Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

NAM.V ·

Encounters 2.45 g/t Pd+Pt+Au Over 28 m at the River Valley Platinum Group Metal s Project , Sudbury Mining District, Ontario.

Drill Results

1

Drill

Program

Encounters 2.45 g/t Pd+Pt+Au Over 28 m

at

the

River Valley

Platinum Group Metal

s

Project

,

Sudbury Mining District, Ontario.

Highlights

A drill hole collared in

main

mineralized

zone

(Dana North)

encounter

ed

2.45 g/t

Pd+Pt+Au over 28

m

,

includ

ing 7.12 g/t over 3m and 4.06 g/t over 6m with a second z

one

of 3.30 g/t Pd+Pt+Au

over 4

m

Drilling continues to encounter PGM mineralization in the footwall of the River Valley

PG

M Deposit with a

ssay

s

of

1.56 g/t

Pd+Pt+Au

over 9m, 1.41

g/t over 8m

,

1.12 g/t over

17 m

and 1.64 m of 7

m

were obtained from drilling in the footwall

D

rilling

has been

focus

ed

on follow

-

up drilling to further test the continuation of the

Pine Zone

and Dana North Zone

River Valley is the Largest Undeveloped Primary PGM resource in Canada,

with 3.9Moz

PdEq in Measured

Plus

Indicated

including an additional

1.2Moz

PdEq

in

Inferred.

September

20

th

, 2017 Vancouver, Canada

–

New Age Metals Inc. (TSX

.

V:

NAM; OTCQB: PAWEF;

FSE: P7J.F)

is pleased to announce

the first drill hole results of the 2017 drilling campaign. Drilling

has focused on the Dana North (T3) and Pine Zone as a follow up of the 2015 and 2016 drilling at

the River Valley PGM Deposit.

Harr

y Barr, Chairman and CEO states,

“

Drill results (Table 1)

have

confirmed continued PGM

mineralization in the footwall t

o the main River Valley contact, where the

current

measured

and indicated resources have been proven

.

At present

the

PGM mineralization has been

extended for approximately 140 metres east of the previous known mineralization into the

footwall of the

identified

resources

.

PGM mineralization in the Pine Zone has now be

en

shown

to extend to at least 300 m below surface.

Wi

th continued drilling success, o

ther

new

targets

could extend along

the

16kms of strike and at depth

that

have

not been previously explored.”

A

ground

geophysical survey was carried

out

on

the Pine Zone

by Abitibi Geophysics (News

Release:

June 19

th

, 2017

).

The surface

IP geophysical s

urvey

was

designed

to t

est the

eastward

and southward

extension

and dip/plunge

of the Pine Zone as well as the adjacent Dana North

Zone (Figure

1

-

2

). The

extension of the IP survey

tested

the Banshee Zone.

Initial

interpretation

s

are complete and the final report

has been completed. Several new targets from

the geophysics

have been identified and are planned for drill testing. The Company has also retained the services

of a geophysical consultant, Alan King of Geoscience North Ltd

(News Release:

Aug 22

nd

, 2017

)

,

to

compile all past and current geophysics into one 3D model and

aid in

the understanding of the

structural controls on the PGM mineralization

.

2

Figure 1

: River Valley Geology Layered Over

Recent IP Geophysics with Recent Area of Drilling

(Red Banded Unit represents the River Valley mi

neralized breccia contact zone

-

westward

dip)

Table 1 Drill Results from Dana North/Pine Zone

(3E = Pd+Pt+Au, N.S.A. = no significant assays)

3

Assay results have been received for

six

of the

eleven

presently drilled holes. Breccia host zones

were indentified in all holes in the program with

fou

r

drill holes (Table 1) returning significant

Pd+Pt+Au (3E in the Ta

ble 1) mineralization to date.

The d

rilling is

mainly of

an exploratory

nature and

intended to test t

he footwall mineralization in

the northern p

ortion

of

the property.

Further re

-

interpretation of the geology, structure and PGM mineralization on the project are

ongoing with the company’s ge

ological and geophysical consultants.

Drill hole T3

-

17

-

04 was collared obliquely into the main PGM Zone and therefore the results are

not true widths. Two high grade PGM zones were encountered from surface to 41 m. The drill

hole was designed to test the footwall Pine Zone PGM mineralization t

o depth.

PGM

mineralization in the Pine Zone has now be

en

shown to extend to at least 300 m below surface.

Figure

2

.

Zoom in of the Pine Zone and Present Area of Drilling

Drill holes were drilled into the Pine Zone to test the PGM footwall mineralization. Drill widths

are considered

not true

width due to the exploratory nature of the drill campaign.

Assay Procedures and QAQC

The drilling

is being undertaken by

Jacob & Sam

uel Drilling Ltd. of Sudbury, Ontario under the

supervision of

NAM geologists

. The drill core samples

are

sent to the SGS Canada Inc. Laboratory

in Lakefield, Ontario for sample preparation and assay analyses. The preparation

involved

crushing of 3 kilograms of each sample to 90% passing 2 mm, and then pulverizing 0.5 kilograms

to 85% passing 75 µm. Palladium, Platinum and Gold were assayed by fire assay with ICP

-

AES

finish (GE

-

FAI313). Copper, Nickel and 32 additional metals were assa

yed by two acid digestion

and ICP

-

OES finish (GE

-

ICP14B). Blanks and blind certified standard samples were submitted at

4

regular intervals for assay with the core samples as part of

NAM

’s rigorous Quality

Assurance/Quality Control program.

Future Activity

WSP Canada (News Release:

Sept 7

th

, 2017

) will be conducting the updated resource calculation

and model for the River Valley PGM Deposit. This will incorporate

any

new

drill results

and

interpretations.

This present exploration activity of drilling and geophysics is geared to establish the res

ource

base for a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) Report which the company plans to initialize

in the near future.

To date (not including the present drill program) an approximate 612 holes (136,574 metres)

have been conducted by the company and its

past major joint venture partner to test the PGM

mineralization extents

along the contact of the

River Valley Intrusion. As well, several 43

-

101

complaint resource estimates have been generated.

The

River Valley

Deposit

is the Largest

Undeveloped Primary

PGM resource in Canada,

with 3.9Moz PdEq in Measured Plus

Indicated

including an additional

1.2Moz

PdEq

in

Inferred.

The Company will continue to update investors as the drill results are received.

ABOUT NAM’S PGM DIVISION

NAM’s

flagship project is its

100% owned River Valley PGM Project (

NAM Website

–

River

Valley Project

)

in the Sudbury Mining District of N

orthern

Ontario (100 km east of Sudbury,

Ontario). Presently the River Valley Proj

ect is Canada’s largest primary undeveloped PGM

deposit with Measured + Indicated resources of 91 million tonnes @ 0.58 g/t Palladium, 0.22

g/t Platinum, 0.04 g/t Gold, at a cut

-

off grade of 0.8 g/t PdEq

for

2,463,000 ounces PGM plus

Gold.

T

his equates to

3,942,910

PdEq

ounces.

The River Valley PGM

-

Copper

-

Nickel Sulphide

mineralized zones remain open to expansion

. Currently the company has completed new ground

geophysics and is in the middle of a drill program focused on the Pine and Dana North Zones.

In

2016, the

Company

acquired the River Valley extension property from Mustang Minerals which

added approximately 4kms to the project’s mineralized strike length

to the southern portion of

the intrusion

.

ABOUT NAM’S LITHIUM DIVISION

The Company has

five

pegmatite hosted

Lithium Projects in the Winnipeg River Pegmatite Field,

located in SE Manitoba.

Three of the projects are drill ready

.

This Pegmatite Field hosts the world

class Tanco Pegmatite that has been mined for Tantalum, Cesium and Spodumene (one o

f the

primary Lithium ore minerals) in varying capacities, since

1969

. NAM’s Lithium Projects are

strategically situated in this prolific Pegmatite Field.

Presently, NAM is the largest mineral claim

5

holder in the Winnipeg River Pegmatite Field and is seeki

ng JV partners to further develop the

company’s Li division.

QUALIFIED PERSON

The contents contained herein that relate to Exploration Results or Mineral Resources is based

on information compiled, reviewed or prepared by Carey Galeschuk, a consulting ge

oscientist for

New Age Metals.

Mr. Galeschuk is the Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43

-

101 and has reviewed and approved the technical content of this news release.

On behalf of the Board of Directors

“

Harry Barr”

Harry G. Barr

Chairman and CEO

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Ven

ture

Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Note Regarding For

ward Looking Statements: This release contains forward

-

looking statements that involve risks and

uncertainties.

These statements may differ materially from actual future events or results and are based on current expectations

or beliefs.

For this purpose

, statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward

-

looking statements.

In addition, forward

-

looking statements include statements in which the Company uses words such as “continue”, “efforts”, “expect”, “believe”,

“anticipate”, “confident”, “inte

nd”, “strategy”, “plan”, “will”, “estimate”, “project”, “goal”, “target”, “prospects”, “optimistic” or

similar expressions.

These statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially

depending on a variety o

f important factors, including, among others, the Company’s ability and continuation of efforts to timely

and completely make available adequate current public information, additional or different regulatory and legal requirements

and restrictions that may

be imposed, and other factors as may be discussed in the documents filed by the Company on SEDAR

(www.sedar.com), including the most recent reports that identify important risk factors that could cause actual results to di

ffer

from those contained in the

forward

-

looking statements.

The Company does not undertake any obligation to review or confirm

analysts’ expectations or estimates or to release publicly any revisions to any forward

-

looking statements to reflect events or

circumstances after the date her

eof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Investors should not place undue

reliance on forw

ard

-

looking statements.