital cost of US$474 million.
• For the Lowry Deposit, located 3km south-east of the Johnny Lee Deposit, a Measured and
Indicated Resource of 6.6 million tonnes at 2.4% copper for 154,000 of contained copper,
and Inferred Mineral Resource of 2.8 million tonnes at 2.1% copper for 58,000 tonnes
of contained copper has been defined for the 2025 PFS as compared to solely an inferred
resource outlined in 2020:
o The updated Mineral Resource is based on updated geological modeling, resource
estimation, classification, and mineralogy/recovery assumptions.
o The Lowry Deposit is not covered by the current environmental permits and will
need to undergo further permitting and approvals process.
• The Study Update economic analysis is based on the Johnny Lee Deposit Mineral Reserves
and does not include the Lowry Deposit.
Commenting on the Study Update completion and key outcomes, Sandfire America CEO Lincoln
Greenidge stated:
“Today’s results mark an important milestone for the Black Butte Copper Project and reaffirm our
confidence in the world- class potential of the Johnny Lee and Lowry deposits. The updated PFS
confirms Johnny Lee ’s highest-grade potential of any known undeveloped underground copper
deposit in the United States, and it does so while meeting, and in many cases exceeding, the rigorous
environmental and operational standards set out in our Mine Operating Permit. This reinforces our
longstanding commitment to responsible, modern mining in Montana.
Importantly, the new Mineral Resource estimate for the Lowry Deposit underscores the scale of the
broader area and highlights a powerful opportunity for future growth beyond the initial 8-year mine
plan. Together, these updates position Black Butte as a st rategically significant domestic copper
project at a time when U.S. supply of critical minerals has never been more essential.
Our focus now turns to advancing the project through completion of a feasibility study. We remain
committed to the development of a modern, environmentally responsible operation that will deliver
long-term economic benefits to Meagher County and to the State of Montana, while creating
meaningful value for our shareholders.”
3
1. Black Butte Copper Project Overview
The Black Butte Copper Project consists of 7,684 hectares of fee simple lands held under mineral
lease by the Company and 1,040 unpatented mining claims on U.S. Forest Service Lands (USFS),
leased by the Company, totaling 8,078 hectares. The Black Butte Copper Project is located in south-
central Montana in Meagher County, 27 km north of White Sulphur Springs.
Johnny Lee Deposit
The Johnny Lee Deposit was discovered by a joint venture between Cominco American Inc. and
Utah International in 1985. The Johnny Lee Deposit is comprised of two zones of mineralization: an
upper copper zone (“JL UCZ”) situated at depths of 40m – 210m below surface and an underlying
lower copper zone (“JL LCZ”) at depths of 340m – 520m below surface.
A mine operating plan (“MOP”) application for the extraction of mineralized rock from both zones
of the Johnny Lee Deposit was submitted to the Montana Department of Environmental Quality
(“MT DEQ”) in December 2015. The application was deemed to be complete and compliant, and a
draft MOP permit was issued by the MT DEQ on September 18, 2017. After a full Environmental
Impact Statement (“EIS”) process, a MT DEQ positive record of decision was received on April 9,
2020, allowing for the development and underground mining of the Johnny Lee Deposit to proceed.
On August 14, 2020, the MT DEQ approved the bond posting and issued a Final Mine Operating
Permit allowing the Company the right to commence Phase I Development surface construction at
the mine site.
Following a 2020 legal challenge to the Mine Operating Permit, on February 26, 2024, the Company
received a positive ruling by the Montana Supreme Court reversing a 2021 district court decision and
instructed the district judge to have the MT DEQ completely reinstate Tintina Montana Inc.’s Mine
Operating Permit of the Black Butte Copper Project. The Montana Supreme Court granted the
Company’s request for summary judgement allowing the Company to move forward with
construction of its highly engineered, underground copper mine. The Company won on all counts in
the Montana Supreme Court with a 5- 2 decision upholding the 2020 decision of the MT DEQ to
allow responsible copper mining at the Black Butte Copper Project.
The MOP proposes underground mining of the Johnny Lee Deposit using a drift and fill mining
method and production of a copper concentrate by milling and froth flotation. Mill tailings will be
used for underground paste-fill support and the surplus deposited in a double-lined cemented tailings
storage facility.
Lowry Deposit
The Lowry Deposit, a similar style copper deposit to the Johnny Lee Deposit, is located
approximately 3km to the south-east of the Johnny Lee Deposit. Copper mineralization is primarily
hosted in the Lowry Middle Copper Zone (“LMCZ”) and Lowry Lower Copper Zone (“LLCZ”),
surrounded by a lower grade “halo” of copper mineralization.
For further details about the Project, please go to the Sandfire Resources America Inc. website at
www.sandfireamerica.com.
2. Study Update (PFS)
The current study is an underground Pre- Feasibility Study for the Johnny Lee D eposit, building on
the prior Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA, 2013) and the subsequent Feasibility Study
completed in 2020, which defined an initial Mineral Reserve for the Johnny Lee Deposit. The Study
Update incorporates updated geological and structural models for the JL UCZ and JL LCZ, revised
Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates, updated metallurgical test work and recovery
models, integrated with systematic mineralogy and geometallurgical modelling, and updated capital
and operating cost estimates and refining charges, using long- term copper price assumptions of
US$4.70/lb.
The Study Update mine plan and economic analysis are based only on the Johnny Lee Deposit
Mineral Reserves. The Lowry Deposit is covered by a separate Inferred Mineral Resource estimate
and is not included in the current mine plan, production schedule, or economic analysis. Development
of the Lowry Deposit would require additional technical studies, environmental review , and
permitting.
4
2.1 Economic Analysis
The Study Update economic analysis is based on the Johnny Lee Deposit Mineral Reserves. The
Study Update does NOT include the Lowry Deposit.
The copper price assumption adopted for the base case is US$4.70/lb. from the start of production.
The Project’s post-tax NPV at an 8% discount rate is estimated to be US$99M with an IRR of 11.3%.
Pre-tax NPV at an 8% discount rate is estimated to be US$143M with an IRR of 13.6%. Initial capital
costs are estimated to be US$474M, and sustaining capital is estimated to be US$82M. Cash Costs
(C1) are estimated to be US $2.56/lb. of copper. The life-of-mine all-in sustaining cost is estimated
to be US$2.83/lb. of copper. Payback of start -up capital is achieved approximately 4 years from
commissioning.
2.2 Johnny Lee Deposit - Mineral Reserves
The Mineral Reserve was prepared in accordance with Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
and Petroleum (“CIM”) Definition Standards and will be supported by the Study Update pursuant to
the NI 43 -101 “Standards for Disclosure for Mineral Project”, to be published and filed on the
Company’s website and SEDAR+ profile within 45 days.
A net smelter return (“NSR”) value was calculated for each block in a geological block model based
on metallurgical recovery, grade, price and payability factors. Mine design shapes were generated
based on an NSR cut-off value of US$110/t (operating cost). An NSR cut-off value of US$45/t
(incremental operating cost) was used to determine whether material should be sent to waste or
processed. Detailed mine designs were created with dilution and recovery factors applied, mineral
resource classification considered plus other modifying factors and economic viability tested. The
Mineral Reserve for the Johnny Lee Deposit is shown in Table 1.
Table 1 – Mineral Reserve Johnny Lee Deposit
Class Diluted Tonnes Cu Grade Contained Cu Metal
(t)
Proven - - -
Probable 9,500,000 2.9% 270,000
Total 9,500,000 2.9% 270,000
Notes:
1. The Qualified Person for the Mineral Reserve estimate is Shane McLeay FAusIMM.
2. Effective date: November 14, 2025. All Mineral Reserves have been estimated in accordance wit h
C
IM definitions, as required under NI 43-101.
3. Mineral Reserves were estimated using a US $4.70 /lb. Cu price and NSR cut-off value s of
US$110/
t (operating cost) and US$45/t (incremental operating cost).
4. Tonnages are rounded to the nearest 100 kt, metal grades are rounded to one decimal place, an d
m
etal tonnes are rounded the nearest 10kt. All units are metric.
5. Rounding as required by reporting guidelines may result in summation differences.
6. Average LOM Metallurgical Recovery is 95% for JL LCZ, 78% for JL UCZ, and 86% combined.
7. Mineral Reserves are based on the Mineral Resource estimate effective November 5, 2025.
8. Mineral Reserves are a subset of Mineral Resources.
The Mineral Reserves identified in Table 1 comply with CIM definitions and standards for a NI 43-
101 technical report. Detailed information on mining, processing, metallurgical, and other relevant
factors demonstrate, at the time of the Study Update, that economic extraction is feasible. The Study
Update did not identify any mining, metallurgical, infrastructure or other relevant factors that may
materially affect the estimates of the Mineral Reserves or potential production. Table 2 below shows
the Mineral Reserves broken out by zone.
5
Table 2 – Mineral Reserves for the Johnny Lee Deposit by Zone
Zone Class Diluted Tonnes Cu Grade Contained Cu Metal
(Tonnes)
JL UCZ Total
Proven - - -
Probable 6,700,000 2.2% 140,000
Total 6,700,000 2.2% 140,000
JL LCZ Total
Proven - - -
Probable 2,800,000 4.6% 130,000
Total 2,800,000 4.6% 130,000
Project Total Total 9,500,000 2.9% 270,000
Notes:
1. Tonnages are rounded to the nearest 100 kt, metal grades are rounded to one decimal place, and
metal tonnes are rounded the nearest 10kt. All units are metric.
2. Rounding as required by reporting guidelines may result in summation differences.
3. Mineral Reserves were estimated using a US $4.70 /lb. Cu price and NSR cut-off value s of
US$110/t (operating cost) and US$45/t (incremental operating cost).
2.3 Johnny Lee Deposit - Mineral Resource Estimate
The updated Mineral Resource estimate for the Johnny Lee D eposit has been prepared under the
supervision of Berkley Tracy, P. Geo (PGO#3024) of SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc., an independent
Qualified Person (QP) under NI 43-101.
A total of 305 drillholes were used to inform the 2025 Johnny Lee Deposit geology model and
Mineral Resource estimate including historical and recent drilling between 2010 and present . The
Mineral Resource statement is supported by recent updates to the geological modeling, resource
estimation, and mineralogy with recovery assumptions in addition to historic drilling, analyses, and
studies. Mineralization is hosted in two distinct zones of > 1.2% Cu mineralization, JL UCZ and JL
LCZ.
Drillhole intersection spacing in the JL UCZ ranges from 10 – 100 m. The JL UCZ is hosted by
dolomitic shale with abundant massive pyrite beds and some dolomite layers.
Many of the drillholes that intersected the JL UCZ were stopped-short of the JL LCZ; consequently,
drillhole spacing in the JL LCZ is larger than that of the JL UCZ, ranging from 50 – 200m. The JL
LCZ occurs below the Volcano Valley fault . The JL LCZ is hosted by interbedded shale,
conglomerate, and pyrite beds at the base of the Newland Formation.
Variable metallurgical recoveries for the JL UCZ required modeling on a block-by-block basis. The
JL LCZ has an overall average of 95% recovery. Based on the new test work, the increased recovery
values were used in the current calculation of NSR. Mineral Resource classification was assigned to
the Johnny Lee Deposit block model by the QP based upon: geological knowledge, continuity of Cu
grade within mineralized zones, thickness of the mineralized zones, confidence in the underlying
data (logging, assay, and physical testing), spatial continuity as determined through variography for
Cu, recovery data, and kriging quality variables (kriging efficiency, slope or regression, average
distance to samples, and estimation run pass). Blocks within the JL UCZ and JL LCZ have been
categorized consistent with NI 43 -101 and the CIM definitions and guidelines. A combination of
block scripting and manual smoothing with polylines was used to apply the appropriate block
classification of Mineral Resource categories.
Mineral Resources for the Johnny Lee Deposit have been calculated and reported using an economic
cut-off value (CoV), as estimated in the resource block model. The Mineral Resource statements are
supported by drilling, analyses, geological modelling, and metallurgical studies that determined
updated recoveries. The deposits have been classified into Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral
resources, as per CIM definitions and are summarized in Table 3.
6
Table 3 – Johnny Lee Deposit Mineral Resource at US$45.00/t NSR, effective November 5, 2025 –
SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc.
Mineral Resource
Category
Quantity (Mt) Cu (%) Total Metal (kt)
Measured + Indicated (M+I) Mineral Resources
JL UCZ
Measured 2.3 2.0 46
Indicated 13.8 1.9 261
Sub-Total M+I 16.1 1.9 307
JL LCZ
Measured 0.5 6.5 34
Indicated 2.3 5.1 121
Sub-Total M+I 2.9 5.4 154
Combined JL UCZ + JL LCZ
Measured 2.8 2.8 80
Indicated 16.1 2.4 382
Total M+I 18.9 2.4 462
Inferred Mineral Resources
JL UCZ 2.6 1.5 38
JL LCZ 0.8 3.2 26
Total Inferred 3.4 1.9 64
Source: SRK, 2025
Notes:
1. The effective date of this Mineral Resource is November 5, 2025.
2. The Mineral Resources in this estimate were prepared in accordance with the CIM Standards on
Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines (CIM, 2014) prepared by the CIM
Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by CIM Council.
3. Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Inferred Mineral Resources have a high degree of uncertainty as to their economic and technical
feasibility. There is no certainty that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resources will be
converted to Measured or Indicated Mineral Resources in the future.
4. To demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction, Mineral Resources are
reported using an economic NSR cut -off value of US$45/t, which is approximately equivalent to
0.52% recoverable Cu, based on long- term Cu price assumptions of US$4. 70/lb. and variable
recovery and mill processing cost assumptions.
5. Variable metallurgical recovery has been estimated in the JL UCZ on a block basis with a consistent
95% Cu recovery applied to the JL LCZ.
6. There are no known legal, political, environmental, or other risks that could materially affect the
potential future development of the Mineral Resources. All Mineral Resources are located within
land currently under control or lease to Sandfire Resources America, Inc.
7. All quantities are rounded to the appropriate number of significant figures to reflect the relative
accuracy of the estimate; consequently, sums may not add up due to rounding. Cu assay values were
capped where appropriate.
8. The Mineral Resources for the JL UCZ and JL LCZ were reviewed and approved by Berkley Tracy,
P.Geo (PGO#3024) of SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc., a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43 -101.
2.4 Lowry Deposit - Mineral Resource Estimate
The updated Mineral Resource statement for the Lowry Deposit is summarized in Table 4. The
Mineral Resource statement is supported by recent updates to the geological modeling, resource
estimation, and mineralogy with recovery assumptions in addition to historic drilling, analyses, and
studies. The Lowry Deposit contains no Mineral Reserves and therefore is not included in the Study
Update. The Lowry Deposit has a much lower density of drilling than the Johnny Lee Deposit.
Mineralization is hosted in two distinct zones of > 1.2% Cu mineralization. These zones are termed
the LMCZ and the LLCZ.
A total of 73 drillholes have been used for the Study Update for the Lowry Deposit Mineral Resource.
No drilling has been completed in the Lowry area since 2023. Drillhole intersection spacing in the
LMCZ ranges from 10 – 100 m.
The LMCZ is hosted by broad zones of dolomitic breccia in interbedded pyrite layers, conglomerate,
carbonaceous shale, dolomitic shale and dolomite. Many of the drillholes that intersected the LMCZ
7
were stopped-short of the LLCZ; consequently, drillhole spacing in the LLCZ is larger than that of
the LMCZ, ranging from 50 – 200m. The LLCZ occurs below the Volcano Valley Hanging Wall
with the mineralized base following the Volcano Valley Footwall Zone . The LLCZ is hosted by
interbedded shale, conglomerate, and pyrite beds.
Lowry mineralized intercepts from seven drillholes of the 2021–2022 drilling campaign were used
to generate a composite metallurgical sample within the LMCZ and a separate composite within
the LLCZ. Selected samples were sent to the Base Metal Labs in Kamloops Canada for rock
characterization and recovery testing. The LMCZ composite sample generated a 91% copper
recovery with the LLCZ yielding a 94% recovery. For the Lowry Deposit, metallurgical
recovery was previously assigned using the mean copper recovery of 86% from prior test
work across the deposit. Based on the new test work, the increased recovery values of 91% for the
LMCZ and 94% for the LLCZ were used in the current calculation of NSR cut-off values. Mineral
Resource classification was assigned to the Lowry Deposit block model by the QP based upon:
geological knowledge, continuity of Cu grade within mineralized zones, thickness of the mineralized
zones, confidence in the underlying data (logging, assay, and physical testing), spatial continuity as
determined through variography for Cu, recovery data, kriging quality variables (kriging efficiency,
slope or regression, average distance to samples, and estimation run pass). Blocks within the Lowry
Upper Copper Zone (“LUCZ”), LMCZ and LLCZ have been categorized consistent with NI 43-101
and the CIM definitions and guidelines. A combination of block scripting and manual
smoothing with polylines was used to apply the appropriate block classification of Mineral Resource
categories.
Mineral Resources for the Lowry Deposit have been calculated and reported using an
economic CoV, as estimated in the resource block model. The Mineral Resource statements
are supported by drilling, analyses, geological modelling, and metallurgical
studies that determined updated recoveries. The deposits have been classified into
Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral resources, as per CIM definitions.
Table 4 – Lowry Deposit Mineral Resource at US$110/t NSR, effective November 5, 2025 – SRK
Consulting (U.S.), Inc.
Mineral Resource
Category Quantity (Mt) Cu (%) Total Metal (kt)
Measured + Indicated (M+I) Mineral Resources
Lowry MCZ
Measured 1.2 2.6 30
Indicated 3.6 2.4 86
Sub-Total M+I 4.8 2.4 116
Lowry LCZ
Measured 0.1 1.8 1
Indicated 1.7 2.2 37
Sub-Total M+I 1.8 2.1 38
Combined Lowry UCZ + MCZ + LCZ
Measured 1.2 2.5 31
Indicated 5.3 2.3 123
Total M&I 6.6 2.4 154
Inferred Mineral
Resources
Lowry UCZ 1.3 2.3 30
Lowry MCZ 0.9 2.1 18
Lowry LCZ 0.6 1.7 10
Total Inferred 2.8 2.1 58
Source: SRK, 2025
Notes:
1. The effective date of this Mineral Resource is November 5, 2025.
2. The Mineral Resources in this estimate were prepared in accordance with the CIM Standards on
Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines (CIM, 2014) prepared by the CIM
Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by CIM Council.
3. Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Inferred Mineral Resources have a high degree of uncertainty as to their economic and technical
8
feasibility. There is no certainty that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resources will be
converted to Measured or Indicated Mineral Resources in the future.
4. To demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction, Mineral Resources are
reported using an economic NSR cut-off value of US$110/t, which is approximately
equivalent to 1.28% recoverable Cu, based on long-term Cu price assumptions of US$4.70/lb and
variable recovery and mill processing cost assumptions.
5. Metallurgical recovery for Cu has been assigned to the Lowry deposits: 91% for both LUCZ and
LMCZ and 94% for LLCZ.
6. There are no known legal, political, environmental, or other risks that could materially affect the
potential future development of the Mineral Resources. All Mineral Resources are located within
land currently under control or lease to Sandfire Resources America, Inc.
7. All quantities are rounded to the appropriate number of significant figures to reflect the relative
accuracy of the estimate; consequently, sums may not add up due to rounding. Cu assay values
were capped where appropriate.
8. The Mineral Resources for the LUCZ, LMCZ, and LLCZ were reviewed and approved by Berkley
Tracy, P.Geo (PGO#3024) of SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc., a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43 -
101.
Table 5 shows the tabulated grade-tonnage curve data to assess the sensitivity of Mineral Resources
to changes in NSR CoV at the Lowry Deposit.
Table 5 - Lowry Mineral Resource Sensitivity by Zone – Measured and Indicated
Lowry Middle Copper Zone Lowry Lower Copper Zone
NSR Cutoff
(US$/t) Cu (%) Tonnage (kt) NSR Cutoff
(US$/t) Cu (%) Tonnage (kt)
15 1.2 15.6 15 0.8 12.3
45 1.5 11.1 45 1.1 6.7
60 1.8 8.5 60 1.5 4.0
75 2.1 6.6 75 1.8 2.9
90 2.3 5.6 90 1.9 2.3
105 2.4 5.0 105 2.1 1.9
120 2.5 4.4 120 2.3 1.5
135 2.7 3.7 135 2.4 1.2
150 2.8 3.2 150 2.5 1.1
165 3.0 2.7 165 2.6 0.9
180 3.2 2.2 180 2.8 0.7
195 3.4 1.7 195 2.9 0.6
210 3.5 1.5 210 3.1 0.4
210 3.7 1.2 225 3.2 0.3
2.5 Comparison to Previous Studies
This updated PFS and accompanying Mineral Resource and Reserve estimates supersede the
previous Feasibility Study results released on October 27, 2020 (the “ FS”) and the Johnny Lee
Mineral Resource update announced on October 25, 2019, where applicable. The key changes
include: revised geological and structural interpretations for the JL UCZ and JL LCZ, integration of
expanded metallurgical and geometallurgical datasets into recovery models for the Johnny Lee
Deposit and Lowry Deposit, updated Mineral Resource Estimates for the Johnny Lee Deposit and
Lowry D eposit, updated Mineral Reserve for the Johnny Lee D eposit, and updated capital and
operating cost estimates for the Johnny Lee deposit reflecting current input assumptions.
The previous Mineral Resource Estimate for the Johnny Lee D eposit was released on October 25,
2019, and the previous Mineral Resource for the Lowry Deposit and Mineral Reserve for the Johnny
Lee Deposit were completed in 2020 (effective date October 15, 2020) as part of the Company’s FS.
The most significant change in all 2025 estimations is the use of a NSR cut-off value rather than a
cut-off grade. A significant positive change in the Johnny Lee Probable Mineral Reserve is from 8.8
Mt at 2.6% Cu (230 kt) in the 2020 estimate to 9.5 Mt at 2.9% Cu (270 kt) in the 2025 estimate. This
change is largely underpinned by an increase in the JL LCZ mineral reserve. The 2025 mineral
resource updated for Lowry Deposit includes an upgrade in confidence compared with the 2020