Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

PPX.V ·

Igor PFS shows Pre-Tax 64% IRR (59% Post-Tax), $601/oz AuEq Cash Costs for PPX

Economic Studies

_____________________________________________________________________________________

NEWS RELEASE TSX.V PPX; BVL PPX

Igor PFS shows Pre-Tax 64% IRR (59% Post-Tax), $601/oz AuEq Cash Costs

for PPX

Vancouver, British Columbia – December 4, 2018 – PPX Mining Corp. (the "Company" or “PPX”) is

pleased to announce that it has received the results of an independent Pre-Feasibility Study (“PFS”) for an

integrated underground mine and gol d-silver recovery plant at the Company’s Igor Project in Northern

Peru. The PFS was prepared by Mine Development Associates (“MDA”) of Reno, Nevada in accordance

with the requirements of Canadian National Instrument 43 -101 “Standards of Disclosure for Min eral

Projects” (NI 43 -101). Unless otherwise noted, t he results below are expressed in US dollars , Canadian

dollars are converted at an exchange ratio of 1.33.

Highlights of the PFS

• Pre-tax Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”) of 64% at $1250/oz gold and $16.50/oz silver, 59% post-

tax; 76% pre-tax IRR with $1350/oz gold and $17.82/oz silver prices, 71% IRR post-tax.

• Average Life of Mine (“LOM”) cash operating costs of $601/oz gold equivalent (“AuEq”)

recovered and all-in sustaining costs (“AISC”) of $813/oz gold equivalent LOM.

• Pre-tax Net Present Value at a 5% discount rate (“NPV -5”) of $37.7 million (Cdn$50.1 million)

at $1250/oz gold and $1 6.50/oz silver , $30.1million post -tax; $46.1 million pre-tax NPV -5

(Cdn$61.3 million) with $1350/oz gold and $17.82/oz silver prices, $35.7 million post-tax.

• Post-tax Project pay-back period of approximately twenty-four months and a mine life of seven

years after a three month ramp up and construction phase.

• LOM gold production is estimated to be 108,000 ounces of gold and 1,137,000 ounces of silver for

a total of 122,000 AuEq ounces.

• Total Diluted Proven and Probable Reserves of 1,030,000 tonnes grading 4.10 gpt Au (136,000

ounces Au) and 104.08 gpt Ag (3,445,000 ounces Ag), or 154,000 AuEq ounces at a grade of 4.66

gpt AuEq.

• Total Measured and Indicated Resources of 1,470,000 tonnes, grading 4.72 gpt Au (223,000 ounces

Au) and 109.5 gpt Ag (5.18M ounces Ag) equal to 246,000 AuEq ounces (5.21 gpt AuEq). Inferred

Resources totaled 613,000 tonnes, grading 3. 91 gpt Au (7 7,0000 ounces Au), and 139.7 gpt Ag

(2.75M ounces Ag) equal to 89,000 AuEq ounces. The reported Resources are inclusive of the

Mineral Reserves.

“PPX is excited to complete this important step in advancing the Igor Project and Mina Callanquitas

towards production” said Brian J. Maher, President and CEO of PPX Mining . “The low cash costs, rapid

payback and strong base -case NPV can be attributed to PPX using low -cost heap leach precious metal

recovery. We view the PFS as a base-case road map that outlines the initial production plan for the Igor

Page 2

Project with multiple actionable opportunities to expand gold and silver production and cash flow in the

near term.”

Project upside includes:

▪ As noted in the PFS, adding a conventional milling circuit to the processing plant in years 2-3 can

add significant cash flow and tens of millions of dollars in NPV to the project, as silver grades

increase with depth and higher recoveries offset mill capital. PPX will pursue this option by

conducting additional technical analyses during the first years of the currently planned heap-leach

production.

▪ Exploration drilling has identified an 800-metre extension of the Callanquitas structure at

Portachuelos (please see PPX Press Release dated April 9, 2018) more than doubling the known

strike length of the Callanquitas structure and opening up a large target for resource/reserve

expansion that could support much higher production rates and/or increased mine life.

▪ Our exploration program during 2018 a t Portachuelos, Tesoros and Domo has demonstrated that

the Igor Project is a district-scale project with multiple styles of precious metal mineralization that

could support high-grade underground mining and potentially, large scale surface mining as well.

The Callanquitas underground mine is fully permitted and has been operating for over 18 months in a test

mining and bulk sampling mode. The heap leach processing facility has nearly completed the permitting

process, needing only the final Permit to Initi ate Operations (“F2”) to begin operations. This permit is

expected in December, 2018.

With the completion of the PFS, the Company is prepared to advance the Igor project into production as

outlined in the PFS. PPX looks forward to completing our transiti on from developer to producer and

becoming Peru’s newest gold and silver producer.

Financial Analysis:

The PFS base case uses a gold price assumption of $1,250/oz and a silver price assumption of $16.50/oz ,

and generates a discounted pre-tax net cash flow of $37.7M (5%) over a seven-year mine life. PFS results

are disclosed on a Pre-tax and Post-tax basis. K ey economic metrics, with the base case highlighted are

summarized below.

Gold & Silver Price per Ounce $1,150;

$15.18

$1,250;

$16.50

$1,350;

$17.82

Pre-tax IRR 51% 64% 76%

Pre-tax Cumulative Cash Flow $40.7 $52.5 $64.2

Pre-tax NPV (5% discount rate) $29.2 $37.7 $46.1

Pre-tax NPV (8% discount rate) $23.8 $31.0 $38.3

Post-tax IRR 48% 59% 71%

Post-tax Cumulative Cash Flow $34.0 $41.7 $49.7

Post-tax NPV (5% discount rate) $24.4 $30.1 $35.7

Post-tax NPV (8% discount rate) $19.8 $24.8 $29.8

Post-tax Payback Period (Months) 31.4 23.7 20.5

The financial analysis demonstrates a robust project, well insulated from reduced precious metal prices,

with considerable upside exposure to gold and silver price increases.

Page 3

Mining and Processing

Oxide ore will be obtained from Mina Callanquitas underground workings accessed by a series of ramps

and development drifts. Ore will be stoped using mechanized cut and fill with broken ore transported to

the surface via the ramp system. The PFS assumes that the mine will utilize a contract miner to provide

equipment and personnel for underground mining. Broken ore will be transported by 20-tonne trucks to the

processing plant where the ore will be crushed, screened and agglomerated. Crushed ore will be stacked

on heap leach pads at an average rate of 430 tonnes per day at full production. Pregnant solutions from the

heap leach pads will be treated in a Merrill Crowe processing plant in order to maximize silver recovery.

Gold and silver recoveries have been estimated at 80% and 33% for the purposes of this PFS. The

processing facility will produce gold-silver doré which will be sold for further refining.

Over an 87-month operating period (plus seven-year mine life), production will total 1,030,000 tonnes of

ore with an average fully diluted mining grade, as delivered to the processing plant, of 4.10 gpt Au and

104.1 gpt Ag. Total gold and silver prod uction, LOM, is projected to be 108,000 ounces of gold and

1,137,000 ounces of silver ( 122,000 ounces AuEq). At full steady state production after ramp -up,

production will average 19,000 AuEq ounces per year, reaching a high of 2 7,000 AuEq ounces in year

seven.

Capital and Operating Cost

The total capital cost for the processing plant was originally estimated at $4.71M. The current remaining

capital cost for the processing plant is estimated at $3.64M , including contingencies , and reflects the

$1.07M expended to date.

Processing Direct Costs Total Estimate Current Estimate

Crushing and Grinding $871,600 $ 654,000

Gold Recovery Plant $577,400 $ 434,000

De-Oxygenation $258,200 $ 194,000

Zinc Precipitation $399,800 $ 300,000

Cyanide Addition $217,200 $ 163,000

Smelting $277,900 $ 209,000

Heap Leach Pad & Ponds $281,600 $ 211,000

On-Site Infrastructure $380,700 $ 286,000

Off-Site Infrastructure $541,400 $ 407,000

Total Directs $3,805,800 $ 2,858,000

Processing Indirect Costs

EPCM $114,200 $ 86,000

Contractor's Fees $76,100 $ 57,000

Owners Costs $114,200 $ 86,000

Transportation $114,200 $ 86,000

First Fills $57,100 $ 43,000

Total Indirects $475,800 $ 358,000

Total Directs & Indirects $4,281,600 $ 3,216,000

Contingency $428,200 $ 428,200

Total Processing Capital $4,709,800 $ 3,644,200

Page 4

Mining Capital is mostly capitalized development over the life of the mine and adjustments (payments) to

the mining contractor. Salvage at the end of mine life has been estimated at $908,000.

Mining Capital

Capitalized Development $ 6,045,000

Other Mining Capital $ 190,000

Pre-Production Costs $ 382,000

Total Mining Capital $ 6,617,000

Contractor Adjustments $ 2,374,000

Salvage $ (908,000)

Total Mining Capital $ 8,083,000

Operating costs are subdivided into direct cash operating costs and All-In Sustaining Costs (“AISC”) which

include capital, reclamation, and payments to RIVI Capital for the stream financing. The PFS projects

direct cash operating costs of $601/AuEq ounce and AISC of $813/AuEq ounce which would place the

project near the lower quartile globally in terms of operating costs (based on World Gold Council GoldHub

Q3 2018 Production Costs AISC Chart).

Operating Costs $/tonne $/AuEq Oz

Expensed Mine Development $2.45 $20.61

Underground Mining Costs - Ore $49.38 $415.89

Processing Costs $17.13 $144.29

G&A $2.42 $20.39

Total Direct Cash Operating Costs $71.38 $601.18

RIVI Stream Payments $10.09 $85.00

Reclamation $3.69 $31.11

Capital Costs $11.38 $95.92

All-In Sustaining Costs (AISC) $96.54 $813.21

Mineral Resource Estimate

MDA developed the update mineral resource estimate for the Igor Project that has been utilized in the PFS

in accordance with the requirements of Canadian National Instrument 43-101 “Standards for the Disclosure

of Mineral Projects”. The resource estimate is restricted to the Callanquitas gold and silver deposit within

the Igor Project. Data from a total of 93 diamond core drill holes totaling 23,264 metres in length and 1,126

underground channel samples were used to prepare the resource estimate. The est imation methodology

included establishing separate domains for higher and lower grade portions of the Callanquitas deposit,

utilizing geologic criteria including structure to constrain resources. Individual model blocks are 0.5m x

2.0m x 2.5m in order to mimic the proposed and current mining method . The Inverse-Distance Cubed

(“ID3”) method was used to estimate sample data into the block model. As-built surveys of underground

workings were used to eliminate resource blocks that have already been mined as of October, 2018. A gold

equivalent (“AuEq”) cutoff grade of 2.0 gpt AuEq was used to define the reported Mineral Resources.

Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no

certainty that all or any part of the mineral resource will be converted into mineral reserves. The results of

the mineral resource estimate are summarized below.

Page 5

2018 Igor Reported Resources (2.0 gpt AuEq cutoff)

Type Class Tonnes gpt

Au oz Au gpt Ag oz Ag gpt Au

Eq

oz Au

Eq

Oxide

Measured 109,000 5.32 19,000 61.7 215,000 5.59 20,000

Indicated 1,361,000 4.67 204,000 113.4 4,962,000 5.17 226,000

Meas. +

Ind. 1,470,000 4.72 223,000 109.5 5,177,000 5.21 246,000

Oxide Inferred 344,000 4.58 51,000 124.6 1,376,000 5.13 57,000

Sulfide Inferred 269,000 2.97 26,000 159.1 1,378,000 3.68 32,000

• CIM Definitions and Standards were followed for Mineral Resource estimates;

• Equivalent gold (AuEq) values are based on a 75:1 gold:silver price difference (US$1,300 Au and

US$17.30 Ag) and 3:1 gold:silver recovery difference;

• Mineral Resources are inclusive of Mineral Reserves;

• The Mineral Resource estimate was prepared by Paul Tietz, C.P.G., an independent consultant and

Qualified Person for the purpose of NI 43-101.

• Some apparent discrepancies are due to rounding.

An historical resource estimate for the Callanquitas gold and silver deposit was presented in a Technical

Report, amended September 27, 2013 and available on the Company’s website or SEDAR . The 2013

historical resource estimate consisted entirely of Inferred Mineral Resources reported at a cutoff grade of

1.5 gpt AuEq. The 2013 Technical Report also included tabulated Inferred Resources using a 2.0 gpt AuEq

cutoff. Compared to the historic al resource calculated at a 2.0 gpt AuEq, the current resource estimate

shows that:

▪ 69% of the current resources are in the Measured and Indicated categories, compared to nil in the

historical resource estimate, reflecting the results of the recent in -fill drilling and underground

sampling program. The conversion of a large portion of the Callanquitas resource to the Measured

and Indicated categories is important as only Measured and Indicated Resources may be used to

calculate Proven and Probable Reserves.

▪ The average AuEq grade of the current Measured and Indicated Resources reported herein is 192%

higher than the historical estimate, 5.21 gpt AuEq compared to 2.71 gpt AuEq (the historical AuEq

value is calculated using the same 3:1 gold:silver recovery ratio used in the current estimate).

Mineral Reserves

Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves were estimated by Joseph B. Seamons, P.E. of MDA, in accordance

with the requirements of Canadian National Instrument 43 -101. Proven and Probable reserves were

estimated based on a $1,250 per ounce gold price and $16.50 per ounce silver price. The reserves estimate

utilized Deswik™ Stope Optimizer Software (Deswik.SO™) to define mineable shapes based on a 2.5 gpt

AuEq cutoff grade.

Dilution of 10% (tonnage) was added. Gold and silver grades of the dilution tonnes were based on a 0.5m

shell outside of the mineable stope shapes. Measured and Indicated grades within the dilution shell were

Page 6

calculated for each level, and the metal content of the dilution was reduced by 50% to represent waste due

to mucking on top of fill. A mining extraction of 95% was used to represent a 5% ore loss.

2018 Igor Reported Reserves

Type Class Tonnes gpt

Au oz Au gpt

Ag oz Ag gpt

AuEq

oz

AuEq

Oxide

Proven 8,000 4.56 1,000 32.3 8,000 4.74 1,000

Probable 1,022,000 4.09 134,000 104.6 3,437,000 4.66 153,000

Prov. +

Prob. 1,030,000 4.10 136,000 104.1 3,445,000 4.66 154,000

• CIM Definitions and Standards were followed for Mineral Resource estimates;

• Proven and Probable reserves are based on Measured and Indicated resources;

• Reserves are reported as fully diluted and reflect a 95% extraction rate (5% ore loss);

• Reserves are reported based on $1,250 per ounce gold and $14.50 per ounce silver prices;

• Equivalent gold are reported based on metal prices and 80% recovery of gold and 33% recovery

of silver;

• Some apparent discrepancies are due to rounding.

Metallurgical Testing

Five sets of metallurgical testing have been performed on samples from the Callanquitas deposit. The first

testing was done during 2014 and 2015 and consisted of bottle roll and agitated leach tests. The results

showed that Callanquitas gold and silver mineralization is amenable to CN extraction. In 2015, two sets of

samples were subjected to column leach testing over a variety of leach times and utilizing agglomeration

and non-agglomerated ore samples. The best results from the 2015 column leach came from ore crushed

to ½ inch size with the fines agglomerated. A final set of column leach tests were performed in 2017 with

similar results, the best precious metal recoveries occurred in samples crushed to ½ inch si ze. Gold

dissolution was rapid in the 2017 test work, with most of the gold being extracted within the first five days

of leaching. The opposite was true for silver, with dissolution being slow and continuing to increase

throughout the 35 -day leach cycle . Based on the full body of test work completed to date, the process

design in the PFS considers gold recovery of 80% and silver recovery of 33% over the full leach cycle. The

test work shows that silver recovery can be variable and additional testing is recommended to understand

the source of this variability. Metallurgical test work is summarized below:

Laboratory Year Test Type Crush Size Leach Time

% Recovery

Au

% Recovery

Ag

OM Mining 2014 Bottle Roll 86% -200 Mesh 96 hours 96.1 89.2

Certimin S.A. 2014 Bottle Roll NA 24 hours 87.5 66.1

Alex Stewart Intl. 2014 Bottle Roll NA 120 hours 81.4 8.0

BMI Ingenieros S.A.C. 2015 Bottle Roll 70% -200 Mesh 24 hours 83.7 28.6

BMI Ingenieros S.A.C. 2015 Bottle Roll 70% -200 Mesh 48 hours 83.8 31.0

BMI Ingenieros S.A.C. 2015 Bottle Roll 70% -200 Mesh 24 hours 88.3 77.7

BMI Ingenieros S.A.C. 2015 Column Leach 1/2 Inch 10 days 76.1 19.7

BMI Ingenieros S.A.C. 2015 Column Leach 1/2 Inch 20 days 74.4 25.7

BMI Ingenieros S.A.C. 2015 Column Leach 1/2 Inch 30 days 75.8 23.2

BMI Ingenieros S.A.C. 2015 Column Leach 1/2 Inch 20 days 85.4 14.7

METTS 2017 Column Leach 2 Inch 35 days 66.8 9.3

METTS 2017 Column Leach 1 Inch 35 days 65.1 7.9

Page 7

METTS 2017 Column Leach 1/2 Inch 35 days 67.5 7.6

METTS 2017 Column Leach 2 Inch 35 days 76.2 20.2

METTS 2017 Column Leach 1 Inch 35 days 79.7 22.7

METTS 2017 Column Leach 1/2 Inch 35 days 80.4 33.0

Qualified Persons

The following people have reviewed this press release and all are independent Qualified Persons as defined

by NI 43-101 in their specified areas of expertise:

Disclosure related to process plant design, capital and operational costs: Ernest Burga, P.E.

Disclosure related to metallurgy and process design: Dr. Diogenes Uceda, Ph.D., P.E.

Disclosure related to mining and Reserve estimation: Joseph B. Seamons, P.E. of MDA,

Disclosure related to Mineral Resource estimation: Paul Tietz, C.P.G. of MDA,

Disclosure related to economic analysis: Thomas L. Dyer, P.E. of MDA.

All scientific and technical information in this press release not within the areas of expertise described

above has been reviewed and approved by Quentin J. Browne, P.Geo., Independent Consulting Geologist

to PPX Mining Corp., who is a qualified person under the definitions established by National Instrument

43-101.

About PPX Mining Corp

PPX Mining Corp. (TSX.V: PPX.V, SSE: PPX, BVL: PPX) is a Canadian -based exploration and

development company with assets in northern Peru. Igor, the Company’s 100%-owned flagship gold and

silver project, is located in the prolific Northern Peru gold belt in eastern La Libertad Department. PPX is

developing the Callanquitas Mine and heap leach facility to exploit high grade, underground-minable gold

and silver ore. Based on the Company’s Prefeasibility Study, PPX expects the Callanquitas mine to produce

up to 26,000 AuEq ounces per year over a seven -year mine life at cash cost of less than US$610/AuEq

ounce. Simultaneously, PPX is accelerating its exploration program at Igor in order to f ully evaluate the

resource potential of the entire Igor project area. The Callanquitas structure is open along strike and at

depth, parallel structures are unexplored. New discoveries at Portachuelos, coupled with the Domo and

Tesoros exploration targets , emphasize that the Igor Project is evolving into a district -scale project with

multiple deposits and mineralized zones.

On behalf of the Board of Directors

Brian J. Maher

President and Chief Executive Officer

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT:

PPX Mining Corp.

Brian J. Maher, President and Chief Executive Officer

Phone: 1-530-913-4728

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.ppxmining.com

Page 8

Cautionary Statement:

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture

Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. Certain disclosure in this release, may consti tute

"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and

Canadian securities legislation. In making the forward-looking statements in this release, the Company has applied certain factors

and assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable. However, the forward-looking statements in this release are subject to

numerous risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause future results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in

such forward-looking statements. Such uncertainties and risks are described from time to time in the Company's filings with the

appropriate securities commissions, and may include, among others, market conditions, delays in obtaining or failure to obtain

required regulatory approvals or financing , fluctuating metal prices, the possibility of project cost overruns, mechanical failure,

unavailability of parts and supplies, labour disturbances, interruption in transportation or utilities, adverse weather conditions, and

unanticipated costs and expenses, variations in the cost of energy or materials or supplies or environmental impacts on operations.

There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially

from those anticipated in such statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward -looking statements. The

Company does not intend, and expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to, update or revise any forward-looking statements

whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.