Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

NICU.V ·

Magna Mining Reports Second Quarter 2025 Operating and Financial Results

Financials

Magna Mining Reports Second Quarter 2025

Operating and Financial Results

Sudbury, Ontario--(Newsfile Corp. - August 27, 2025) - Magna Mining Inc. (TSXV: NICU) (OTCQX:

MGMNF) (FSE: 8YD) (the "Company" or "Magna") is pleased to report second quarter 2025 operating

and financial results. Management will host a conference call tomorrow, August 28, 2025, at 08:00 a.m.

EDT to discuss the results. All amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise indicated.

Highlights

April-June 2025 ("Q2") was the first full quarter of production from the McCreedy West copper

mine under Magna's operation.

Total ore processed in Q2 was 59,100 tons from the 700 Footwall Copper Zone and 10,945 tons

from the Intermain Nickel Zone, for a combined total of 70,045 tons.

Combined ore grade for the quarter was 3.26% Copper Equivalent ("Cu Eq").

End of period cash balance of $27 million.

Jason Jessup, CEO, commented, "Since we acquired the McCreedy West Mine on February 28, 2025,

we have implemented multiple mine optimization initiatives and invested substantial capital in equipment

and underground development to improve the operation. During the quarter we increased our staff and

workforce, made management changes and realized a material increase in the amount of daily

development completed at the mine. Throughout Q2, we started to see evidence of these operational

improvements, with month over month increases in the amount of payable copper-equivalent pounds as

well as improved grades within the operation. More importantly, we are consistently improving on the

productivity of our development crews, which will lead to more workplaces in the mine and better

flexibility in our mine plan. The second quarter, and the remainder of 2025, is focused ensuring the mine

is in a strong position for 2026 production. I am pleased with the results to date and look forward to

building this operation into a long-life, sustainable producer that generates free cash flow."

Table 1: Magna Mining Q2 2025 Tons Mines, Payable Copper Equivalent Pounds and Grades

Q2 2025

April

May

June

Tons Processed

15,580

26,905

27,560

Cu Eq Grade (%)

1

(contained)

2.54

3.34

3.56

Cu Eq lbs

1

(payable)

442,000

1,172,000

1,439,000

1

Copper equivalent payable pounds and copper equivalent payable grade were calculated using the following US dollar prices:

Q2 2025: $4.29/lb Cu, $6.88/lb Ni, $15.81/lb Co, $1,072.35/oz Pt, $990.29/oz Pd, $3,301.29/oz Au, $33.64 Ag.

Table 2: McCreedy West Q1 and Q2 2025 Development Rates

Month

Development (ft/day)

Jan / Feb (Under Prior Operator)

6

March

6.9

April

14.4

May

16.2

June

17

Table 3: Q2 2025 Operating and Financial Highlights

In 000s, except per units and per share amounts

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q2 2024

Financial results

Net revenue from mining operations

18,465

4,453

-

Cash margin

1

(1,191)

2,69

-

Net income (loss)

(9,501)

29,098

(3,948)

Adjusted net loss

1

(8,930)

(5,442)

(4,442)

Operating cash flow

(11,560)

(2,584)

(3,747)

Free cash flow

1

(10,714)

(10,584)

(3,921)

Per share information:

Net earnings (loss)

(0.05)

0.15

(0.03)

Adjusted net loss

1

(0.04)

(0.03)

(0.03)

Operating cash flow

1

(0.06)

(0.01)

(0.02)

Free cash flow

1

(0.05)

(0.05)

(0.02)

Selected Financial Statement data:

Cash and cash equivalents

27,018

38,250

4,419

Working capital

31,914

39,330

1,371

Total assets

163,534

168,132

24,509

Total non-current liabilities

65,276

68,601

871

Operational results

Ore Processed (Dry tons)

700 Copper Zone

59,100

13,911

-

Intermain Nickel Zone

10,945

6,477

-

Throughput

70,045

20,388

-

Copper equivalent grade (%)

700 Copper Zone

2

3.35

3.04

-

Intermain Nickel Zone

2

2.77

2.96

-

3.26

3.01

-

Metals Payable

Copper (000s lbs)

1,629

552

-

Nickel (000s lbs)

327

132

-

Cobalt (000s lbs)

4

2

-

Platinum (ozs)

1,156

-

-

Palladium (ozs)

1,218

13

-

Gold (ozs)

284

-

-

Silver (ozs)

9,499

1638

-

Cu equivalent payable pounds (000s)

2

3,053

790

-

Average realized price (per lb Cu Eq payable)

1

6.08

6.32

-

Cash costs (per lb Cu Eq payable)

1,2

6.47

5.98

-

Cash margin (per lb Cu Eq payable)

1

(0.39)

0.34

-

AISC (per lb Cu Eq payable)

1,2

7.55

6.65

-

Production costs/ton processed

1

219

194

-

Exchange Rates

Average 1 USD → CAD exchange rates

1.3841

1.4359

1.3684

Cost Metrics (in USD)

Cash costs

1,2

4.67

4.16

-

AISC

1,2

5.45

4.63

-

1

For the reconciliation of these non-IFRS measures to the consolidated financial statements, please see the reconciliations at the end of this

news release. Magna uses non-IFRS performance measures in this news release as it believes that these generally accepted industry

performance measures provide a useful indication of the Company's operational performance. Non-IFRS performance measures do not have

standardized meanings defined by IFRS Accounting Standards and may not be comparable to information in other issuers' reports and filings.

They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS Accounting

Standards.

2

Copper equivalent payable pounds for the purpose of copper equivalent payable grade, cash cost and AISC were calculated using the following

US dollar prices:

Q2 2025: $4.29/lb Cu, $6.88/lb Ni, $15.81/lb Co, $1,072.35/oz Pt, $990.29/oz Pd, $3,301.29/oz Au, $33.64 Ag.

Q1 2025: $4.40/lb Cu, $7.18/lb Ni, $15.38/lb Co, $944.31/oz Pt, $1,005.61/oz Pd, $3,135.60/oz Au, $34.61 Ag.

Q2 Financial Highlights

Q2 cash costs were C$6.47 per pound or US$4.67.

All in sustaining costs for the same quarter were C$7.55 per pound or US$5.45, which includes the

purchase of a scoop tram, and developing 282 equivalent feet of capital development.

Operating cash outflow of $11.6 million.

Free cash outflow of $10.7 million.

Adjusted net loss of $8.9 million.

End of period cash balance of $27 million.

Further details regarding the calculation of production costs, cash margins and all in sustaining costs can

be found in the quarterly MD&A.

Q2 Operational Highlights

McCreedy West produced 3.05 million pounds of copper equivalent payable in the quarter at an

average grade of 3.26% Cu Eq.

Total ore processed in Q2 was 59,100 tons from the 700 Footwall Copper Zone and 10,945 tons

from the Intermain Nickel Zone.

April production was affected by a lack of operating and capital development completed in the

preceding quarters while the mine was under prior ownership (Table 1 and Table 2). Production in

April also included tonnage from the Intermain nickel zone that was previously developed by the

prior operators.

In anticipation of bringing future mines into commercial production, the company added technical

and administrative staff in Q2 who are currently focused on the optimization of the McCreedy West

mine.

Table 4: McCreedy West Q2 2025 Cu Eq Contained Grade (%) By Zone

April

May

June

700 Zone

2.53

3.43

3.70

Intermain Zone

2.65

2.95

2.60

Total

2.54

3.34

3.56

Webcast Link

Webcast Link:

https://www.gowebcasting.com/14155

Participant Dial In:

(N. America Toll Free): 1-844-763-8274

Participant International Dial In:

1-647-484-8814

Conference call participants should ask to join the Magna Mining Inc. quarterly results conference call.

Qualified Person

The scientific or technical information in this press release has been reviewed and approved by David

King, M.Sc., P.Geo. Mr. King is the Senior Vice President, Exploration and Geoscience for Magna

Mining Inc. and is a qualified person under Canadian National Instrument 43-101.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

All statements, other than statements of historical fact, contained or incorporated by reference in this

press release constitute "forward-looking statements" and "forward-looking information" (collectively,

"forward-looking statements") within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Generally, these forward-

looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as "may", "might",

"potential", "expect", "anticipate", "estimate", "believe", "could", "should", "would", "will", "intend", "plan",

"forecast", "prospective", "significant" or other similar words or phrases or variations thereof. Forward-

looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of assumptions that, while considered

reasonable by management, are inherently subject to business, market and economic risks,

uncertainties and contingencies that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be

materially different from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements, including risks

relating to the failure to realize anticipated or assumed production and operational improvements from

current or planned optimization initiatives at the McCreedy West mine, the failure to commence or

complete as quickly as planned additional development work at McCreedy West, the failure to

successfully realize on talent and technical expertise to unlock the long-term, sustainable potential of

McCreedy West or other assets of the Company and other risks disclosed in the Company's most recent

annual management discussion and analysis, available on the SEDAR+ website (at:

www.sedarplus.ca

).

Although the Company has attempted to identify important risks, uncertainties, contingencies and factors

that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking

statements, there can be no certainty or assurance that the Company has accurately or adequately

captured, accounted for or disclosed all such risks, uncertainties, contingencies or factors. Readers

should place no reliance on forward-looking statements as actual results, performance or achievements

may be materially different from those expressed or implied by such statements. Resource exploration

and development, and mining operations, are highly speculative, characterized by several significant

risks, which even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge will not eliminate.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. The Company does not undertake

to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future events or

otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.

About Magna Mining Inc.

Magna Mining Inc.

is a producing mining company with a strong portfolio of copper, nickel, and

platinum group metals (PGM) assets located in the world-class Sudbury mining district of Ontario,

Canada. The Company's primary asset is the

McCreedy West Mine

, currently in production, supported

by a pipeline of highly prospective past-producing properties including

Levack

,

Crean Hill

,

Podolsky

,

and

Shakespeare

.

Magna Mining is strategically positioned to unlock long-term shareholder value through continued

production, exploration upside, and near-term development opportunities across its asset base.

Additional corporate and project information is available at

www.magnamining.com

and through the

Company's public filings on the SEDAR+ website at

www.sedarplus.ca

.

For further information, please contact:

Jason Jessup

Chief Executive Officer

or

Paul Fowler, CFA

Senior Vice President

705-482-9667

Email:

[email protected]

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the

policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this

press release.

NON-IFRS PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Please see below for the reconciliation of non-IFRS measures referred to in this news release to the

consolidated financial statements.

Average realized price per copper equivalent payable pound

Average realized price per copper equivalent payable pound is a non-IFRS Accounting Standards

measure and does not constitute a measure recognized by IFRS Accounting Standards and does not

have a standardized meaning defined by IFRS Accounting Standards. Average realized price per

copper equivalent payable pound is calculated by dividing total metal proceeds received by the

Company for the relevant period by the copper equivalent payable pounds. It may not be comparable to

information in other issuers' reports and filings.

In 000s, except per unit amounts

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Revenue per financial statements (a)

18,465

4,453

Treatment and refining charges

1,634

539

Recognition of deferred streaming revenue

(1,549)

-

Copper equivalent revenue from mining operations (a)

18,550

4,992

Copper equivalent pounds sold (000s) (b)

3,053

790

Average realized price copper equivalent sold CAD (c) = (a) ÷ (b)

6.08

6.32

Average 1 USD → CAD exchange rate (d)

1.3841

1.4359

Average realized price copper equivalent sold USD (c) ÷ (d)

4.39

4.40

Cash costs per copper equivalent payable pound

Cash cost per copper equivalent payable pound is a non-IFRS Accounting Standards performance

measure and does not constitute a measure recognized by IFRS Accounting Standards and does not

have a standardized meaning defined by IFRS Accounting Standards, as well it may not be comparable

to information in other issuers' reports and filings. The Company has included this non-IFRS Accounting

Standards performance measure throughout this document as Magna believes that this generally

accepted industry performance measure provides a useful indication of the Company's operational

performance. The Company believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance

with IFRS, certain investors use this information to evaluate the Company's performance and ability to

generate cash flow. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be

considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with

IFRS. The following table provides a reconciliation of total cash costs per copper equivalent payable

pound to cost of sales per the financial statements for each of the last eight quarters:

In 000s, except per unit amounts

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Cost of sales per financial statements

20,275

4,422

Smelting, treatment and refining charges

1,634

539

Depletion and depreciation

(2,168)

(238)

Cash costs (a)

19,741

4,723

Copper equivalent payable pounds (000s) (b)

3,053

790

Cash costs per copper equivalent payable pound (c) = (a) ÷ (b)

6.47

5.98

Average 1 USD → CAD exchange rate (d)

1.3841

1.4359

Cash costs per copper equivalent payable pound USD (c) ÷ (d)

4.67

4.16

Production costs per ton processed

Mine-site cost per ton processed is a non-IFRS Accounting Standards performance measure and does

not constitute a measure recognized by IFRS Accounting Standards and does not have a standardized

meaning defined by IFRS Accounting Standards, as well it may not be comparable to information in

other issuers' reports and filings. As illustrated in the table below, this measure is calculated by adjusting

cost of sales, as shown in the statements of income for non-cash depletion and depreciation, royalties

and inventory level changes and then dividing by tons processed through the smelter. Management

believes that mine-site cost per ton processed provides additional information regarding the

performance of mining operations and allows Management to monitor operating costs on a more

consistent basis as the per ton processed measure reduces the cost variability associated with varying

production levels. Management also uses this measure to determine the economic viability of mining

blocks. As each mining block is evaluated based on the net realizable value of each ton mined, the

estimated revenue on a per ton basis must be in excess of the production cost per ton processed in

order to be economically viable. Management is aware that this per ton processed measure is impacted

by fluctuations in throughput and thus uses this evaluation tool in conjunction with production costs

prepared in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards. This measure supplements production cost

information prepared in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards and allows investors to distinguish

between changes in production costs resulting from changes in production versus changes in operating

performance.

In 000s, except per unit amounts

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Cost of sales per financial statements

20,275

4,422

Depletion and depreciation

(2,168)

(238)

Royalties and streaming expense

(2,772)

(223)

Mining and processing costs (a)

15,335

3,961

Ore processed (tons) (b)

70,046

20,388

Production costs per ton processed (a) ÷ (b)

219

194

Cash Margin

Cash margin is a non-IFRS Accounting Standards measure and does not constitute a measure

recognized by IFRS Accounting Standards and does not have a standardized meaning defined by IFRS

Accounting Standards, as well it may not be comparable to information in other issuers' reports and

filings. It is calculated as the difference between total sales revenue, net of smelting, refining and

treatment costs from mining operations and cash mine site operating costs (see Cash cost per ounce of

gold sold under this Section above) per the Company's Financial Statements. The Company believes it

illustrates the performance of the Company's operating mines and enables investors to better

understand the Company's performance in comparison to other metal producers who present results on

a similar basis.

In 000s, except per unit amounts

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Copper equivalent revenue from mining operations (per above)

18,550

4,992

Cash costs (per above)

19,741

4,723

Cash margin

(1,191)

269

Per pound of copper equivalent payable

(Canadian dollar):

Average realized price (a)

6.08

6.32

Cash costs (b)

6.47

5.98

Cash margin (a) - (b)

(0.39)

0.34

All-in Sustaining Costs

All-in sustaining costs (

"AISC"

) include mine site operating costs incurred at Magna mining operations,

sustaining mine capital and development expenditures, mine site exploration expenditures and

equipment lease payments related to the mine operations and corporate administration expenses. The

Company believes that this measure represents the total costs of producing copper equivalent payable

pounds from current operations and provides Magna and other stakeholders with additional information

that illustrates the Company's operational performance and ability to generate cash flow. This cost

measure seeks to reflect the full cost of copper production from current operations on a per-pound basis

of copper equivalent payable. New project and growth capital are not included.

In 000s, except per unit amounts

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Cost of sales, per financial statements

20,275

4,422

Smelting, treatment and refining charges

1,634

539

Depletion and depreciation

(2,168)

(238)

Cash costs

19,741

4,723

Sustaining mine exploration and development

468

-

Sustaining mine capital equipment

1,381

-

Corporate and general

2,191

997

Less: KGHM Integration costs

(742)

(465)

All-in Sustaining costs (AISC) (a)

23,039

5,255

Pounds of copper equivalent payable (b)

3,053

790

AISC

(c) = (a) ÷ (b)

7.55

6.65

Average 1 USD → CAD exchange rate (d)

1.3841

1.4359

AISC

USD (c) ÷ (d)

5.45

4.63

Free cash flow and operating and free cash flow per share

Free cash flow is calculated by taking net cash provided by operating activities less cash used in capital

expenditures and lease payments as reported in the Company's financial statements. Free cash flow per

share is calculated by dividing free cash flow by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for

the period.

Operating cash flow per share is a non-IFRS Accounting Standards measure and does not constitute a

measure recognized by IFRS Accounting Standards and does not have a standardized meaning defined

by IFRS Accounting Standards. Operating cash flow per share is calculated by dividing cash flow from

operating activities in the Company's Financial Statements by the weighted average number of shares

outstanding for each year. It may not be comparable to information in other issuers' reports and filings.

In 000s, except per share amounts

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Net cash provided by operating activities per financial statements (c)

(11,560)

(2,584)

Sustaining mine exploration and development

(468)

-

Sustaining mine capital equipment

(1,381)

-

Purchase of Project Nikolas Company Inc.

-

(5,000)

Site maintenance capital equipment

(231)

-

Funds held against standby letters of credit

2,926

(3,000)

Free cash flows

(a)

(10,714)

(10,584)

Weighted number of shares (000s) (b)

203,647

197,739

Per Share data

Operating cash flow (c) ÷ (b)

(0.06)

(0.01)

Free cash flow (a) ÷ (b)

(0.05)

(0.05)

Adjusted net loss and Adjusted net loss per share

Adjusted net loss and adjusted net loss per share are non-IFRS Accounting Standards performance

measures and do not constitute a measure recognized by IFRS Accounting Standards and do not have

standardized meanings defined by IFRS Accounting Standards, as well both measures may not be

comparable to information in other issuers' reports and filings. Adjusted net loss is calculated by

removing the one-time gains and losses resulting from the disposition of non-core assets, non-recurring

expenses and significant tax adjustments (mining tax recognition and exploration credit refunds) not

related to current period's income, as detailed in the table below. Magna discloses this measure, which

is based on its financial statements, to assist in the understanding of the Company's operating results

and financial position.

In 000s, except per share amounts

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Net income (loss) per financial statements

(9,501)

29,098

Adjustments for:

Gain on bargain purchase of KGHM assets

-

(57,227)

Project Nikolas Company Inc. Integration costs

742

779

Transaction Costs

35

2,426

Total adjustments

777

(54,022)

Related income tax effect

(206)

10,236

Recognition of mining taxes

-

9,246

571

(34,540)

Adjusted net loss (a)

(8,930)

(5,442)

Weighted number of shares (000s) (b)

203,647

197,739

Per Share data

Adjusted net loss (a) ÷ (b)

(0.04)

(0.03)

To view the source version of this press release, please visit

https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/264179