Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

NICN.V ·

NiCAN Doubles Land Position at the Pipy Project in Thompson, Manitoba

Mergers & Acquisitions Property Options & Staking

NiCAN Limited

390 Bay St, Suite 700A

Toronto, ON, M5H 2M8

NiCAN Doubles Land Position at the Pipy Project in Thompson, Manitoba

Toronto, Ontario – September 6, 2022 – NiCAN Limited (“NiCAN” or the “Company”) (TSX-V:NICN) has

expanded its land position at its Pipy Project (“Pipy”) along the Thompson Nickel Belt, now totaling over

24 km2 of prospective ground (Figure 1). The new claims , known as Pipy North, cover an area of 11. 84

km2, and are contiguous with Vale’s property to the south.

Highlights:

• Doubled land position at the Pipy project, now totaling over 24 km2

• Targeting high grade nickel sulphide mineralization similar to the Thompson T1 and T3 mines

• Initial work plan includes airborne electromagnetic survey followed by a diamond drilling program

• Prospective Pipe Formation on Pipy South has been defined via historical drilling and recently

completed airborne magnetic surveys

Figure 1: NiCAN’s Land Position at the Pipy Project in Thompson Manitoba

2

The newly acquired Pipy North claims are interpreted to be underlain by the Pipe Formation, confirmed

by available aeromagnetic and government geological mapping . The Pipe Formation is known to host all

the nickel deposits in the Thompson area. A folded anticlinal structure is interpreted along with iron

formation of the Pipe Formation and associated ultramafic rocks. Pipy North is along strike from Pipy

South (Figure 2 ) and sits in the same structural stratigraphic position as Vale’s formerly producing

Birchtree Mine, 18 km to the southwest along strike.

Figure 2: Geological Structure of the Pipy Land Package

Pipy South Claim Group

The two Pipy South claim areas cover 13 km2 and are 12 km north of the Thompson Mine and adjacent to

the Mystery Lake South ultramafic hosted deposit. The property is underlain by an 8 km long synclinal

structure exposing Ospwagan Group sediments including the critical Pipe Formation that host the nickel

deposits in the Thompson Nickel Belt.

The recently acquired high-resolution UAV airborne magnetic survey was instrumental in interpreting the

geology and a new structural model was developed from the three-dimensional inverted magnetic data.

The magnetic data revealed the syncline comprised of two synclines on the east and west edges with an

3

anticline in the middle. The various fold closures associated with the synclines and anticlines are an ideal

location to structurally concentrate massive sulphides (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Similar Stratigraphy and Structural Setting to the Thompson Deposit – Pipy South vs

Thompson T1 and T3 Deposits

4

Pipy South was explored in the late 1950s, through the early 1970s. There are 71 historical drill holes, 48

of which were drilled by INCO Limited (“INCO”) in 1967 and 1968. Much of the early drilling was shallow

and appears to be testing conductors. The assessment files only contain summary logs for the 1967 INCO

drilling with more detailed logs for 9 of the 12 drill holes drilled in 1968. Importantly, six drill holes mention

significant intervals of disseminated sulphides , including short intervals of massive sulph ides or sulphide

breccia and three drill holes mention pentlandite. Several drill holes intersected intervals of ultramafic

rock. None of the INCO drill logs included any assay information.

The Company has identified several drill targets as a result of th e historical drilling data and the new

structural model of Pipy South.

Pipy North Claim Group

The newly acquired ground covers an area of 11.84 km2 of stratigraphy over a folded strike length of 6 km

similar to that which hosts the world-class Thompson T1 and T3 deposits located 28 km to the southwest.

Historical drilling of 1,720 metres in nine drill holes by I NCO in 1967 and 19 68 and one drill hole by

Falconbridge Limited in 2001 intersected Pipe Formation sulphide iron formation and ultramafic

intrusions, the key ingredients for nickel deposit formation in the Thompson Nickel Belt.

Three of the INCO drill holes cut significant lengths of ultramafic rocks from 50 metres to 100 metres in

core length. The INCO drill logs are summary logs, which do not provide detailed descriptions of lithology,

mineralization, or assay data. The area has been flown by airborne geophysical surveys, both magnetic

and electromagnetic, also covered locally by HLEM ground geophysics.

The historical geophysical testing systems were not as powerful as the technology available today and

predate recent advances in 3D modelling and inversions. NiCAN intends to leverage all the advantages of

recent geophysical systems, 3D modelling softwa re, in house expertise, and recent research on the

Thompson Nickel Belt to model a comprehensive structural and geological representation to guide future

drilling.

Qualified Person

Mr. Stan Clemmer, P.Geo, a consultant to NiCAN, who is a qualified person under National Instrument

43-101 – Standards of Disclosure of Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) has reviewed and approved the

scientific and technical information in this press release.

About NiCAN

NiCAN Limited is a mineral exploration company, trading under the symbol “NICN” on the TSX -V. The

Company is actively exploring two nickel projects, both located in well-established mining jurisdictions in

Manitoba, Canada.

Contact Information:

Brad Humphrey Sandy Noyes

President and CEO Investor Relations & Communications

416.565.4007 [email protected]

[email protected]

5

www.nicanltd.com

To receive news releases by e-mail, please register using the NiCAN website at www.nicanltd.com.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

The information contained herein contains certain “forward -looking information” under applicable

securities laws concerning the proposed financing, business, operations and financial performance and

condition of NiCAN Limited. Forward -looking in formation includes, but is not limited to, the size and

timing of the drill program, results of the drill program, NiCAN’s ability to identify mineralization similar

to that found in prior drill holes, the benefits and the potential of the properties of the C ompany; future

commodity prices (including in relation to NiEq calculations); drilling and other exploration potential;

costs; and permitting. Forward -looking information may be characterized by words such as “plan,”

“expect,” “project,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate”, “estimate” and other similar words, or statements

that certain events or conditions “may” or “will” occur. Forward-looking information is based on the

opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made and are based on a number

of assumptions and subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual

events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking information. Many of

these assumptions are based o n factors and events that are not within the control of the C ompany and

there is no assurance they will prove to be correct. Factors that could cause actual results to vary

materially from results anticipated by such forward -looking information includes ch anges in market

conditions, fluctuating metal prices and currency exchange rates, the possibility of project cost overruns

or unanticipated costs and expenses and permitting disputes and/or delays. Although the C ompany has

attempted to identify important f actors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ

materially from those described in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause

actions, events or results not to be anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that

forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ

materially from those anticipated in such statements. The Co mpany undertakes no obligation to update

forward-looking information if ci rcumstances or management’s estimates or opinions should change

except as required by applicable securities laws. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on

forward-looking information.

Neither TSX-V nor its Regulation Services Provider (as tha t term is defined in policies of the TSX -V) accepts

responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.