Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

NICU.V ·

Magna Mining Announces Initial Mineral Resource Estimate on the Denison Project Containing a Total Indicated Mineral Resource of over 31 Million Tonnes

Resource Estimates Mergers & Acquisitions

Magna Mining Announces Initial Mineral

Resource Estimate on the Denison Project

Containing a Total Indicated Mineral Resource

of over 31 Million Tonnes

Sudbury, Ontario--(Newsfile Corp. - November 7, 2022) - Magna Mining Inc (TSXV: NICU) (the

"Company") is pleased to announce the initial Mineral Resource Estimate for the Denison Project which

includes the past producing Crean Hill NiCu-PGE Mine in Sudbury, Ontario.

The Company recently announced the closing of the acquisition of Lonmin Canada Inc. ("Loncan"), which

owns the Denison Project. The Denison Project is centered on the past producing Crean Hill Mine in the

Sudbury Basin, which was a significant producer of Ni-Cu-Pt-Pd-Au over a period spanning more than

80 years. Historical production at Crean Hill was focused on the contact-style nickel-copper

mineralization. More recent exploration on the property by Loncan has demonstrated the potential for

high grade Pt-Pd-Au mineralization in the footwall of the contact nickel zones.

Denison Mineral Resource Estimate Highlights

Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate:

Million

Tonnes

Ni (%)

Cu (%)

Co (%)

Pt (g/t)

Pd (g/t)

Au (g/t)

NiEq (%)*

OPEN PIT

16.8

0.53

0.49

0.02

0.48

0.37

0.25

1.08

UNDERGROUND

14.5

0.96

0.84

0.03

0.88

1.02

0.54

2.07

Contained metal (Indicated category) of 500M lbs nickel, 450M lbs copper, and 1.7M oz

platinum + palladium + gold

High grade underground Indicated resource of 14.5 M tonnes at 2.07 % nickel equivalent*

Resource starts at surface and could be amenable to open pit mining as well as near

surface underground mining methods

The total indicated resource incorporates mineralization from the contact style Ni-Cu

dominated zones, as well as the Pt-Pd-Au rich, low sulphide footwall mineralization

Mineralization is well defined and primarily in the Indicated category from surface to

approximately 1200 m below surface

*

See notes on Mineral Resource assumptions, at the end of this release, including metal prices and

recoveries used.

Magna Mining CEO, Jason Jessup, commented: "We believe that this Mineral Resource Estimate

clearly demonstrates that the Denison Project has considerable remaining mineralization, and has the

potential to, once again, become a significant producing mine.

The proximity of our other project, the

permitted mine and mill site at Shakespeare, means that this asset is a natural fit for our company and

gives us a unique advantage in exploring and developing Crean Hill.

Now that the acquisition has closed,

we plan to commence our maiden exploration program at Crean Hill and commission a new technical

study to demonstrate the potential synergies between Crean Hill and Shakespeare."

Figure 1: Map Showing Location of Denison in Relation to Shakespeare.

To view an enhanced version of Figure 1, please visit:

https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/8002/143392_c0ffece604c1eb39_003full.jpg

Figure 2: Map Showing the Denison Property and Local Geology. Source: WSP 2020.

To view an enhanced version of Figure 2, please visit:

https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/8002/143392_c0ffece604c1eb39_004full.jpg

Mineral Resources

The Mineral Resources at Denison were estimated by SGS Geological Services and are summarized in

Table 1. Sensitivity to cut-off grade is illustrated in Table 2, and contained metal summarized in Table 3.

Mineral Resources include near surface mineralization with potential for open pit mining, as well as

higher grade mineralization amenable to conventional underground mining methods (Figure 3). The full

technical report, which is being prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 -

Standards of

Disclosure for Mineral Projects

("NI 43-101") will be available on SEDAR (

www.sedar.com

) under the

Company's issuer profile within 45 days from this news release.

Table 1: Denison Mineral Resources as at August 19, 2022

(please

see notes on Mineral Resource

assumptions at the end of this release, including metal prices and recoveries used).

(A)

Open Pit Resources

Cut-off

Grade

Tonnes

Ni %

Cu %

Co %

Pt g/t

Pd g/t

Au g/t

NiEq %

Indicated

0.3% NiEq

16,760,000

0.53

0.49

0.02

0.48

0.37

0.25

1.08

Inferred

0.3% NiEq

434,000

0.43

0.49

0.02

0.29

0.14

0.07

0.82​

(B)

Underground Resources

Cut-off

Grade

Tonnes

Ni %

Cu %

Co %

Pt g/t

Pd g/t

Au g/t

NiEq %

Indicated

1.1% NiEq

14,531,000

0.96

0.84

0.03

0.88

1.02

0.54

2.07

Inferred

1.1% NiEq

1,170,000

0.61

0.46

0.02

0.64

1.09

0.21

1.41​

Table 2: Denison Mineral Resources, Sensitivity to Cut-off Grade. Open Pit Resources (A) and

Underground Resources (B).

(A)

Open Pit Resources

Cut-off Grade

NiEq (%)

Tonnes

Ni%

Cu%

Co%

Pt g/t

Pd g/t

Au g/t

Indicated

0.2

17,241,000

0.52

0.48

0.02

0.47

0.36

0.25

0.3

16,760,000

0.53

0.49

0.02

0.48

0.37

0.25

0.4

16,080,000

0.55

0.5

0.02

0.49

0.38

0.26

0.5

14,977,000

0.57

0.52

0.02

0.5

0.39

0.27

0.6

13,528,000

0.61

0.55

0.02

0.53

0.42

0.28

0.8

9,961,000

0.7

0.62

0.02

0.62

0.5

0.32

Inferred

0.2

440,000

0.43

0.48

0.02

0.28

0.14

0.07

0.3

434,000

0.43

0.49

0.02

0.29

0.14

0.07

0.4

410,000

0.45

0.51

0.02

0.3

0.15

0.08

0.5

326,000

0.49

0.58

0.02

0.29

0.19

0.1

0.6

283,000

0.53

0.62

0.02

0.33

0.22

0.11

0.8

192,000

0.61

0.7

0.02

0.32

0.16

0.16​

(B)

Underground Resources

Cut-off Grade

NiEq (%)

Tonnes

Ni%

Cu%

Co%

Pt g/t

Pd g/t

Au g/t

Indicated

0.8

21,678,000

0.78

0.7

0.03

0.73

0.82

0.45

1

16,789,000

0.89

0.79

0.03

0.82

0.94

0.51

1.1

14,531,000

0.96

0.84

0.03

0.88

1.02

0.54

1.2

12,581,000

1.02

0.9

0.03

0.94

1.1

0.58

1.3

10,909,000

1.09

0.95

0.04

1.01

1.18

0.61

1.5

8,278,000

1.23

1.06

0.04

1.14

1.37

0.68

Inferred

0.8

4,039,000

0.5

0.41

0.02

0.44

0.64

0.15

1

1,779,000

0.58

0.47

0.02

0.56

0.89

0.19

1.1

1,170,000

0.61

0.46

0.02

0.64

1.09

0.21

1.2

754,000

0.67

0.5

0.02

0.62

1.32

0.21

1.3

539,000

0.73

0.51

0.02

0.63

1.44

0.23

1.5

340,000

0.82

0.56

0.03

0.73

1.65

0.18​

(1)

In-pit Mineral Resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.3% NiEq within a conceptual pit shell and underground (below-pit) Mineral

Resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 1.1% NiEq from the bottom of the conceptual pit shell. Values in this table reported above and below

the cut-off grades should not be misconstrued with a Mineral Resource Statement. The values are only presented to show the sensitivity of the

block model estimates to the selection of cut-off grade. All values are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate and numbers may

not add due to rounding.

(2)

NiEq Cut- off grades are based on metal prices of $8.50/lb Ni, $3.75/lb Cu, $22.00/lb Co, $1000/oz Pt, $2000/oz Pd and $1,750/oz Au and

consider metal recoveries of 78% for Ni, 95.5% for copper, 56% for Co, 69.2% for Pt, 68% for Pd and 67.7% for Au.

(3)

All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate. Composites have been capped where appropriate.

Table 3: Denison Mineral Resources, Contained Metal in Open Pit Resources (A) and

Underground Resources (B).

(A)

Open Pit Resources

Cut-off Grade

Category

Tonnes

Ni lbs

(Millions)

Cu lbs (Millions)

Co lbs (Millions)

Pt ozs

(Thousands)

Pd ozs

(Thousands)

Au ozs

(Thousands)

0.3% NiEq

Indicated

16,760,000

195.78

181

7.39

258.65

199.38

134.71

0.3% NiEq

Inferred

434,000

4.11

4.69

0.19

4.05

1.95

0.98

(B)

Underground Resources

Cut-off Grade

Category

Tonnes

Ni lbs

(Millions)

Cu lbs (Millions)

Co lbs (Millions)

Pt ozs (Thousands)

Pd ozs (Thousands)

Au ozs (Thousands)

1.1% NiEq

Indicated

14,531,000

307.45

269.02

9.61

411.12

476.53

252.28

1.1% NiEq

Inferred

1,170,000

15.73

11.86

0.52

24.07

41.00

7.9​0

Figure 3: Denison Project Longitudinal Section Showing Current Open Pit and Underground

Mineral Resource Blocks Coloured by Nickel Equivalent Grade.

(As of August 19, 2022)

To view an enhanced version of Figure 3, please visit:

https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/8002/143392_c0ffece604c1eb39_011full.jpg

Figure 4: Denison Project Vertical Section Looking West, Showing the 109 FW Zone and

Diamond Drilling Composites Greater than 0.8% Ni Equivalent over Greater than 10 feet Core

Length. Selected Loncan Diamond Drillhole Intercepts are Highlighted. Section Location Shown

on Figure 4.

To view an enhanced version of Figure 4, please visit:

https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/8002/143392_c0ffece604c1eb39_012full.jpg

Notes on Mineral Resource Assumptions:

(1)

The classification of the current Mineral Resource Estimate into Indicated and Inferred is consistent with current 2014 CIM Definition

Standards - For Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves.

(2)

All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate

and numbers may not add due to rounding.

(3)

All Resources are presented undiluted and in situ, constrained by continuous 3D wireframe models, and are considered to have reasonable

prospects for eventual economic extraction.

(4)

Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower

level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected

that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.

(5)

It is envisioned that parts of the Denison deposit may be mined using open pit mining methods. In-pit mineral resources are reported at a cut-

off grade of 0.3 % NiEq within a conceptual pit shell.

(6)

The results from the pit optimization are used solely for the purpose of testing the "reasonable prospects for economic extraction" by an open

pit and do not represent an attempt to estimate mineral reserves. There are no mineral reserves on the Property. The results are used as a guide

to assist in the preparation of a Mineral Resource statement and to select an appropriate resource reporting cut-off grade.

(7)

Underground (below-pit) Mineral Resources are estimated from the bottom of the pit and are reported at a base case cut-off grade of 1.1 %

NiEq. The underground Mineral Resource grade blocks were quantified above the base case cut-off grade, below the constraining pit shell and

within the constraining mineralized wireframes. At this base case cut-off grade the deposit shows good deposit continuity with limited orphaned

blocks. Any orphaned blocks are connected within the models by lower grade blocks.

(8)

Based on the size, shape, location and orientation of the Denison deposit, it is envisioned that the deposit may be mined using longhole open

stoping (a bulk mining method that has long been utilized in the Sudbury region).

(9)

High grade capping was done on 10 ft (3.05 m) composite data.

(10)

Bulk density values were determined based on physical test work from each deposit model and waste model.

(11)

NiEq cut-off grades are based on metal prices of $8.50/lb Ni, $3.75/lb Cu, $22.00/lb Co, $1000/oz Pt, $2000/oz Pd and $1,750/oz Au and

considers metal recoveries of 78% for Ni, 95.5% for copper, 56% for Co, 69.2% for Pt, 68% for Pd and 67.7% for Au.

(12)

The in-pit base case cut-off grade of 0.3% NiEq considers a mining cost of US$2.50/t rock and processing, treatment and refining,

transportation and G&A cost of US$38.00/t mineralized material, and an overall pit slope of 55 degrees. The below-pit base case cut-off grade of

1.1 % NiEq considers a mining cost of US$80.00/t rock and processing, treatment and refining, transportation and G&A cost of US$42.50/t

mineralized material.

(13)

The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or

other relevant issues.

Qualified Person

The Denison project 2022 Mineral Resource Estimate was prepared by Allan Armitage, Ph.D., P.Geo.,

of SGS Geological Services, an independent Qualified Person, in accordance with the guidelines of the

Canadian Securities Administrators' NI 43-101, with an effective date of August 19th, 2022.

Armitage

conducted a site visit to the property on May 25 - May 26, 2022.

Certain technical information in this press release has been reviewed and approved by David King,

M.Sc., P.Geo. Mr. King is the Senior Vice President, Technical Services for Magna Mining Inc. and is a

qualified person under NI 43-101.

About Magna Mining Inc.

Magna Mining is an exploration and development company focused on nickel, copper and PGM projects

in the Sudbury Region of Ontario, Canada. The Company has two advanced assets in the Sudbury

region;

the past producing Shakespeare Mine which has major permits for the construction of a 4500

tonne per day open pit mine, processing plant and tailings storage facility and the past producing Crean

Hill Mine. Additional information about the Company is available on SEDAR (

www.sedar.com

) and on

the Company's website (

www.magnamining.com

).

For further information, please contact:

Jason Jessup

Chief Executive Officer

or

Paul Fowler, CFA

Senior Vice President

Email:

[email protected]

Cautionary Statement

This press release contains certain forward-looking information or forward-looking statements as

defined in applicable securities laws. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts and are

subject to several risks and uncertainties beyond the Company's control, including statements

regarding the potential production at the Shakespeare Mine and the Denison Mine the economic and

operational potential of the Shakespeare Mine and the Denison Mine, potential acquisitions, plans to

complete exploration programs, potential mineralization, exploration results and statements regarding

beliefs, plans, expectations, or intentions of the Company. Resource exploration and development is

highly speculative, characterized by several significant risks, which even a combination of careful

evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. All forward-looking statements herein are

qualified by this cautionary statement. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on

forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or otherwise

revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information or future events or

otherwise, except as may be required by law.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the

policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this

press release.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit

https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/143392