Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

RK.V ·

Rockhaven Substantially Upgrades Gold and Silver Mineral Resources at its Klaza Project, Yukon 686,000 Indicated and 507,000 Inferred Gold Ounces

Resource Estimates

1016 – 510 West Hastings Street

Vancouver, BC V6B 1L8

604-687-2522

[email protected]

www.rockhavenresources.com

Rockhaven Substantially Upgrades Gold and Silver Mineral Resources

at its Klaza Project, Yukon

686,000 Indicated and 507,000 Inferred Gold Ounces

June 21, 201 8 - Rockhaven Resources Ltd. (TSX-V:RK) (“Rockhaven”) is pleased to

announce updated Mineral Resource estimate s for the high-grade Western BRX, Central BRX,

Central Klaza, and Western Klaza zones at its 100%-owned and road accessible Klaza property ,

located in the Dawson Range Gold Belt of southern Yukon.

The updated Mineral Resource estimates incorporate results from approximately 13,300 m of in-

fill and expansion diamond drilling completed subsequent to the 2015 Mineral Resource

estimate, and utilizes results from recent metallurgical test work to revise cut-off grades. Bulk

tonnage low-grade mineralization in the Eastern Zones requires additional sampling, drilling and

modeling, and is not included in these Mineral Resource estimates.

Highlights from this news release include:

 Indicated Mineral Resources of 4.5 Mt containing 686,000 oz gold and 14,071,000 oz

silver (grading 4.8 g/t gold and 98 g/t silver) or 907,000 oz gold equivalent (grading

6.3 g/t gold equivalent);

 Inferred Mineral Resources of 5.7 Mt containing 507,000 oz gold and 13,901,000 oz

silver (grading 2.8 g/t gold and 76 g/t silver) or 725,000 oz gold equivalent (grading

3.9 g/t gold equivalent); and,

 Pit-constrained resources significantly increased in tonnes and grade compared to previous

Mineral R esource estimate s, including the Western BRX Zone with 759 kt at an

average grade of 9.5 g/t gold, totaling 232,000 oz gold in the Indicated category.

Table 1: Mineral Resource Estimate Summary, June 5, 20181,5

Tonnes

Grade Contained Metal

Au Ag Pb Zn AuEQ4 Au Ag Pb Zn AuEQ4

(kt) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (%) (g/t) (koz) (koz) (klb) (klb) (koz)

Indicated3 4,457 4.8 98 0.7 0.9 6.3 686 14,071 73,268 92,107 907

Inferred3 5,714 2.8 76 0.6 0.7 3.9 507 13,901 77,544 89,176 725

1 CIM Definition Standards (2014) were used for reporting the Mineral Resources. Using drilling results to December 31, 2017. The Qualified

Persons are Adrienne Ross, P.Geo. of AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd , and Nicholas Ingvar Kirchner, FAusIMM, MAIG. of AMC

Mining Consultants Pty Ltd.

2 Near surface Mineral Resources are constrained by an optimized pit shell at a metal prices of $1,400/oz Au, $19/oz Ag, $1.10/lb Pb, and

$1.25/lb Zn.

3

Cut-off grades applied to the pit-constrained and underground resource are 1.0 g/t and 2.3 g/t AuEQ respectively.

4 Gold equivalent values assume $1,400/oz Au, $19/oz Ag, $1.10/lb Pb, and $1.25/lb Zn, and variable recoveries for the different metals.

5 Numbers may not add up due to rounding. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. All

metal prices are quoted in US$ at an exchange rate of $0.80 US to $1.00 Canadian.

2

“The Klaza project ho sts high-grade gold and silver resources that are near surface, road

accessible and located wit hin one of the safest mining jurisdictions in the world ,” stated Matt

Turner, CEO of Rockhaven Resources. “ We have upgraded much of our Inferred Mineral

Resource to the Indicated category for $4 per oz gold or at a rate of 52 oz gold per metre drilled.*

Additionally, the conversion of high-grade resources from underground to open pittable should

have major economic benefits for the project.”

The following table reports the Mineral Resources by potential mining method.

Table 2: Mineral Resource Estimate by mining method, June 5, 20181,5

Category Tonnes

Grade Contained Metal

Au Ag Pb Zn AuEQ4 Au Ag Pb Zn AuEQ4

(kt) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (%) (g/t) (koz) (koz) (klb) (klb) (koz)

Indicated

Pit-

Constrained2,3 2,447 5.3 90 0.7 1.0 6.7 414 7,096 39,143 52,935 529

Underground3 2,010 4.2 108 0.8 0.9 5.8 272 6,974 34,125 39,172 378

Total 4,457 4.8 98 0.7 0.9 6.3 686 14,071 73,268 92,107 907

Inferred

Pit-

Constrained2,3 1,754 2.6 43 0.4 0.5 3.3 147 2,429 14,897 18,599 187

Underground3 3,960 2.8 90 0.7 0.8 4.2 359 11,472 62,647 70,578 538

Total 5,714 2.8 76 0.6 0.7 3.9 507 13,901 77,544 89,176 725

* See footnotes under Table 1

About the Klaza Deposit

The Klaza project hosts a large hy drothermal system that is concentrated within a 4 km long by

3 km wide structural corridor. Current Mineral Resource areas have only been systematically

explored to about 275 m below surface, but well mineralized intersections occur as deep as

450 m. Eleven k nown mineralized zones have been identified within the corridor and all are

open for expansion along strike and to depth. The deposit model for the Klaza deposit suggest

the zones could be well mineralized to depths of 1,000 m or more below surface.

In spring 2016, Rockhaven completed a Preliminary Economic Asse ssment (PEA) of the Klaza

property in order to demonstrate project viability and recognize key economic sensitivities . The

PEA identified several opportunities to improve future economics, including:

 Exploring alternate processing methods that could lower overall processing costs and

allow lower-grade mineralization, which was excluded from the PEA , to be effectively

processed;

 Better definition of near surface mineralization in order to maximize the open -pit

potential of the Mineral Resources; and,

 Infill drilling in order to confirm grade continuity within the deposit and increase the

grade of the known high-grade veins.

In 2016 and 2017, Rockhaven completed 13,291 m of infill and expansion diamond drilling ,

within and near to the 2015 Mineral Resources . This drilling successfully demonstrated the

continuity of high-grade structures and identified much higher-grade areas within the known vein

zones. Examples of these high -grade intersections include 182 g/t gold and 231 g/t silver over

3

0.61 m in Central Klaza; and, 94 g/t gold and 545 g/t silver over 2.63 m in Western BRX. The

drilling also outlined lower -grade mineralization in the hanging wall and footwall of the Central

Klaza Zone, and provided material for metallurgical testing.

The eastern portion of the Klaza vein system (Eastern Zones) comprises multiple, sub -parallel

veins and veinlets, and includes the Eastern Klaza, Eastern BRX, Pika, Stroshein , and part of the

AEX zones. All of these zones are open to the east, towards the mostly untested Kelly Porphyry.

Previously, these zones were assumed to be similar to the discreet high -grade vein zones to the

west (Western and Central portions of the BRX and Klaza) and were sampled, targeted and

modeled using this assumption. The recent drilling and metallurgical test work have

demonstrated that the mineralization is structurally, mineralogically and metallurgically different

from the western zones. Th is area has bulk tonnage potential and requires additional sampling,

drilling and modelling before a Mineral Resource estimate can be finalized.

Metallurgical testwork completed in 2017 demonstrates that dense media separation is effective

in the Central Klaza, Western BRX, and Eastern zones (see Rockhaven news release dated April

19, 2018). This test work also showed that the Eastern Zones responded well to direct cyanide

leaching. The new processing techniques identified by the test work allow for lower cut -off

grades to be applied to the current Mineral Resource estimate s. The application of p re-

concentration should allow for less selective , lower cost mining methods in both underground

and open pit workings in future economic studies.

Next Steps

The current Mineral Resource estimate s and re cent metallurgical test work have highlighted

multiple priority targets for further resource expansion and definition. These include:

 Continued conversion of Inferred Mineral Resources to Indicated Mineral Resources;

 Additional definition and expansion drilling in the Eastern Zones to prepare for a future

Mineral Resource estimate;

 Exploration drilling of near surface mineralized zones that parallel the Mineral

Resources, including high-grade structures identified by the 2017 program;

 Expansion of Inferred Mineral Resources below the Western and Central portions of the

BRX and Klaza zones; and,

 Expansion of the area of fracture -style mineralization surrounding the known Eastern

Zones.

Resource Methodology

The 2018 Mineral Resource estimate was reported by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.

and AMC Mining Consultants Pty Ltd. (AMC) and estimated using a combination of Ordinary

Kriging (OK), Localized Multiple Indicator Kriging (LMIK) and restr icted Ordinary Kriging

(ROK).

The estimates were based on a revised geological model which included 2016 and 2017 drilling .

Mineralization wireframes were constructed by Archer, Cathro & Associates (1981) Limited

using GEMS software for the Central BRX, Western BRX, Central Klaza and Western Klaza

4

areas based on lithological, structural and assay data. In total, 25 separate wireframes were

constructed that modeled zones of continuous mineralization.

AMC completed an OK estimate on t hese domains. Prior to estimation, drillhole data was

composited to 1 m and s amples were capped for all variables within each domain where

required.

In addition to the OK estimate, a broad mineralized envelope was constructed by AMC to

encompass mineral ization i n parts of the Central Klaza zones where mineralization comprises

closely spaced narrow veins , around which it is difficult to construct wireframes . These

envelopes were constructed assuming a nominal 0.3 g/t gold boundary to define the outer lim its

of these systems, and exclude vein zones defined by the high-grade wireframes.

LMIK was used to estimate gold and silver Mineral Resources and ROK for other elements

within the mineralized envelope. Samples were composited to 3 m within these envelopes.

A parent block dimensions of 25 mE x 12.5 mN x 5 mRL was assumed for the Klaza Block

model. Indicator thresholds were selected based on the geostatistical characteristics of each

domain, and were selected to discretize the profiles at slope changes and key grade thresholds.

The indicator estimates were modified with a change of support correction to emulate a selective

mining unit (SMU) scale mining block for moderate -scale, selective open pit mining on 5 m

benches, and assessment for potent ial underground mining. The resultant MIK estimates were

localized for the final LMIK model into SMU blocks having dimensions of 6.25 mE x 3.125 mN

x 5 mRL.

Densities of individual blocks were calculated using a regression formula based on recorded

density measurements and iron, lead, zinc and copper grades.

Tables showing the Mineral Resource for each zone included can be found below and on

Rockhaven’s website at www.rockhavenresources.com.

Metallurgy

The Mineral Resource estimate has been prepared using results from recent metallurgical

testwork, (see Rockhaven news release dated April 19, 2018). Dense media separation has been

shown to be effective in the Western BRX and Central Klaza zones.

Qualified Persons

The Mineral Resource estimate was completed by AMC.

The OK Mineral Resource estimate disclosed in this press release for the Klaza Project have

been prepared by Dr. A. Ross, P.Geo. , an employee of AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. ,

who is independent of Rockhaven and a "Qualified Person" for the purpose of National

Instrument 43-101. Dr. Ross has read and approved the content of this press release as it pertains

to the disclosed Mineral Resource estimate.

5

The LMIK and ROK Mineral Resource estimate disclosed in this press release for the Klaza

Project have been prepared by Mr Nicholas Ingvar Kirchner , an employee of AMC Mining

Consultants Pty Ltd., who is independent of Rockhaven and a "Qualified Person" for the purpose

of National Instrument 43 -101. Mr Kirchner has read and approved the content of this press

release as it pertains to the disclosed Mineral Resource estimate.

All other technical information in this news release has been approved by Matthew R . Dumala,

P.Eng., a geological engineer with Archer, Cathro & Associates (1981) Limited and qualified

person for the purpose of National Instrument 43-101.

Further details supporting the geological model, estimation procedure and metallurgical testwork

will be available in a National Instrument 43 -101 Technical Report . The report will be posted

under the Rockhaven profile at www.sedar.com within 45 days from the date of this news

release.

* Costs to upgrade the Mineral Resources from inferred to indicated was calculated using a cumulative

exploration cost for the Klaza Project of $2,793,000 based on 13, 291 m of infill drilling at an average

cost of $210/m. Costs included drilling, assays, labour , camp costs, fuel, general camp con sumables and

winter office work.

About Rockhaven

Rockhaven Resources Ltd. is a mineral exploration company focused on growth through the

advancement of its Klaza project. For additional information concerning Rockhaven or its Klaza

project please visit Rockhaven’s website at www.rockhavenresources.com.

Matthew Turner

President, CEO and Director

Rockhaven Resources Ltd.

T:604-687-2522

[email protected]

NEITHER THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT

TERM IS DEFINED IN THE POLICIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY

FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.

This news release may contain forward looking statements based on assumptions and judgments of management

regarding future events or results that may prove to be inaccurate as a result of exploration and other risk factors

beyond its control, and actual results may differ materially from the expected results.

6

Table 4: Western BRX Mineral Resource Estimate, June 5, 20181,5

Tonnes

Grade Contained Metal

Au Ag Pb Zn AuEQ4 Au Ag Pb Zn AuEQ4

(kt) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (%) (g/t) (koz) (koz) (klb) (klb) (koz)

Indicated

Pit-

Constrained2,3

759 9.5 109 0.9 1.0 11.2 232 2,671 15,312 16,201 273

Underground3 510 6.7 122 0.9 1.1 8.5 110 2,001 10,341 11,920 140

Total

(Indicated)

1,269 8.4 115 0.9 1.0 10.1 341 4,672 25,653 28,120 414

Inferred

Pit-

Constrained2,3

369 4.7 54 0.5 0.6 5.6 56 644 3,915 4,884 67

Underground3 974 3.7 93 0.7 0.9 5.2 116 2,906 16,044 19,976 162

Total (Inferred) 1,343 4.0 82 0.7 0.8 5.3 172 3,550 19,958 24,859 228

* See footnotes under Table 1

Table 5: Central BRX Mineral Resource Estimate, June 5, 20181,5

Tonnes

Grade Contained Metal

Au Ag Pb Zn AuEQ4 Au Ag Pb Zn AuEQ4

(kt) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (%) (g/t) (koz) (koz) (klb) (klb) (koz)

Indicated

Pit-

Constrained2,3

289 2.9 150 0.8 1.3 5.1 27 1,396 5,029 8,141 47

Underground3 424 1.9 106 1.0 1.1 3.6 26 1,443 9,793 10,171 50

Total

(Indicated)

713 2.3 124 0.9 1.2 4.2 53 2,838 14,822 18,312 97

Inferred

Pit-

Constrained2,3

238 1.9 99 0.7 0.8 3.4 15 760 3,795 3,993 26

Underground3 1,187 1.7 102 1.0 0.9 3.3 64 3,896 26,215 23,401 126

Total (Inferred) 1,425 1.7 102 1.0 0.9 3.3 79 4,656 30,010 27,394 152

* See footnotes under Table 1

7

Table 6: Western Klaza Mineral Resource Estimate, June 5, 20181,5

Tonnes

Grade Contained Metal

Au Ag Pb Zn AuEQ4 Au Ag Pb Zn AuEQ4

(kt) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (%) (g/t) (koz) (koz) (klb) (klb) (koz)

Indicated

Pit-

Constrained2,3

139 4.8 234 0.8 0.9 7.8 21 1,043 2,388 2,722 35

Underground3 361 4.0 181 0.6 0.7 6.4 47 2,099 4,440 5,773 74

Total

(Indicated)

500 4.2 195 0.6 0.8 6.8 68 3,142 6,828 8,495 109

Inferred

Pit-

Constrained2,3

2 1.8 118 0.3 0.6 3.3 0 8 12 26 0

Underground3 227 3.9 170 0.5 0.8 6.1 28 1,240 2,440 3,817 44

Total (Inferred) 229 3.8 169 0.5 0.8 6.0 28 1,248 2,452 3,842 44

* See footnotes under Table 1

Table 7: Central Klaza Mineral Resource Estimate, June 5, 20181,5

Tonnes

Grade Contained Metal

Au Ag Pb Zn AuEQ4 Au Ag Pb Zn AuEQ4

(kt) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (%) (g/t) (koz) (koz) (klb) (klb) (koz)

Indicated

Pit-

Constrained2,3

1,260 3.3 49 0.6 0.9 4.3 133 1,987 16,414 25,871 173

Underground3 715 3.9 62 0.6 0.7 5.0 90 1,432 9,550 11,309 114

Total

(Indicated)

1,976 3.5 54 0.6 0.9 4.5 223 3,419 25,964 37,180 288

Inferred

Pit-

Constrained2,3

1,145 2.1 28 0.3 0.4 2.6 76 1,017 7,176 9,696 94

Underground3 1,572 3.0 68 0.5 0.7 4.1 151 3,431 17,948 23,385 206

Total (Inferred) 2,717 2.6 51 0.4 0.6 3.4 227 4,448 25,124 33,081 301

* See footnotes under Table 1