Orezone Announces Updated Feasibility Study to Incorporate a Phase II High-Grade Sulphide Expansion
1
Orezone Announces Updated Feasibility Study
to Incorporate a Phase II High-Grade Sulphide Expansion
November 19, 2018, Orezone Gold Corporation ( TSXV: ORE ) (“Orezone” or t he “Company”) is pleased to
provide the following key updates on its 90%-owned Bomboré Gold Project:
• Work has commenced to u pdate the 2018 Feasibility Study (“2018 FS”) to include a staged high er-
grade sulphide expansion (“Phase II Sulphide Expansion”) to complement the oxide mine plan in the
2018 FS. The Phase II Sulphide Expansion is envisioned as a 3,000 to 3,500 tonne per day (“tpd”)
sulphide circuit to process zones of higher -grade sulphide and lower transition oxide resources
starting in Year 3 of commercial production. Capital for this expansion is expected to be funded by
future operating cash flows.
• Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. (“RPA”) will update the current January 5, 2017 mineral resource (“2017
Resource”) estimate to include the oxide material within the previously termed Restricted Zones and
the free milling sulphide material at P17S in support of this Phase II Sulphide Expansion study.
This update to the 2018 FS will not impact the ongoing development and schedule of the Bomboré project as
presented in the 2018 FS. As stated in the Company’s press release of November 8 th, 2018, the current
project is being designed as a 5.2 Million tonne per annum (“ Mtpa”) operation and is currently advancing
through detailed engineering with first gold production scheduled to commence by October 2020.
Patrick Downey, President and CEO, stated that “We are very excited to commence an updated feasibility study
to evaluate the potential upside of a sulphide circuit to meaningfully contribute to the project’s future gold
production as part of a phased expansion to the 2018 FS oxide mine plan . Previously, the sulphides at
Bomboré were viewed as a large low -grade deposit. However, a recent detailed review of the Measured and
Indicated (“M&I”) sulphide resources by the Company and our consultants has identified continuous zones of
significantly higher grade, near surface mineralization which warrants a more in-depth analysis. In addition
to the high er grade sulphides at P17S, we have successfully identified four additional areas of thick and
continuous higher-grade M&I sulphide resources located directly beneath current oxide reserves. Historical
metallurgical test work together with pit geotechnical evaluations have been previously completed on these
sulphides which will allow for rapid advancement of th is update to the 2018 FS, which we are targeting for
completion by the end of Q2 2019.”
Feasibility Update for Phase II Sulphide Expansion
Test work and previously released studies indicate that the sulphide process plant extension will consist of a
crushing and grinding circuit that feeds into a leac hing circuit that will be designed to provide the first the
24 hours of leaching. This partially-leached material will then be fed to the main oxide carbon in-leach circuit
where overall leaching of the blended material will be completed, and the gold reco vered to the oxide plant
2
carbon elution circuit. Test work to date on sulphide material indicates recoveries ranging from 73% in the
north (Maga and P8/P9) to over 90% in the south (Siga and P17S). The gold recovery, tailings and reagent
systems of the oxide plant design in the 2018 FS will remain unchanged as will the main project infrastructure.
The overall plant throughput is currently contemplated to remain at 5.2Mtpa with these higher -grade
sulphides replacing lower -grade oxides. Over the past quarte r, the Company, in conjunction with its
consultants, has been reviewing the sulphide mineralization beneath the current oxide reserve pits in the
2018 FS. The 2017 Resource statement estimated that the sulphide zones contained 96 M tonnes of M& I
resources at a gold grade of 0.83 g/t (above a lower cut-off grade of 0.38 g/t), including 71M tonnes of M&I
resources at a gold grade of 0.97 g/t over a higher cut -off grade of 0.5 g/t (refer to Appendix B for the pit
design parameters used by RPA for the resource estimation).
From this review, t he Company has outlined several higher-grade sulphide zones located within the Main
M&I sulphide. Subsets of the 2017 RPA M&I resource estimates for these zones are included in table 1 below.
For the initial review, these zones of higher-grade sulphides have been constrained to a maximum depth of
100 m but the mineralization remains open at depth.
Table1: Subsets of RPA 2017 M&I Resource Estimate
Notes:
1. CIM (2014) definitions were followed for Mineral Resources.
2. Mineral Resources are estimated at variable cut -off grades depending on weathering layer and location. Elevated cut -off grades have been used to identify
higher-grade mineralization within the Mineral Resources.
3. Mineral Resources are estimated using a long-term gold price of US$1,400/oz.
4. A minimum mining width of approximately 3 m was used.
5. Estimates for contained gold have been rounded to the nearest 100 oz.
6. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated e conomic viability and have not had the considerations applied to them that allow
conversion to Mineral Reserves. This work will be carried out during the Phase II Sulphide Expansion study.
A review of these zones by the Company’s consultants has indicated sufficient thickness and continuity to
advance to detailed feasibility to evaluate the potential to convert these resources into reserves (see location
of areas of interest, Appendix A). These zones will be included in the updated FS in combination with the
lower transition oxides and P17S.
The Company has retained its previous consultants from the 2018 FS for this FS update. Lycopodium
Minerals Canada Ltd. will act as lead study manager together with AMC Consultants, Knight Piésold Consulting
and RPA. The FS update will be based on the con struction of the sulphide circuit in Year 2 of commercial
production to allow the Company to access up to two years of operating cash flow to self-fund the expansion.
Sulphides
Pit Depth (m below oxide)
Cut off grade (g/t Au)
Measured Indicated M&I Measured Indicated M&I Measured Indicated M&I Measured Indicated M&I Measured Indicated M&I
Tonnes (kt) 273 35 308 317 547 864 0 3,238 3,238 278 3,440 3,718 867 7,260 8,128
Grade (g/t Au) 2.62 2.36 2.59 1.31 1.30 1.31 0.00 1.27 1.27 1.37 1.31 1.32 1.74 1.30 1.34
Contained Gold (oz) 23,000 2,700 25,700 13,300 23,000 36,300 0 132,100 132,100 12,200 145,000 157,200 48,500 302,800 351,200
Lower Transition
Cut off grade (g/t Au)
Measured Indicated M&I Measured Indicated M&I Measured Indicated M&I Measured Indicated M&I Measured Indicated M&I
Tonnes (kt) 23 6 29 518 140 658 0 824 824 1,094 996 2,090 1,635 1,966 3,601
Grade (g/t Au) 1.77 1.60 1.73 1.15 1.00 1.12 0.00 0.97 0.97 1.01 1.06 1.03 1.07 1.02 1.04
Contained Gold (oz) 1,300 300 1,600 19,200 4,500 23,700 0 25,600 25,600 35,500 33,900 69,400 56,000 64,300 120,400
0.22 to 0.24 0.42 0.52 and 0.65 0.55 n/a
0.40 0.42 and 0.95 0.77 and 0.90 0.88 n/a
95 66 90 96 n/a
Subsets of RPA 2017 M&I Resource Estimate
P17S Maga Siga P8/P9 Combined
3
Significant historical metallurgical, environmental and geotechnical test work has already been completed on
the sulphide material from these zones and been included in previously filed NI 43 -101 reports. Work
includes:
• Grind versus recovery test work;
• Leach kinetics including optimal leach residence time;
• Reagent consumptions;
• Crushing and grinding Work Indices;
• Abrasion Indices;
• Waste rock acid rock drainage(ARD) characterization; and
• Pit wall geotechnical drilling and analysis.
The Company will benefit from the extensive database of existing test work in reducing both the costs and
schedule of this FS update.
In 2012, McClelland performed a feasibility -level test work program. The testwork included ore variability
composite testing, comminution testing, CIL/CIP leaching, residue characterization, and waste rock testing.
The sulphide composites were tested at two grind sizes (-75 and -53μm). The results, which are taken directly
from Table 13.13 in the August 23rd, 2018 NI 43-101 technical report are summarized in Appendix C.
A 2009 AMMTEC metallurgical program included in the August 23rd, 2018 NI 43-101technical report in
Tables 13.5 and 13.6 provide additional recovery data for the sulphide resources. The samples provided to
AMMTEC were PQ and HQ drill cores taken from the fresh rock, transition, and oxide ore zones. Summary
results from the AMMTEC program are presented in Appendix D.
Bomboré Resource Update by RPA
The resource estimate update will be performed by RPA who completed the 2017 Resource estimate. The new
resource estimate will include oxide material from the previously excluded Restricted Zones based on all prior
drilling up to February 2016. This material is located within the flood zones of seasonal river crossings (see
Appendix A). Any material within the Restricted Zones that falls within an updated mine plan will be mined
and subsequently backfilled with waste from the same area during each year’s dry season of November to
April. Permitting of the Restricted Zones is advanced with submission of an Environmental and Social Impact
Assessment report as the next steps.
The RPA resource update will also include the near surface P17S sulphide deposit. This deposit does not have
significant oxide mineralization and therefore, is currently outside of the existing mining permit. A resource
estimate for P17S was included in the 2017 Resource based on limited drilling to February 2016 which
identified a M&I resource of 335,000 tonnes at a gold grade of 2.52 grams per tonne (“g/t”) . This resource
was to a depth of ~100 m and down dip extension of ~190 m from surface. Over the past two years, the
Company has conducted successful follow-up drilling at P17S (see Company’s Press Release of July 16,
2018) which has materially increased the size of the deposit. The drilling continued to define the extensions
of the deposit, which is hosted in a series of shallowly-plunging granodiorite thickened fold hinges, with the
most recent drilling having intersected new fold hinges and defined the down -plunge extension of the
original deposit over a distance of at least 500 m, to a vertical depth of about 200 m. All new drilling data
4
available as of October 2018 will be incorporated within the new resource estimate by RPA.
Qualified Persons
Tim Miller, SME and COO, Pascal Marquis, Geo and SVP and Patrick Downey, P.Eng and CEO of Orezone, are
Qualified Persons under National Instrument 43-101 and have reviewed and approved the information in this
news release. Orezone has also prepared and filed a current technical report on the Bomboré Project titled
“NI 43-101 Technical Report Feasibility Study of the Bomboré Gold Project Burkina Faso” with a date of 23
August 2018, and which is available at www.sedar.com and at www.orezone.com. The technical r eport
includes relevant information regarding the effective dates and the assumptions, parameters and methods of
the mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Bomboré Project, as well as information regarding data
verification, and other matters releva nt to the scientific and technical disclosure contained in this news
release. Readers should also refer to the annual information form of Orezone for the year ended December
31, 2017 and other continuous disclosure documents filed by Orezone since January 1, 2018 available at
www.sedar.com, for this detailed information, which is subject to the qualifications and notes set forth
therein.
About Orezone Gold Corporation
Orezone is a Canadian company with a successful gold discovery track record and recent mine development
experience in Burkina Faso, West Africa. The Company owns a 90% interest in Bomboré, a fully permitted, low
cost, development stage gold project in Burkina Faso, situated 85 km east of the capital city of Ouagadougou,
adjacent to an international highway.
For further information please contact Orezone at +1 (613) 241 -3699 or visit the Company’s website at
www.orezone.com.
Orezone Gold Corporation
Patrick Downey
President and Chief Executive Officer
Tel: 1 778 945 8977 / Toll Free: 1 888 673 0663
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND FORWARD -LOOKING INFORMATION: This news release contains certain “forward -looking
statements” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward -looking statements and forward -looking
information are frequently characterized by words such as “plan”, “expect”, “project”, “intend”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “estimate”,
“potential”, “possible” and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions “may”, “will”, “could”, or “should”
occur.
This news release includes certain forward -looking statements. These include statements regarding, among others, construction
enhancement opportunities including expansion of plant processing capacity to 5.2Mtpa, successful permitting of the Restricte d
Zone oxides and P17S for inclusion into a new mine plan, the potential of processing higher grade sulphide material on a 3,000 to
3,500 tpd basis as supplemental plant feed into the 2018 FS oxide mine plan and the associated plant improvements required, t he
construction start-up of the sulphide plant extension in Year 2 of commercial production with commencement of gold production
from the sulphide circuit starting in Year 3, the funding of the sulphide expansion from internal operating cash flow, and the
completion of a feasibility update to the 2018 FS by the end of Q2 2019.
All such forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by management and qualified persons
in light of their experience and perception of historical trends, cur rent conditions and expected future developments, as well as
other factors management and the qualified persons believe are appropriate in the circumstances. Readers are cautioned that
actual results may vary from those presented.
5
In addition, all forward-looking information and statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that
could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward -looking statements including, but not
limited to, use of assumptions that may not prove to be correct, unexpected changes in laws, rules or regulations, or their
enforcement by applicable authorities; the failure of parties to contr acts to perform as agreed; social or labour unrest; changes in
commodity prices; unexpected failure or inadequacy of infrastructure, the possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated costs
and expenses, accidents and equipment breakdowns, political risk, unanticipated changes in key management pers onnel and
general economic, market or business conditions, the failure of exploration programs, including drilling programs, to deliver
anticipated results and the failure of ongoing and uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing nee ded in the
future, and other factors described in the Company’s most recent annual information form and management discussion and analysis
filed on SEDAR on www.sedar.com. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward -looking information or
statements.
This news release also contains references to estimates of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. The estimation of Mineral
Resources is inherently uncertain and involves subjective judgments about many relevant factors. Mineral Resources tha t are not
Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The accuracy of any such estimates is a function of the quantit y
and quality of available data, and of the assumptions made and judgments used in engineering and geological interpretation, which
may prove to be unreliable and depend, to a certain extent, upon the analysis of drilling results and statistical inferences that may
ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Mineral Resource estimates may have to be re -estimated based on, among other things: (i)
fluctuations in the price of gold; (ii) results of drilling; (iii) results of metallurgical testing, process and other studie s; (iv) changes to
proposed mine plans; (v) the evaluation of mine plans subsequent to the date of any estimates; and (vi) the possible failure to
receive required permits, approvals and licenses.
Although the forward -looking statements contained in this news release are based upon what management of the Company
believes are reasonable assumptions, the Company cannot assure investors that actual results will be consistent with these forward-
looking statements. These forward -looking statements are made as of the date of this news release and are expressly qualified in
their entirety by this cautionary statement. Subject to applicable securities laws, the Company does not assume any obligation to
update or revise the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this
news release.
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange)
accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
6
Appendix A: Map of Sulphide Areas Considered
7
Appendix B: Whittle Parameters for 2017 Resource Pit Shells
Upper
Saprolite & Lower Upper Lower
Operating Parameter/Assumption Units Regolith Saprolite Transition Transition Sulphides
Pit Wall Slopes:
Maximum overall Degrees 40 40 45 45 50
Mining Parameters:
Waste Rock Mining Cost $/t 1.30 1.30 1.60 1.60 1.75
Ore Mining Cost $/t 2.45 2.45 2.75 2.75 2.75
Mining Recovery % 97% 97% 97% 97% 95%
Mining Dilution % 3% 3% 3% 3% 5%
Mining Dilution Grade g/t Au 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Processing Parameters:
Process Cost $/t 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 10.30
Re-handle Cost $/t 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
Process Sustaining Cost $/t 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Recovery, Au % 91% 88% 86% 83% 82%
G&A Cost $/t 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.25
Closure Cost $/t 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35
Revenue Parameters:
Sale Price US$/oz Au 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400
Payable % Au 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9
Burkina Faso NSR: >US$1,300/oz Au % 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
CSR % 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Selling Costs US$/oz Au 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50
North and South Estimated Cut-off Grade: g/t Au 0.202 0.208 0.214 0.224 0.381
P16 and P17 Estimated Cut-off Grade: g/t Au 0.216 0.222 0.228 0.239 0.396
Orezone Gold Corporation – Bomboré Gold Project
WHITTLE PARAMETERS FOR RESOURCE PIT SHELLS
8
Appendix C: McClelland Grind and Cyanide Concentration Optimization Tests
Appendix D - AMMTEC Leach Extraction Results
Sulphides 80%-150μm 1.0 2 75.3 1.06 0.32 1.38 0.47 1.0
Sulphides 80%-106μm 1.0 2 78.2 1.05 0.29 1.34 0.39 1.0
0.5 2 80.0 1.2 0.28 1.48 0.23 1.4
1.0 4 79.6 1.1 0.27 1.37 0.5 1.1
1.5 2 83.4 1.41 0.28 1.68 1.13 0.9
2.0 2 79.4 1.11 0.27 1.38 1.88 0.8
0.5 2 82.3 1.16 0.25 1.4 0.47 1.5
1.0 4 83.3 1.19 0.23 1.42 1.28 1.4
1.5 2 80.8 1.14 0.25 1.39 1.52 1.0
2.0 2 81.0 1.13 0.25 1.38 2.62 0.8
Sulphides 80%-45μm 1.0 2 84.4 1.28 0.24 1.52 2.36 1.7
100%-75μm
100%-53μm
Sulphides
Sulphides
g Au/t ore Gold
Extraction
%
McClelland Grind Size and Cyanide Concentration Optimization Tests
No. of
TestsNaCN g/LGrind Size Ore Type
Extracted Tail Calc'd Head NaCN
Reagents, kg/t ore
Lime Added
Description
CIL Cyanidation @ 4 P80 Grind Sizes 150μm 106μm 75μm 53μm 150μm 106μm 75μm 53μm
Gold Extraction (%) @8 Hours 65.21 71.35 72.67 73.56 83.2 88.12 91.87 88.46
NaCN Consumption (kg/t) @8 Hours 1.26 1.39 1.33 1.38 1.28 1.18 0.95 1.35
Description
CIL Cyanidation @ 4 P80 Grind Sizes 150μm 106μm 75μm 53μm 150μm 106μm 75μm 53μm
Gold Extraction (%) @8 Hours 89.48 90.8 90.94 90.93 92.56 91.63 91.66 94.23
NaCN Consumption (kg/t) @8 Hours 1.75 1.84 1.76 1.85 1.69 1.74 1.57 1.7
Transition excluding metasediments Transition metasediments
AMMTEC Fresh Rock Leach Extraction Results
AMMTEC Transition Samples Leach Extraction Results
Fresh Rock - P8P9-Maga area Fresh Rock - Siga area