BeMetals Completes Technical Report for the Kato Gold Project in Japan and Identifies Four High Priority Targets for Drilling
TSXV – BMET
July 28, 2021 OTCQB – BMTLF
FRANKFURT – 1OI.F
BeMetals Completes Technical Report for the Kato Gold Project in Japan and
Identifies Four High Priority Targets for Drilling
Vancouver, British Columbia – BeMetals Corp. (TSXV: BMET, OTCQB: BMTLF, Frankfurt: 1OI.F) (the
“Company” or “BeMetals”) is pleased to announce the results of a technical report (the “report”) for its wholly
owned Kato Project (“Kato” or the “ Project”) in Japan. This report represents the first formal technical
compilation and target generation report for the Project and is based upon geological work conducted by the
Metals and Mining Agency of Japan ( “MMAJ”) in the 1990s, and subsequent drilling between 2018-2020 by
Kazan Resources prior to being acquired in April 2021 by BeMetals.
REPORT HIGHLIGHTS
Four priority drill target areas identified based upon historical intersections and geological setting
The first extensive data compilation providing rational and strong motivation for the drill targets
Revised exploration drill hole design and equipment deployment aimed to improve penetration and
core recovery of both the extensive alteration zones and higher-grade gold bearing veins
Table 1. Highlighted Historical Gold Drill Intersections at the Kato Project
Drill Hole ID From (m) To (m) Core Interval (m) Gold Grade g/t Company/Organisation
5MAHB-2 314.80 332.30 17.50 8.15 MMAJ
7MAHB-1 258.85 277.50 18.65 5.01 MMAJ
KT19-02A 120.48 177.05 56.57 0.80 Kazan Resources
Including 136.95 164.50 27.55 1.40
Including 150.50 164.50 14.00 2.10
KT20-010
Kazan Resources
Interval 1: 165.30 224.20 58.90 0.76
Including 167.70 175.10 7.40 2.99
Interval 2: 229.80 232.60* 2.80 3.10
These drill results are historical in nature. The main mineralized zone has only been completely crossed by three widely-spaced holes so the orientation
and true thickness of the mineralized zone is currently not known. A nominal cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au has been applied to determine the boundaries
of the intersections. * Drill hole ended in mineralization. See Table 3 below and QA/QC section for more information.
John Wilton, President and CEO of BeMetals stated, “This month we are pleased to have completed the first
formal technical report for our Kato Gold Project in Japan which has included field validations and related drill
core review. The field inspections were conducted this year. The four high priority drill targets generated from
this work are very exciting and include strong geological motivation for confirmation and extensions to the
high-grade, main zone, intersected by MMAJ’s historical drilling. The historical drilling also indicates broader
lower-grade gold intercepts with alteration zones surrounding the high-grade veins. Table 1 above indicates
selected intersections of both styles of gold mineralization.
2
The Kato Project is the most advanced of our five compelling gold exploration properties in the prospective
Japanese epithermal gold terrane. The Kato mineralization is considered an example of a low -sulphidation
epithermal system. Examples of deposits formed from this style of gold mineralization would include the
world famous Hishikari Gold Mine in Kyushu, as the largest in Japan. The Julietta and Kupol deposits in Eastern
Russia are also examples of this style of deposit and both projects were originally mined and or developed by
Bema Gold Corp . Table 2 below provides more details of these and other examples , with a representative
range of scale and grades for this deposit type.”
Mr. Tom Garagan, a BeMetals founding Director , and formerly Vice President of Exploration at Bema Gold
Corp., commented, “The Kato Project was selected for its compelling geology and prospectivity with historic
high-grade drill intersections within a large structurally prepared terrane. Japan has seen little exploration in
recent decades and offers the potential for significant discoveries. Although at an earlier stage, Kato has
similar geology to Bema Gold’s historical Julietta Mine that we explored, developed and operated in the
Russian Far East.”
Mr. Wilton continued, “As a result of the extensive clay and other alteration minerals developed around the
high-grade zones at Kato, which are encouraging from an overall gold mineralization potential point of view,
intersecting the main target units has proved challenging in historic drilling. To address this, the Company has
revised the specifications of appropriate drilling equipment and drill hole design, including the planned use of
improved drill muds and a cleaning system that should enhance drilling efficiency.”
The following Table 2 illustrates some examples of gold deposits around the world, which appear to exist in
an analogous geological environment as the Kato Project.
Table 2. Global Examples of Low-Sulphidation Epithermal Deposits with Ranges of Tonnage and Grades
Deposit
Measured Indicated Inferred Reference Resource
Status
Tonnage
(Mt)
Grade
(g/t Au)
Tonnage
(Mt)
Grade
(g/t Au)
Tonnage
(Mt)
Grade
(g/t Au)
Lihir* 81 1.9 250 2.3 67 2.3 Gleeson et
al., 2020
Current (1)
Waihi+ — — 6.0 5.21 2.5 4.73 Oceana
Gold, 2021
Current (2)
Masbate* — — 136.4 0.81 31.6 0.79 B2Gold
Corp, 2020
Current (3)
Kupol# — — 6.4 20.33 4.09 12.45 Crowl et al.,
2005
Historical (4)
Julietta# — — 0.22 19.63 0.18 18.47 Bema, 2005 Historical (5)
Deposit
Measured Indicated Inferred Reference
Tonnage
(Mst)
Grade
(oz/st Au)
Tonnage
(Mst)
Grade
(oz/st Au)
Tonnage
(Mst)
Grade
(oz/st
Au)
Grassy
Mountain* 18.2 0.02 12.7 0.05 1 0.04 Raponi et
al., 2020
Current (6)
Note: * = reported using 2014 CIM Definition Standards; # = reported using 2005 CIM Definition Standards; + reported using 2 012 JORC Code. All
estimates other than Grassy Mountain used metric tonnes and gram per tonne units. The Grassy Mountain estimate was reported using US Customary
units of short tons and ounces per short ton.
3
(1) Lihir Operations, Aniolam Island, Papua New Guinea, NI 43-101 Technical Report: report prepared for Newcrest Mining Ltd., effective date
30 June, 2020.
(2) Summary Of Table 1 - 2012 JORC: Waihi Gold Mine; as at 31 December 2020” 21 February, 2021, Waihi-JORC-Table-1.pdf
(3) 2020 Annual Information Form: 30 March, 2021; https://www.b2gold.com/_resources/financials/B2Gold-Annual-Information-Form-
2021.pdf
(4) 2005 Technical Report, Summarizing the Kupol Project Feasibility Study, Chukhotka Okrug, Russia, Bema Gold Corp.
(5) 2005 Bema Gold Corporation Annual Information Form
(6) Grassy Mountain Project, Oregon, USA, NI 43-101 Technical Report on Feasibility Study: report prepared for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.,
effective date 15 September, 2020
KATO GOLD PROJECT
The Project is situated in a rural setting near the centre of Hokkaido, directly northwest of the town of
Kamishihoro (population 4,900) and 40 kilometres north of the city of Obihiro (population 169,000) . (See
Figure 1). The Kato Project (historically referred to as the Seta River Prospect) is an example of a remarkably
well-preserved low sulphidation epithermal gold occurrence. Outcropping of clay-altered and weakly -
mineralized lake -bed sediments are evidence of a high -temperature steam -heated zone above a
hydrothermal plumbing system. This mineralization style identified to date is considered an example of a low-
sulphidation epithermal system. The classic example of this mineralization type in Japan is the Hishikari mine,
on the island of Kyushu. Global examples of this type of mineralization include Lihir (Papua New Guinea),
Kupol and Julietta (Russia), Waihi (New Zealand) and Masbate (Philippines), (See Table 2).
The 1990s MMAJ drilling at Kato identified a zone of higher-grade gold mineralization over approximately 170
metres of strike with an additional kilometre of potentially -favorable geology largely untested by drilling to
the southeast. The gold-bearing zone is hosted in quartz–adularia vein and breccia, and occurs at depths that
range from around 50 –225 metres below surface (See Figure 2 and Table 1). Table 3 includes the complete
set of historical drill intersection results for the Kato Project.
The priority drill target remains to intersect the quartz–adularia vein zone that hosts higher gold grades, and
verify the grades reported in the MMAJ reports. The drilling plan will also seek to step out to the southeast
along strike in a potential area of extension to the quartz–adularia vein zone and hydrothermal breccia zones
that lack sufficient investigation. In addition, BeMetals plans to drill- test a sinter target in the southern
extension area of the Project. The locations of the four proposed drill holes are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 1: Location of Kato Gold Project and Other BeMetals Exploration Projects in Japan
4
Figure 2: Composite Cross Section Showing Priority Target Zone Area and Historical Drill Hole Intersections
Figure 3: Proposed Priority Drill Holes Location Plan and Simplified Geological Map
5
Table 3. Kato Project: Historical Drill Hole Intersections
Drill Hole ID From (m) To (m) Core Interval (m) Gold Grade g/t Comments
3MAHB-6 153.95 165.9 11.95 0.42
Including 153.96 157.2 3.24 1.05
3MAHB-6 126.25 127.25 1 0.66
3MAHB-7 64.5 72.4 7.9 0.7
4MAHB-5 116.8 119.3 2.5 13.11
4MAHB-5 217.6 218.9 1.3 1.67
4MAHB-6 175.5 184 8.5 3.42
4MAHB-6 300.6 316.8 16.2 0.51
4MAHB-6 320.9 323.8 2.9 0.77
5MAHB-1 44.2 44.6 0.4 7.96
5MAHB-2 252.9 266.1 13.2 0.52
Including 258.3 266.1 7.8 0.6
5MAHB-2 314.8 332.3 17.5 8.15
5MAHB-3 115.15 115.7 0.55 3.64
6MAHB-1 382.8 433.4 50.6 1.16
Including 387 387.75 0.75 8.1
6MAHB-2 250.6 254.5 3.9 3.22
6MAHB-2 278.5 283 4.5 2.68
6MAHB-3 277 283.5 6.5 0.52
7MAHB-1 258.85 277.5 18.65 5.01
Including 262.77 270.5 7.73 8.52
7MAHB-2 Did not intersect the primary target and was
not sampled
7MAHB-3 54.4 55.6 1.2 3.12
7MAHB-3 202.63 203.15 0.52 2.7
7MAHB-3 206.7 208.15 1.45 2.17
7MAHB-3 467.15 467.3 0.15 0.04
7MAHB-4 266.65 269.3 2.65 3.71
7MAHB-4 272.4 298.9 26.5 2.84
Including 274.1 276.7 2.6 8.28
7MAHB-5 275.28 275.75 0.47 60.62
7MAHB-5 290.75 291.19 0.44 4.69
7MAHB-6 90.3 93.75 3.45 1.94
7MAHB-6 345.2 377.3 32.1 0.64
7MAHB-7 203 207.8 4.8 2.96
7MAHB-7 226.3 226.6 0.3 6.4
7MAHB-8 418.35 419.65 1.3 3.08
8MAHB-1 299.1 309.7 10.6 2.37
8MAHB-2 141.4 152.35 10.95 1.07
KT18-01 Hole did not reach primary target
KT18-2 15.7 37.7 22 0.5 Hole did not reach primary target
KT19-02A 120.48 177.05 56.57 0.8 Hole did not reach primary target
Including 136.95 164.5 27.55 1.4
Including 150.5 164.5 14 2.1
KT19-03 128.6 138.17 9.57 0.64
KT19-03 168.87 176.16 7.29 0.22
KT19-04 Hole did not reach primary target
KT19-05 Hole did not reach primary target
KT19-06 121.5 122.2 0.7 1.12
KT19-07 162.05 182.07 20.02 0.58 Hole did not reach primary target
Including 165.3 169.37 4.07 1.05
KT19-07 242.97 243.27* 0.3 21.1 *0.33m from end of hole depth
KT19-08 Hole did not reach primary target
KT20-010 165.3 224.2 58.9 0.76
Including 167.7 175.1 7.4 2.99
KT20-010 229.8 232.6 2.8 3.1
These drill results are historical in nature. MAHB series drill holes completed by MMAJ and KT series drill holes completed by Kazan Resources. BeMetals
has not undertaken any independent investigation of the sampling nor has it independently analyzed the results of the histori cal exploration work in
order to verify the resu lts. BeMetals considers these historical drill results relevant as the Company will use these data as a guide to plan future
exploration programs. The Company also considers the data to be reliable for these purposes however the Company's future expl oration work will
6
include verification of the data through drilling. *Drill hole ended in mineralization. The main mineralized zone has only be en completely crossed by
three widely-spaced holes so the orientation and true thickness of the mineralized zone is currently not known. A nominal cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au has
been applied to determine the boundaries of the intersections.
Table 4. Drill Hole, Azimuth, Dip, EOH Depth, Collar Co-ordinates of Historical Core Drill Holes
Drill Hole ID WGS84 East WGS84 North WGS84 Elevation Azimuth Dip End of Hole Depth
3MAHB-6 683532.57 4796635.41 470.54 63 -20 501.0
3MAHB-7 683888.19 4795867.08 470.46 63 -30 500.0
4MAHB-5 683430.24 4796667.42 463.9 243 -42 500.7
4MAHB-6 683461.67 4796630.82 461.09 63 -43 501.0
5MAHB-1 683299.86 4796539.87 472.38 63 -43 700.2
5MAHB-2 683611.39 4797167.28 557.75 243 -38 600.1
5MAHB-3 683627.23 4796437.06 454.32 63 -45 501.1
6MAHB-1 683734.58 4797066.17 560.76 243 -37 500.1
6MAHB-2 683114.34 4797042.14 489.11 63 -24 501.0
6MAHB-3 683682.56 4795939.28 476.19 243 -25 501.5
7MAHB-1 683263.39 4796875.81 476.87 055 -33 500.1
7MAHB-2 683802.56 4797127.14 571.93 243 -49 503.0
7MAHB-3 683227.27 4796582.58 482.99 52 -39 670.7
7MAHB-4 683350.57 4796762.05 469.95 38 -25 501.5
7MAHB-5 683653.30 4796777.37 518.75 243 -39 600.0
7MAHB-6 683476.25 4796356.74 452.86 63 -36 600.4
7MAHB-7 683316.16 4796935.36 496.65 72 -10 300.0
7MAHB-8 683277.21 4796856.96 476.24 53 -45 502.5
8MAHB-1 683349.49 4796759.91 469.95 38 -50 600.2
8MAHB-2 683659.31 4796152.57 458.32 65 -30 451.0
KT18-02 683578.44 4797050.74 535.71 245 -52 51.15
KT19-02A 683576.81 4797052.26 535.48 245 -52 183.0
KT19-03 683556.97 4796716.98 492.38 63 -45 256.3
KT19-06 683535.84 4796626.27 469.88 243 -45 79.4
KT19-07 683647.93 4796985.70 552.09 235 -50 243.6
KT19-08 683787.00 4796687.00 508.00 243 -45 68.7
KT20-010 683424.00 4796856.00 497.00 030 -45 232.6
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL
A site visit was conducted by Mr. Luke Viljoen from 27 –31 January, 2021. He inspected the Project area,
reviewed local infrastructure, geological characteristics, verified grab sample locations, inspected drill core
and drilling sites, reviewed geological data collection and sample preparation procedures, discussed historical
activities on the properties with BeMetals representatives, and collected a number of verification samples of
outcrop and drill core from the Kato area. Verification performed on the Kazan Resources drilling included
checks of original paper log data against digitally uploaded data, and review of QA/QC data. Data are
acceptable for early-stage exploration vectoring.
7
TECHNICAL REPORT
The Qualified Persons preparing the technical report are Mr Tom Garagan, P.Geo., and Mr. Luke Viljoen, Pr.
Sci. Nat. The report will be filed with SEDAR and posted on the Company’s website.
ABOUT BEMETALS CORP.
BeMetals is a precious and base metals exploration and development company focused on becoming a leading
metal producer through the acquisition of quality exploration, development and potentially production stage
projects. The Company has recently established itself in the gold sector with the acquisition of certain wholly
owned exploration projects in Japan. BeMetals is also progressing both its advanced high -grade, zinc-silver-
gold-copper polymetallic underground exploration at the South Mountain Project in Idaho through a
preliminary economic assessment, and its tier- one targeted, Pangeni Copper Exploration Project in Zambia.
Guiding and leading BeMetals’ growth strategy is a strong board and management team, founders and
significant shareholders of the Company, who have an extensive proven record of delivering considerable
value in the mining sector through the discovery, construction and operation of mines around the world.
The technical information in this news release for BeMetals has been reviewed and approved by John Wilton,
CGeol FGS, CEO and President of BeMetals, and a “Qualified Person” as defined under National Instrument
43-101.
ON BEHALF OF BEMETALS CORP.
“John Wilton”
John Wilton
President, CEO and Director
For further information about BeMetals please visit our website at bemetalscorp.com and sign-up to our email
list to receive timely updates, or contact:
Derek Iwanaka
Vice President, Investor Relations & Corporate Development
Telephone: 604-609-6141
Email: [email protected]
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies
of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This news release contains "forward- looking statements" and “forward looking information” (as defined under applicable
securities laws), based on management’s best estimates, assumptions and current expectations. Such statements include but
are not limited to, statements with respect to future exploration, development and advancement of the South Mountain
Project, the Pangeni project and the Japan properties, and the acquisition of additional base and/or precious metal projects.
Generally, these forward -looking statements can be identified by the use of forward- looking terminology such as "expects",
"expected", "budgeted", "forecasts", "anticipates", "plans", "anticipates", "believes", "intends", "estimates", "projects", "aims",
"potential", "goal", "object ive", "prospective", and similar expressions, or that events or conditions "will", "would", "may",
"can", "could" or "should" occur. These statements should not be read as guarantees of future performance or results. Such
statements involve known and unk nown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or
achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such statements, including but not limited to: the
actual results of exploration activities , the availability of financing and/or cash flow to fund the current and future plans and
expenditures, the ability of the Company to satisfy the conditions of the option agreements for the South Mountain Project
8
and/or the Pangeni Project, and changes in the world commodity markets or equity markets. Although the Company has
attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-
looking statements, there may be other factors that cause r esults not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can
be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from
those anticipated in such statements. The forward- looking statements and forward looking information are made as of the
date hereof and are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. The Company disclaims any obligation to revise or
update any such factors or to publicly announce the result of any re visions to any forward- looking statements or forward
looking information contained herein to reflect future results, events or developments, except as require by law. Accordingly ,
readers should not place undue reliance on forward- looking statements and information. Please refer to the Company’s most
recent filings under its profile at www.sedar.com for further information respecting the risks affecting the Company and its
business.