OSISKO DEVELOPMENT ANNOUNCES MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR SAN ANTONIO PROPERTY, SONORA STATE, MEXICO 576,000 oz of Au and 1.37 M oz Ag Indicated and 544,000 oz Au and 1.76 M oz of Ag Inferred
1
OSISKO DEVELOPMENT ANNOUNCES MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR
SAN ANTONIO PROPERTY, SONORA STATE, MEXICO
576,000 oz of Au and 1.37 M oz Ag Indicated and
544,000 oz Au and 1.76 M oz of Ag Inferred
MONTREAL, June 30, 2022 – Osisko Development Corp. (“ Osisko Development ” or the “ Company”)
(ODV TSX.V & NYSE) is pleased to announce an initial open pit resource estimate for the Sapuchi, Golfo
de Oro, California, High Life and Calvario Deposits at its San Antonio Project ( “San Antonio” or the
“Project”) in Sonora State, Mexico.
San Antonio Project Mineral Resource
• Indicated Mineral Resource of 576,000 ounces of gold and 1.37 million ounces of silver (14.9 million
tonnes grading 1.2 g/t Au and 2.9 g/t Ag).
• Inferred Mineral Resource of 544,000 ounces of gold and 1.76 million ounces of silver (16.6 million
tonnes grading 1.0 g/t Au and 3.3 g/t Ag).
• Mineral resource comprises oxide, transition and sulphide zones for each deposit using 0.27 g/t Au
cut-off grade for oxide and 0.44 g/t Au cut-off grade for transition and sulphide and a 50-degree pit
slope.
• The 2022 Mineral Resource Estimate (“MRE”) covers a portion of the Sapuchi – Cero Verde trend
that encompasses five deposits: Sapuchi, Golfo de Oro, California, Calvario and High Life over
approximately 2.8 km along strike, a maximum width of 600 metres (m) to a maximum depth of
300 m below surface.
• The MRE is based on 84,454 m of current and verified historic drilling in 5 79 holes, of which
27,870 m of drilling in 177 holes were drilled by the Company in 2021.
• Gold mineralization is hosted within altered hydrothermal breccia and sediments, as stockwork
quartz veins and veinlets, adjacent to intrusions and fault structures and often associated with iron
carbonate minerals.
• Resource summary and sensitivity tables are presented in the tables below.
The MRE incorporates five deposits, Sapuchi, California, Golfo de Oro, High Life and Calvario, as part of
what comprises 2.8 km of the 10.0 km within the Sapuchi-Cero Verde trend of the San Antonio Project
(Figure 1) . The deposits are in the indicated and inferred categories listed in Table 1 and a further
breakdown by deposit and oxide zone are listed in the Tables 2 and 4. Grade sensitivity is presented in
Table 3. Potential mining scenarios indicate a strip ratio of 1.0 to 6.7. The MRE was conducted by Talisker
Exploration Services Inc., under the supervision of Servicios Geológicos IMEx, S.C and Micon International
Limited.
The deposits are constrained within a geologic model of the hydrothermal breccia, the main mineralization
control known to date. Additional drill targets remain underexplored on the property and new exploration
2
drilling is recommended to verify historic data and potentially add new resource. Further infill and
exploration drilling is recommended on the Project.
Operational Update
The San Antonio Project gold mineralization is characterized by hydrothermal breccia that forms an
approximately 3,000 m long east -northeast trending mineralization corridor with the Luz del Cobre copper
deposit at the east. The gold mineralization is associated with intense chlorite and carbonate alteration and
is intrusion related with host sedimentary rocks. The breccia has been defined to a vertical depth of 500 m
and at an average depth of 250 m. Drilling has occurred within the three major zones at Sapuchi, Golfo de
Oro and California, over a combined strike length of 1 km of the 3 km breccia trend.
Since Osisko Development’s acquisition of the San Antonio Project in November 2020, the Company has
successfully achieved the following operational milestones
• The construction of a leach pad and carbon in column plant at the end of 2021 to process stockpiled
mineralized material.
• The stockpile has a total of 1.1 M tonnes with an average grade of 0.57 g/t Au.
• The processing of the stockpile began in Q4 2021 and currently, 680,000 tonnes of mineralized
material has been placed and processed.
Chris Lodder, President of Osisko Development commented, “ The addition of this new resource further
strengthens our portfolio for near term advancement and towards possible production. Osisko Development
has made considerable progress at San Antonio in the past year with the construction of the leach pad,
near term processing of the stockpile and completion of a drill program to generate this initial resource. The
Company believes there is potential to add to the mineral resource through continued exploration and
drilling on the property.”
Table 1: 2022 San Antonio Project Mineral Resource Estimate for an open pit scenario- all deposits
indicated category
INDICATED
Deposit Weathering
Zone
Tonnes
(Mt)
Au
(g/t)
Ag
(g/t)
Au
Ounces
(000)
Ag
Ounces
(000,000)
California
Oxide 0.6 0.93 2.8 17 0.05
Transition 0.2 0.79 3.3 6 0.02
Sulphide 3.1 1.31 2.4 130 0.23
Total 3.9 1.22 2.5 153 0.31
Golfo de
Oro
Oxide 0.2 1.07 2.8 7 0.02
Transition 0.1 1.19 2.8 6 0.01
Sulphide 5.3 1.46 2.5 249 0.42
Total 5.7 1.44 2.5 262 0.46
Sapuchi
Oxide 1.9 0.85 3.6 53 0.22
Transition 1.4 1.04 3.6 47 0.16
Sulphide 2.1 0.94 3.4 62 0.22
Total 5.4 0.93 3.5 162 0.61
Total
Oxide 2.7 0.89 3.4 77 0.30
Transition 1.8 1.02 3.5 59 0.20
Sulphide 10.4 1.31 2.6 441 0.88
Total 14.9 1.20 2.9 576 1.37
3
Table 2: 2022 San Antonio Project Mineral Resource Estimate for an open pit scenario- all deposits
inferred category
INFERRED
Deposit Weathering
Zone
Tonnes
(Mt) Au (g/t) Ag (g/t)
Au
Ounces
(000)
Ag
Ounces
(000,000)
California
Oxide 0.4 0.68 2.1 8 0.02
Transition 0.1 0.85 2.6 4 0.01
Sulphide 1.1 1.27 3.8 46 0.14
Total 1.6 1.10 3.3 58 0.17
Golfo de
Oro
Oxide 0.5 0.80 3.0 12 0.04
Transition 0.2 0.93 3.4 5 0.02
Sulphide 5.7 1.29 2.5 237 0.46
Total 6.4 1.24 2.5 254 0.52
High Life
Oxide 0.5 0.84 4.2 14 0.07
Transition 0.2 0.73 4.5 4 0.02
Sulphide 0.1 0.90 8.3 4 0.04
Total 0.8 0.83 4.9 22 0.13
Sapuchi
Oxide 3.2 0.74 3.7 75 0.37
Transition 1.6 0.92 3.6 48 0.19
Sulphide 2.8 0.92 4.1 84 0.37
Total 7.6 0.85 3.8 208 0.94
Calvario
Oxide 0.1 0.53 0.0 2 0.00
Transition 0.0 0.55 0.0 0.0 0.00
Sulphide 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00
Total 0.1 0.53 0.0 2 0.00
Total
Oxide 4.6 0.74 3.5 111 0.51
Transition 2.1 0.90 3.6 61 0.24
Sulphide 9.8 1.18 3.2 371 1.00
Total 16.6 1.02 3.3 544 1.76
Table 3: San Antonio Project Mineral Resource Estimate for an open pit scenario, all deposits
separated by oxide zone.
Category Zone Tonnes
(Mt) Au (g/t) Ag (g/t)
Au
Ounces
(000)
Ag
Ounces
(000,000)
Indicated
Oxide 2.7 0.89 3.4 77 0.30
Transition 1.8 1.02 3.5 59 0.20
Sulphide 10.4 1.31 2.6 441 0.88
Total 14.9 1.20 2.9 576 1.37
Inferred
Oxide 4.6 0.74 3.5 111 0.51
Transition 2.1 0.90 3.6 61 0.24
Sulphide 9.8 1.18 3.2 371 1.00
Total 16.6 1.02 3.3 544 1.76
4
Table 4: San Antonio Project Cut- Off Gold Price Sensitivity Table (Base cases in Bold) , Indicated
Category
Sensitivity to Gold Price INDICATED
Gold
Price
US$/oz
Cut-off
Grade (g/t)
Weathering
Zone
Tonnes
(Mt)
Au
(g/t)
Ag
(g/t)
Au
Ounces
(000)
Ag
Ounces
(000,000)
1400
0.34 Oxide 2.6 0.90 3.4 76 0.29
0.55 Transition 1.6 1.07 3.6 55 0.18
0.55 Sulphide 8.0 1.44 2.8 372 0.72
Total 12.3 1.28 3.0 504 1.19
1450
0.33 Oxide 2.6 0.90 3.4 76 0.29
0.54 Transition 1.6 1.06 3.5 56 0.19
0.54 Sulphide 8.2 1.43 2.8 377 0.73
Total 12.5 1.27 3.0 510 1.21
1500
0.32 Oxide 2.7 0.90 3.4 77 0.29
0.52 Transition 1.7 1.05 3.5 57 0.19
0.52 Sulphide 9.0 1.40 2.7 404 0.78
Total 13.3 1.25 3.0 537 1.27
1550
0.31 Oxide 2.7 0.89 3.4 77 0.29
0.50 Transition 1.7 1.05 3.5 57 0.19
0.50 Sulphide 9.3 1.38 2.7 411 0.80
Total 13.6 1.24 2.9 545 1.29
1600
0.30 Oxide 2.7 0.89 3.4 77 0.29
0.48 Transition 1.7 1.04 3.5 58 0.20
0.48 Sulphide 9.6 1.37 2.7 420 0.83
Total 14.0 1.23 2.9 554 1.31
1650
0.29 Oxide 2.7 0.89 3.4 77 0.29
0.47 Transition 1.8 1.03 3.5 58 0.20
0.47 Sulphide 9.8 1.35 2.7 426 0.84
Total 14.3 1.22 2.9 561 1.33
1700
0.28 Oxide 2.7 0.89 3.4 77 0.29
0.46 Transition 1.8 1.02 3.5 58 0.20
0.46 Sulphide 10.1 1.33 2.6 432 0.86
Total 14.5 1.21 2.9 567 1.35
1750
0.27 Oxide 2.7 0.89 3.4 77 0.30
0.44 Transition 1.8 1.02 3.5 59 0.20
0.44 Sulphide 10.4 1.31 2.6 441 0.88
Total 14.9 1.20 2.9 576 1.37
1800
0.27 Oxide 2.7 0.89 3.4 77 0.30
0.43 Transition 1.8 1.02 3.5 59 0.20
0.43 Sulphide 10.6 1.30 2.6 446 0.89
Total 15.1 1.20 2.9 582 1.39
1850
0.26 Oxide 2.7 0.89 3.4 77 0.30
0.42 Transition 1.8 1.01 3.5 59 0.20
0.42 Sulphide 10.9 1.30 2.6 455 0.91
Total 15.4 1.19 2.8 591 1.41
1900
0.25 Oxide 2.7 0.89 3.4 77 0.30
0.41 Transition 1.8 1.01 3.5 59 0.20
0.41 Sulphide 11.0 1.29 2.6 457 0.92
Total 15.6 1.18 2.8 593 1.42
5
Table 5: San Antonio Project Cut- Off Gold Price Sensitivity Table (Base cases in Bold), Inferred
Category
Sensitivity to Gold Price INFERRED
Gold
Price
US$/oz
Cut-off
Grade (g/t)
Weathering
Zone
Tonnes
(Mt) Au (g/t) Ag (g/t)
Au
Ounces
(000)
Ag
Ounces
(000,000)
1400
0.34 Oxide 3.9 0.81 3.7 103 0.47
0.55 Transition 1.6 1.00 3.9 52 0.20
0.55 Sulphide 5.9 1.38 3.5 261 0.67
Total 11.4 1.13 3.6 416 1.34
1450
0.33 Oxide 4.1 0.79 3.7 104 0.48
0.54 Transition 1.7 0.98 3.8 54 0.21
0.54 Sulphide 6.7 1.33 3.5 286 0.75
Total 12.5 1.11 3.6 444 1.44
1500
0.32 Oxide 4.2 0.78 3.6 105 0.48
0.52 Transition 1.8 0.96 3.7 56 0.22
0.52 Sulphide 7.6 1.29 3.4 314 0.83
Total 13.6 1.09 3.5 475 1.53
1550
0.31 Oxide 4.3 0.77 3.6 107 0.49
0.50 Transition 1.9 0.94 3.7 58 0.23
0.50 Sulphide 8.1 1.26 3.3 330 0.87
Total 14.3 1.07 3.5 494 1.59
1600
0.30 Oxide 4.4 0.76 3.5 109 0.50
0.48 Transition 2.0 0.93 3.7 59 0.23
0.48 Sulphide 8.5 1.24 3.3 339 0.90
Total 14.9 1.06 3.4 506 1.63
1650
0.29 Oxide 4.5 0.76 3.5 110 0.50
0.47 Transition 2.0 0.93 3.7 59 0.23
0.47 Sulphide 8.9 1.22 3.3 348 0.93
Total 15.4 1.10 3.3 517 1.67
1700
0.28 Oxide 4.6 0.75 3.4 111 0.51
0.46 Transition 2.0 0.91 3.6 60 0.24
0.46 Sulphide 9.3 1.20 3.2 360 0.97
Total 16.0 1.03 3.3 531 1.72
1750
0.27 Oxide 4.6 0.74 3.4 111 0.51
0.44 Transition 2.1 0.90 3.6 61 0.24
0.44 Sulphide 9.8 1.18 3.2 371 1.00
Total 16.6 1.02 3.3 544 1.76
1800
0.27 Oxide 4.8 0.73 3.3 114 0.52
0.43 Transition 2.2 0.89 3.6 62 0.25
0.43 Sulphide 10.4 1.15 3.1 386 1.04
Total 17.4 1.00 3.2 562 1.81
1850
0.26 Oxide 4.9 0.73 3.3 114 0.52
0.42 Transition 2.2 0.89 3.5 63 0.25
0.42 Sulphide 10.9 1.13 3.1 395 1.07
Total 18.0 0.99 3.2 572 1.85
1900
0.25 Oxide 5.0 0.72 3.3 115 0.52
0.41 Transition 2.3 0.88 3.5 64 0.26
0.41 Sulphide 11.2 1.12 3.0 404 1.09
Total 18.4 0.99 3.2 583 1.87
6
Mineral Resource Estimate Notes (For Tables 1, 2 and 3):
• Rodrigo Calles, of Servicios Geológicos IMEx, S.C. , William Lewis and Alan S J San Martin, of
Micon International Limited have reviewed and validated the mineral resource estimate for Sapuchi,
Golfo de Oro, California, High Life and Calvario deposits. All are independent “Qualified Persons”
(as defined in NI 43-101) responsible for the 2022 MRE. The effective date of the mineral resource
estimate is June 24th, 2022.
• Specific extraction methods are used only to establish reasonable cut -off grades for various
portions of the deposit. No Preliminary Economic Analysis, Pre- Feasibility Study or Feasi bility
Study has been completed to support economic viability and technical feasibility of exploiting any
portion of the mineral resource, by any particular mining method.
• The mineral resources disclosed in this press release were estimated using the Canadian Institute
of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) standards on mineral resources and reserves
definitions, and guidelines prepared by the CIM standing committee on reserve definitions and
adopted by the CIM council.
• The calculated economic cut -off grade for the resource in: Oxides ( 70% recovery) is 0. 27 g/t Au,
Transition and sulphides (90% recovery) is 0.44 g/t Au
• Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
• Geologic modeling was completed by Osisko Development geologist Gilberto Moreno. The MRE
was completed by Geologist Leonardo Souza, MAusIMM (CP) of Talisker Exploration Services ,
under the supervision of Rodrigo Calles, of Servicios Geológicos IMEx, S.C., William Lewis and
Alan S. J. San Martin, of Micon International Limited
• The estimate is reported for a potential open pit scenario and with USD assumptions. The cut-off
grades were calculated using a gold price of $1,750 per ounce, a CAD:USD exchange rate of 1.3;
mining cost of $2. 95/t; processing cost of $4 /t for oxides and $13.0/t for transition and sulphides ;
and general and administration costs of $2.50/t. The cut -off grades should be re-evaluated in light
of future prevailing market conditions (metal prices, exchange rate, mining cost, etc.) .
• A density of 2.55 g/cm 3 was established for all oxide zones, 2.69 g/cm3 for transition zones and
2.74g/cm3 for the sulphide zones.
• Resources for Sapuchi, Golfo de Oro, California, High Life and Calv ario were estimated using
Datamine Studio RM 1.3 software using hard boundaries on composited assays (3.0 m for all
zones). Ordinary Kriging interpolation method was used in a with a parent block size = 10m x 10m
x 5m.
• Results are presented in- situ. Ounce (troy) = metric tons x grade / 31.10348. Calculations used
metric units (metres, tonnes, g/t). The number of metric tons was rounded to the nearest thousand.
Any discrepancies in the totals are due to rounding effects; rounding followed the recommendations
as per NI 43-101;
• Neither the Company, Servicios Geológicos IMEx, S.C., nor Micon International Limited. is aware
of any known environmental, permitting, legal, title- related, taxation, socio- political, marketing or
other relevant issue that could materially affect the mineral resource estimate other than disclosed
in this press release.
Gold Price Sensitivity Notes (For Tables 4 and 5):
• William Lewis of Micon International Limited has reviewed and validated the gold price sensitivities
for the various mineralization types and it is the opinion of the Q P that they meet the test of
reasonable prospects of economic extraction. Mr. Lewis is an independent “Qualified Person” (as
defined in NI 43-101).
7
Table 6: San Antonio Project Mineral Resource Estimate in pit resources for oxide and transition
only.
TOTAL BY OXIDE AND OXIDE + TRANSITION
Oxidation
Zone Category Tonnes
(Mt) Au (g/t) Ag (g/t)
Au
Ounces
(‘000)
Ag
Ounces
(‘000,000)
Strip
Ratio
Oxide
Only
Indicated 2.6 0.9 3.4 75 0.3 1.0
Inferred 4.2 0.8 3.4 104 0.5
Oxide +
Transition
Indicated 4.2 1.0 3.5 131 0.5 1.1
Inferred 5.9 0.8 3.5 157 0.7
Mineral Resource Estimate Notes (For Table 6):
The same notes for Tables 1 through 3 are applicable for Table 6. However, two separate pit scenarios
were run: 1) A pit using just the oxide material and 2) a pit run using the oxide and transition material. These
separate runs resulted in slightly different oxide and transition resources than those that resulted from using
the ultimate pit where all three mineralization types were used.
In accordance with National Instrument 43- 101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ( “NI 43-
101”), a Technical Report for the San Antonio Project will be filed on SEDAR and the Company’s website
within 45 calendar days of this disclosure.
Qualified Persons and 43-101 Disclosure
Per NI 43-101, Maggie Layman, P.Geo. Vice President Exploration of Osisko Development Corp., is a
Qualified Person and has prepared, validated, and approved the technical and scientific content of this
news release.
The Independent and Qualified Persons for the Mineral Resources Estimate update, as defined by NI 43-
101, is Rodrigo Calles, P.Geo of Servicios Geológicos IMEx and William Lewis, P.Geo of Micon
International Limited. and confirm having reviewed this press release and that the scientific and technical
information is consistent.
About Osisko Development Corp.
Osisko Development Corp. is uniquely positioned as a premier gold development company in North
America to advance the Cariboo Gold Project and other properties in the USA and Mexico, with the objective
of becoming the next mid-tier gold producer. The Cariboo Gold Project, located in central British Columbia,
Canada, is Osisko Development's flagship asset. The considerable exploration potential at depth and along
strike distinguishes the Cariboo Gold Project relative to other development assets. Osisko Development's
project pipeline is complemented by its interest in the San Antonio gold project, located in Sonora, Mexico
and the Trixie gold test mine, located in Utah, U.S.A.
For further information, please contact Osisko Development Corp.:
Jean Francois Lemonde
VP Investor Relations
Tel: 514-299-4926
8
Cautionary Statements Regarding Estimates of Mineral Resources
This news release uses the terms indicated and inferred mineral resources as a relative measure of the
level of confidence in the resource estimate. Readers are cautioned that mineral resources are not mineral
reserves and that the economic viability of resources that are not mineral reserves has not been
demonstrated. The mineral resource estimate disclosed in this news release may be materially affected by
geology, environmental, permitting, legal, title, socio -political, marketing or other relevant issues. The
mineral resource estimate is classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and
Petroleum’s “CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves” incorporated by
reference into NI 43-101. Under NI 43-101, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis
of feasibility or pre- feasibility studies or economic studies except for preliminary economic assessments.
Readers are cautioned not to assume that further work on the stated resources will lead to mineral reserves
that can be mined economically.
Forward-looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this news release may be deemed "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and "forward- looking
information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. These forward ‐looking
statements, by their nature, require Osisko Development to make certain assumptions and necessarily
involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from
those expressed or implied in these forward ‐looking statements. Forward ‐looking statements are not
guarantees of performance. Words such as "may", "will", "would", "could", "expect", "believe", "plan",
"anticipate", "intend", "estimate", "continue", or the negative or comparable terminology, as well as terms
usually used in the future and the conditional, are intended to identify forward ‐looking statements.
Information contained in forward‐looking statements is based upon certain material assumptions that were
applied in drawing a conclusion or making a forecast or projection, including management's perceptions of
historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, results of further exploration work
to define and expand mineral resources, as well as other considerations that are believed to be appropriate
in the circumstances, and any other information herein that is not a historical fact may be "forward look ing
information". Material assumptions also include, management's perceptions of historical trends, current
conditions and expected future developments, results of further exploration work to define or expand any
mineral resources, as well as other considerations that are believed to be appropriate in the circumstances.
Osisko Development considers its assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently available,
but cautions the reader that their assumptions regarding future events, many of which are beyond the
control of Osisko Development, may ultimately prove to be incorrect since they are subject to risks and
uncertainties that affect Osisko Development and its business. Such risks and uncertainties include, among
others, risks relating to capital market conditions, the ability to continue current production, regulatory
framework, the ability of exploration activities (including drill results) to accurately predict mineralization;
errors in management's geological modelling; the ability of to complete further exploration activities,
including drilling; property and stream interests in the Project; the ability of the Company to obtain required
approvals; the results of exploration activities; risks relating to exploration, development and mining
activities; the global economic climate; metal prices; dilution; environmental risks; and community and non-
governmental actions and the responses of relevant governments to the COVID -19 outbreak and the
effectiveness of such responses. Readers are urged to consult the disclosure provided under the heading
"Risk Factors" in the Company's annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2021, as
amended, which has been filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) under Osisko Development's issuer profile
and on the SEC's EDGAR website (www.sec.gov), for further information regarding the risks and other
factors applicable to the exploration results. Although the Company's believes the expectations conveyed
by the forward-looking statements are reasonable based on information available at the date of preparation,
no assurances can be given as to future results, levels of activity and achievements. The Company
disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events or results or otherwise, except as required by law. There can be no assurance that these