Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

SCZ.V ·

Santacruz Silver Reports Third Quarter 2017 Production and Financial Results

Financials

TSX.V: SCZ

FSE: 1SZ

November 28, 2017

Santacruz Silver Reports Third Quarter 2017 Production and Financial Results

Vancouver, B.C. – Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (TSX.V:SCZ) (the “Company” or “Santacruz”) reports on

the operating and financial results from the Rosario Project in San Luis Potosi, Mexico and the Veta Grande

Project in Zacatecas, Mexico for the third quarter of 2017. The full version of the financial statements and

accompanying management’s discussi on and analysis can be viewed on the Company’s website at

www.santacruzsilver.com or on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. All amounts are in thousands of US dollars

unless otherwise indicated.

Q3 Highlights:

 Silver equivalent produced ounces of 231,162;

 Head grade of 201 Ag Eqv. g/t;

 In situ Veta Grande vein material developed at Level 6 of the Garcia Mine with higher head grades

than the mineralized material from the Chorros.

"In the third quarter the Company dealt with production equipment challenges at both the Rosario Project and

Veta Grande Project compounded by lower than expected head grades ," stated Arturo Préstamo, President

and Chief Executive Officer of Santacruz. "Importantly, at Veta Grande we successfully reached Level 6 where

we are currently developing in situ mineralized material contained in pillars located in the Veta Grande vein.

Preliminary assay results from chip samples collected across of this material ar e indicating higher grades. ”

Prestamo continued, “At Rosario we reached Level 2 of the Membrillo Prospect where we again are seeing

higher grades from preliminary assay results from chip samples collected across the main Membrillo vein. We

remain focused on developing these key projects with anticipated improvement."

2017 Third Quarter Operational Highlights

Summary of Production Results 2017 Q3 (2) 2017 Q2 (2) 2016 Q3 (3)

Material Processed (tonnes milled) 46,940 57,685 24,744

Silver eqv. ounce production (1) 231,162 270,659 164,924

Silver production (ounces) 88,234 89,243 76,168

Gold production (ounces) 394 472 86

Lead production (tonnes) 148 238 121

Zinc production (tonnes) 595 725 643

Average Head Grade (g/t Ag Eqv.) 201 207 252

Rosario Project Operational Results

Summary of Production Results 2017 Q3 (2) 2017 Q2 (2) 2016 Q3 (3)

Material Processed (tonnes milled) 18,956 27,967 24,744

Silver eqv. ounce production (1) 127,689 124,717 164,924

Silver production (ounces) 26,274 33,181 76,168

Silver head grade (g/t) 51 42 102

Silver recovery (%) 85% 87.3% 94.2%

Gold production (ounces) 328 298 86

Lead production (tonnes) 49 40 121

Zinc production (tonnes) 449 408 643

Average Head Grade (g/t Ag Eqv.) 241 172 252

Veta Grande Project Operational Results

Summary of Production Results 2017 Q3 (2) 2017 Q2 (2)

Material Processed (tonnes milled) 27,984 29,718

Silver eqv. ounce production (1) 103,473 145,942

Silver production (ounces) 61,960 56,062

Silver head grade (g/t) 107 102

Silver recovery (%) 64.5% 63.8%

Gold production (ounces) 66 174

Lead production (tonnes) 99 198

Zinc production (tonnes) 146 317

Average head grade (g/t Ag Eqv.) 174 218

(1) AgEqvOz=(Au*Pau)+(Ag*Pag)+(Pb*Ppb*2205)+(Zn*Pzn*2205)

(Pag)

(2) Metal Prices 2017: Ag $16.00, Au $1,150, Pb $0.90, Zn $1.15

(3) Metal Prices Q3 2016: Ag $14.50, Au $1,100, Pb $0.76, Zn $0.71

2017 Third Quarter Financial Highlights

2017 Q3 2017 Q2 2016 Q3

Financial

Revenue $1,798 $2,641 $3,026

Mine Operations Income (Loss) (4) $(1,819) $(1,827) $786

Net Income (Loss) $(5,899) $(8,485) $(11,064)

Net Income (Loss) Per Share – Basic

($/share) (0.04) (0.05) (0.08)

Adjusted EBITDA (4) $(1,628) $(1,390) $869

Operating (1)

Material Processed (tonnes milled) 46,940 57,685 24,744

Silver Equivalent Produced (ounces) (1) 231,162 270,659 164,924

Silver Equivalent Sold (payable ounces) (2) 166,880 219,226 198,639

Production Cost per Tonne (3) 62.91 59.15 69.47

Cash Cost per Silver Equivalent ($/oz.) (3) 23.65 21.24 12.20

All-in Sustaining Cost per Silver

Equivalent ($/oz.) (3) 28.14 24.62 15.88

Average Realized Silver Price per Ounce

($/oz.) (2) (5) 16.85 17.17 19.10

(1) Silver equivalent ounces produced in 2017 have been calculated using prices of US$16.00/oz., US$1, 150/oz., US$1.00/lb. and

US$1.15/lb. for silver, gold, lead and zinc respectively applied to the metal content of the lead and zinc concentrates produced by the

Rosario Project as well as by the Veta Grande Project. Silver equivalent ounces produced in 2016 have been calculated using prices

of US$14.50/oz., US$1,100/oz., US$0.76/lb and US$0.71/lb for silver, gold, lead and zinc respectively applied to the metal content of

the lead and zinc concentrates produced by the Rosario Project during the third quarter of 2016.

(2) Silver equivalent sold ounces have been calculated using the realized silver prices stated in the table above, applied to the payable

metal content of the lead and zinc concentrates sold from the Rosario Project and Veta Grande Project

(3) The Comp any reports non -IFRS measures which include Production Cost per Tonne, Cash Cost per Silver Equivalent, All -in

Sustaining Cost per Silver Equivalent and Average Realized Silver Price per Ounce. These measures are widely used in the min ing

industry as a be nchmark for performance, but do not have a standardized meaning and may differ from methods used by other

companies with similar descriptions.

(4) The Company reports additional non -IFRS measures which include Mine Operations Income (Loss) and Adjusted EBITD A. These

additional financial disclosure measures are intended to provide additional information.

(5) Average realized silver price per ounce is prior to all treatment, smelting and refining charges.

Financial Results

The Company recorded a net loss of $5, 899 in Q3 2017 compared to a net loss of $11,064 in Q3 2016. The

decrease in net loss relates largely to an impairment charge of $4,350 on the Rosario Project during Q3 2017

as compared to an impairment charge of $16,688 recorded with respect to the San F elipe Property offset by a

gain on settlement of debt of $6,377 during Q3 2016.

Revenues in Q3 2017 decreased by $1,228 (41%) as compared to Q3 2016 primarily as a result of a 24%

decrease in the silver equivalent ounces sold combined with a decrease in the realized silver price.

Production costs of $2,933 recorded during the current quarter increased by $1,278 as compared to Q3 2016.

The increase reflects $1,644 of production costs from the Veta Grande Project in Q3 2017 (Q3 2016 - $nil)

offset in part by a decrease in production costs ($366) at the Rosario Project due to lower production.

The operations for Q3 2017 resulted in a negative gross margin of $1,819 (2016 – positive gross margin of

$786). This decrease in gross margin is primarily the re sult of decreased revenues during the current quarter

as discussed above, along with an increase in operating costs due to the addition of the Veta Grande Project.

Operational Results and Costs

Rosario Project

In Q3 2017 silver equivalent production from the Rosario Project increased by 2% (2,972 ounces) compared to

Q2 2017 as a result of higher head grades offset by lower mill throughput tonnage . Compared to Q3 2016 the

silver equivalent production decreased by 23% from 164,924 ounces to 127,689 ounces . The decrease

reflects the 23% decrease in tonnes milled.

The low er mill throughput tonnage realized in Q3 2017 reflects reduced availability of certain production

equipment due to working capital constraints and a heavier than normal rainy season that s lowed mining

operations in both August and September. With the completion of the sale of the Gavilanes property in August

the Company was able to put all production equipment back in service by quarter end.

The cash operating cost per tonne of mineralize d material processed ($68.68/t) was virtually unchanged from

Q2 2017 ($68.80/t). The Q3 2017 unit costs were higher than expected due to the low production volume.

Compared to Q3 2016, cash cost of production per tonne stayed consistent as the percentage decrease in

cash cost of production was matched by an equivalent percentage decrease in production tonnage.

Cash cost of production per silver equivalent ounce sold decreased by 17% in Q3 2017 to $20.40/oz as

compared to $24.64/oz in Q2 2017. This change in unit costs is due primarily to the 32% decrease in

mineralized material processed that resulted in in a decrease of production costs offset by a higher head

grade of silver, gold, lead, and zinc. Compared to Q3 2016, cash cost of production per silver equivalent

ounce increased by 67% reflecting the significantly lower head grades of silver, lead and zinc and lower

recoveries of silver and lead realized in Q3 2017.

All-in sustaining cash cost of production per silver equivalent ounce sold decreased b y 15% in Q3 2017 to

$24.33/oz as compared to $28.69/oz in Q2 2017. This change in unit costs is again due to the decrease

(32%) in production costs during the quarter offset by a 3% decrease in payable ounces sold. Compared to Q3

2016, the all-in sustaini ng cash cost of production per silver equivalent ounce increased by 53% reflecting

significantly lower head grades of silver, lead and zinc and lower recoveries of silver and lead offset by a

higher recovery of zinc realized in Q3 2017.

Veta Grande Project

At the Veta Grande Project, s ilver equivalent production in Q3 2017 decreased by 29% to 103,473 ounces as

compared to Q2 2017. The decrease reflects a 6% decrease in tonnes milled combined with a 20% decrease

in average silver equivalent head grade . The throughput tonnage decrease occurred because of an extensive

maintenance period on one of the ball mills during September (approximately three weeks). The decrease in

head grade reflects the results of mining lower grade Chorros as well as experienci ng reduced mill feed from

the higher grade Armados vein. In early November two sections of unmined Veta Grande vein at Level 6 were

encountered, both believed to be pillars left by previous mine operators. Preliminary assay results from chip

samples collected across the in situ vein material in the pillars returned higher grades than grades currently

being realized from the Chorros. In addition, the bulk density of the in situ vein material is expected to be

greater than the bulk density of the Chorros as the Chorros are comprised of unconsolidated mineralized

material and void space.

The cash operating cost per tonne of mineralized material processed increased by 18% in Q3 2017 to $59.07

as compared to $5 0.07 in Q2 2017 as the result of an 11% increase in cash operating costs combined with a

6% decrease in tonnes milled . The operating cost increase reflects a combination of the foreign exchange

impact of a strengthened Mexican peso versus US dollar in Q3 2017 as well as increased costs for stope

development at the Armados vein.

Cash cost of production per silver equivalent ounce sold increased by 50% in Q3 2017 to $27.77/oz as

compared to $18.57/oz in Q2 2017. This change in unit costs reflects in part the cash operating cost increase

described abov e as well as a 40% decrease in silver equivalent ounces sold from lower head grades

described above, offset by a decrease in treatment, smelting and refining costs during the quarter.

All-in sustaining cash cost of production per silver equivalent ounce sold increased by 54% in Q3 2017 to

$32.98/oz as compared to $21.42/oz in Q2 2017. This change occurred for the same reasons that the cash

cost of production per silver equivalent ounce sold increased.

About Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.

Santacruz is a Mexican focused silver company with two producing silver projects (Rosario, including the

Cinco Estrellas property and Membrillo Prospect, and the right to operate the Veta Grande silver proje ct and

milling facility); and two exploration properties includ ing the Minillas property and Zacatecas properties. The

Company is managed by a technical team of professionals with proven track records in developing, operating

and discovering silver mines in Mexico. Our corporate objective is to become a mid -tier silver producer.

‘signed’

Arturo Préstamo Elizondo,

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

For further information please contact:

Arturo Prestamo

Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.

Email: [email protected]

Telephone: (011) (52) 81 8378 5707

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies

of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this r elease.

Forward looking information

Certain statements contained in this news release constitute "forward -looking information" as such term is

used in applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward -looking information is based on plans, expectations and

estimates of management at the date the information is provided and is subject to certain factors and

assumptions. In making the forward -looking statements included in this news release, the Company has

applied several material assumptions, that the C ompany's financial condition and development plans do not

change as a result of unforeseen events, that third party mineralized material to be milled by the Company will

have properties consistent with management's expectations, that the Company will recei ve all required

regulatory approvals, and that future metal prices and the demand and market outlook for metals will remain

stable or improve. Forward -looking information is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other

factors that could caus e plans, estimates and actual results to vary materially from those projected in such

forward-looking information. Factors that could cause the forward -looking information in this news release to

change or to be inaccurate include, but are not limited to, the risk that any of the assumptions referred to prove

not to be valid or reliable, which could result in lower revenue, higher cost, or lower production levels; delays

and/or cessation in planned work; changes in the Company's financial condition and dev elopment plans;

delays in regulatory approval; risks associated with the interpretation of data (including in respect of the third

party mineralized material) regarding the geology, grade and continuity of mineral deposits; the possibility that

results wil l not be consistent with the Company's expectations, as well as the other risks and uncertainties

applicable to mineral exploration and development activities and to the Company as set forth in the Company's

continuous disclosure filings filed under the Co mpany's profile at www.sedar.com. There can be no assurance

that any forward -looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ

materially from those anticipated in such sta tements. Accordingly, the reader should not place any undue

reliance on forward -looking information or statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update

forward-looking information or statements, other than as required by applicable law.

Rosario Project

The decisions to commence production at the Rosario Mine , Cinco Estrellas Property and Membrillo Prospect

were not based on a feasibility study of mineral reserves demonstrating economic and technical viability, but

rather on a more preliminary esti mate of inferred mineral resources. Accordingly, there is increased

uncertainty and economic and technical risks of failure associated with this production decision. Production

and economic variables may vary considerably, due to the absence of a complete and detailed site analysis

according to and in accordance with NI 43-101.

Veta Grande Project

The decision to commence production at Veta Grande Project was not based on a feasibility study on mineral

reserves demonstrating economic and technical viability . Accordingly, there is increased uncertainty and

economic and technical risks of failure associated with this production decision. Production and economic

variables may vary considerably due to the absence of a complete and detailed site analysis accord ing to and

in accordance with NI 43-101.