Friday, September 18, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Friday, September 18, 2026 Admin

NEXG.V ·

NexGold Initiates a 25,000-metre Infill Diamond Drill Program at the Goliath Gold Complex, Ontario

Exploration Programs

Page 1 of 6

N

EWS RELEASE TSXV: NEXG | OTCQX: NXGCF January 28, 2026

NexGold Initiates a 25,000-metre Infill Diamond Drill Program

at the Goliath Gold Complex, Ontario

TORONTO, January 28, 2026 – NexGold Mining Corp. (TSXV: NEXG; OTCQX: NXGCF) (“NexGold”

or the “Company”) is pleased to announce it has commenced diamond drilling at the Company’s Goliath

Gold Complex in Ontario (“Goliath Complex”) ( Figure 1). The drill program, which comprises up to

25,000 metres, is focused on the Goldlund Deposit and is designed to infill and potentially expand open-

pit Mineral Resources (Figure 2). This drill program will primarily be focused on the deeper portions of

the Goldlund open- pit Mineral Resource where the Company would like to increase drill density and

further drill test high-grade plunging shoots to test their geological continuity . The d rill p rogram was

initiated late in 2025 and is anticipated to continue throughout 2026.

Kevin Bullock, President and CEO, stated: “We expect 2026 will be a transformational year for NexGold

as we advance towards a final investment decision at the permitted open pit Goldboro Gold Project in

Nova Scotia. While that work progresses, we will continue our focus on creating value for shareholders,

stakeholders and Rightsholders , which includes the opportunity to optimiz e the Goliath Complex in

Ontario. The current drill program is consistent with project optimization and value creation, which will

also include continued engagement with First Nations communities, advancement of permitting activities,

as well as feasibility and other technical studies. We anticipate regular updates on the drill program

throughout the year as drill results are available.”

The Goliath Complex, comprised of the Goliath, Goldlund and Miller D eposits, includes Proven &

Probable Mineral Reserve s of 1,267,000 ounces of gold and 1,724,000 ounces of silver (30,319,000

tonnes at a grade of 1.30 g/t gold and 1.77 g/t silver), including Probable Reserves of 621,000 ounces of

gold (16,256,000 tonnes at a grade of 1.19 g/t gold) at Goldlund (Table 1). These Mineral Reserves are

based on a Mineral Resource Estimate that includes 1,784,500 ounces of gold and 2,819,100 ounces of

silver in combined Measured and Indicated open-pit Mineral Resources (64,769,000 tonnes grading 0.86

g/t gold and 2.99 g/t silver), including the Goldlund Deposit hosting 911,000 ounces of gold in Measured

and Indicated open-p it Mineral Resources (33,353,000 tonnes at 0.85 g/t gold) (Tables 2-5). In

addition, the Goldlund open-pit includes an Inferred Mineral Resource of 680,200 ounces of gold

(28,833,000 tonnes grading 0.73 g/t gold) (Table 4).

The Goliath Complex Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resource Estimate was published in a technical

report entitled “Goliath Gold Complex – NI 43-101 Technical Report and Prefeasibility Study” dated

March 27, 2023 (with an effective date of February 22, 2023) and was prepared by Ausenco Engineering

Canada Inc. The technical report is available under the Company’s profile on SEDAR +

at www.sedarplus.ca and on the Company’s website at www.NexGold.com.

Page 2 of 6

Figure 1. Map showing the Goliath Complex in northwestern Ontario

and the location of the Goldlund Deposit.

Page 3 of 6

Figure 2. Map showing the proposed open pits and associated Mineral Reserve

at the Goldlund Deposit, which includes the areas of drilling planned for 2026.

Table 1: Goliath Gold Complex Mineral Reserve

Classification Quantity

(kt)

Au

(g/t)

Au

(koz)

Ag

(g/t)

Ag

(koz)

Open Pit – Goliath

Proven 3,969 1.05 134 3.22 410

Probable 5,580 0.67 119 2.20 395

Proven & Probable 9,549 0.83 254 2.62 805

Open Pit – Goldlund

Proven - - - - -

Probable 16,256 1.19 621 - -

Proven & Probable 16,256 1.19 621 - -

Open Pit – Miller

Proven - - - - -

Probable 738 1.03 24 - -

Proven & Probable 738 1.03 24 - -

Underground – Goliath

Proven 596 3.96 76 16.73 321

Probable 3,180 2.85 292 5.85 598

Proven & Probable 3,776 3.03 368 7.56 918

Total

Proven 4,565 1.43 210 4.98 731

Probable 25,754 1.28 1,057 1.20 993

Proven & Probable 30,319 1.30 1,267 1.77 1,724

Notes: 1. Mineral reserves with an effective date of December 31, 2022 are founded on and included within the mineral resource estimates,

with an effective date of January 17, 2022. 2. Mineral reserves were developed in accordance with CIM Definition Standards (2014). 3. Open

pit mineral reserves incorporate 10%, 7% and 9% dilution for Goliath, Goldlund and Miller, respectively. Open pit mineral reserves include 1%

Page 4 of 6

loss for Goliath and Miller, no losses are included for Goldlund. Goliath underground mineral reserves include 5% dilution and 0% loss for

development. For stopes at Goliath underground, the mineral reserves include 15% dilution (both downhole and uphole stopes) and 90%

(downhole) and 80% (uphole) recovery. 4. Open pit mineral reserves are reported based on open pit mining within designed pits above cut-off

values of C$15.22/t, C$16.00/t and C$23.63/t for Goliath, Goldlund and Miller, respectively. Goliath underground mineral reserves are reported

based on underground mining within designed underground stopes above a mill feed cut-off value of C$107.66/t (inclusive of 15% mining

dilution). The cut-off values are based on a gold price of US$1,550/oz Au, a silver price of US$22, transportation costs of C$5/oz Au,

payabilities of 99% Au and 97% Ag, LOM average gold recoveries of 94.2% for Goliath, 94.3% for Goldlund and 94.0% for Miller, and a silver

recovery of 60% for Goliath. 5. Underground mineral reserves following Year 13 have been removed from the LOM plan and thus are excluded

in the mineral reserve table above. Some low grade Goldlund material above cut-off is not fed to the plant and therefore not included in the

mineral reserves. 6. The Qualified Person for the open pit mineral reserve estimate is Colleen MacDougall, Peng; and the Qualified Person for

the underground mineral reserve estimate is Sean Kautzman, Peng, both are SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. employees. 7. Rounding may

result in apparent summation differences between tonnes, grade and contained metal.

Table 2: Goliath Gold Complex Mineral Resource Estimate

Goliath Gold Complex (effective January 17, 2022)

Type Classification Cut-off11 Tonnes Au (g/t) Au (Oz) Ag (g/t)10 Ag (Oz)

Open Pit

Measured 0.25 / 0.3 6,223,000 1.20 239,500 4.70 940,600

Indicated 0.25 / 0.3 58,546,000 0.82 1,545,000 2.53 1,878,500

Meas+Ind 0.25 / 0.3 64,769,000 0.86 1,784,500 2.99 2,819,100

Inferred 0.25 / 0.3 32,301,000 0.73 754,900 0.80 85,200

Underground

Measured 2.20 170,000 6.24 34,100 22.34 122,100

Indicated 2.20 2,772,000 3.59 320,000 7.08 580,800

Meas+Ind 2.20 2,942,000 3.74 354,100 8.04 702,900

Inferred 2.20 270,000 3.21 27,900 4.06 6,300

Total

Measured 6,393,000 1.33 273,600 5.17 1,062,700

Indicated 61,318,000 0.95 1,865,000 2.98 2,459,300

Meas+Ind 67,711,000 0.98 2,138,600 3.42 3,522,000

Inferred 32,571,000 0.75 782,800 0.84 91,500

Notes:

1. Mineral Resources were estimated by ordinary kriging by Dr. Gilles Arseneau, associate consultant of SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.,

Mineral Resources were prepared in accordance with NI 43- 101 and the CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Miner al

Reserves (2014) and the CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines (2019). This estimate of

Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, or other relevant

issues. Mineral Resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

2. Mineral Resource effective date January 17, 2022.

3. Goliath Open Pit Mineral Resources are reported within an optimized constraining shell at a cut-off grade of 0.25g/t gold that is based on

a gold price of US$1,700/oz, a silver price of US$23/oz, and a gold and silver processing recovery of 93.873*Au(g/t)^0.021 and 60%

respectively.

4. Goldlund Open Pit Mineral Resources are reported within an optimized constraining shell at a cut-off grade of 0.3g/t gold that is based on

a gold price of US$1,700/oz and a gold processing recovery of 90.344xAu(g/t)^0.0527.

5. Miller Open Pit Mineral Resources are reported within an optimized constraining shell at a cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t gold that is based on a

gold price of US$1,700/oz and a gold processing recovery of 93.873*Au(g/t)^0.021.

6. Goliath Underground Mineral Resources are reported inside shapes generated from Deswick Mining Stope Optimiser (DSO) at a cut -off

grade of 2.2g/t gold that is based on a gold price of US$1,700/oz, a silver price of US$23/oz, and a gold and silver processing recovery of

93.873*Au(g/t)^0.021 and 60% respectively.

7. Goldlund Underground Mineral Resources are reported inside DSO shapes at a cut-off grade of 2.2g/t gold that is based on a gold price

of US$1,700/oz and a gold processing recovery of 90.344xAu(g/t)^0.0527.

8. Gold and Silver assays were capped prior to compositing based on probability plot analysis for each individual zones. Assays were

composited to 1.5 m for Goliath, 2.0 m for Goldlund and 1.0 m for Miller.

9. Excludes unclassified mineralization located within mined out areas.

10. Silver grade and ounces are derived from the Goliath tonnage only.

11. Goliath Open Pit and Goldlund/Miller cut-off grades are 0.25g/t and 0.30g/t, respectively.

12. All figures are rounded to reflect the estimates' relative accuracy, and totals may not add correctly.

Page 5 of 6

Table 3: Goliath Deposit Mineral Resource Estimate1

Goliath (effective January 17, 2022.)

Type Classification Cut-off Tonnes Au (g/t) Au (Oz) Ag (g/t) Ag (Oz)

Open Pit

Measured 0.25 6,223,000 1.20 239,500 4.70 940,600

Indicated 0.25 23,081,000 0.75 559,400 2.53 1,878,500

Meas+Ind 0.25 29,304,000 0.85 798,900 2.99 2,819,100

Inferred 0.25 3,330,000 0.66 70,200 0.80 85,200

Underground

Measured 2.20 170,000 6.24 34,100 22.34 122,100

Indicated 2.20 2,550,000 3.55 291,000 7.08 580,800

Meas+Ind 2.20 2,720,000 3.72 325,100 8.04 702,900

Inferred 2.20 48,000 2.95 4,600 4.06 6,300

Total

Measured 6,393,000 1.33 273,600 5.17 1,062,700

Indicated 25,631,000 1.03 850,400 2.98 2,459,300

Meas+Ind 32,024,000 1.09 1,124,000 3.42 3,522,000

Inferred 3,378,000 0.69 74,800 0.84 91,500

1. Refer to the Notes on the Mineral Resource Estimate in Table 1 of this News Release

Table 4: Goldlund Deposit Mineral Resource Estimate1

Goldlund (effective January 17, 2022.)

Type Classification Cut-off Tonnes Au (g/t) Au (Oz)

Open Pit

Measured 0.30 0 0.00 0

Indicated 0.30 33,353,000 0.85 911,000

Meas+Ind 0.30 33,353,000 0.85 911,000

Inferred 0.30 28,833,000 0.73 680,200

Underground

Measured 2.20 0 0.00 0

Indicated 2.20 222,000 4.06 29,000

Meas+Ind 2.20 222,000 4.06 29,000

Inferred 2.20 222,000 3.26 23,300

Total

Measured 0 0.00 0

Indicated 33,575,000 0.87 940,000

Meas+Ind 33,575,000 0.87 940,000

Inferred 29,055,000 0.75 703,500

1. Refer to the Notes on the Mineral Resource Estimate in Table 1 of this News Release

Table 5: Miller Deposit Mineral Resource Estimate

Miller (effective January 17, 2022.)

Type Classification Cut-off Tonnes Au (g/t) Au (Oz)

Open Pit

Measured 0.30 0 0 0

Indicated 0.30 2,112,000 1.10 74,600

Meas+Ind 0.30 2,112,000 1.10 74,600

Inferred 0.30 138,000 1.01 4,500

1. Refer to the Notes on the Mineral Resource Estimate in Table 1 of this News Release

Technical Disclosure and Qualified Persons

Paul McNeill, P.Geo., VP Exploration of NexGold, is considered a “Qualified Person” for the purposes of

National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and has reviewed and approved

the scientific and technical disclosure contained in this news release on behalf of NexGold.

About NexGold Mining Corp.

NexGold is a gold-focused company with assets in Canada and Alaska. NexGold’s Goldboro Gold Project is located in Nova

Scotia. The Goliath Gold Complex (which includes the Goliath, Goldlund and Miller deposits) is located in Northwestern Ontario.

NexGold also owns several other projects throughout Canada, including the Weebigee-Sandy Lake Gold Project JV, and

grassroots gold exploration property Gold Rock. In addition, NexGold holds a 100% interest in the high-grade Niblack copper -

gold-zinc-silver VMS project, located adjacent to tidewater in southeast Alaska. NexGold is committed to inclusive, informed and

meaningful dialogue with regional communities and Indigenous Nations throughout the life of all our projects and on all aspects,

including creating sustainable economic opportunities, providing safe workplaces, enhancing social value and promoting

community wellbeing.

Page 6 of 6

Further details about NexGold, including the Feasibility Study for the Goldboro Gold Project and the Prefeasibility Study for the

Goliath Gold Complex, are available under the Company’s issuer profile on www.sedarplus.ca and on NexGold’s website

at www.nexgold.com.

Contact:

Kevin Bullock

President & CEO

(647) 388-1842

[email protected]

Orin Baranowsky

Chief Financial Officer

(647) 697-2625

[email protected]

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture

Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release. No stock exchange, securities commission

or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This news release contains or incorporates by reference “forward- looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities

legislation and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable U.S. securities laws. Except for statements of historical fact relating

to the Company, certain information contained herein constitutes forward- looking information including, but not limited to, the Company’s

strategic objectives and plans; timing and outcome of exploration activities (includi ng drilling); expected initiatives to be undertaken by

management of the Company in identifying exploration opportunities; timing of advancement, completion and outcome of technica l studies,

community relations and permitting activities; and project financing activities. Generally, forward-looking information is characterized by the use

of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”,

“intends”, “is projected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, “targets”, or variations of such words and phrases. Forward- looking

information may also be identified in statements where certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “should”, “would”, “might”, “will be taken”,

“occur” or “be achieved”.

Forward-looking information involve known or unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance

or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those projected by such forward- looking statements. Such factors, risks and

uncertainties include, among others: ability to timely receive requisite regulatory approvals, reliance on third-parties, including contractors, local

communities and governmental entities, for development and mining activities; the ability of the Company to obtain required approvals; and

those factors described in the Company’s Management Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2024 and in the Company’s

most recent disclosure documents filed under the Company’s SEDAR + profile at www.sedarplus.ca. Although management of the Company

has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-

looking information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be

no assurance that forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those

anticipated in such information. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward- looking information. The forward-

looking information contained herein is presented to assist shareholders in understanding the Company’s plans and objectives and may not be

appropriate for other purposes. The Company does not undertake to update any forward- looking information contained herein, except in

accordance with applicable securities laws.