Patriot Achieves 6% Li2O Spodumene Concentrate Grade in Preliminary HLS Metallurgical Testwork on the CV13 Pegmatite Indicating Potential for Joint Processing with CV5
Patriot Battery Metals Inc.
Suite 700 - 838 W. Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6C 0A6
www.patriotbatterymetals.com TSX-V: PMET / ASX: PMT / OTC: PMETF / FSE: R9GA
Patriot Achieves 6% Li2O Spodumene Concentrate Grade in
Preliminary HLS Metallurgical Testwork on the CV13 Pegmatite
Indicating Potential for Joint Processing with CV5
July 4, 2023 – Vancouver, BC, Canada Ju ly 5, 2023 – Sydney, Australia
Highlights
• Heavy Liquid Separation (“HLS”) testwork on five (5) core sample composites from the
CV13 Pegmatite cluster indicate that a simple Dense Media Separation (“DMS”) process
flowsheet is applicable.
• HLS test work followed by magnetic separation produced 6+% Li 2O spodumene
concentrates at overall lithium recoveries exceeding 70%.
o Strong recoveries at both low, moderate, and high feed grades.
• Fe2O3 content of ~0.60% in final spodumene concentrate following magnetic separation
on HLS concentrate.
• Results provide a strong indication that material from both the CV13 Pegmatite and CV5
Pegmatite may be processed jointly using the same design criteria and flowsheet (i.e.,
processed at the same plant).
Mineral Process Consultant and Project Steering Group member, Brett Grosvenor, comments:
“The results of this HLS testwork at CV13 are very positive and indicate strongly that joint
processing with CV5 Pegmatite material is practical and viable. From a Project development, risk
mitigation, and flowsheet perspective, it is difficult to ask for a better result.”
Patriot Battery Metals Inc. (the “Company” or “Patriot”) ( TSX-V: PMET) (ASX: PMT)
(OTCQX: PMETF) (FSE: R9GA) is pleased to announce the results of preliminary Heavy
Liquid Separation (“HLS”) testwork on CV13 Pegmatite core samples . The CV13 Pegmatite
cluster is located approximately 3.8 km along geological trend westwardly of the CV5 Pegmatite
cluster (Figure 1), where drilling has defined a large and continuous spodumene mineralized body
(see news release dated June 14, 2023).
The primary objective of the HLS test program on CV13 i s to assess the liberation and recovery
characteristics of spodumene at different locations along the collective ~2.2-km trend that defines
the cluster. HLS testing is a cost- effective way to rapidly assess the applicability of larger scale
Dense Media Separation (“DMS”) processing, which is more reflective of an operating and
continuous process, and the preferred method of spodumene pegmatite processing. Further, the
data will allow for an initial assessment on the potential for joint processing with CV5 Pegmatite
material using the same design criteria and flowsheet (i.e., the same process plant). Prior HLS and
DMS testwork completed on the CV5 Pegmatite demonstrates that a simple DMS only flowsheet
is applicable (see news releases dated August 4, 2022, and December 19, 2022).
The benefits of DMS (± magnetic separation) compared to alternative recovery methods (i.e.,
flotation) are considerable and include relatively lower CAPEX and OPEX, reduced reagent needs,
coarser product and tailings, quicker operational start-up, and overall, less technical risk. A DMS
circuit also only requires a typically coarse crush size compared to a smaller crush size (or
grinding), which results in reduced power consumption and less equipment.
The HLS test program on CV13 Pegmatite material utilized five (5), ~8-10 m, NQ-size, quarter-
core composite samples collected from drill holes CV22-077, 082, 084, 085, 092, and 103 across
the western, central, and eastern portions of the collecti ve ~2.2-km trend that defines the cluster
(Figure 2). This included four (4) samples from the upper pegmatite body, and one (1) sample
from the lower pegmatite body. The test program was completed by SGS Canada Inc. at their
facility in Lakefield, ON, where the prior testwork for the Project was also completed.
Head grades for t he composites ranged from 0.84% to 1.42% Li 2O, averaging 1.14% Li 2O, and
included varied amounts of mica and tourmaline to further assess their impact on the process. The
sample composites were crushed to -9.5 mm (-3/8”) – a coarse crush size – with the fine fraction
(-0.85 mm) screened out, and followed by HLS tests at six (6) different cut points (2.65, 2.70, 2.80,
2.85, 2.90, and 2.95). Magnetic separation was also completed on the concentrate to assess any
lingering iron mineral rejection (e.g., amphibole, mica). It should be noted that magnetic separation
was only applied to some samples in order to reduce iron grades in the final concentrate. The
requirement for magnetic separation to be included in the flowsheet will continue to be assessed
further as the project progresses.
The Company is pleased to report that the testwork has returned very positive results with lithium
recoveries ranging from 67% to 77% at an interpolated spodumene concentrate grade of
6.00% Li2O. Recoveries also remained strong on the lower grade samples, which is a testament to
the coarse-grained nature of the spodumene making it more amenable to liberation . Collectively,
the preliminary HLS results strongly indicate that a DMS only operation at CV13 is applicable.
Further, the result s support a joint processing approach for the CV5 and CV13 pegmatites ,
whereby both could be processed at reasonable recovery in the same process plant. Such a scenario
is optimal and reduces site infrastructure footprints and needs in the event of joint development.
To date, the metallurgical data collected from the CV5 and CV13 pegmatites is highly encouraging
and demonstrates that a DMS only flowsheet is applicable at both clusters. Further, the data
suggests that both pegmatites could be jointly crushed and feed the same process plant , while
maintaining reasonably high recoveries into a marketable spodumene concentrate of +5.5% Li2O.
As a next step, t he Company intends to collect a sizable and representative, composite drill core
sample over the summer-fall of 2023 in order to feed a DMS pilot plant.
Figure 1: Location of the CV13 Pegmatite cluster relative to the CV5 Pegmatite cluster.
Figure 2: Distribution of composite core samples collected for HLS testwork at the CV13 Pegmatite cluster.
Figure 3: Results from the inaugural drill testing at the CV13 Pegmatite cluster, completed in 2022.
.
About the CV Lithium Trend
The CV Lithium Trend is an emerging spodumene pegmatite district discovered by the Company
in 2017 and spans more than 25- km across the Corvette Property. The core area includes an
approximate 3.7 -km long spodumene pegmatite (the ‘CV5 Pegmatite’) and multiple proximal
secondary spodumene pegmatite lenses.
To date, six (6) distinct clusters of lithium pegmatite have been discovered across the Corvette
Property – CV5 Pegmatite and associated lenses, CV4, CV8 -12, CV9, CV10, and CV13. Given
the proximity of some pegm atite outcrops to each other, as well as the shallow till cover in the
area, it is probable that some of the outcrops may reflect a discontinuous surface exposure of a
single, larger pegmatite ‘outcrop’ subsurface. Further, the high number of well -mineralized
pegmatites along the trend indicate a strong potential for a series of relatively closely
spaced/stacked, sub-parallel, and sizable spodumene -bearing pegmatite bodies, with significant
lateral and depth extent, to be present.
Qualified/Competent Person
The information in this news release that relates to exploration results for the Corvette Property is
based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr. Darren L. Smith, M.Sc., P.Geo., who
is a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101, and member in good standing
with the Ordre des Géologues du Québec (Geologist Permit number 1968), and with the
Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta (member number 87868). Mr.
Smith has reviewed and approved the technical information in this news release.
Mr. Smith is Vice President of Exploration for Patriot Battery Metals Inc. and a Senior Geologist
and Project Manager with Dahrouge Geological Consulting Ltd. Mr. Smith holds common shares
and options in the Company.
Mr. Smith has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralization, type of deposit
under consideration, and to the activities being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as
described by the JORC Code, 2012. Mr. Smith consents to the inclusion in this news release of the
matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
About Patriot Battery Metals Inc.
Patriot Battery Metals Inc. is a hard -rock lithium exploration company focused on advancing its
district-scale 100%-owned Corvette Property located in the Eeyou Istchee James Bay region of
Quebec, Canada. The Corvette Property is one of the largest and highest -grade hard rock lithium
projects being explored, with over 50 kilometres of strike length over a 214 square kilometre land
package and over 70 lithium bearing pegmatite outcrops identified to date.
The Corvette Property is situated proximal to the all-weather Trans Taiga Road and Hydro-Québec
power line infrastructure in the Eeyou Istchee James Bay re gion of Quebec. The Property hosts
significant lithium potential highlighted by the CV5 Pegmatite, which has been traced by drilling
over a strike length of at least 3.7 km with spodumene pegmatite encountered as deep as 425 m
vertical depth.
For further i nformation, please contact us at [email protected] or by calling
+1 (604) 279-8709 or visit www.patriotbatterymetals.com. Please also refer to the Company’s
continuous disclosure filings, available under its profile at www.sedar.com and www.asx.com.au,
for available exploration data.
This news release has been approved by the Board of Directors,
“BLAIR WAY”
Blair Way, President, CEO, & Director
Disclaimer for Forward-Looking Information
This news release contains forward -looking statements and other statements that are not historical facts.
Forward-looking statements are often identified by terms such as “will”, “may”, “should”, “anticipate”,
“expects” and similar expressions. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including with
respect to the ability of the Company to process minerals from its properties as proposed, or at all, included
in this news release are forward -looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. There can be no
assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ
materially from those anticipated in such statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from the Company’s expectations include the results of further exploration and testing,
and other risks detailed from time to time in the filings made by the Company with securities regulators,
available at www.sedar.com . The reader is cautioned that assumptions used in the preparation of any
forward-looking information may prove to be incorrect. Events or circumstances may cause actual results
to differ materially from those predicted, as a result of numerous known and unknown risks, uncertainties,
and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. The reader is cautioned not to
place undue reliance on any forward -looking information. Such information, although considered
reasonable by management at the time of preparation, may prove to be incorrect and actual results may
differ materially from those anticipated. Forward -looking statements contained in this news release are
expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. The forward -looking statements contained in this news
release are made as of the date of this news release and the Company will update or revise publicly any of
the included forward-looking statements as expressly required by applicable law.
No securities regulatory authority or stock exchange has reviewed nor accepts responsibility for the
adequacy or accuracy of the content of this news release.
Appendix 1 – JORC Code 2012 Table 1 information required by ASX Listing Rule 5.7.1
Section 1 – Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques
• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut
channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard
measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as down
hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF
instruments, etc). These examples should
not be taken as limiting the broad meaning
of sampling.
• Include reference to measures taken to
ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems used.
• Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation that are Material to the
Public Report.
• In cases where ‘industry standard’ work
has been done this would be relatively
simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was
used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3
kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g
charge for fire assay’). In other cases
more explanation may be required, such
as where there is coarse gold that has
inherent sampling problems. Unusual
commodities or mineralisation types (eg
submarine nodules) may warrant
disclosure of detailed information.
• Core sampling protocols met or exceeded industry
standard practices.
• The five (5) HLS samples were comprised of saw-
cut, quarter-core intervals and collected from six
(6) different holes.
• The HLS samples are collectively considered an
appropriate test approach to evaluate DMS at the
greater CV13 Pegmatite cluster as a whole.
Samples were selected to be as representative as
practical.
Drilling
techniques
• Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation,
open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger,
Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core
diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of
diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other
type, whether core is oriented and if so,
by what method, etc).
• The samples utilized quarter-core NQ size drill
core.
Drill sample
recovery
• Method of recording and assessing core
and chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.
• Measures taken to maximise sample
recovery and ensure representative
nature of the samples.
• Whether a relationship exists between
sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
material.
• N/a – metallurgical testing reported in this release.
Logging • Whether core and chip samples have
been geologically and geotechnically
• N/a – metallurgical testing reported in this release.