TRIGON METALS ANNOUNCES RELEASE OF FEASIBILITY STUDY THAT SHOWS A 103.4% IRR FOR ITS KOMBAT SURFACE MINING OPERATIONS AND PLANT RESTART HIGHLIGHTS OF THE FEASIBILITY STUDY (PHASE 1) PRODUCTION RESTART: Positive Feasibility Study confirms Phase 1 of the restart program to self -fund mill
1
TRIGON METALS ANNOUNCES RELEASE OF FEASIBILITY STUDY THAT SHOWS A 103.4% IRR FOR
ITS KOMBAT SURFACE MINING OPERATIONS AND PLANT RESTART
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE FEASIBILITY STUDY (PHASE 1) PRODUCTION RESTART:
Positive Feasibility Study confirms Phase 1 of the restart program to self -fund mill
refurbishment and the reopening of the AFW shaft
Robust base case after tax IRR of 103.4%
Start-up capital cost for the Kombat open pits of US$6.4 million, includes US$4.7 million for
plant refurbishment
In 2020, 10.7 million lb of copper produced , generating projected revenue of US$30.7
million, at a copper price of US$3.10/lb and a C1 cash cost of US$1.85/lb (base case)
Base case f ree cash flo ws of US$5.7 million (US$7.7 million, at a high case copper price of
US$3.28/lb) to be utilized to fund exploration at AFW underground mine to achieve life of
mine strategy
Offtake and project finance facility (announced in September 2017) to be finalized on the
back of the Feasibility Study submission to the lender
Pre-Feasibility Study for the underground reopening to be completed in near term
Toronto, Canada – June 5, 2018 – Trigon Metals Inc. (TSX -V: TM) (“Trigon” or the “Company”) is
pleased to announce the results of its feasibility study (“Feasibility Study”) prepared by Minxcon
(Pty) Ltd (“Minxcon”) on the surface mining areas of the Company’s Kombat operations located in
northern Namibia (“Kombat”).
The proposed surface mining operations in the Kombat East and Kombat Central areas (the “Kombat
open pits”) represent the first phase of the Company’s life of mine (“LoM”) strategy as presented in
the recently published technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Kombat Copper
Project, Namibia”, dated March 22, 2018, including a Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”).
Future phases of the strategy comprise the recommencement of the various historic underground
mines at Kombat, starting with the Asis Far West underground mine (“AFW”) , as well as surface
mining at Gr oss Otavi, and ultimately back into Asis West to mine the gap area and explore the
resource at depth.
The positive after tax net present value (“NPV”) of US$4.6 million (at a base case copper price of
US$3.10/lb) (US$6.5 million at a high case copper price of US$3.28/lb) and healthy internal rate of
return (“IRR”) of 103.4% for the Kombat open pits as presented in the Feasibility Study confirm the
robust nature of the Kombat operations.
Stephan Theron, President and CEO of Trigon, commented: “The completion of the feasibility study
is a major milestone for the Company and its stakeholders. We are extremely pleased with the
positive results and look forward to taking the next steps towards production and further
development. We have submitted the Feasibility Study results to our offtake and project finance
partner and expect sign off and the availability of the funding facility in the near term.”
2
A NI 43-101 technical report with respect to the Feasibility Study will be filed under the Company’s
profile on SEDAR within 45 days of this press release.
Financing Facility
As previously announced, Trigon, together with its 80% owned subsidiary, Manila Investments (Pty)
Ltd (“Manila”), has agreed to terms with a majo r international trading house for a copper
concentrate offtake from Kombat (the “Offtake”) and a financing facility of up to US$7.7 million (the
“Facility”) to fund the restart of open pit mining.
Trigon will act as guarantor for the Facility, and security will include first ranking charges and security
interest over all present and future property and assets of Manila.
The terms of both the Offtake and the Facility are subject to various conditions precedent, including
final due diligence and approvals from the trader, which are in the process of being completed.
Feasibility Study Results
Based on the Mineral Resource Estimates for the Kombat East and Kombat Central areas as
presented in the table below, the Kombat open pits have an NPV of US$4.6 million, at a real discount
rate of 7.6%, which represents a payback period of 1.6 years and a highly attractive IRR of 103.4%.
The Company still plans to undertake additional drilling in the surface mining area with the goals of:
(i) increasing the open pit Mineral Resource within the current pit boundaries, (ii) drilling between
the Central and East pits, outside of the existing pit boundaries, and (iii) testing potential to the
north and west of these areas. The three phase drilling program to extend the c urrent open pit
Mineral Resource comprises a further 34 holes, with an aggregate of 1,437 meters to be drilled, and
may represent potential upside on the Feasibility Study results.
Summary of Economic Results
Low Case Base Case High Case
Copper Price* US$/lb 2.99 3.10 3.28
Silver Price US$/oz 18 18 18
Revenue (LoM) US$ million 56.7 58.7 62.2
Free Cash Flows
(LoM)
US$ million 4.4 5.7 7.7
NPV 7.6% ** US$ million 3.5 4.6 6.5
IRR ** % 75.0% 103.4% 158.9%
Payback ** Years 1.8 1.6 1.5
*Low case and high case prices are based on the average 25 th and 75th percentile consensus copper price over the LoM,
as per various bank and analyst forecasts in real terms.
**NPV, IRR and payback are reported after-tax.
Mineral Resources and Reserves
The Feasibility Study analysis has been based on the Indicated Mineral Resource Estimates for the
Kombat East and Kombat Central areas as at February 28, 2018, as presented in the table below.
3
The Mineral Resource Estimates were prepared and classified by Minxcon in accordance with the
reporting guidelines as required by the Canadian Securities Administrators. The Qualified Person
responsible for the declaration of the Mineral Resource Estimation is Mr. Uwe Engelman BSc (Zoo.
& Bot.), BSc Hons (Geol.), Pr .Sci.Nat. Reg. No. 400058/08 , MGSSA, who is a “qualified person ” as
such term is defined in NI 43- 101 and CIM definition standards.
Mineral Resource Estimate as at February 28, 2018
Mine Area
Mineral
Resource
Class
Tonnes Density Cu Pb Ag Cu Content Pb Content Ag Content
Mt t/m3 % % ppm t t kg
Kombat East Indicated 0.951 2.82 1.03 0.92 1.01 9,806 8,721 961
Kombat Central Indicated 0.578 2.81 1.32 0.41 5.96 7,623 2,341 3,440
Kombat West Indicated - - - - - - - -
Total Indicated 1.529 2.82 1.14 0.72 2.88 17,428 11,062 4,401
Kombat East Inferred 0.397 2.85 1.11 0.78 1.63 4,409 3,096 648
Kombat Central Inferred 0.287 2.84 1.37 0.87 5.92 3,926 2,502 1,701
Kombat West Inferred 0.461 2.88 2.76 2.96 2.45 12,700 13,633 1,130
Gross Otavi Inferred 0.643 2.84 0.93 2.50 0.85 6,006 16,053 546
Asis West Inferred 2.475 2.88 4.05 1.28 32.36 100,214 31,735 80,078
Asis Gap Inferred 0.166 2.83 2.35 0.35 21.15 3,909 590 3,514
Asis Far West Inferred 1.082 2.85 3.42 0.10 35.81 37,000 1,036 38,763
Total Inferred 5.511 2.86 3.05 1.25 22.93 168,163 68,644 126,380
Notes
1. The open pit Mineral Resource is declared to a depth of 150 m with a CuEq cut off of 0.77 % for Otavi and 0.6%
for Kombat at a Cu Price of US$8,535 per Cu tonne and Pb Price of US$2,683 per Pb tonne.
2. The underground Mineral Resource (below 150 m) is declared at a CuEq cut off of 1.4 % at a Cu Price of US$7,033
per Cu tonne and Pb Price of US$2,315 per Pb tonne.
3. A geological loss of 15% for the Inferred and 10% for the Indicated Mineral Resource has been applied.
4. The Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
5. Mineral Resources are reported as total Mineral Resources and are not attributed.
6. Columns may not add up due to rounding
7. Inferred Mineral Resources have a large degree of uncertainty as to their existence and whether they can be mined
economically. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of the Inferred Mineral Resource will be upgraded to a
higher confidence category. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
Mineral Reserve Estimate as at April 30, 2018
The Mineral Reserve Estimates were prepared and classified by Minxcon in accordance with the
reporting guidelines as required by the Canadian Securities Administrators. The Qualified Person
responsible for the declaration of the Mineral Reserve Estimation is Mr. Daan van Heerden B Eng
(Min.), MCom (Bus. Admin.), MMC, Pr.Eng. Reg. No. 20050318 , FSAIMM, AMMSA, who is a
“qualified person” as such term is defined in NI 43- 101 and CIM definition standards.
Area Reserve
Classification
Tonnes Cu
Grade
Pb
Grade
Ag
Grade
Cu
Content
Pb
Content
Ag
Content
Mt % % g/t t t kg
East & Central Probable Mineral
Reserves 0.77 1.30% 0.47% 4.33 9,985 3,598 3,322
4
Notes:
1. Cu Cut-off of 0.71%.
2. Cu Price of US$6,825 per Cu tonne and Ag Price of US$572.83 per Ag kg.
3. Exchange Rate of NAD:US$12.43.
4. The Mineral Reserves are reported as total Mineral Reserves and are not attributed.
Production and Processing
The Kombat open pits have a LoM of three years mining 767kt at an average mined grade of 1.3%
copper as set out in the table below.
Item Unit Feasibility Study
Ore Tonnes Mined kt 767
Average Cu Grade Mined % 1.3
Average Ag Grade Mined g/t 4.3
Total Cu Concentrate kt 42
Total Cu Metal Recovered kt 9
Total Ag Metal Recovered koz 94
LoM Years 3
The estimated saleable copper tonnes over the LoM are illustrated in the graph below.
Capital expenditure
The start-up capital required for first production from the Kombat open pits is estimated at US$6.4
million, including contingencies. This includes US$4.7 million for refurbishment of the existing mill
and concentrator at a capacity of 35kt per month and phase 1 of a new tailings storage facility. The
plant and infrastructure can also be used as a base for future underground operations as presented
in the PEA dated March 22, 2018 as referred to above, but may require further expansion capital.
Revenue and operating costs
The Kombat open pits are forecast to generate reven ue of US$58.7 million over their LoM, based
on the following commodity price forecasts (in real terms) as used in the Feasibility Study.
-
1 000
2 000
3 000
4 000
5 000
6 000
2019
2020
2021
Metal Tonnes
Saleable Copper Metal Tonnes
5
Item Unit 2019 2020 2021
Silver US$/oz. 17.60 17.80 18.10
Copper US$/tonne 6,895 6,779 6,803
Copper US$/lb 3.13 3.07 3.09
Direct cash costs (C1) for the Kombat open pits consist of mining and plant operating costs,
concentrate transport costs, treatment costs and refining costs. Other cash costs (C3) include
corporate overheads and the Namibian revenue royalty of 3%. The Kombat open pits have an
estimated all-in sustainable cost of US$2.64/copper equivalent pound (“CuEq lb”).
The turnover, cost and earnings numbers are displayed in the table below per recovered copper
equivalent pound.
Item Unit Feasibility Study
Copper Equivalent Tonnes* Tonnes 9,286
Net Turnover US$/CuEq lb 3.10
Mine Cost US$/CuEq lb 0.76
Plant Costs US$/CuEq lb 0.61
Other Costs US$/CuEq lb 0.59
Direct Cash Costs (C1) US$/CuEq lb 1.95
Capex US$/CuEq lb 0.38
Production Costs (C2) US$/CuEq lb 2.33
Royalties US$/CuEq lb 0.09
Corporate Overheads US$/CuEq lb 0.22
All-in Sustainable Costs (C3) US$/CuEq lb 2.64
*Copper equivalent tonnes take into account payability terms as per the off-take referred to above.
Cash flows
The Kombat open pits are forecast to generate US$5.7 million of free cash flows over the three year
LoM, which cash is expected to be applied to the second phase of the Company’s operations, being
exploration and development at AFW.
AFW Pre-Feasibility Study
As previously announced, in conjunction with the Feasibility Study, the Company has undertaken a
Pre-Feasibility Study on AFW, split into two phases being exploration and development, and mining.
Environmental Permitting
The Company applied to secure the Environmental Clearance Certificate required for open pit
mining and associated activities, as well as that needed for exploration activities for underground
mining at AFW, and awaits approval from the relevant Namibian authorities.
Qualified Person
Mr. D van Heerden B Eng (Min.), MCom (Bus. Admin.), MMC, Pr.Eng. No. 20050318, FSAIMM,
AMMSA of Minxcon, is a “qualified person” as such term is defined in NI 43- 101 and CIM definition
standards and has reviewed and approved the technical information and data included in this press
release. Mr. van Heerden is considered independent of Trigon.
6
Trigon Metals Inc.
Trigon is a publicly traded Canadian exploration and development company with its core business
focused on copper operations in Namibia, one of the world’s most prospective copper regions,
where it ha s substantial assets in place. The Company continues to hold an 80% interest in five
mining licenses in the Otavi Mountain lands, an area of Namibia widely recognized for its high-grade
copper deposits. Within these licenses are three past producing mines including the Company’s
flagship property, the Kombat Mine.
For further information, contact:
Stephan Theron
+1 (416) 861 5899
Website: www.trigonmetals.com
Cautionary Notes
This news release contains information with respect to certain Non -GAAP measures, including
certain cash costs per pounds and all-in sustaining costs. These measures are included because these
statistics are key performance measures that management may use to monitor performance.
Management may use these statistics in future to assess how the Company is performing to plan
and to assess the overall effectiveness and efficie ncy of mining operations. These performance
measures do not have a meaning within International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") and,
therefore, amounts presented may not be comparable to similar data presented by other mining
companies. These perfor mance measures should not be considered in isolation as a substitute for
measures of performance in accordance with IFRS.
This news release contain s forward-looking statements. These statements include statements
regarding the Feasibility Study , including without limitation, expected costs, capital required,
production, revenues, free cash flow, life of mine (LoM), NPV and other economic and operational
performance parameters metrics, the AFW Pre-Feasibility Study and mineral resources, the
Company’s strategies and the Company’s abilities to execute such strategies, the Company’s ability
to obtain the n ecessary permits and approvals , the Company’s ability to restart the Kombat Mine,
the Company’s ability to obtain adequate financing, the Company’s ability to execute on the Facility
and the Offtake, the Company’s expectations for the Kombat Mine, the economic viability of mining
at the Kombat Mine and the Company’s future plans and objectives. These statements are based on
current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties including, without
limitation, risks and uncertainties inherent to economic studies; risks and uncertainties relating to:
history of losses; requirements for additional capital; dilution; loss of its material properties; interest
rates increase; global economy; no history of production; future metals price fluctuations,
speculative nature of exploration activities; periodic interruptions to exploration, development and
mining activities; environmental hazards and liability; industrial accidents; failure of processing and
mining equipment to perform as expected; labor disputes; supply problems; uncertainty of
production and cost estimates; the interpretation of drill results and the estimation of mineral
resources and reserves; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; possible
variations in ore reserves, grade of mineralization or recovery rates may differ from what is indicated
7
and the difference may be material; legal and regulatory proceedi ngs and community actions;
accidents, title matters; regulatory restrictions; permitting and licensing; volatility of the market
price of Common Shares; insurance; competition; currency fluctuations; loss of key employees;
uncertainties and risks inherent with doing business in a developing country, including, without
limitation, war, corruption, terrorism, political instability and the uncertainty of the rule of law; and
other risks of the mining industry. Actual results could differ materially because of factors discussed
in the management discussion and analysis section of our interim and most recent annual financial
statements or other reports and filings filed at www.sedar.com from time to time. We do not assume
any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as required by applicable laws.
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the
policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this
release.