NexGen Announces Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Arrow Deposit
NexGen Announces Updated Mineral Resource Estimate
for the Arrow Deposit
Vancouver, BC, March 6, 201 7 – NexGen Energy Ltd. (“ NexGen” or the “ Company”) ( TSX:NXE,
OTCQX:NXGEF) is pleased to announce the results of its updated independent Mineral Resource estimate for
the basement-hosted Arrow uranium deposit on the Company’s 100% owned Rook I property in
Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Based on holes drilled to early November 2016 (AR-14-01 to AR-16-113c2),
the estimate comprises an Indicated Mineral Resource of 179.5 M lbs of U 3O8 contained in 1.18 M tonnes
grading 6.88% U3O8, including the A2 High Grade Core of 164.9 M lbs of U3O8 contained in 0.40 M tonnes
grading 18.84% U3O8 and an Inferred Mineral Resource of 122.1 M lbs of U3O8 contained in 4.25 M tonnes
grading 1.30% U3O8.
Tables 1 and 2 summarize the Arrow Mineral Resource Estimates and Mineral Resource Sensitivity to Cut-Off
Grade, respectively.
Table 1 – Arrow Mineral Resource Estimate Summary – December 20, 2016 (the “Effective Date”)
Structure Tonnage (tonnes) Grade (U3O8 %) Metal U3O8 (U3O8 lbs)
Indicated Mineral Resources
A2 High Grade 400,000 18.84 164,900,000
A2 790,000 0.84 14,500,000
Total 1,180,000 6.88 179,500,000
Inferred Mineral Resources
A1 860,000 0.76 14,300,000
A2 High Grade 30,000 12.72 8,600,000
A2 1,100,000 0.76 18,500,000
A3 High Grade 150,000 8.74 28,200,000
A3 1,460,000 1.16 37,300,000
A4 550,000 1.07 12,900,000
180 m SW 110,000 0.94 2,300,000
Total 4,250,000 1.30 122,100,000
Notes:
1. CIM Definition Standards were followed for Mineral Resources.
2. Mineral Resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.25% U3O8 based on a long-term price of US$65 per lb U3O8 and estimated costs.
3. A minimum mining width of 1.0 m was used.
4. Numbers may not add due to rounding.
Highlights:
Rapid Conversion of Inferred to Indicated:
Drilling from 2016 at the Arrow Deposit has converted 89% of the March 2016 Arrow Deposit Maiden Inferred
Mineral Resource into the updated I ndicated Mineral Resource category. This level of conversion is truly
unprecedented which continues to confirm the strong continuity of grade and thickness seen across the Arrow
deposit;
A2 High Grade Domain Sees Significant Growth in Grade and Resources:
The A2 High Grade D omain has grown to an Indicated Mineral Resource of 1 64.9 M lbs U 3O8 contained in
0.40 M tonnes grading 18.84% U 3O8 compared to the March 20 16 maiden A2 High Grade D omain Inferred
Mineral Resource of 120.5 M lbs U3O8 contained in 0.41 M tonnes grading 13.26% U3O8;
Growth of Arrow Continues:
Mineralization remains open in most directions, and the winter 2017 drilling will focus on the newly identified
northeast extension of the A2, the up -dip northeast extension of the A3 shear and newly identified A3 High
Grade Domain, and the southwest gap between Arrow and the 180 m Southwest Area.
The Company has cash on hand of approximately $65 million.
Garrett Ainsworth, Vice-President, Exploration and Development, commented: “Infill and expansion drilling at Arrow in
2016 has been highly successful with 89% of the Maiden Inferred Mineral Resource converted into I ndicated Mineral
Resource and a significant expansion of the A2 High Grade Domain. The strength of continuity across the mineralization
is a solid signature of the Arrow deposit and a function of the high conversion r ate. Additionally, a new A3 High Grade
Domain has been identifie d and is in the early stages of definition. Further, the footprint of Arrow increased
significantly with multiple new shears and zones being defined. There remain multiple large, high priority untested
areas at Arrow including southwest and northeast along strike with material future resource growth potential . The
collaboration between NexGen and RPA has resulted in a high quality Mineral Resource estimate that is industry
leading for basement-hosted uranium deposits in the Athabasca Basin.”
Leigh Curyer, Chief Executive Officer, commented: “Today’s updated Mineral Resource places the Arrow Deposit into a
class of its own with respect to grade, resource size, and given the fact its setting is land -based and basement-hosted.
The really exciting part is tha t Arrow remains in the very early -stages of defini tion. Results issued most recently on
February 23, 2017 that are not included in today’s resource update, together with the 180 m gap area and multiple
untested areas demonstrate many years of drilling rema in ahead of the Company before the true extent of Arrow can
be determined. As we look ahead to 2017 and beyond, we are committed to our goal of developing the Company into
becoming the world’s leading supplier of mined uranium.”
The high -grade, basement-hosted Arrow Deposit was discovered in February 2014, and has rapidly grown
into the largest undeveloped uranium deposit in Canada . Arrow is hosted entirel y within basement rocks,
and currently comprises a series of 5 parallel stacked sub-vertical mineralized lenses with a remarkable
vertical extent. At its highest point, mineralization reaches the sub-Athabasca unconformity approximately
105 m below surface. The Mineral Resource reported herein extends to a depth of 970 m below surface.
Wide spaced drill holes beneath the Mineral Resource have intersected mineralization at depths of up to 980
Conference Call:
NexGen will host a conference call today, Monday March 6, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. Participants may
join the conference call using the following call-in details:
Local/International: +1 647 427 7450
North America Toll Free: +1 888 231 8191
A replay of this conference call will be available until Monday April 3, 2017. The playback numbers are:
Local/International: +1 416 849 0833
North America Toll Free: +1 855 859 2056
Playback Passcode: 83828716 #
Table 2 – Arrow Mineral Resource Sensitivity to Cut-Off Grade as of the Effective Date
Cut-Off (U3O8 %) Tonnage (tonnes) Grade (U3O8 %) Metal (U3O8 lbs)
Indicated Mineral Resources
0.25 1,180,000 6.88 179,500,000
0.30 1,100,000 7.09 179,200,000
0.50 1,000,000 8.26 177,700,000
1.00 600,000 12.51 172,000,000
2.00 400,000 18.07 166,000,000
2.50 400,000 18.64 165,300,000
3.00 400,000 18.84 165,000,000
5.00 400,000 19.34 163,800,000
10.00 300,000 22.27 150,800,000
Inferred Mineral Resources
0.25 4,250,000 1.30 122,100,000
0.30 3,800,000 1.42 119,500,000
0.50 2,600,000 1.89 109,200,000
1.00 1,300,000 3.12 88,500,000
2.00 500,000 5.74 65,200,000
2.50 400,000 6.80 59,400,000
3.00 300,000 7.57 55,600,000
5.00 200,000 9.68 45,600,000
10.00 100,000 13.58 22,200,000
m below surface. The deposit as defined in the Mineral Resource estimate has an overall strike length of 875
m, and the individual lenses vary in thickness from 1 m to 20 m.
Geology and Mineralization
The Rook I Property is located along the southwestern edge of the Athabasca Basin, straddling the
Athabasca/basement unconformity. Basement rocks beneath the Athabasca Group belong to the Taltson
Domain (previously Lloyd Domain ) and consist of northeast trending Archean and Aphebian granitic and
metasedimentary gneisses, the latter containing gra phitic pelitic and semipelitic gneisses and granofels,
which are favourable host rocks for uranium mineralization. Unconformably overlying the basement rocks
are flat lying sandstones with conglomera te horizons that make up the mid -Proterozoic Athabasca G roup.
The thickness of the Athabasca Group varies on the property between 0 and 20 m. In the western part of the
Rook I property, remnants of Devonian sandstones are occasionally seen in drill core overlying basement
rocks and Athabasca Group. These are locally overlain by flat lying Cretaceous Mannville Group mudstones,
siltstones and sandstones with minor sporadic coal horizons. Recent unconsolidated sandy glacial deposits
are present over almost all of the property and vary in thickness from to 60 m.
Uranium mineralization at Arrow occurs within and proximal to structurally prepared basement rocks
(graphitic mylonites) that show varying degrees of clay, chlorite, and hematite alteration . Structures have
been reactivated multiple times, and five main parallel structural zones ( namely the A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5
shears) have been recognized, with the A2 and A3 Shears hosting higher grade, thicker and more continuous
mineralization than the others thus far. Mineralization consists predominantly of uraninite/pitchblende that
occurs as massive to semi -massive accumulations, foliation controlled , mineral replacements and
disseminations. A continuous zone of higher grade mineralization in the A2 shear is known as the A2 High
Grade Domain.
Drilling, Sampling and Analytical
The updated Arrow Deposit Mineral Resource is defined by a total of 200 diamond core drill holes. The drill
hole spacing for Indicated Mineral Resource is approximately 25 m x 25 m, and hole spacing for Inferred
Mineral Resource is approximately 50 m x 50 m . All of the core collected is NQ sized (47.6 mm diameter) .
Mineralized intervals (defined as greater than 500 cps using handheld RS -120 scintillometer) were split on -
site in 0.5 m and 1.0 m intervals and transported by company personnel to SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories
(an SCC ISO/IEC 17025: 2005 Accredited Facility) of Saskatoon for geochemical analysis and U3O8 assay. Most
samples were analyzed using ICP -MS (Inductively Coupled Plasma – Mass Spectrometry) for trace elements
after partial and total digestions, plus ICP-OES (Inductively Coupled Plasma – Optical Emission Spectrometry)
for major and minor elements after a total digestion, and fusion solution of boron by ICP-OES. All mineralized
samples for assay were analyzed for U 3O8 by ICP-OES. Select samples were also analyzed for gold by fire
assay. Analytical results were only accepted after stringent internal QA/QC criteria had been passed. All
grade data used in the Mineral Resource estimate were obtained from chemical assays, and no down-hole
radiometric probe data was used.
Estimation Methodology
Mineral Resources were estimated by NexGen and reviewed and audited by Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.
(RPA), an independent consulting company with substantial experience completing uranium Mineral
Resource estimates in the Athabasca Basin, and around the globe. The interpretation of the three-
dimensional mineralized lenses (domains) was created in Leapfrog software, directly from the drill hole data
using a threshold of 0.05% U 3O8. All wireframes were then exported to Vulcan software to ensure
wireframes were “snapped” to the drill holes to ensure that the boundaries accurately correspond to
selected drill hole intervals. Five high grade portions of the deposit were modelled in the A2 shear and two
high grade portions of the deposit were modelled in the A3 shear. All higher grade wireframes were based on
a threshold of 5.0% U3O8. The higher grade wireframes are located within and completely encompassed by a
0.05% grade shell within the A2 and A3 shears. Figure 1 is an isometric cross section of the wireframes. Drill
hole assay data were composited to 1.0 m lengths within the wireframes and tagged with the corresponding
domain code.
Uranium (as U3O8) grades were interpolated with an ordinary kriging (OK) function for the A2 high grade and
the A2 low grade enveloping domain. All other uranium grades (as % U3O8) were interpolated using ID2
(inverse distance squared). All uranium grades were interpolated into a block model with blocks measuring 4
m (along strike) x 4 m (down dip) x 4 m (across strike), with sub-blocks to a minimum of 1 m x 1 m x 1 m. The
grade shells were used as hard boundaries, such that only drill hole data inside of any given domain could
inform the blocks within that domain. Very high grade assay values were capped at 40% U3O8 within the A3
High Grade Domain and grade caps ranged from 8% to 25% U3O8 in the lower grade domains.
A total of 5,647 bulk density measurements have been collected on drill core samples. The measurements
show a strong relationship between uranium grade and density at the Arrow deposit, with higher grade
samples being more dense than lower grade samples . Therefore, the uranium grade was used to estimate
the density of samples without density measurements, this was done with a polynomial formula which is
based on a regression fit. Densities were then interpolated into the block model to convert mineralized
volumes to tonnage, and were also used to weight the uranium grades interpolated into each block.
The resulting block model was validated by visual inspection, volumetric comparison, swath plots, and block
grade estimation using an alternative method. As well, the mean block grade at zero cutoff was compared to
the mean of the composited assay data to ensure no global bias.
Qualified Persons
The Mineral Resource Estimate was audited and accepted by Mr. Mark Mathisen, C.P.G., Senior Geologist at
RPA and Mr. David Ross , P.Geo., Director of Resource Estimation and Principal Geologist at RPA. Both are
independent Qualified Persons in accordance with the requirements of National Instrument (NI) 43 -101 and
they have approved the disclosure herein. Additionally, the technical info rmation in this news release has
been approved by Mr. Garrett Ainsworth, P.Geo., Vice President – Exploration & Development for NexGen.
Mr. Ainsworth is a qualified person for the purposes of NI 43-101 and has verified the sampling, analytical,
and test data underlying the information or opinions contained herein by reviewing original data certificates
and monitoring all of the data collection protocols.
A Technical Report co -authored by Mr. Mathisen and Mr. Ross will be filed on SEDAR within 45 days of this
news release.
Figure 1: Isometric Cross Section View of the Wireframe Models
About NexGen
NexGen is a British Columbia corporation with a focus on the acquisition, exploration and development of
Canadian uranium projects. NexGen has a highly experienced team of uranium industry professionals with a
successful track record in the discovery of uranium deposits and in developing projects through discovery to
production. NexGen’s goal is to become the world’s leading supplier of mined uranium.
NexGen owns a portfolio of highly prospective uranium assets in the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan, Canada,
including a 100% interest in Rook I, location of the Arrow Deposit , in February 2014 and Bow Discovery in
March 2015 and the Harpoon D iscovery in August 2016. The Arrow Deposit’s March 2017 updated Mineral
Resource comprises an Indicated Mineral Resource of 179.5 M lbs of U 3O8 contained within 1.18 M tonnes
grading 6.88% U 3O8, and an Inferred Mineral Resou rce of 122.1 M lbs of U 3O8 contained within 4.25 M
tonnes grading 1.30% U3O8.
Leigh Curyer
Chief Executive Officer
NexGen Energy Ltd.
+1 604 428 4112
www.nexgenenergy.ca
Travis McPherson
Corporate Development Manager
NexGen Energy Ltd.
+1 604 428 4112
http://www.nexgenenergy.ca
This news release contains "forward -looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian
securities legislation. “Forward -looking information” includes, but is not limited to, statements with respect
to the activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the
future, including, without limitation, planned exploration activities and the completion of an updated mineral
resource estimate. Generally, but not always, forward-looking information and statements can be identified
by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”,
“intends”, “anticipates”, or “believes” or the negative connotation thereof or var iations of such words and
phrases or state that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”,
“occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connation thereof.
Such forward -looking information and statements are based on numerous assumptions, including among
others, that the results of planned exploration activities are as anticipated, the price of uranium, the
anticipated cost of planned exploration activities, that general business and economic conditions will not
change in a material adverse manner, that financing will be available if and when needed and on reasonable
terms, and that third party contractors, equipment and supplies and governmental and other app rovals
required to conduct the Company’s planned exploration activities will be available on reasonable terms and in
a timely manner. Although the assumptions made by the Company in providing forward -looking information
or making forward-looking statements are considered reasonable by management at the time, there can be
no assurance that such assumptions will prove to be accurate.
Forward-looking information and statements also involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and
other factors, which ma y cause actual events or results in future periods to differ materially from any
projections of future events or results expressed or implied by such forward -looking information or
statements, including, among others: negative operating cash flow and depen dence on third party financing,
uncertainty of additional financing, no known mineral reserves, assay results may not be consistent with
preliminary results, alternative sources of energy, aboriginal title and consultation issues, reliance on key
management and other personnel, potential downturns in economic conditions, actual results of exploration
activities being different than anticipated, changes in exploration programs based upon results, availability of
third party contractors, availability of equipment and supplies, failure of equipment to operate as anticipated;
accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral
exploration industry, environmental risks, changes in laws and regulations, community relations and delays in
obtaining governmental or other approvals.
Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those contained in the forward -looking information or implied by forward-looking
information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended.
There can be no assurance that forward -looking information and statements will prove to be accurate, as
actual results and future ev ents could differ materially from those anticipated, estimated or intended.
Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward -looking statements or information. The
Company undertakes no obligation to update or reissue forward -looking inform ation as a result of new
information or events except as required by applicable securities laws.