Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

OMG.V ·

Omai Gold Delivers PEA with After-Tax NPV5% of $556 Million and 19.8% IRR at a $1,950/oz Gold Price for Wenot Open Pit Project in Guyana

Economic Studies

Omai Gold Delivers PEA with After-Tax NPV5% of $556 Million

and 19.8% IRR at a $1,950/oz Gold Price

for Wenot Open Pit Project in Guyana

(All dollar amounts are in United States dollars, unless otherwise stated)

April 4, 2024, Toronto, Ontario – Omai Gold Mines Corp. (OMG: TSXV; OMGGF: OTCQB) (“Omai Gold”

or the “Company”) is pleased to announce positive results from its first Preliminary Economic Assessment

(“PEA”) for the Wenot Project, one of the two gold deposits located on its 100%-owned Omai Property, in

Guyana. The PEA supports an initial open pit mining scenario for production averaging 142 ,000 ounces of

gold per year over a 13-year mine life, with peak year production of 184,000 ounces. Total Wenot production

is estimated at 1,840,000 ounces of payable gold. A spot gold price sensitivity of $2,200/oz supports an

after-tax Net Present Value5% (“NPV”) of $777 million, a 24.7% Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”), and a payback

period of 3.5 years.

Elaine Ellingham, President and CEO comments: “ We are extremely pleased with this first economic

assessment for the new Omai that incorporates only our Wenot open pit deposit at this time. This PEA is an

important step forward as it converts our successful exploration programs into a baseline production scenario

that shows potential for robust economic development for Omai to once again become a large- scale gold

producer, supported by the many benefits of a brownfields project including good road access, a nearby

skilled workforce and the strong support of government for re-development.”

“Although we have not included the adjacent Gilt Creek Deposit in this PEA economics, we are confident

that it will contribute to an overall future mine plan. Since Gilt Creek would be an underground mine, it would

have required significant additional engineering, time and cost , and our priority was to establish a baseline

valuation for our shareholders. We have fast-tracked the advancement of this project over the past two years

and are pleased to deliver these tangible results.”

PEA Highlights for Wenot Open Pit

▪ After-tax NPV 5% of $55 6 million and after -tax IRR of 19.8% based on $1,950/oz gold with a

sensitivity case at $2,200/oz gold giving an after-tax NPV5% of $777 million and IRR of 24.7%

▪ Initial capital (“Capex”) of $375 million and sustaining capital of $172 million over life-of-mine

▪ Projected average gold production of 142,000 oz per year over a 13-year mine life

 After-tax payback of 4.3 years at base case $1,950/oz gold (3.5 years at $2,200/oz gold)

 Average cash operating costs of $916/oz gold and all-in sustaining costs of $1,009/oz

 Cumulative cash flow of $1.07 billion after-tax over 13 years on base case assumptions

 Total payable gold production of 1.84 million ounces

 Average head grade of 1.51 g/t Au and 92.5% process recovery

 Average strip ratio for the open pit life-of-mine estimated at 7.8:1

Click here to view a 3D model of the Wenot Open Pit Deposit

Omai’s CEO continued, “We are pleased with the PEA results as it establishes the potential for a single

“superpit” for the Wenot deposit. We further believe that Omai holds exceptional potential to both expand the

mine plan and to boost the economics: 1) At Wenot, there are gold zones identified along strike and at depth

that can be expected to expand Mineral R esources within and outside the designed PEA pit ; 2) By

completing engineering studies and incorporating the adjacent Gilt Creek Deposit, the Omai mine plan could

potentially expand to a 20+ year mine life; and 3) By advancing work on two high-grade near-surface zones,

there is potential for higher grade process plant feed for the first few years that would boost economics

considerably. The PEA sets the stage for Omai to advance engineering and permitting initiatives towards a

Preliminary Feasibility Study (“ PFS”). With these goals in mind, we are anxious t o continue our work

advancing the Omai Project in 2024.”

OMG NEWS RELEASE 2

Financial and operating metrics from the PEA are presented in Table 1 below.

Note: The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too

speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to

be categorized as Mineral Reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized. Mineral

Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

Table 1. Financial and Operating Metrics from the Preliminary Economic Assessment

2024 Wenot Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA)

Highlights

Production

Mine life (years) 13.0

T otal gold production (ounces) 1,840,000

Average annual gold production (ounces) 142,000

To tal mineralization mined (tonnes) 41,101,000

T otal waste mined (tonnes) 322,291,000

T otal material mined (tonnes) 363,392,000

Total waste-to-mineralization ratio 7.8:1

Average gold grade (grams per tonne) 1.51

Gold Process Recovery (%) 92.5%

Average Process Plant throughput (tpd) 9,000

Operating Costs

Mining cost per tonne (T otal Material) $1.63

Mining cost per tonne (Mineralization) $14.44

Processing Cost per tonne $15.58

G&A cost per tonne $3.16

T otal cost per tonne processed 1,3 $33.19

Total cash cost (per ounce sold)1,3 $916

Mine-site all-in-sustaining cost (per ounce sold)2,3 $1009

1 Total cash costs include mining, processing, surface infrastructures, transport, G&A and royalty costs.

2 All-in sustaining cost (“AISC”) includes total cash costs, sustaining capital expenses to support the on-going operations, and

closure/reclamation.

3 Non-IFRS financial performance measures with no standardized definition under IFRS. Refer to the note at the end of this press

release.

OMG NEWS RELEASE 3

Capital Costs

Initial capital expenditure (Initial Capex)3 $375.2 M

Sustaining capital expenditures3 $171.5 M

Net reclamation costs (cost less salvage value) $0

T otal capital expenditure – life of mine $546.8 M

T otal capital expenditure (per ounce sold) – life of mine $297/oz

Base Case Economic Analysis: $1,950 per ounce Gold Price

IRR (after-tax) 19.8%

NPV @ 0% discount rate (millions, after-tax) $1,067.7

NPV @ 5% discount rate (millions, after-tax) $556.4

Payback (years) 4.3

Economic Analysis Sensitivity at $2,200 per ounce Gold Price

IRR (after-tax) 24.7%

NPV @ 0% discount rate (millions, after-tax) $1,402.5

NPV @ 5% discount rate (millions, after-tax) $776.6

Payback (years) 3.5

Financial Analysis and Sensitivities

The Project generates cumulative after-tax free cash flow of $1,067 million and average annual free cash

flow of $112.5 million over the 13-year producing mine life.

Figure 1. After-tax Cash Flow over Life-of-Mine

OMG NEWS RELEASE 4

The PEA financial analysis is sign ificantly influenced by gold price, operating costs and capital costs as

shown in Table 2. For example, at the base case gold price of US$1,950/oz, the Wenot Project generates

after-tax NPV of $556.4 million using a 5% discount rate with an after -tax IRR of 19.8%. However, a 10%

sensitivity increase to the base case gold price to $2,145/oz, results in an after-tax NPV of $728.2 million and

an after-tax IRR of 23.7% with a payback period of 3.6 years from the commencement of production.

Table 2. PEA Sensitivities to Gold Price, Operating Costs (Opex) and Capital Costs (Capex)

Gold Price Sensitivities

Range GOLD PRICE After Tax NPV (5%) ($M) IRR Payback (Yrs)

-20% $1,560 210.1 11.1% 8.4

-10% $1,755 384.1 15.7% 5.8

0 $1,950 556.4 19.8% 4.3

10% $2,145 728.2 23.7% 3.6

20% $2,340 899.8 27.3% 3.2

Opex Sensitivities

Range OPEX After Tax NPV (5%) ($M) IRR Payback (Yrs)

-20.0% $807 706.3 23.6% 3.7

-10.0% $908 631.5 21.7% 3.9

0.0% $1,009 556.4 19.8% 4.3

10.0% $1,110 481.1 17.9% 4.7

20.0% $1,211 406.0 15.9% 5.8

Capex Sensitivities

Range CAPEX After Tax NPV (5%) ($M) IRR Payback (Yrs)

-20.0% $300 638.8 24.7% 3.5

-10.0% $338 597.7 22.1% 3.9

0.0% $375 556.4 19.8% 4.3

10.0% $413 514.9 17.9% 4.7

20.0% $450 473.5 16.2% 5.4

Gold Production

Annual production over the life-of-mine from the Wenot pit is expected to average 14 2,000 ounces of gold

with a peak year production of 184,000 ounces, for total payable gold production of 1,840,000 ounces.

Figure 2. Wenot Production Profile

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Annual Gold

Production (Koz)

Production Year

Wenot Gold Production Profile

OMG NEWS RELEASE 5

Capital Costs

The initial capital costs are estimated at $375.2 million, with life-of-mine sustaining costs estimated at $172

million. Contingencies of $ 54 million and $18 million are included in initial and sustaining capital costs ,

respectively. These estimates were based on current costs and quotes received from potential local vendors

with other estimates based on references and experience from similar operations.

The main components of the $375.2 million initial capital costs include: $100 million for the processing plant

equipment and buildings plus $75 million indirect costs to construct the process plant , $46 million for mining

equipment and surface preparation, $45 million for surface civil and infrastructure, $33 million for capitalized

pre-stripping, $20 million for owner’s costs, and $54 million contingency.

The main components of the $172 million sustaining capital include: $139 million for mining equipment , $9

million for tailings and water treatment, $6 million for process plant equipment, and $18 million contingency.

Cash Costs

Total cash cost including royalties is estimated at $41.00 per tonne processed or $916/oz of payable gold.

The all -in-sustaining cost is estimated at $1, 009/oz of payable gold. Operating cost estimates were

developed using vendor quotes and knowledge of similar operations with productivities being derived from

benchmarking and industry practices.

Table 3. Total Cash Costs

Mining Cost (per tonne processed) $14.44

Processing Cost (per tonne processed) $15.58

G&A Cost (per tonne processed) $3.16

To tal Cost (per tonne of processed) 1 $33.19

Royalties (per tonne processed) $7.81

To tal Cash Cost (per ounce sold)1,3 $916

Mineral Resource Estimate

The PEA is based only on the Wenot O pen Pit Deposit and excludes the adjacent Gilt Creek D eposit.

Management believes that the Gilt Creek Deposit, which would require underground mining, is sufficiently

attractive to be integrated into a larger mine plan , however, to accelerate and simplify this current PEA, it

was excluded.

On February 8, 2024, the Company announced an updated Mineral Resource Estimate (“MRE”) for the Omai

Property in Guyana (Wenot and Gilt Creek Deposits). It details a total Indicated MRE of 1.985 million ounces

of gold averaging 2.15 g/t Au and an Inferred MRE of 2.279 million ounces averaging 2.26 g/t Au.

The PEA is based on the Wenot Deposit, with an Indicated MRE of 834,000 ounces averaging 1.48 g/t Au

and an Inferred MRE of 1,614,000 ounces averaging 1.99 g/t Au. The pit design used in the PEA does not

include 58,600 oz of Indicated Mineral Resources and 456,900 oz of Inferred Mineral Resources, which

represents approximately 21% of the total Wenot MRE ounces (Figure 5). These excluded MRE ounces are

either hosted within multiple, narrow veins or are isolated zones at depth that result in a high strip ratio.

However, it is expected that at least a portion of this currently ex cluded Mineral Resource could be

incorporated in future economic scenarios upon further drilling.

OMG NEWS RELEASE 6

Figure 3. 3-D Model of Wenot and Gilt Creek Deposits, Omai Gold Property, Guyana

The Mineral Resource Estimates for Omai are presented in Table 4. Notes accompanying the 2024 MRE

are shown below the table, summarizing the economic and technical assumptions.

Table 4. 2024 (January) Mineral Resource Estimates

Indicated Resources Inferred Resources

Resource Area Mining Method Tonnes

(k)

Au

(g/t)

Au

(koz)

Tonnes

(k) Au (g/t) Au

(koz)

GILT CREEK (1.5 g/t Cut-

Off) Underground 11,123 3.22 1,151 6,186 3.35 665

WENOT (0.35 g/t Cut-Off) Open Pit 17,572 1.48 834 25,183 1.99 1,614

Total Mineral Resource Estimate 28,695 2.15 1,985 31,369 2.26 2,279

Wenot Mineral Resource Estimate by Deposit Type

WENOT

Saprolite &

Alluvium Open Pit 2,048 1.07 70 153 1.13 5

Fresh Rock

& Transition Open Pit 15,524 1.53 764 25,030 2.00 1,609

Notes to Accompany the 2024 Mineral Resource Estimate:

1. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

2. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation,

socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.

3. The Inferred Mineral Resource in this estimate has a lower level of confidence than that applied to an Indicated

Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of

the Inferred Mineral Resourc e could potentially be upgraded to an Indicated Mineral Resource with continued

exploration.

OMG NEWS RELEASE 7

4. The Mineral Resources were estimated in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and

Petroleum (CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions (2014) and Best Practices

Guidelines (2019) prepared by the CIM Standi ng Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by the CIM

Council.

5. Wenot wireframe constrained gold assays were composited to 1.5 metre lengths and subsequently capped between

10 to 25 g/t. Gilt Creek Wireframe constrained gold assays were composited to 1.0 metre lengths and subsequently

capped between 12 to 40 g/t.

6. The Wenot Mineral Resource Estimate incorporates 9,840 assay results from 603 diamond drill holes totalling

87,323 m within the mineralized wireframes.

The Gilt Creek Mineral Resource Estimate incorporates 7,056 assay results from 46 diamond drill holes totalling

27,997 m within the mineralized wireframes

7. Grade estimation was undertaken with ID3interpolation.

8. Wenot wireframe constrained bulk density was determined from 30 site visit samples.

Gilt wireframe constrained bulk density was determined from 28 site visit samples.

9. Wenot gold process recoveries used were 92% for Alluvium/Saprolite and 92% for Transition/Fresh Rock.

Gilt Creek gold process recovery used was 92%

10. The gold price used was US$1,850/oz

11. Wenot US$ open pit operating costs used were $2.50/t for mineralized material mining, $1.75/t for waste mining,

$10/t for Alluvium/Saprolite processing, $14/t for Transition/Fresh Rock processing and $2.50/t G&A. Gilt Creek

US$ underground operating costs used were $60/t for mining, $15/t for processing and $7/t G&A.

12. At Gilt Creek, MRE blocks were reviewed for grade and geometric continuity. Isolated/orphaned and single block

width strings of blocks were removed in order to only report Mineral Resources with a reasonable prospect of

economic extraction.

13. Wenot pit slopes were 45o.

Mining

The Project area consists of subdued topography. The area, topography, and climate are amenable to the

conventional open pit mining operations proposed for the Project, similar to historic al operations. No

underground mining is planned at this stage although the potential for development of underground mining of

the Gilt Creek Deposit will be evaluated in the future.

The Wenot mining operations will encompass a single large open pit with 55o hard rock inter ramp slopes

and 30o saprolite slopes that will be mined with conventional mining equipment in two pushback phases. In

order to improve mining selectivity and reduce dilution, two different bench heights and sets of mining

equipment will be used. Mineralization will be mined using a 5 m high bench height with 150 mm diameter

blast hole drills, and a fleet consisting of 5 m3 bucket excavators and 35 t rigid body haul trucks. Waste rock

and saprolite will be mined on 10 m high benches using 200 mm diameter blast hole drills, 22 m 3 bucket

hydraulic excavators, and 177 t haul trucks. Major pieces of mining equipment will be purchased v ia a lease

financing agreement. Various support equipment will be required, such as dozers, graders, water trucks,

and light vehicles for maintenance, personnel transport and mine supervision. The surficial saprolite cover,

which is anticipated to be free digging and will not require blasting, is up to 60m thick forming the upper part

of the 440 m deep open pit.

The open pit mine will have a mineralization production rate that averages 9,000 tpd over a 13- year mine

life. A total of 322.3 Mt of waste rock is planned to be mined, with 2.6 Mt of mineralization in saprolite and

38.5 Mt of mineralization in fresh rock, for a total strip ratio of 7.8:1, at an average grade of 1.51 g/t Au

containing 1.99 Moz Au. Total material mined will peak at 110,000 tpd.

Mineralization may be delivered either to the primary crusher or placed into a nearby stockpile. Waste

rock is either taken to a waste storage facility or used in tailings dam embankment construction.

OMG NEWS RELEASE 8

Figure 4. Wenot Open Pit Design (Two Phases)

Metallurgy & Processing

An average of 9,000 tpd of gold mineralized material will be treated in the Omai process plant. The process

plant will consist of a semi-autogenous grinding mill in closed circuit with a pebble crusher and ball mill in a

closed circuit with cyclones (SABC circuit). Primary crushing will consist of a gyratory crusher for hard run-

of-mine (“ROM”) feed. A gravity circuit, which precedes leaching will recover coarse gold from the cyclone

underflow, while the cyclone overflow is thickened and treated in a multi -tank carbon-in-leach (“CIL”) or

carbon-in-pulp (“CIP”) circuit. Gold will be stripped from the loaded carbon, concentrated by electrowinning

and recovered as gold bars in a gold room.

The Omai Gold process plant will be designed to be a compact facility with attached grinding media and

reagent reception. The process plant facilities will include a laboratory, a mill maintenance workshop, and

safety, personal services and management offices.

Metallurgical Data

The anticipated metallurgical performance for processing the O mai Mineral Resources has a dual base of

verification: (i) A comprehensive test program by Lakefield Research (now SGS Canada) that was completed

in 1990 on drill core representing seven mineralized zones, and (ii) The processing of 80 million tonnes of

mineralized material over 12 years by Omai Gold Mines Limited (OGML) from the Fennel and Wenot pits as

well as alluvial zones.

During operations from 1993 to 2005, the hard rock ROM feed was crushed in a gyratory crusher and ground

by a combination of SAG and ball mills (a SABC designation). Soft mineralized material was blended by a

backhoe into the crushed hard rock feed. A combination of gravity -based methods including spiral, Nelson

centrifuge and tabling was employed to recover free gold. Gold leaching was conventional with a mild

concentration of process reagents, air-sparged leaching followed by CIP gold recovery, strippi ng from the

carbon, electrowinning and electric furnace refining. The historical gold recovery ranged from 92% to 94%.

Metallurgical testing at Lakefield included grinding tests indicating that the Bond Work Index was very high

for the hard-rock composites at 19 to 25 KWh/t. As anticipated, the Work Index was very low (~6 KWh/t) for

saprolite. Gravity concentration was examined for diorite and saprolite composites and a substantial

proportion of gold (~30%) was recovered. A series of standard, 48-hour leach tests were performed on each

composite, with the effect of pre- grinding of the samples to up to 90% passing -200 mesh. The results

indicated a high gold extraction, from 92% to 97% on the hard rock samples, with only a small effect due to

grind size.