Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

LAM.TO ·

Laramide Announces an Increase in Mineral Resource Estimate for Westmoreland Uranium Project

Resource Estimates

Laramide Announces an Increase in Mineral

Resource Estimate for Westmoreland Uranium

Project

Highlights:

The Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) for

Westmoreland

has been updated to include results

from drilling carried out in 2012, 2023 & 2024.

The updated Mineral Resource Estimate reports a Total Indicated Resource of 48.1 MLbs. of

U

3

O

8

at an average grade of 770 ppm and a Total Inferred Resource of approximately 17.7

MLbs. of U

3

O

8

at an average grade of 680 ppm.

70% (48.1 MLbs.) of the Resource is now classified Indicated and 30% (17.7 MLbs.) is

classified Inferred.

Update includes re-estimate of the Redtree, Huarabagoo and Junnagunna deposits as well as

an Initial Resource for Long Pocket.

TORONTO

,

Feb. 28, 2025

/CNW/ -

Laramide Resources Ltd.

(

"Laramide"

or the

"Company"

)

(TSX: LAM) (ASX: LAM) (OTCQX: LMRXF) a uranium mine development and exploration company

with a portfolio of globally significant projects, is pleased to provide an updated Mineral Resource

Estimate ("MRE") for the Westmoreland Project in northwest

Queensland Australia

(

"Westmoreland"

).

The updated Mineral Resource Estimate represents a 34% increase in Indicated Resources and an

11% increase in Inferred Resources, compared to the 2009 estimate. The updated MRE now

reports Total Indicated Resource of 48.1 million pounds of U

3

O

8

and Total Inferred 17.7 million

pounds across four deposits: Redtree, Huarabagoo, Junnagunna and Long Pocket.

Laramide President and CEO

Marc Henderson

commented:

"This updated MRE reiterates our long-held view that

Westmoreland

is a genuinely world class

deposit. At 65-plus million pounds it ranks as one of the largest undeveloped uranium deposits in

the world and has the potential to be a top 10 global uranium mine. It has demonstrable attributes

that support a long-life mining operation that could support ongoing jobs and regional development

in

North-West Queensland

while providing the world with the raw materials required for the

burgeoning Nuclear Power industry and drive towards Net Zero. Moreover, we have identified

extensions to mineralisation and targets in the mineral system so have a clear line of sight to

adding yet more pounds.

"Building on a few years of significant effort and work, this update is a credit to our Australian

Exploration team and all contractors involved.

"Pending the support of the new Liberal Queensland Government, we will look forward to quickly

transitioning the Project to a Development Phase while concurrently continuing with high-impact

exploration to further grow the resource base."

About the Westmoreland Project

The Westmoreland Uranium Project is located in far northwest

Queensland, Australia

, approximately

380km northwest of the mining township of Mt Isa. The Project is 100% owned by Laramide

Resources through its wholly owned subsidiary Tackle Resources Pty Ltd. The Project comprises

three granted and contiguous Exploration Permits for Minerals (EPMs) – EPM 14558, EPM 14672

and EPM 28807. Also, a Mineral Development Licence (MDL), MDL 2026, is pending grant.

The Project area has been subject to exploration for uranium since the 1950's and is host to

numerous mineral occurrences and deposits, including the four largest: Redtree, Huarabagoo,

Junnagunna, and Long Pocket.

Figure 1: Westmoreland Project Map showing uranium prospects and deposits (CNW

Group/Laramide Resources Ltd.)

Mineral Resource Statement

An update to the Mineral Resource Estimate for the Westmoreland Uranium Project,

Queensland,

Australia

has been prepared by Addsion Mining Services of the

United Kingdom

on behalf of

Laramide Resources Ltd. ("the issuer"). The issuer is a dual listed entity on the TSX and ASX stock

exchanges of

Canada

and

Australia

respectively, as such the estimate is reported in accordance

with National Instrument 43-101,

Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects

, ("NI 43-101") and

prepared under Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") Definition Standards.

CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources (2014) and Best Practices Guidelines outline by

CIM (2019) have been followed. The estimate is also reported in accordance with The Australasian

Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves ('the JORC Code'

2012 edition.)

The updated Mineral Resource Estimate has an effective date of

January 31

st

, 2025, and is

reported above a cut-off grade of 200 ppm U

3

O

8

and comprises of:

Indicated Resources of 27.8 million tonnes at an average grade of 770 ppm U

3

O

8

for 48.1

million contained Lbs. of U

3

O

8.

Inferred Resources of approximately 11.8 million tonnes at an average grade of 680 ppm U

3

O

8

for 17.7 million contained Lbs. of U

3

O

8.

The updated estimate supersedes all previous estimates. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral

Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be

materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or

other relevant issues. It is important to note that currently, only exploration, and not mining for

uranium is permitted in

Queensland, Australia

. However, it is reasonable to expect that the policy

may change in the future as there is a historical precedent for uranium mining within the State.

Table 1 sets out the Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources by deposit. Readers are encouraged

to review the accompanying notes and explanatory text in support of the estimate.

Table 1 Mineral Resources by deposit for the Westmoreland Uranium Project,

Queensland,

Australia

. Reported above a cut-off grade of 200 ppm U3O8. Effective 31

st

January 2025

.

Deposit

Tonnes

Density g/m

3

U

3

O

8

ppm

U

3

O

8

ML

bs.

Indicated

Redtree

14,000,000

2.5

880

27

Huarabagoo

2,500,000

2.6

890

4.9

Junnagunna

10,000,000

2.5

640

15

Long Pocket

1,300,000

2.5

420

1.2

Total Indicated

27,800,000

2.5

770

48.1

Inferred

Redtree

3,000,000

2.5

800

5.2

Huarabagoo

3,100,000

2.6

870

6.0

Junnagunna

3,000,000

2.5

620

4.2

Long Pocket

2,700,000

2.5

380

2.3

Total Inferred

11,800,000

2.5

680

17.7

Notes To Mineral Resource Estimate

1.

Numbers are rounded to reflect that an estimate of tonnage and grade has been made, as such products may have discrepancies. Tonnages are expressed in the metric

system, concentrations as parts per million (ppm), equivalent to grammes per tonne, and contained metal as pounds (Lbs.).

2.

The Independent Qualified Person as defined by CIM definition Standards, and the Independent Competent Persons as defined by the JORC code 2012 edition is Mr. Richard

Siddle MSc, MAIG. Mr. Siddle is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientist (#6802) and Director of Addsion Mining Services Ltd of the United Kingdom, Mr. Siddle has

been working continuously for Addison Mining Services as a Minerals Resource Geologist since November 2014.

3.

Mr. Siddle completed a site visit to the project area between the 21

st

and 23

rd

of January 2025, and inspected representative sections of drill core, visited rehabilitated drill sites

and inspected selected outcrop geology. Discussions were held with the issuer's technical teams and exploration and socio-environmental considerations discussed. No items

of material concern were identified which are not discussed within the accompanying documentation.

4.

Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Resources in this Mineral Resource

Estimate are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Resources as Indicated or Measured, however it is reasonably expected

that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration. Additional drilling, bulk density determination and

improved topographic surveys are required to increase the confidence in the Mineral Resources; increased levels of information brought about by further drilling may serve to

either increase or decrease the Mineral Resources. No Measured Resources are reported.

5.

Reasonable Prospects of Eventual Economic Extraction contemplates mining by open pit mining methods with mineral processing by conventional leaching. Mining costs are

estimated at approximately US$3/t, mineral processing at US$30/t and general and administrative cost at US$5/t processed. Considering a U

3

O

8

price of US$80/Lb. a breakeven

cut-off grade of 200 ppm is used for reporting.

6.

Pit optimization tests showed that all mineralized material above cut-off grade within the Redtree, Junnagunna and Huarabagoo deposit block models has reasonable prospect of

being extracted by open pit methods. At Long Pocket an ultimate pit shell was used to constrain the estimate of reported Mineral Resources.

Figure 2: Westmoreland - Mineral Resource Estimate Areas (no Mineral Resources are reported for

the Link area) (CNW Group/Laramide Resources Ltd.)

Figure 3: Westmoreland Long Section looking NW, displaying drillholes and block models (CNW

Group/Laramide Resources Ltd.)

Basis of Estimate

The Westmoreland Project has been explored periodically from the 1950s until present day. A

summary of drillholes by deposit and drilling period used to inform the estimate is summarized in

Table 2. Approximately 55% of the drillholes are NQ or HQ diamond core drillholes with the

remainder being reverse circulation or percussion drillholes. The data from the historical drilling as

well as the early phase of Laramide drilling was provided to AMS in multiple Access databases and

Excel files. In 2023 AMS conducted a review of the dataset and compiled it into one geological

database management system and data repository using MX Deposit software. All data collected

since

July 2023

was recorded digitally in MX Deposit.

Table 2: Summary of drillhole information.

Deposit

Drill Period

No of

Drillholes

Minimum

Depth (m)

Maximum

Depth (m)

Total meters

Mean Depth

(m)

Redtree

HISTORICAL

504

3.66

245.24

26,640.34

53

LCR2007-2012

126

13.50

302.70

8,855.00

70

ALL

630

3.66

302.70

35,495.34

56

Huarabagoo

HISTORICAL

357

3.66

216.10

31,785.55

89

LCR2007-2012

39

80.00

201.00

4,616.39

118

LCR2022-2024

30

37.80

141.10

3,417.80

114

ALL

426

3.66

216.10

39,819.74

93

Junnagunna

HISTORICAL

443

25.00

154.05

22,115.56

50

LCR2007-2012

41

50.00

152.40

4,168.40

102

LCR2022-2024

18

98.60

158.05

2,286.75

127

ALL

502

25.00

158.05

28,570.71

57

Long Pocket

HISTORICAL

83

9.14

217.93

4,942.60

60

LCR2007-2012

12

60.00

71.20

747.50

62

LCR2022-2024

65

42.70

132.70

3,730.10

57

ALL

160

9.14

217.93

9,420.20

59

The main deposits of interest consist of Redtree, Huarabagoo and Junnagunna as well as the area

between Huarabagoo and Junnagunna (the Link zone). The total strike length is approximately 8 km

along an azimuth of 40 degrees. Deposit geometries are described as follows.

Redtree strike length is approximately 1.5 km and up to 0.6 km width on the NW side of the

dyke and 0.2 km on the SE side of the dyke. The mineralisation occurs to up to

100 m

below

the surface.

Huarabagoo strike length 2.5 km strike length and

150 m

width, depth of the mineralisation up to

100 m

from the surface.

Junnagunna strike length 1.5 km strike length and up to 0.6 km width on the NW side of the

dyke and 0.3 km on the SE side of the dyke. Depth of the mineralisation up to

120 m

from the

surface.

Long Pocket is located appropriately 7 km to the E from Junnagunna. The mineralisation area is

approximately 1 km West-East as well as North-South extents.

Estimation Techniques

The estimate was completed using Micromine Origin and Beyond 2025 software. Wireframe

restricted block models, one for each deposit, were estimated by Ordinary Kriging using increasingly

larger search radii to inform the block models until all blocks were populated. In the first pass a

minimum of three drillholes were required within the search radii equal to approximately 1.5 times the

drill spacing in the search direction. Directional semi variograms were modelled for each deposit and

used to weight the two-meter downhole composites of original assays during grade estimation. A

combination of top-cutting and grade clamping was applied to restrict the influence of very high-

grade samples. During grade clamping high-grade values are given their original value inside a given

distance, and outside that distance the value is reduced, different parameters were used for each

deposit based on the grade distributions and observed continuity.

Variable anisotropy was used during implicit modelling of wireframes and block estimation to better

honour the geometry of the deposit; typically, mineralization is steep to sub vertical within proximity

to the

Westmoreland

dyke system which spans the length of Redtree, Junnagunna and Huarabagoo,

rolling over to horizontal to sub horizontal mineralization approximately

20 m

from the dyke edged. At

Huarabagoo mineralization is dominantly sub vertical. Mineralization occurs as uranium oxides (such

as uraninite and carnotite) hosted almost exclusively in the "PTW4"

Westmoreland

conglomerate

with the underlying "PTW3" unit acting as a base to truncate mineralization. All models were

validated through review of local and global statistics comparing the input to the output data and by

visual inspection. Bulk Density determinations were used to inform the model with density values of

2.5 to 2.6 g/cm

3

used within the PTW4 conglomerate.

The estimate was classified according to the Qualified/Competent Persons view of the estimation

confidence. Indicated Resources are reported in areas where the spacing and quality of data are

sufficient to allow estimation to a level of confidence which can be used for mine planning and

economic evaluation. Those areas classified as Indicated Resources are typically informed by data

with spacing 30 to

50 m

and estimated into blocks approximately one third of the data spacing.

Comparison of Previous Estimates

The previous Mineral Resource Estimate had an effective date of

May 11

th

2009 and is superseded

by this estimate dated effective

January 31

st

2025. Differences in the estimate are shown in Table 3.

Differences in the estimate are attributed to the following items.

Additional drilling and receipt of assay results post

May 2009

to

January 2025

at Junnagunna

and Huarabagoo.

Additional exploration at Long Pocket, which was not included in the previous estimate.

Application of more sophisticated 3D modelling techniques, including implicit modelling which

was not commonly employed in 2009, and is more adept at modelling complex geometry than

traditional cross section interpretation.

The Redtree deposit, which has not seen further exploration has no material change and this

helps to support the veracity of the estimates.

Table 3 Comparison to previous estimates.

2009 MRE

Deposit

Tonnes

Density g/m

3

U

3

O

8

ppm

U

3

O

8

MLb.

Indicated

Redtree

12,900,000

2.5

900

25.5

Huarabagoo

1,460,000

2.5

830

2.7

Junnagunna

4,360,000

2.5

810

7.8

Long Pocket

-

-

-

-

Total Indicated

18,700,000

2.5

880

36

Inferred

Redtree

4,460,000

2.5

670

6.6

Huarabagoo

2,400,000

2.5

1,090

5.8

Junnagunna

2,150,000

2.5

750

3.6

Long Pocket

-

-

-

-

Total Inferred

9,000,000

2.5

800

15.9

Relative Difference %

Tonnes

Grade

Contained Metal

Indicated

Redtree

9 %

-2 %

6 %

Huarabagoo

71 %

7 %

81 %

Junnagunna

129 %

-21 %

92 %

Long Pocket

Total Indicated

49 %

-13 %

34 %

Inferred

Redtree

-33 %

19 %

-21 %

Huarabagoo

29 %

-20 %

3 %

Junnagunna

40 %

-17 %

17 %

Long Pocket

Total Inferred

31 %

-15 %

11 %

Absolute Difference %

Tonnes

Grade ppm

Contained Metal MLbs.

Indicated

Redtree

1,100,000

-

-20

1.5

Huarabagoo

1,040,000

0.1

60

2.2

Junnagunna

5,640,000

-

-170

7.2

Long Pocket

1,300,000

2.5

420

1.2

Total Indicated

9,100,000

-

-110

12.1

Inferred

Redtree

-1,460,000

-

130

-1.4

Huarabagoo

700,000

0.1

-220

0.2

Junnagunna

850,000

-

-130

0.6

Long Pocket

2,700,000

2.5

380

2.3

Total Inferred

2,800,000

-

-120

1.8

Environmental and Social Considerations

The project area is on land which has significance to the local Indigenous people and who are the

traditional custodians of the land. While the area is remote, Laramide, through its local subsidiary

Lagoon Creek Resources has an existing Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA) in place and has

maintained a working relationship with the local indigenous groups since 2006 and has involved them

in exploration activities. An activity exclusion zone exists at the southern end of the Huarabagoo

deposit which will require further negotiation for future access and exploration activities.

Only preliminary environmental studies have been completed in the area. It is acknowledged that

environmental constraints will be present should the project advance through the permitting steps to

production. Environmental constraints include species of concern and threatened species within the

region and site. However, the exact extent and distribution is currently unknown and further

environmental studies are required to map the local distribution of species.

Recommendations

It is noted that exploration drilling in the Link zone, between the Huarabagoo and Junnagunna

deposits, has identified uranium mineralisation. However, the drill spacing is insufficient for resource

estimation. Further drilling is recommended to potentially incorporate this zone in future resource

estimates. Furthermore, drilling data to the north of Junnagunna suggests the deposit remain open

and presents a compelling exploration target.

Additional recommendations to advance the project include further environmental studies, continued

exploration of satellite prospects on the property and infill and extensional drilling at all prospects. A

gap analysis to review the steps and data required to advance the project to Pre-Feasibility is also

advised.

Qualified/Competent Person Review

The technical information in this release relating to Mineral Resource Estimates has been reviewed

by Mr. R. J. Siddle, MSc, MAIG Principal Resource Geologist for Addison Mining Services Ltd. Mr.

Siddle is an independent Qualified Person within the meaning of the CIM Definition Standards for

Mineral Resources (2014) and independent Competent Person within the meaning of the JORC

(2012). He has over 15 years' experience in the industry, relevant experience includes undertaking

mineral resource estimates for a variety of commodities including gold and tin deposits. Mr. Siddle

has prior involvement with the project having worked as an exploration geologist for Lagoon Creek

Resources on the

Westmoreland

project in 2007 and 2008.

Mr. Siddle received assistance in preparation of the Mineral Resource Estimate from Ms.

Paula

Mierzwa

, Senior Geologist for Addison Mining Services. Ms. Mierzwa worked under the supervision

of Mr. Siddle and is thanked for her valued contribution to the study.

Mr. Siddle has reviewed and verified the technical information that forms the basis of, and has been

used in the preparation of, the Mineral Resource Estimate and this announcement, including

analytical data, drilling logs, QC data, density measurements, and sampling. Mr. Siddle consents to

the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on the information, in the form and context in

which it appears.

The update to Mineral Resources constitutes a Material Change and a NI 43-101 Technical report

will be filed on sedarplus.com within 45 days of this announcement.

This announcement dated

28th February 2025

has been authorised for release to the TSX and ASX

by President and CEO of Laramide Resources.

Follow us on Twitter @LaramideRes

About Laramide Resources Ltd.

Laramide is focused on exploring and developing high-quality uranium assets in Tier-1 uranium

jurisdictions. The company's portfolio comprises predominantly advanced uranium projects in districts

with historical production or superior geological prospectivity. The assets have been carefully chosen

for their size and production potential, and the two large development projects are considered to be

late-stage, low-technical risk projects. As well, Laramide has expanded its pipeline with strategic

exploration in

Kazakhstan

where the company is exploring over 5,500 km

2

of the prolific Chu-Sarysu

Basin for world class roll-front deposits which are amenable to in-situ recovery.

Forward-looking Statements and Cautionary Language

This release includes certain statements that may be deemed to be "forward-looking statements."

All statements in this release, other than statements of historical facts, that address events or

developments that the management of the Company expect, are forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are frequently, but not always, identified by words such as "expects",

"anticipates", "believes", "plans", "projects", "intends", "estimates", "envisages", "potential",

"possible", "strategy", "goals", "objectives", or variations thereof or stating that certain actions,

events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved, or the

negative of any of these terms and similar expressions. Actual results or developments may differ

materially from those in forward-looking statements. Laramide disclaims any intention or obligation

to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future

events or otherwise, save and except as may be required by applicable securities laws.

Since forward-looking information addresses future events and conditions, by their very nature

they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those

currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These include, but are not limited to,

exploration and production for uranium; delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or

development projects or capital expenditures; the uncertainty of resource estimates; health, safety

and environmental risks; worldwide demand for uranium; uranium price and other commodity price

and exchange rate fluctuations; environmental risks; competition; incorrect assessment of the

value of acquisitions; ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources; and

changes in legislation, including but not limited to tax laws, royalties and environmental

regulations.

SOURCE

Laramide Resources Ltd.

View original content to download multimedia:

http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/February2025/28/c7229.html

%SEDAR: 00003540E

For further information:

To learn more about Laramide, please visit the Company's website at

www.laramide.com or contact: Marc Henderson, President and CEO, Toronto, Canada, +1 (416)

599 7363; Ann Baines, Director, Investor Relations, Toronto, Canada, +1 (647) 832-9904

CO: Laramide Resources Ltd.

CNW 07:30e 28-FEB-25