Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

LUC.TO ·

Lucara Announces Positive Feasibility Study FOR Karowe Underground

Economic Studies

NEWS RELEASE

LUCARA ANNOUNCES POSITIVE FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR KAROWE

UNDERGROUND

NOVEMBER 4, 2019 (LUC – TSX, LUC – BSE, LUC – Nasdaq Stockholm) Lucara Diamond Corp. (“Lucara” or

the “Company”) is pleased to announce the results of a positive underground Feasibility Study (“FS”) to expand its

100% owned Karowe diamond mine, one of the world’s most prolific producers of large, high value type IIA diamonds

and the only diamond mine in recorded history to have produced two +1000 carat diamonds. The underground

expansion at Karowe is expected to double the mine life, and generate significant revenue and cashflow out to 2040,

extending benefits to the Company, its employees, shareholders, communities surrounding the mine, and Botswana.

Combined Open Pit / Underground Economic Highlights (all figures in US dollars)

• LOM production of 7.8 million carats out to 2040; resource remains open to depth

• $5.25 billion in Gross Revenue

• Pre-production capital costs of $514 million for the underground project

• After-tax undiscounted net cash flow of $1,220 million, no real diamond price escalation

• After-tax NPV(5%) of $718 million

• Payback Period of 2.8 years extending the mine life 15 years (including stockpiles)

• Average LOM operation costs of $28.43 per tonne of ore processed

Eira Thomas, President and CEO commented: “Lucara is highly encouraged by the results of the Karowe Underground

feasibility study which has outlined a much larger economic opportunity than first envisaged in the 2017 PEA and

represents an exciting, world class growth project for our Company. Diamond deposits are rare and getting rarer. In

this context, we are extending a mine that is in a class of its own, having produced 15 diamonds in excess of 300

carats, including 2 greater than 1000 carats in just seven years of production. Further, we have sold ten diamonds for

in excess of $10 million each, including the record-setting 813 carat Constellation which sold for $63.1 million.

A significant portion of the cost to expand our mine underground can be funded from cash flow, and the investment is

expected to be paid back in under 3 years, as the underground allows us to exploit the highest value part of the orebody

first and generate more than $5 .25 billion in gross revenue. What’s more, margins remain healthy despite the

application of conservative diamond pricing models that reflect the current, difficult market environment. Lucara’s short

term view is that the market is now stabilizing. Longer term, the fundamentals are expected to strengthen in line with

supply shortfalls from mature, depleting mines in Australia and Canada. It is important to note that a return to diamond

prices observed in 2015 would nearly double the NPV(5%) of this project to $1.4 billion.”

Key Findings of the Study:

• The Karowe Mine has produced 2.5 million carats since 2012 and generated $1.5 billion in revenue. The FS

looks to double the mine life from the original mine design of 2010 and add net cash flow of $1.22 billion and

gross revenue of $5.25 billion.

• After-tax NPV (5%) of $718 million for the combined open pit and underground with no real diamond price

escalation

2

• Updated Resource confirms increasing value with depth. The combined open pit and underground Indicated

resource now stands at 54.27 million tonnes at 15.3 carats per hundred tonnes (“cpht”) for a contained

diamond resource of 8.3 million carats excluding stockpiles.

• Long hole shrinkage (“LHS”) underground bulk mining method selected will provide early access to higher

value ore and allows for a short pay back period of 2.8 years and low operating costs of $28.43 per tonne

processed.

• On the basis of a construction start in mid-2020, ore from underground mining will seamlessly integrate into

current operations providing mill feed starting in 2023 with a ramp up to 2.7Mtpa to the processing plant by

2026, and the opportunity to increase throughput. Current production rates will be maintained through the

underground ramp up period.

• The Underground is designed to access the South lobe kimberlite resource below the current planned bottom

of the open pit (which is expected to be at approximately 700 meters above sea level (“masl”)), to a depth of

310 masl. Access to the South Lobe underground will be via two vertical shafts (production and ventilation)

of approximately 765 and 715 meters deep respectively.

• Identified key focus areas of hydrogeology, geotechnical constraints of the kimberlite and host rocks have

been addressed through an intensive set of work programs and data collection that commenced during the

Preliminary Economic Assessment completed in November 2017 and were substantially updated and

augmented by the FS study.

Zara Boldt, Chief Financi al Officer commented: “Lucara is weathering the current downturn in the diamond market

better than most of our peers. Karowe’s high value deposit and unique production profile has allowed us to generate

enough cash to operate our business, develop the Clara sales platform and to have been a steady dividend payer.

Based on the strong economics outlined in the feasibility study, we are confident that our external financing requirement

will be modest and that attractive financing options are available to supplement the expected contribution of our cash

flow from operations to fund the underground project. We are optimistic about diamond prices recovering in the short

to medium term as global supply decreases next year and we have also identified a number of optimization

opportunities for the underground that could add additional value to the project in the near term. With this in mind,

Lucara’s Board of Directors has determined that using our available cash flow for detailed engineering and design work,

early procurement initiatives and to investigate project debt financing options in the near-term, rather than the payment

of a dividend, is the best use of the Company’s capital going forward.”

Key Operational Parameters

Parameter Unit

UG

Base

Case

OP UG

Base Case

After-Tax Undiscounted Net Cash Flow US$M $844 $1,220

After-Tax NPV (5%) US$M $388 $718

After-Tax NPV (8%) US$M $226 $536

After-Tax IRR % 16% N/A

Pre-Tax Undiscounted Net Cash Flow US$M $1,447 $2,156

Payback Period (post-tax) years 2.4 2.8

3

Key Operational Parameters continued

Tonnage and Grade

UG

Base

Case

OP UG

Base Case

Waste Tonnes mined (millions) 0.751 13.43

Ore Tonnes mined (millions) 33.46 49.97

Processed Tonnes (millions) 33.46 56.03

Diamond grade (cpht) based on a 1.25mm bottom

cut-off size (“BCOS”) and inclusive of estimated mining

dilution 15.1 13.99

Mine Life (Years) 12.9 20.9

Average Annual UG Base

Case

OP UG

Base Case

Production Rough Diamonds (carats) 392,000 374,000

Operating Cost Kimberlite (US$/t treated) $30.57 $28.43

Diamonds (US$/carat recovered) $725.00 $670.00

Feasibility Study Approach

The FS has been prepared following Canadian Institute of Mining Guidelines for the development of an underground

mine. Production from the underground is planned to be coincident with open pit operations coming to completion, at

Lucara’s Karowe Mine (”Karowe Mine”) in Botswana. All dollar amounts in this release are presented in US dollars

unless otherwise stated.

Based on the positive FS results, the Company will commence advancement of detailed engineering immediately, in

parallel with project permitting, arranging project financing and long lead item procurement.

The results of the FS represent forward-looking information that are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and

other factors that may cause results to differ materially from those presented here. (See “Cautionary Note Regarding

Forward Looking Statements” below.)

The Karowe Underground FS contemp lates both a stand-alone UG scenario and a combined Open Pit Underground

LOM scenario. The FS provides for the development of a Long Hole Shrinkage (“LHS”) operation to mine the South

Lobe of the AK06 kimberlite resource from the base of the planned open pit to the 310 masl elevation. Access to the

South Lobe underground will be via two vertical shafts (production and ventilation). All Underground mined kimberlite

will be processed at the existing Karowe processing plant over a 13-15 year period following the cessation of the current

open pit operations, which is expected to occur in 2025.

As a brownfield operation, the Karowe Mine process plant and other site facilities and equipment are sufficient in many

areas to support the planned underground mining operation. Existing on -site infrastructure includes offices,

warehouses, laydown areas, maintenance facilities, a crushed kimberlite stockpile and reclaim, access and service

roads, an airstrip, explosives magazines, and water and electrical infrastructure. Upgrades to power infrastructure are

required to support shaft services and are costed into the model.

4

Capital and Operating Cost Estimates

Capital costs were estimated using a combination of Karowe budget input, first principle cost estimation with vendor

quotes, contractor estimates and guided by benchmarking and experience. The UG pre-production capital cost estimate

is shown in Table 1. The OP sustaining capex adds another $54 million to the UG capital costs. The combined OP and

UG operating cost estimates for the FS LOM are shown in Table 2.

Table 1: Karowe UG Capital Distribution

Capital Costs Pre-Production (US$M) Sustaining/Closure

(US$M) Total (US$M)

Mining 321.5 38.1 359.7

Bulk Earthworks 18.8 - 18.8

Process Plant 0.1 46.5 46.6

Tailings - 22.3 22.3

Onsite Infrastructure 5.9 - 5.9

Buildings & Facilities 1.6 - 1.6

Offsite Infrastructure 19.6 - 19.6

Project Indirects 47.7 - 47.7

Owner’s Costs 46.9 34.0 80.9

Subtotal 462.1 140.9 603.0

Contingency 51.6 12.8 64.4

Total 513.7 153.8 667.5

Table 2: Summary of LOM Operating Costs

OPEX Unit Cost

$/t Milled

Unit Cost

$/carat

Total

$M

OP Mining (per ore tonne mined) 8.25

UG Mining (per ore tonne mined) 8.72

Combined Mining 7.77 56 435

Processing 15.06 108 844

G&A 5.60 40 314

Total 28.43 203 1,593

5

Economics

The main assumptions with respect to the economic model are listed in Table 3. Table 4 shows the baseline diamond

prices by zone.

Table 3: Economic Assumptions

Item Unit Value

NPV Discount Rate % 5% & 8%

Annual Escalation % 0

Escalation Start Year Year N/A

Escalation End Year Year N/A

BWP:US$ FX BWP:US$ 10.6

ZAR:US$ FX ZAR:US$ 14

Source: JDS (2019)

Table 4: Baseline Diamond Prices

Unit 2020 2021 2022 FS

North 222 222 222 222

Centre 323 329 349 349

EMPKS 618 705 741 777

MPKS 513 578 604 631

Source: JDS (2019)

Results

The economic results for the Project, based on the assumptions outlined above are presented in Table 5.

Table 5: UG-Only and Combined Economic Results

UG-Only UG and OP Combined

Parameter Unit Pre-tax Results After-tax

Results Pre-tax Results After-tax

Results

NPV5% US$M 710 388 1,266 718

NPV8% US$M 454 226 945 536

IRR % 20.8 16 na na

Payback period Production years 2.3 2.4 2.8 2.8

Source: JDS (2019)

The break-even price for the Project (NPV @ 8% discount rate) is US$4 14/carat after tax for the combined open pit

and underground.

Sensitivities

Sensitivity analyses were performed using diamond prices, mill head grade, CAPEX, and OPEX as variables. The value

of each variable was changed plus and minus 20% independently while all other variables were held constant. The

Project is most sensitive to the diamond price and head grade, followed by the OPEX and least sensitive to the CAPEX.

The results of the UG-only sensitivity analyses are shown in Table 6.

6

Table 6: UG Only Sensitivity Results (NPV @ 8%, IRR)

Variable

Pre-tax NPV8% (M$) Pre-tax IRR (%)

-20%

Variance

0%

Variance

20%

Variance

-20%

Variance

0%

Variance

20%

Variance

CAPEX 547 454 360 25.6 20.8 17.1

OPEX 609 454 264 23.9 20.8 16.3

Diamond Price or

Grade 170 454 738 13.6 20.8 26.4

Source: JDS (2019)

Mineral Resources

In support of the FS an updated Mineral Resource Estimate, see Table 7 – Karowe Mine AK06 Updated Mineral

Resource Statement reflecting depletion as of June 30, 2019, was prepared by SRK. The updated resource estimate

is based on historical evaluation data combined with new deep drilling data from the FS study programme. New

sampling results (microdiamond, bulk density, and petrography) have been fully integrated with recent deep drilling and

historical drilling. Separate size distribution and value models have been developed from production data for the two

dominant domains within the South Lobe, the EM/PK(S) and M/PK(S). Grade and tonnage estimates are based on an

updated and revised geological model, an updated recoverable grade model based on Karowe processing plant

recoveries and updated average price per carat values. The 2019 mineral resources for Karowe, as summarized in

Table 7, have been classified as either Indicated or Inferred mineral resources, according to CIM Definition Standards

for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (CIM, 2014). Mineral Resources reported are inclusive of those portions

of the Mineral Resource that have been converted to Mineral Reserves as shown in Table 8 and have an effective date

of July 1, 2019.

7

Table 7 – Karowe Mine AK06 Updated Mineral Resource Statement

Classification Domain Volume

(Mm3)

Tonnes

(Mt)

Density

(t/m3)

Carats

(Mcts)

Grade

(cpht)

Average

US$/ct

Indicated

South M/PK(S) 9.40 27.81 2.96 3.01 10.8 $631

South EM/PK(S) 7.62 22.10 2.90 4.68 21.2 $777

Centre 1.28 3.28 2.57 0.50 15.1 $367

North 0.44 1.08 2.45 0.13 11.8 $222

TOTAL INDICATED 18.74 54.27 2.90 8.32 15.3 $690

Inferred

South M/PK(S) 0.10 0.31 3.05 0.03 10.5 $631

South EM/PK(S) 1.40 4.18 2.97 0.87 20.9 $777

South_KIMB3 0.32 0.94 2.94 0.10 10.9 $631

TOTAL INFERRED 1.82 5.42 2.97 1.01 18.6 $750

Notes:

• Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. All numbers have been

rounded to reflect accuracy of the estimate.

• Mineral Resources are in-situ Mineral Resources and are inclusive of in-situ Mineral Reserves.

• Mineral Resources are exclusive of all mine stockpile material.

• Mineral Resources are quoted above a +1.25 mm bottom cut- off and have been factored to account for diamond losses within

the smaller sieve classes expected within a commercial process plant.

• Inferred Mineral Resources are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling, sufficient to imply

but not verify geological grade and continuity. They have a lower level of confidence than that applied to an Indicated

Mineral Resource and cannot be directly converted into a Mineral Reserve.

• Average diamond value estimates are based on value models generated from production and sales data from Karowe

operations as provided by Lucara Diamond Corporation.

• Mineral Resources have been estimated with no allowance for mining dilution and mining recovery.

Mineral Reserves

The Karowe Mineral Reserve Estimate for the FS was compiled by QP Gord Doerksen, P.Eng. and has an effective

date of September 26, 2019 and is summarized in Table 8.

8

Table 8: Karowe Mine AK06 Mineral Reserve Statement

Lobe - Type Classification Ore

(Mt)

Diluted Grade

(cpht)

Contained

Carats

('000s ct)

Price

(US$/ct)

Open Pit

North Probable 0.6 10.0 56 222

Centre Probable 3.2 15.1 478 349

South – EM/PK(S) Probable 3.6 23.9 850 777

South – M/PK(S) Probable 10.2 10.8 1,098 631

Open Pit Total 17.4 14.2 2,481 618

Underground

South – EM/PK(S) Probable 16.3 19.9 3,246 777

South – M/PK(S) Probable 17.1 10.6 1,807 631

Underground Total 33.5 15.1 5,053 725

Stockpiles

North Probable 0.4 12.7 51 222

Centre Probable 0.4 12.8 54 349

South – M/PK(S) Probable 1.6 9.5 151 631

Mixed Probable 4.0 5.0 198 609

Stockpiles Total 6.4 7.1 454 542

Combined

All Total 57.3 13.9 7,988 681

1. Prepared by Gord Doerksen, P.Eng. JDS Energy & Mining Inc.

2. CIM definitions were followed for Mineral Reserves and the effective date of the Mineral Reserve is September 26 2019.

3. Mineral Reserves are estimated at a cut-off value of US$31/t based on an OP and UG mining cost of US$9/t, a processing cost

of US$16/t and a G&A cost of US$6/t. Process recovery of the diamonds was assumed to be 100% as the recoveries were

included in the mineral resource block model assumptions and therefore have taken recoveries into account. All of the

kimberlite material in the South Lobe is above the cut-off value.

4. Average diamond value estimates are based on value models generated from production and sales data from Karowe

operations as provided by Lucara Diamond Corporation.

5. Tonnages are rounded to the nearest 100,000 tonnes, diamond grades are rounded to one decimal place. Tonnage and grade

measurements are in metric units; contained diamonds are reported as thousands of carats.

Source: JDS (2019)

Geotechnical

An exhaustive 21,000m geotechnical/hydrogeological drilling and data collection program was undertaken in

preparation for the FS. Over 8,000 field rock strength tests and over 2,000 laboratory tests encompassing a full suite

of testing were conducted. Pumping tests from 23 water boreholes, 58 packer tests and 400 hydrochemical tests and

analyses were undertaken.

The unusually high strength (and low weathering susceptibility) of the South Lobe kimberlite eliminates natural caving

as an option but presents a good opportunity for stoping. Kimberlite intact strengths are lower (roughly half) where the

kimberlite is in contact with the country rock. The bulk of the host rock above the basement granite, comprising ~345m

of sedimentary stratigraphy (shales, mudstones and sandstones of the Karoo Supergroup) and ~130m of igneous rock

(basalts of the Stormberg Lava Group) are of good quality and display sparse jointing. There are some weaker layers

within the country rock stratigraphy that exhibit low intact strengths including red mudstone intercalated beds within the

lower sandstone, carbonaceous shale (water-bearing) and weathered granite.

There are no major faults or fault zones evident in the kimberlite or host sediments.