Magna Mining Reports Mineral Resource Estimate for the Levack Mine in Sudbury, Ontario
Magna Mining Reports Mineral Resource
Estimate for the Levack Mine in Sudbury,
Ontario
Sudbury, Ontario--(Newsfile Corp. - November 18, 2025) - Magna Mining Inc. (TSXV: NICU) (OTCQX:
MGMNF) (FSE: 8YD) ("Magna" or the "Company") is pleased to announce the results of a Mineral
Resource Estimate ("MRE") prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 -
Standards of
Disclosure for Mineral Projects
for the past-producing Levack Mine, located in the North Range of the
Sudbury Basin, Ontario, Canada (Figure 1). The Levack Mine MRE is comprised of both footwall-type
deposits, which contain copper ("Cu") and precious metals including gold ("Au"), platinum ("Pt"),
palladium ("Pd") and silver ("Ag"), and contact-type deposits hosting mineralization rich in nickel ("Ni")
and Cu.
Levack Mineral Resource Estimate Highlights (as of August 31, 2025, the cut-off for diamond drill data
incorporated in the MRE):
Current mineralization in the Levack Mine includes 6.1 million tonnes in the Indicated category at
3.5% copper equivalent ("CuEq"), comprised of 1.1% Cu, 1.4% Ni, 0.6 grams per tonne (g/t) Pt,
0.7 g/t Pd, 0.1 g/t Au, and 2.0 g/t Ag,
as well as 5.2 million tonnes in the Inferred category at 3.6%
CuEq (1.2% Cu, 1.4% Ni, 0.6 g/t Pt, 0.8 g/t Pd, 0.2 g/t Au, 2.1 g/t Ag).
The high grade footwall-type deposits contain 368,000 tonnes in the Inferred category at 9.4%
CuEq (5.4% Cu, 0.75% Ni, 2.9 g/t Pt, 5.4 g/t Pd, 1.5 g/t Au, and 21.0 g/t Ag), as well as 178,000
tonnes in the Indicated category at the previously-mined Morrison Footwall Cu-PGE deposit
grading 15.5% CuEq (9.1% Cu, 2.4% Ni, 3.6 g/t Pt, 6.6 g/t Pd, 1.6 g/t Au, 34.2 g/t Ag), which
remains open at depth.
The No. 3 Footwall deposit is particularly rich in precious metals, containing 76,000 tonnes in the
Inferred category grading 7.9 g/t Pt, 15.7 g/t Pd, 3.1 g/t Au and 30.3 g/t Ag, as well as 4.5% Cu and
0.7% Ni (13.4% CuEq) with important potential implications for ongoing exploration in the footwall
environment.
The zones of contact-type mineralization generally occur at depths of less than 750 metres
(approximately 2,460 feet) and contain 5.9 million tonnes in the Indicated category grading 0.9%
Cu, 1.4% Ni, and 2.1 g/t precious metals (Pt+Pd+Au+Ag), or 3.2% CuEq, as well as 4.8 million
tonnes in the Inferred category at 3.2% CuEq (0.9% Cu, 1.5% Ni, 1.5 g/t precious metals
(Pt+Pd+Au+Ag)).
Dave King, SVP Exploration and Geoscience, stated, "Today's announcement of Magna's initial mineral
resource estimate for our flagship Levack Mine in Sudbury represents an important milestone as it
confirms the presence of significant mineralization, much of which can be accessed using existing
infrastructure. Importantly, in addition to over 5.9 million tonnes of contact-type mineralization in the
Indicated category, 178,000 tonnes of mineralization grading 15.5% CuEq remains at the Morrison
Footwall Cu-PGE deposit.
There also is potential to expand the Morrison deposit with further drilling as it
remains open at depth.
The very high grade precious metals mineralization delineated in the No. 3
Footwall deposit will be a high priority target for our ongoing exploration efforts, along with other
prospective areas in the footwall environment at Levack."
Jason Jessup, CEO, stated, "The results of Magna's first mineral resource estimate for the Levack Mine
exceeded our expectations, particularly in terms of the grade of the remaining mineralization at the
Morrison Footwall Cu-PGE deposit, and the significant tonnage of relatively shallow, contact-type nickel-
copper mineralization. This resource estimate will now be used to complete a Preliminary Economic
Assessment ("PEA") with the vision of utilizing a new ramp from surface to access the shallower
deposits, as well as the existing shaft and loading pocket infrastructure to hoist higher grade footwall
copper-precious metals ore from deeper within the mine. The contract to complete the PEA will be
awarded prior to the end of the year and will be completed during 2026. In addition, we have already
engaged a contractor to begin developing the scope of work to re-establish hoisting capabilities, and
this work could potentially begin in early 2026. At present, there is a contract mining company working on
the 3900 Level ramp to develop access to the 3600 Level between the No.2 and No.3 shaft stations.
This connection is expected to be completed in Q2 2026 and will provide many benefits for footwall
exploration and synergies with a neighbouring mine. The Levack Mine has quickly become the flagship
project within our company and 2026 will be an exciting year as we continue to move towards a
production restart while at the same time exploring for new copper-precious metals deposits in the
footwall environment at the mine."
The MRE was completed by Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo, Senior Geologist of Orix Geoscience Inc. and
incorporates diamond drill data up to a cut-off of August 31, 2025.
Both the Indicated and Inferred
resources in the Morrison Footwall Cu-PGE deposit have been constrained geologically as discrete
veins that have either been defined by previous mining operations, or by multiple diamond drill
intercepts. Certain mineralized intercepts around the Morrison deposit have been excluded from this
MRE where their relationship to known veins has not yet been established. Follow up drilling in these
areas will be incorporated into the Company's ongoing exploration program, with the goal of including
these intercepts in a future MRE update. The Morrison deposit also remains open at depth, with
underground drilling to test for potential extensions planned for 2026 once drill platforms have been
established. Diamond drilling to target the expansion of the Inferred resource at the No. 3 Footwall
deposit will also be a focus during 2026, given the significant precious metal grades outlined in the MRE
(see Table 3).
This MRE will serve as the basis for the completion of a PEA study by a third-party consultant.
This study
will further refine the potential to access the shallow, contact-type mineralization via a new ramp from
surface, as was previously investigated by the Company's internal work.
In addition, the PEA will also
evaluate a re-start of production from the Morrison Footwall Cu-PGE deposit via the No.2 Shaft.
The
No.2 Shaft is currently being used to move personnel and materials in support of underground drilling,
rehabilitation and new development work at Levack Mine.
Work is currently underway to determine what
is required to re-establish ore and waste hoisting capabilities at the No.2 Shaft.
The results of the
evaluation of the hoisting system could support a decision to begin the recommissioning work as early
as Q1 2026.
Figure 1:
Location of Magna's Existing Properties, Location of Levack Mine and Key Sudbury
Infrastructure.
To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/8002/274933_674abd1ab4c4f937_002full.jpg
Table 1: Levack Mineral Resource Estimate
1
- Indicated Category, August 31, 2025
Deposit
Type
Category
Cut-off
Grade
Short
Tons
Metric
Tonnes
Cu
%
Ni
%
Co
%
Pt
(g/tonne)
Pd
(g/tonne)
Au
(g/tonne)
Ag
(g/tonne)
CuEq
%
Contact
Indicated
2.00%
CuEq
6,535,000
5,928,000
0.89
1.41
0.05
0.46
0.56
0.07
0.99
3.18
Footwall
Indicated
2.50%
CuEq
197,000
178,000
9.06
2.37
0.02
3.60
6.58
1.56
34.15
15.52
Total
Indicated
6,732,000
6,106,000
1.13
1.44
0.04
0.56
0.74
0.11
1.95
3.54
Table 2: Levack Mineral Resource Estimate
1
- Inferred Category, August 31, 2025
Deposit
Type
Category
Cut-off
Grade
Short
Tons
Metric
Tonnes
Cu
%
Ni
%
Co
%
Pt
(g/tonne)
Pd
(g/tonne)
Au
(g/tonne)
Ag
(g/tonne)
CuEq
%
Contact
Inferred
2.00%
CuEq
5,288,000
4,797,000
0.87
1.46
0.04
0.39
0.40
0.05
0.68
3.15
Footwall
Inferred
2.50%
CuEq
406,000
368,000
5.42
0.75
0.01
2.91
5.40
1.53
21.00
9.35
Total
Inferred
5,694,000
5,165,000
1.19
1.41
0.04
0.57
0.76
0.16
2.13
3.59
Table 3: Levack Mineral Resource Estimate
1
- Footwall Zones, August 31, 2025
Deposit
Type
Zone
Category
Cut-off
Grade
Short
Tons
Metric
Tonnes
Cu
%
Ni
%
Co
%
Pt
(g/tonne)
Pd
(g/tonne)
Au
(g/tonne)
Ag
(g/tonne)
CuEq
%
Footwall
Keel
Indicated
2.50%
CuEq
-
-
Footwall
Morrison
Indicated
2.50%
CuEq
197,000
178,000
9.06
2.37
0.02
3.60
6.58
1.56
34.15
15.52
Footwall
No.3 FW
Indicated
2.50%
CuEq
-
-
Total
Indicated
2.50%
CuEq
197,000
178,000
9.06
2.37
0.02
3.60
6.58
1.56
34.15
15.52
Footwall
Keel
Inferred
2.50%
CuEq
229,000
208,000
4.36
0.48
0.01
1.41
1.88
1.10
17.74
6.44
Footwall
Morrison
Inferred
2.50%
CuEq
93,000
85,000
8.83
1.47
0.01
2.16
4.87
1.20
20.67
12.88
Footwall
No.3 FW
Inferred
2.50%
CuEq
83,000
76,000
4.49
0.68
0.01
7.86
15.66
3.08
30.32
13.36
Total
Inferred
2.50%
CuEq
406,000
368,000
5.42
0.75
0.01
2.91
5.40
1.53
21.00
9.35
Table 4: Levack Mineral Resource Estimate
1
, Sensitivity to Cut-off Grade, August 31, 2025
Cut-off
Grade
Type
Category
Short
Tons
Metric
Tonnes
Cu
%
Ni
%
Co
%
Pt
(g/tonne)
Pd
(g/tonne)
Au
(g/tonne)
Ag
(g/tonne)
CuEq
%
1.50%
CuEq
Contact
Indicated
9,767,000
8,861,000
0.75
1.20
0.04
0.40
0.49
0.06
0.88
2.70
1.75%
CuEq
Contact
Indicated
7,951,000
7,213,000
0.82
1.31
0.04
0.43
0.53
0.06
0.93
2.95
2.00%
CuEq
Contact
Indicated
6,535,000
5,928,000
0.89
1.41
0.05
0.46
0.56
0.07
0.99
3.18
2.25%
CuEq
Contact
Indicated
5,348,000
4,852,000
0.97
1.52
0.05
0.49
0.60
0.07
1.04
3.42
2.50%
CuEq
Contact
Indicated
4,350,000
3,946,000
1.04
1.62
0.05
0.52
0.63
0.08
1.10
3.66
2.00%
CuEq
Footwall
Indicated
200,000
181,000
8.94
2.34
0.02
3.55
6.48
1.53
33.74
15.30
2.25%
CuEq
Footwall
Indicated
198,000
180,000
9.00
2.35
0.02
3.57
6.53
1.55
33.94
15.40
2.50%
CuEq
Footwall
Indicated
197,000
178,000
9.06
2.37
0.02
3.60
6.58
1.56
34.15
15.52
2.75%
CuEq
Footwall
Indicated
195,000
177,000
9.13
2.38
0.02
3.63
6.63
1.57
34.37
15.63
3.00%
CuEq
Footwall
Indicated
193,000
175,000
9.21
2.40
0.02
3.66
6.69
1.58
34.60
15.76
Cut-off
Grade
Type
Category
Short
Tons
Metric
Tonnes
Cu
%
Ni
%
Co
%
Pt
(g/tonne)
Pd
(g/tonne)
Au
(g/tonne)
Ag
(g/tonne)
CuEq
%
1.50%
CuEq
Contact
Inferred
7,625,000
6,917,000
0.75
1.25
0.04
0.34
0.35
0.05
0.70
2.72
1.75%
CuEq
Contact
Inferred
6,384,000
5,791,000
0.82
1.35
0.04
0.36
0.38
0.05
0.70
2.93
2.00%
CuEq
Contact
Inferred
5,288,000
4,797,000
0.87
1.46
0.04
0.39
0.40
0.05
0.68
3.15
2.25%
CuEq
Contact
Inferred
4,378,000
3,971,000
0.93
1.56
0.05
0.42
0.43
0.06
0.70
3.36
2.50%
CuEq
Contact
Inferred
3,498,000
3,173,000
1.01
1.66
0.05
0.46
0.47
0.06
0.75
3.61
2.00%
CuEq
Footwall
Inferred
448,000
406,000
5.01
0.69
0.01
2.75
5.02
1.42
19.84
8.68
2.25%
CuEq
Footwall
Inferred
425,000
386,000
5.23
0.72
0.01
2.83
5.22
1.48
20.45
9.03
2.50%
CuEq
Footwall
Inferred
406,000
368,000
5.42
0.75
0.01
2.91
5.40
1.53
21.00
9.35
2.75%
CuEq
Footwall
Inferred
387,000
352,000
5.60
0.77
0.01
3.00
5.60
1.58
21.58
9.67
3.00%
CuEq
Footwall
Inferred
364,000
330,000
5.86
0.80
0.01
3.13
5.86
1.65
22.39
10.10
1
Footnotes
to the Levack Mineral Resource Estimate
1
.
The effective date of the Levack Mine Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) is August 31, 2025. This is the close out date for the final mineral
resource models and mine out models (as-builts)
2
.
The mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 2.00% CuEq for Contact deposits and 2.50% CuEq for Footwall deposits. Values
in this table reported above and below the cut-off grades should not be misconstrued with a Mineral Resource Statement. The values are
only presented to show the sensitivity of the block model estimates to the selection of cut-off grade.
3
.
CuEq is calculated using metal prices of $4.50/lb Cu, $7.31/lb Ni, $15.00/lb Co, $1,291/oz Pt, $1,031/oz Pd ,$3,324/oz Au, and $37.40/oz
Ag. Metal recoveries considered are 91% for Cu, 85% for Ni, 68% for Co, 64% for Pt, 69.5% for Pd, 70.5% for Au, and 70% for Ag
4
.
The mineral resource was estimated by Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo. of Orix Geoscience Inc. and is an independent Qualified Person as
defined by NI 43-101. A site visit was conducted on July 9
th
, 2025.
5
.
The classification of the current Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) into Indicated and Inferred mineral resources is consistent with
current 2014 CIM Definition Standards - For Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves.
6
.
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate and numbers may not add due to rounding.
7
.
The mineral resources are presented undiluted and in situ, constrained by diamond drillhole information and previous underground
geological mapping, and are considered to have reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The mineral resource is
exclusive of mined out material. The drillhole database includes data from 10,525 surface and underground diamond drill holes completed
between 1911 and 2025. The drilling totals 4,382,756 ft (1,335,864 m) including 341,394 assay intervals representing 1,393,512 ft (424,742
m) of data.
8
.
Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower
level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably
expected that most Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.
9
.
Grades for Ni, Cu, Co, Pt, Pd, Au, and Ag are estimated for each mineralization domain using ~2.0 ft (0.61 m), 2.5 ft (0.76 m), or 5.0 ft
(1.52 m) composites assigned to that domain, depending on the style of mineralization. To generate grade within the blocks, the inverse
distance squared (ID2) interpolation method was used for all domains. Samples were capped before compositing when required.
10
.
Reliable density measurements were available for 21% of the samples in the drillhole database (71,712 measured samples) allowing for
zone-specific Ni and Cu-based regression formulas to be created and applied to estimate missing densities.
Figure 2:
Levack Mine Underground Development and Mineralized Zones.
Oblique 3D View
Looking Northwest.
To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/8002/274933_674abd1ab4c4f937_007full.jpg
Figure 3:
Levack Mine Underground Development and Mineralized Zones.
Oblique 3D View
Looking Southeast.
To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/8002/274933_674abd1ab4c4f937_008full.jpg
The technical report in support of the above noted mineral resource estimates will be filed by Magna
within 45 days of this press release.
Announcement of Filing of Q3 Financials and Conference Call
The Company is scheduled to release its Q3 2025 financial results and MD&A after the market close on
Tuesday November 25, 2025.
In addition, the Company will be holding a conference call and webcast on
Wednesday November 26, 2025 at 8:00am EST.
To register for the conference call, please use the following link to obtain a Dial-in Number and PIN:
https://register-conf.media-server.com/register/BIfc83dc419540403380a832570e704494
To attend the webcast in listen-only mode, please use the following link:
https://edge.media-
server.com/mmc/p/xxh36742
Qualified Person for Technical Information
The scientific and technical information in this press release has been reviewed and approved by both
Jonathan Cirelli, P.Geo, Senior Geologist of Orix Geoscience Inc., independent of the Company, and
David King, M.Sc., P.Geo, Senior Vice President, Exploration and Geoscience for the Company. Both
Mr. Cirelli and Mr. King are qualified persons under National Instrument 43-101.
Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Statements
All statements, other than statements of historical fact, contained or incorporated by reference in this
press release constitute "forward-looking statements" and "forward-looking information" (collectively,
"forward-looking statements") within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Generally, these forward-
looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as "may", "might",
"potential", "expect", "anticipate", "estimate", "believe", "could", "should", "would", "will", "continue",
"intend", "plan", "forecast", "prospective", "significant" or other similar words or phrases or variations
thereof. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of assumptions that, while
considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to business, market, economic, technical
and other risks, uncertainties and contingencies that may cause actual results, performance or
achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements,
including risks and uncertainties relating to the failure of additional drilling to support assumptions,
expectations or estimates of potential mineralization, metal tonnes or grade, such as those related to the
Morrison Deposit, the failure of additional drilling to support additional expansion or delineation of
estimated resources, the failure of additional drilling to support production planning, the lack of
availability of drill rigs to implement exploration or other programs or the failure to proceed as quickly as
planned with additional exploration or other drilling, continued delays for assay results, the failure to
proceed as quickly as planned with or to complete additional development as anticipated, such as the
development of a ramp from the surface of, or recommissioning of the hoisting plant at, the Levack Mine,
the failure to proceed as quickly as planned with a restart of mining at the Levack Mine, assuming there
will be any restart, and other risks disclosed in the Company's annual management discussion and
analysis, available on the SEDAR+ website (at:
www.sedarplus.ca
). Although the Company has
attempted to identify important risks, uncertainties, contingencies and factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements, there can be
no certainty or assurance that the Company has accurately or adequately captured, accounted for or
disclosed all such risks, uncertainties, contingencies or factors. Readers should place no reliance on
forward-looking statements as actual results, performance or achievements may be materially different
from those expressed or implied by such statements. Resource exploration and development, and
mining operations, are highly speculative, characterized by several significant risks, which even a
combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge will not eliminate. Forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date they are made. The Company does not undertake to update any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future events or otherwise, except
in accordance with applicable securities laws.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the
policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press
release.
About Magna Mining Inc.
Magna Mining Inc.
is a producing mining company with a strong portfolio of copper, nickel, and
platinum group metals (PGM) assets located in the world-class Sudbury mining district of Ontario,
Canada. The Company's primary asset is the
McCreedy West Mine
, currently in production, supported
by a pipeline of highly prospective past-producing properties including
Levack
,
Crean Hill
,
Podolsky
,
and
Shakespeare
.
Magna Mining is strategically positioned to unlock long-term shareholder value through continued
production, exploration upside, and near-term development opportunities across its asset base.
Additional corporate and project information is available at
www.magnamining.com
and through the
Company's public filings on the SEDAR+ website at
www.sedarplus.ca
.
For further information, please contact:
Jason Jessup
Chief Executive Officer
or
Paul Fowler, CFA
Executive Vice President
705-482-9667
Email:
To view the source version of this press release, please visit
https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/274933