Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

MKO.V ·

Mako Mining Announces Positive Metallurgical Test Results at San Albino with Optimized Overall GOLD Recoveries Ranging from 86.1 to 96.9%

Metallurgy & Processing

1

December 13, 2019

PRESS RELEASE - #19-20

TSX-V: MKO

MAKO MINING ANNOUNCES POSITIVE METALLURGICAL TEST RESULTS AT SAN

ALBINO WITH OPTIMIZED OVERALL GOLD RECOVERIES RANGING FROM 86.1 to 96.9%

Mako Mining Corp. (TSX-V: MKO) (“Mako” or the “Company”) is pleased to report th at it has completed further

mineralogical and metallurgical tests on its wholly-owned San A lbino gold project (“San Albino”) located in Nueva

Segovia, Nicaragua. The various tests completed from 2016 to 2 019 were designed to confirm conclusions from

previous work in 2013 and 2014 as well as provide further design parameters for the mill flowsheet and the associated

mill operations and tailings manag ement. Overall, the program supported conclusions of previous process

development work and the current mill design parameters.

Akiba Leisman, Chief Executive O fficer of Mako states “these me tallurgical results are the culmination of a

significant amount of work completed after the Company’s Prelim inary Economic Assessment for the San Albino

Gold Deposit dated April 29, 201 5 (the “PEA”) and available on the Mako’s website and SEDAR profile at

www.sedar.com. As a result of the recent metallurgical test work, Mako has decided to use a carbon-in-leach (“CIL”)

plant design, which yielded optimized overall recoveries ranging from 86.1 to 96.9%, depending on the mineralization

type and despite the presence of carbonaceous material in these samples. Gravity recoveries averaged 36.3% with

higher gravity recoveries possible when higher-grade material is processed through the plant. Finally, Mako is using

a dry stack tailings storage facility, which will contain filte red tailings. It is our belief that this tailings design will

provide the highest level of safety with the least amount of environmental impact.”

As with previous process development testing, the sample materi al used for the most recent testing program

represented the three styles of mineralization at San Albino recognized as oxide and mixtures of oxide and sulphide.

Four composite samples were assembled from diamond drilling core to represent the deposit as follows: (1) the San

Albino Oxide composite; (2) the San Albino Fresh composite; and (3) the Arras Oxide composite. A fourth sample,

(4) the Underground composite, was also tested to confirm the metallurgical response in the chosen flowsheet.

With the recognized impact of the free gold in the deposit, the head grade of the samples was determined in triplicate

by fire assay and crosschecked with metallic assays. The silve r assays were completed with atomic absorption

spectroscopy while the sulphur and carbon analyses were subject to microbalance measurements and Leco furnace

gas detection. The grade of the four samples used in the testing program are shown in Table 1 and Table 2 below.

Table 1 – Composite Gold Head Grade Analysis

Au (g/t) by Direct Fire-assays on 30g Splits Au (g/t) by

Metallics on

~500g Splits

Average

Composite ID Cut A Cut B Cut C REP Cut A

San Albino Oxide 8.69 12.75 9.38 11.65 10.14 10.52

San Albino Fresh 11.60 11.81 9.99 11.45 8.57 10.68

Arras Oxide 4.28 3.86 3.96 3.62 4.71 4.09

Underground 7.86 5.79 4.86 8.60 6.85 6.79

Overall Average 8.02

2

Table 2 – Other Head Grade Analysis

Composite ID

Items Unit

San Albino

Oxide

San Albino

Fresh

Arras Oxide Underground

Ag ppm 21.30 16.3 12.90 11.5

TOT/C % 0.22 1.34 0.10 1.65

C/ORG % 0.17 0.65 0.08 0.80

C/INORG % <0.01 0.43 <0 .01 0.71

C/GRA % 0.05 0.26 0.01 0.28

TOT/S % 0.23 1.72 0.10 1.58

ELM/S % 0.01 <0 .01 <0 .01 <0.01

S/S- % 0.06 1.50 0.09 1.31

S(SO4) % 0.21 0.02 0.21 0.05

As ppm 2650.0 5368.0 9647.0 2570.0

Sb ppm 7.5 7.1 10.6 5.2

Bi ppm 34.5 20.9 <0 .5 8.9

Se ppm 18.0 12.0 22.0 14.0

SiO2 % 73.77 75.0 75.0 79.72

The program was designed to subject each of the samples to bench scale tests of the chosen flowsheet for San Albino

from comminution, gravity concen tration, CIL cyanide leaching, cyanide destruction in tailings, and solid liquid

separation of the tailings. The leach circuit proposed employs activated carbon to address the known carbon content

at San Albino. The four samples in this current test work had a total carbon content ranging from 0.10 to 1.65% with

the potential gold absorbing levels ranging from <0.01 to 0.71% in-organic carbon. The Underground composite had

the highest level of potential preg-robbing carbon with the San Albino Fresh composite somewhat less.

In addition to the metallurgical testing, the four composite sa mples were subjected to mineralogical studies to

characterize the gold and silver occurrences to assess particle size and shape and levels of liberation. The study

showed that over 90% of the gold in the four composites occurre d as native gold or gold electrum with only trace

quantities in other gold minerals. The size of the gold grains averaged 12.4 to 30 microns with more than 50% coarser

than 30 microns and generally conducive to gravity concentratio n. The particle shape was mostly circular. There

was a high proportion of liberation of the gold particles at 80 % passing 150 microns and conducive to cyanide

leaching. The silver occurrence had 60 to 90% containment in t he gold particles or gold minerals and could be

recovered in conjunction with the gold.

In support of comminution in the crushing and grinding of the S an Albino mineralization, the crusher work index

tests averaged 4.72 kW/t with the abrasion index average at 0.2882. The work index for grinding averaged 15.4 kW/t

indicating a moderately hard rock to grind to liberation of the gold and silver at 80% passing 75 microns. Gravity

recovery of the four composites showed good results and ranged from 28.8 to 50.1% with the highest gravity recovery

result on the Arras Oxide composite.

Metallurgical response tests were carried out on the four sampl es for grinding, gravity recovery and cyanidation of

the gravity tails with CIL. Four different grind sizes were te sted for each composite sample. The testing showed

gold recoveries by gravity ranging from 24.7 to 50.1% with over all gold recoveries from combined gravity and CIL

ranging from 70.2 to 96.8%. The oxide samples showed the highe st recoveries and the fresh composite sample

showed the lowest. Although there were four size distributions used in the testing from 80% passing 50 microns to

150 microns there was no appreciable trend in recoveries on the finer sizes as would be expected. The cyanide leach

conditions were maintained with NaCN consumption ranging from 0 .97 kg/t to 2.65 kg/t and lime consumption

ranging from 0.62 to 1.89 kg/t. The lowest reagent consumption indicated was on the San Albino Fresh composite

sample. Preliminary optimization testing showed no improvement with the addition of lead nitrate but some

3

improvement with extension of the leach time from 24 to 48 hr f or the San Albino Fresh composite sample with the

leach time extension increasing the cyanide consumption.

The optimized leach tests on the three composites showed overall gold recoveries averaging 86.1% for the San Albino

Fresh composite, 92.3% for the Arras Oxide composite and 96.9% for the San Albino Oxide composite (each averages

o f f o u r C I L t e s t s , r e s p e c t i v e l y ) . G r a v i t y r e c o v e r y f o r t h e t h ree samples averaged 36.3%. Silver recovery was

relatively constant for the three samples tested averaging 67.5 % with the highest silver recovery at 74.1% reported

on the lower grade Arras Oxide composite. The leach conditions were optimized for three tests on each sample with

the grind at 80% passing 75 microns.

Comparisons of the overall flowsheet performance to the sulphur content of the mineralization and the acid insoluable

carbon showed strong correlations with both constituents in the mineralization contributing to decreases in gold

recovery. Detoxification of the leach circuit tailings showed that the INCO/SO2 treatment could achieve less than 1

mg/l of WAD CN in the tailings with cyanide lowered to less than the compliance level. Settling and filtration testing

of the leach tailings showed that pressure filtration would be required to achieved a tailings moisture level suitable

for conveying and dry stacking. Work is continuing on defining tailings treatment procedures.

Sampling, Assaying, QA/QC and Data Verification

All sample preparation, compositi ng, and test work was performe d or overseen by Bureau Veritas Laboratories in

Vancouver, Canada. Their processes and assaying results met the requirements of the Company and its employees,

including Senior Metallurgical Engineer Craig L. McKenzie, and are traceable and well documented.

Qualified Person

Ross MacFarlane P. Eng Watts, Griffis and McOuat Limited (“WGM” ), Associate Metallurgist and Joe Hinzer,

P.Geo., the President and Director of WGM both independent of M ako and "Qualified Pe rsons" under NI 43-101

have reviewed and approved the written scientific and technical disclosure contained in this press release.

On behalf of the Board,

Akiba Leisman

CEO

About Mako

Mako Mining Corp. is a publicly listed gold mining, development and exploration firm. The Company is developing

its high-grade San Albino gold project in Nueva Segovia, Nicaragua. Mako’s primary objective is to bring San Albino

into production quickly and efficiently, while continuing exploration of prospective targets in Nicaragua.

For further information: Mako Mining Corp., Akiba Leisman, Chie f Executive Officer, Telephone: 203-862-7059,

E-mail: [email protected] o r v i s i t o u r w e b s i t e a t www.makominingcorp.com a n d S E D A R

www.sedar.com.

Forward-Looking Statements: Statements contained herein, other than of historical fact, may be considered “forward-looking

information” within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking information is based on certain expectations

and assumptions, including that the Company’s exploration and metallurgical and mineralogical testing and studies will be

successfully completed; that any outstanding metallurgical te st results, mineralogical studies and recoveries will be as

anticipated; that the Company will be able to successfully adjust its mine plan based on anticipated successful test results; that

the geological model will continue to yield highly predicable results; that the carbon-in-leach plant design will yield anticipated

results and be successful and such other risk factors as outlined in the continuous disclosure documents of the Company filed on

SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Such forward-looking information is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties which could

cause actual events or results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking information, including, without

limitation, the risks that additional satisfactory exploration and test and study results at San Albino will not be obtained; t hat

4

the PEA is preliminary in nature and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized; the risk of economic and/or technical

failure at the San Albino project associated with basing a production decision on the PEA without demonstrated economic and

technical viability; that exploration results will not translate in to the discovery of an economically viable deposit; risks an d

uncertainties relating to political risks involving the Company’s exploration and development of mineral properties interests;

the inherent uncertainty of cost estimates and the potential for unexpected costs and expense; commodity price fluctuations, the

inability or failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and other risks and uncertainties. Such information contained

herein represents management’s best judgment as of the date hereof, based on information currently available and is included

for the purposes of providing investors with the Company’s plans and expectations at its San Albino project and may not be

appropriate for other purposes. Mako does not undertake to update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with

applicable securities laws.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture

Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.