Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

RVG.V ·

Revival GOLD Files Ni 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment FOR the Mercur GOLD Project

Economic Studies

1

REVIVAL GOLD FILES

NI 43-101 PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT

FOR THE MERCUR GOLD PROJECT

Toronto, ON – May 5th, 2025 – Revival Gold Inc. (TSXV: RVG, OTCQX: RVLGF) (“Revival Gold” or the

“Company”) has filed on SEDAR+ a technical report prepared in accordance with National

Instrument 43 -101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43 -101”) on the Mercur

Project (“Mercur” or the “Project”), titled “Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical

Report on the Mercur Gold Project , Tooele & Utah Counties, Utah, USA ” (the “Technical Report”).

The Technical Report supports disclosure made by the Company in its news release dated March

31st, 2025, titled “ Revival Gold Delivers Compelling PEA Results and Attractive Potential Re -

Development Timeline for the Mercur Gold Project”. There are no material differences in the

Technical Report from those results disclosed in the March 31st, 2025, news release.

Mercur Heap Leach PEA Highlights1

• Life-of-mine (“LOM”) production of 65.6 million tonnes (“MT”) of mineralized material at

0.60 grams per tonne (“g/T”) and 75% average recovery generating an average of 95,600

ounces of gold per year over a 10-year mine life;

• After-tax NPV at a 5% discount rate (“NPV5%”) of $295 million and after-tax IRR of 27% at

a gold price of $2,175 per ounce increasing to a $752 million NPV5% and 57% IRR at a gold

price of $3,000 per ounce;

• After-tax payback period of 3.6 years at $2,175 per ounce of gold decreasing to 1.7 years

at $3,000 per ounce of gold;

• Pre-production and working capital of $ 208 million and additional LOM sustaining capital

of $110 million;

• LOM average cash cost of $1,205 per ounce of gold and all in sustaining cost of $1,363 per

ounce of gold;

• PEA mine plan developed from Indicated Mineral Resources of 35.3 MT grading 0.66 g/T

gold containing 746,000 ounces of gold and Inferred Mineral Resources of 36.2 MT grading

0.54 g/T gold containing 626,000 ounces of gold2; and,

• Expected timeline to complete mine permitting of approximately two years.

1 The PEA economic analysis was developed using a gold price of $2,175 per ounce. All amounts shown in this news release are in

United States dollars and metric units of measurement unless otherwise stated.

2 Mineral Resources were estimated based on a gold price of $2,000 per ounce.

2

The Technical Report was prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 guidelines by Kappes, Cassiday &

Associates (“KCA”) of Reno , Nevada and RESPEC Company LLC (“RESPEC”) of Reno, Nevada (the

“Study Authors”) with an effective date of March 25th, 2025. The Technical Report can be found on

the Company’s website at www.revival-gold.com and on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca under the

Company’s issuer profile.

Qualified Persons

Technical information included in this news release was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer,

P.Eng., a QP and Vice President, Engineering and Development for the Company, and Mr. Dan Pace,

RM SME, a QP and Chief Geologist for the Company. Mr. Pace’s review focused on the geological

representativity of the Mineral Resource numerical models, including review of the laboratory and

field data that support the models, while Mr. Meyer’s review focused on mine, process and

infrastructure designs, capital and operating costs, and financial modeling.

About Revival Gold Inc.

Revival Gold is one of the largest, pure gold mine developers in the United States. The Company is

advancing development of the Mercur Gold Project in Utah and mine permitting preparations and

ongoing exploration at the Beartrack-Arnett Gold Project located in Idaho. Revival Gold is listed on

the TSX Venture Exchange under the ticker symbol “RVG” and trades on the OTCQX Market under

the ticker symbol “RVLGF”. The Company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada, with its exploration

and development office located in Salmon, Idaho.

For further information, please contact:

Hugh Agro, President & CEO or Lisa Ross, Vice President & CFO

Telephone: (416) 366-4100 or Email: [email protected]

Cautionary Statement

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX

Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

This press release contains "forward -looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities

legislation and "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of

1995 (collectively, "forw ard-looking statements"). Forward -looking statements are not comprised of historical facts.

Forward-looking statements include estimates and statements that describe the Company’s future plans, objectives or

goals, including words to the effect that the Company or management expects a stated condition or result to occur.

Forward-looking statements may be identified by such terms as “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “estimates”,

“may”, “could”, “would”, “will”, or “plan”. Since forward- looking statements are based on assumptions and address

3

future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Although these

statements are based on information currently available to the Company, the Company provides no assurance that

actual results will meet managem ent’s expectations. Risks, uncertainties, and other factors involved with forward -

looking statements could cause actual events, results, performance, prospects, and opportunities to differ materially

from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements in this news release include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the results of the

PEA on the Project, such as future estimates of internal rates of return, net present value, future production, estimates

of cash cost, proposed mining plans and methods, mine life estimates, cash flow forecasts, metal recoveries, estimates

of capital and operating costs, timing for permitting and environmental assessments, timing, completion and results of

feasibility studies, and the size and timing of phased development of the Project. Furthermore, forward -looking

statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by

the Company as of the date of such statements, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and

competitive uncertainties and contingencies. With respect to this specific forward-looking information concerning the

development of the Project, the Company has based its assumptions and analysis on certain factors that are inherently

uncertain. Uncertainties include: (i) the adequacy of infrastructure; (ii) geological characteristics; (iii) metallurgical

characteristics of the mineralization; (iv) the ability to develop adequate processing capacity; (v) the price of gold, silver

and other commodities; (vi) the availability of equipment and facilities necessary to complete development; (vii) the

cost of consumables and mining and processing equipment; (viii) unforeseen technological and engineering problems;

(ix) natural disasters and/or accidents; currency fluctuations; (xi) changes in regulations; (xii) the compliance by and/or

key suppliers with terms of agreements; (xiii) the availability and productivity of skilled labour; (xiv) the regulation of

the mining industry by various governmental agencies, including permitting and environmental assessments; (xv) the

ability to raise sufficient capital to develop such projects; (xiv) changes in project scope or design; and (xvi) political

factors.

This release also contains references to estimates of mineral resources. The estimation of mineral resources is

inherently uncertain and involves subjective judgments about many relevant factors. Mineral resources that are not

mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The accuracy of any such estimates is a function of the

quantity and quality of available data, and of the assumptions made and judgments used in engineering and geological

interpretation (including estimated future production from the Project, the anticipated tonnages and grades that will

be mined and the estimated level of recovery that will be realized), which may prove to be unreliable and depend, to a

certain extent, upon the analysis of drilling results and statistical inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate.

Mineral resource estimates may have to be re-estimated based on: (i) fluctuations in commodities prices; (ii) results of

drilling, (iii) metallurgical testing and other studies; (iv) proposed mining o perations, including dilution; (v) the

evaluation of mine plans subsequent to the date of any estimates; and (vi) the possible failure to receive required

permits, approvals and licenses or changes to existing mining licenses.

Forward-looking statements and information involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, should

not be read as guarantees of future performance or results and will not necessarily be accurate indicators of whether

or not such results will be achieved. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the results

expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or information, including, but not limited to: the Company's

ability to finance the development of its mineral properties; assumptions and discount rates being appropriately applied

to the PEA, uncertainty as to whether there will ever be production at the Company's mineral exploration and

development properties; risks related to the Company's ability to c ommence production at the Project and generate

material revenues or obtain adequate financing for its planned exploration and development activities; uncertainties

relating to the assumptions underlying resource and reserve estimates; mining and developmen t risks, including risks

related to infrastructure, accidents, equipment breakdowns, labour disputes, bad weather, non- compliance with

environmental and permit requirements or other unanticipated difficulties with or interruptions in development,

construction or production; the geology, grade and continuity of the Company's mineral deposits; the uncertainties

4

involving success of exploration, development and mining activities; permitting timelines; government regulation of

mining operations; environmental risks; unanticipated reclamation expenses; prices for energy inputs, labour,

materials, supplies and services; uncertainties involved in the interpretation of drilling results and geological tests and

the estimation of reserves and resources; unexpected cost increases in estimated capital and operating costs; the need

to obtain permits and government approvals; material adverse changes, unexpected changes in laws, rules or

regulations, or their enforcement by applicable authorities; the failure of parties to contracts with the company to

perform as agreed; social or labour unrest; changes in commodity prices; and the failure of exploration programs or

studies to deliver anticipated results or results that would justify and support continued exploration, studies,

development or operations. For a more detailed discussion of such risks and other factors that could cause actual results

to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward -looking statements, refer to other risks and

uncertainties disclosed in the Company’s public filings with Canadian securities regulators, including its most recent

annual information form and management’s discussion and analysis, available at www.sedarplus.ca . The forward -

looking statements contained in this press release are made as of the date of this press release. Except as required by

law, the Company disclaims any intention and assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward -looking

statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Additionally, the Company undertakes

no obligation to comment on the expectations of, or statements made by, third parties in respect of the matters

discussed above.

Non-IFRS/Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures

The Company has included certain terms or performance measures in this news release that commonly used in the gold

mining industry that are not defined under International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") or United States

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("US GAAP"). This includes: all-in sustaining costs per ounce and cash cost per

ounce. Non-IFRS/Non-GAAP financial performance measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed under

IFRS or US GAAP, and therefore, they may not be compa rable to similar measures employed by other companies. The

data presented is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute

for measures prepared in accordance with IFRS or US GAAP and should be read in conjunction with the Company's

financial statements. Because the Company has provided these measures on a forward -looking basis, it is unable to

present a quantitative reconciliation to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and pres ented in

accordance with IFRS or US GAAP without unreasonable efforts. This is due to the inherent difficulty of forecasting the

timing or amount of various reconciling items that would impact the most directly comparable forward-looking IFRS or

US GAAP me asure that have not yet occurred, are outside of the Company's control and/or cannot be reasonably

predicted.

Definitions

"All-in sustaining costs" is a non -IFRS or US GAAP financial measure calculated based on guidance published by the

World Gold Council ("WGC"). The WGC is a market development organization for the gold industry and is an association

whose membership comprises leading gold mining companies. Although the WGC is not a m ining industry regulatory

organization, it worked closely with its member companies to develop these metrics. Adoption of the all- in sustaining

cost metric is voluntary and not necessarily standard, and therefore, this measure presented by the Company may not

be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. The Company believes that the all- in sustaining cost

measure complements existing measures and ratios reported by the Company. All- in sustaining cost includes both

operating and capital costs required to sustain gold production on an ongoing basis. Sustaining operating costs

represent expenditures expected to be incurred at the Project that are considered necessary to maintain production.

5

Sustaining capital represents expected capital expenditures comprising mine development costs, including capitalized

waste, and ongoing replacement of mine equipment and other capital facilities, and does not include expected capital

expenditures for major growth projects or enhancement capital for significant infrastructure improvements.

"Cash cost per gold ounce" is a common financial performance measure in the gold mining industry but has no standard

meaning under IFRS or US GAAP. The Company believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in

accordance with IFRS or US GAAP, certain investors use this information to evaluate the Company's performance and

ability to generate cash flow. Cash cost figures are calculated in accordance with a standard developed by The Gold

Institute. The Gold Institute ceased operations in 2002, but the standard is considered the accepted standard of

reporting cash cost of production in North America. Adoption of the standard is voluntary, and the cost measures

presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.