Lithium Americas Increases Mineral Resource and Reserve for Thacker Pass
Lithium Americas Increases Mineral Resource and Reserve for Thacker Pass
(All amounts in US$ unless otherwise indicated)
VANCOUVER, British Columbia--(BUSINESS WIRE)--January 7, 2025--Lithium Americas
Corp. (TSX: LAC) (NYSE: LAC) (“Lithium Americas” or the “Company”) announced an
increased mineral resource and mineral reserve estimate for the Thacker Pass lithium project in
Humboldt County, Nevada (“Thacker Pass” or the “Project”), including the release of an
independent National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) technical report (“Technical Report”)
entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Thacker Pass Project Humboldt County, Nevada,
USA,” and an independent S-K 1300 technical report (the “S-K 1300 Technical Report”)
entitled “S-K 1300 Technical Report on the Thacker Pass Project Humboldt County, Nevada,
USA,” both dated effective December 31, 2024. The Project is indirectly owned by Lithium
Nevada Ventures LLC (“LN”). LN is a joint venture between the Company, which has a 62%
ownership, and General Motors Holdings LLC (“GM”), which has a 38% ownership.
Jonathan Evans, President and CEO, commented, “We are excited to release the results of our
Thacker Pass Technical Report that demonstrates the multigenerational opportunity for
transformational growth the Project creates. Thacker Pass is now the largest measured lithium
reserve and resource in the world and has the potential to become an unmatched district,
generating American jobs and helping the U.S. regain independence of its energy supply. We are
committed to safely and sustainably developing Thacker Pass while engaging with our
stakeholders to increase domestic production of critical minerals.”
HIGHLIGHTS
Proven and Probable (“P&P”) mineral reserve estimate of 14.3 million tonnes (“Mt”)
lithium carbonate equivalent (“LCE”) at an average grade of 2,540 parts per million
(“ppm”) lithium (“Li”), an increase of 286% since the November 2022 Feasibility
Study1; supports an expansion of up to five phases with an 85-year mine life.
Measured and Indicated (“M&I”) mineral resource estimate of 44.5 Mt LCE at an
average grade of 2,230 ppm Li; an increase of 177% since the November 2022 Feasibility
Study.
Expansion plan targeting 160,000 tonnes per year (“t/y”) of battery-quality lithium
carbonate (“Li2CO3”) production capacity in four phases of 40,000 t/y each, respectively
(“Phase 1,” “Phase 2,” “Phase 3” and “Phase 4”), with a sulfuric acid plant without an
additional Li2CO3 production circuit as Phases 1-4 are expected to have excess capacity
(“Phase 5”). Phase 4 expansion incorporates a direct rail line from Winnemucca to
Thacker Pass.
Project economics for an 85-year life of mine (“LOM”) (“Base Case”) and an optimized
production scenario for years 1-25 of the 85-year LOM (“Years 1-25” or “Production
Scenario”). Both the Base Case and Production Scenario use a price assumption of
$24,000 per tonne of Li2CO3.
Average annual EBITDA2 for the Production Scenario is estimated at $2.2 billion
per year and $2.1 billion per year for the Base Case.
Production Scenario after-tax net present value (“NPV”) of $5.9 billion at 8%
discount and 19.6% after-tax internal rate of return (“IRR”), and Base Case after-
tax NPV of $8.7 billion at 8% discount and 20.0% after-tax IRR.
Production Scenario operating costs (“OPEX”) of $6,238 per tonne lithium carbonate
produced, and Base Case OPEX of $8,039 per tonne lithium carbonate produced.
Capital cost (“CAPEX”) estimates for Phase 1 of $2.93 billion (as previously disclosed
in March 2024), Phase 2 of $2.33 billion, Phase 3 of $2.74 billion, Phase 4 and 5 together
of $4.32 billion, based on cost estimates from Q2 2024 and include a 15% contingency.
Construction of each of Phases 1 through 4 is expected to be spaced four years apart, with
Phase 5 beginning at the same time as Phase 4.
Phase 1 is expected to create nearly 2,000 jobs during construction and approximately
350 full-time jobs during operations. Over the LOM, an average of approximately 1,100
full-time employees are expected to support mining and processing operations.
Additional jobs are expected to be created in the local communities through ancillary and
support services, such as transportation, maintenance and supplies.
Phase 1 is targeted for completion in late 2027. The Company is targeting to announce
the final investment decision (“FID”) for Phase 1 in early 2025. Bechtel is the
engineering, procurement and construction management (“EPCM”) contractor for the
construction of Phase 1.
1 For more details, refer to the Company’s Feasibility Study entitled “Feasibility Study National
Instrument 43-101 Technical Report for the Thacker Pass Project Humboldt County, Nevada,
USA”, dated effective November 2, 2022, available on SEDAR+.
2 Earnings before income, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) is a non-GAAP
financial measure, refer to Non-GAAP Measures for more information.
PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS
The Thacker Pass Technical Report results reflect continuous improvement initiatives, including
optimizing the mine plan and incorporating results of test work completed at the Company’s
Lithium Technical Development Center.
The Thacker Pass deposit allows the mine to have multiple grades of ore exposed at any given
time, enabling flexibility to deliver optimum ore blends as needed to maximize economics. The
Company has developed an optimized mine plan which allows an approximate 25% increase in
recovery for the first 12 years of production, providing a higher economic return during the years
of capital investment for building Phases 2 through 5.
Process optimizations and engineering development updates include:
Beneficiation circuit: the number of decanter centrifuges reduced from six to four.
Counter-current Decantation (“CCD”) thickeners: smaller diameter.
Filter presses: reduced from eight membrane type to four recessed chamber type.
Brine evaporators: reduced from three to two.
Sulfuric acid plant for Phase 1 through 4: size of plant reduced from the previous 3,000
tonnes per day (“t/d”) sulfuric acid to 2,250 t/d sulfuric acid, reducing the transportation
and consumption of liquid sulfur.
Final polishing step where low levels of calcium and magnesium are removed: improved
reaction parameters in the calcium precipitation circuit reduce loading on ion exchange.
Reagents: reduced soda ash consumption in the lithium carbonate circuit.
To maximize the life of mine, ore control parameters would be lowered after the construction of
Phase 1 through 5 is completed. Phase 5 would consist of a 3,000 t/d sulfuric acid plant and a
brine plant to supplement feed to the processing plants of Phases 1 through 4, to maintain their
nominal production capacity at 40,000 t/y.
Estimated OPEX for Years 1-25 is approximately $500 per tonne lower (~7%), than the
November 2022 Feasibility Study. Lower raw material (reagent) consumption and costs,
decreased maintenance on less equipment and reduced tailings placement (due to less tailings
produced) were offset by higher mining costs to achieve the optimized mine plan, power utility
costs based on final selection of power provider and general and administrative costs for
insurance.
TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY
December 2024 Thacker Pass Technical Report
Results (US$)
Production Scenario
(Years 1-25)
Base Case
(85-year LOM)
Mineral resource (Measured & Indicated) 44.5 Mt LCE at a grade of 2,230 ppm Li
Mineral reserves (Proven & Probable) 14.3 Mt LCE at a grade of 2,540 ppm Li
Ore reserve life 85 years
Operational life 25 years 85 years
Nominal production capacity
160,000 t/y Li2CO3
(Phases 1-4 at 40,000 t/y Li 2CO3 each, with additional
Phase 5 producing brine to feed to Phases 1-4 lithium
processing plants)
Mining method Continuous open-pit mining
Processing method Sulfuric acid leaching
Metallurgical Recovery 82.1% 80.4%
Initial capital costs – Phase 1 $2.93 billion
Initial capital costs – Phase 2 $2.33 billion
Initial capital costs – Phase 3 $2.75 billion
Initial capital costs – Phase 4 and 5 (includes rail) $4.32 billion
Sustaining capital costs $1.55 billion $6.92 billion
Operating Costs (average) (per tonne LCE) $6,238 $8,039
Lithium carbonate price assumption (per tonne) $24,000
Average Annual EBITDA (per year) $2.2 billion $2.1 billion
After-tax NPV @ 8% Discount Rate $5.9 billion $8.7 billion
After-tax IRR 19.6% 20.0%
CONSTRUCTION TIMELINE
Construction of Thacker Pass to reach total nominal design capacity of 160,000 t/y of Li 2CO3 is
planned over five phases. Each of Phases 1 through 4 are expected to be spaced 4 years apart
with Phase 5 beginning at the same time as Phase 4. Construction of Phases 2 through 5 is
expected to occur over a 13-year period, from the start of Phase 1 first production. Phase 4
expansion includes a direct rail line to Thacker Pass for the transportation of raw materials and
finished product. The lithium carbonate production plants for Phase 1 through 4 is expected to
have excess capacity that would take brine feed from Phase 5 to maintain their nominal
production capacity of 40,000 t/y. Additional required permitting for Phases 2 through 5 will be
initiated following the completion of Phase 1 construction.
Thacker Pass Expansion by Phase Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
Sulfuric Acid Plant Capacity (t/d) 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250 3,000
Nominal Design LCE Production (t/y) 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 -
Beneficiation circuit X X X X X
Leaching, Neutralization & CCD circuits X X X X X
Magnesium and calcium removal circuit X X X X Partial
Lithium carbonate production plant X X X X -
Construction of Phase 1 commenced in early 2023 and the Company is targeting to announce
FID in early 2025. Bechtel is the EPCM contractor for the construction of Phase 1. In Q4 2024,
the Company provided Bechtel and other major contractors with limited full notice to proceed to
de-risk the construction schedule and continue to target completion in late 2027.
Current work at Thacker Pass for Phase 1 includes excavation of the process plant (now over
75% complete), advancing detailed engineering (now over 50% complete) and awarding of
procurement packages. At the Workforce Hub, the Company’s full-service housing facility in
Winnemucca for construction workers, the site’s utility infrastructure is being built out.
CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE
Total estimated CAPEX for the development of Phases 1 through 5 for total nominal production
of 160,000 t/y of lithium carbonate is $12.4 billion. CAPEX estimates are based on Q2 2024
pricing and include a 15% contingency. CAPEX estimates include early works, mine
development, mining, the process plant, the off-site transload facility, commissioning and all
associated infrastructure.
CAPEX for Phase 2, 3, 4 and 5 is derived from Phase 1 estimates. CAPEX for Phases 2 and 3
benefits from established mine and plant infrastructure from Phase 1. CAPEX for Phases 4 and 5
include the addition of one processing plant, two sulfuric acid plants and a direct rail line to
Thacker Pass.
Thacker Pass CAPEX
Estimates
($US millions)
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase
4 & 5
Additional
LOM
Mine $88 - - - -
Process & Sulfuric Acid
Plants $2,842 $2,326 $2,754 $4,074 -
Infrastructure Relocation - $2 - - $114
Rail expansion - - - $241 -
Total Development
Capital $2,930 $2,328 $2,754 $4,315 $114
Sustaining capital costs for Years 1 through 25 total $1.55 billion and for LOM total $6.92
billion. Sustaining capital costs include replacement costs for mining equipment, process plant
equipment, expansions of storage facilities and infrastructure and capital repayment to third
parties for the off-site transload terminal, mining and limestone quarry. Capital costs for Phases 2
through 5 are not included in sustaining capital costs.
Sustaining Capital Cost Estimate (US$ millions) Production Scenario
(Years 1-25)
Base Case
(85-year LOM)
Mine including equipment capital $636 $3,445
Mobile equipment $28 $93
Process plants and infrastructure $626 $3,125
Third-party capital repayment $259 $259
Total sustaining capital cost $1,549 $6,921
OPERATING COST ESTIMATE
OPEX include raw materials, labor, utilities, maintenance materials, supplies and outside
services and tailings. Reagents for the sulfuric acid plant and process plant account for
approximately 50% of total operating costs for LOM or 56% for Years 1-25. Primary reagents
include liquid sulfur, soda ash, quicklime, caustic soda, flocculant and limestone.
Summary of Thacker Pass OPEX (US$)
Production Scenario
(Years 1-25)
Base Case
(85-year LOM)
$ per tonne
Li2CO3
% of
Total
$ per tonne
Li2CO3
% of
Total
Mine $904 14% $1,767 22%
Lithium Processing & Sulfuric Acid Plants $5,013 80% $5,946 74%
General & Administrative $321 5% $326 4%
Total Operating Costs 6,238 100% $8,039 100%
MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE
Thacker Pass Mineral Resource Estimate as of December 31, 2024
Category In Situ Dry
Tonnage (Mt)
Average Li
(ppm)
Lithium Carbonate
Equivalent (Mt)
Measured 560.8 2,680 8.0
Indicated 3,225.2 2,150 36.5
Total Measured & Indicated 3,786.0 2,230 44.5
Inferred 1,981.5 2,070 21.6
Notes for the December 31, 2024 Mineral Resource:
1. The independent Qualified Person who supervised the preparation of and approved
disclosure for the estimate is Benson Chow, P.G., SME-RM.
2. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
3. The Mineral Resource model has been generated using Imperial units. Metric tonnages
shown in table are conversions from the Imperial Block Model.
4. Mineral Resources are inclusive of 1,056.7 million metric tonnes (Mt) of Mineral
Reserves
5. Mineral Resources are reported using an economic break-even formula: “Operating Cost
per Resource Short Ton”/“Price per Recovered Short Ton Lithium” * 10^6 = ppm Li
Cutoff. “Operating Cost per Resource Short Ton” = US$86.76, “Price per Recovered
Short Ton Lithium” is estimated: “Lithium Carbonate Equivalent (LCE) Price” * 5.3228
* (1 – “Royalties”) * “Metallurgical Recovery”. Variables are “LCE Price” =
US$26,308/Short Ton ($29,000/tonne) Li2CO3, “GRR” = 1.75% and “Metallurgical
Recovery” = 73.5%.
6. Presented at a cutoff grade of 858 ppm Li. and a maximum ash content of 85%.
7. A mineral resource constraining pit shell has been derived from performing a pit
optimization estimation using Vulcan software and the same economic inputs as what
was used to calculate the cutoff grade.
8. The conversion factor for lithium to LCE is 5.3228.
9. Applied density for the mineralization is weighted in the block model based on clay and
ash percentages in each block and the average density for each lithology (Section 14.1.6.4
of the Technical Report).
10. Measured Mineral Resources are in blocks estimated using at least 3 drill holes and 10
samples where the closest sample during estimation is less than or equal to 900 ft.
Indicated Mineral Resources are in blocks estimated using at least 2 drill holes and 10
samples where the closest sample during estimation is less than or equal to 1,500 ft.
Inferred Mineral Resources are in blocks estimated using at least 2 drill holes and 9
samples where the closest sample during estimation is less than or equal to 2,500 ft.
11. Tonnages and grades have been rounded to accuracy levels deemed appropriate by the
QP. Summation errors due to rounding may exist.
12. Mineral Resources are presented on a 100% basis. LN indirectly owns the Project.
Lithium Americas owns a 62% interest in LN and GM owns the remaining 38%.
MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE
Thacker Pass Mineral Reserve Estimate as of December 31, 2024
Category
Run-of-Mine
(ROM) Dry
Tonnage (Mt)
Average Li
(ppm)
Lithium Carbonate
Equivalent (Mt)
Proven 269.5 3,180 4.5
Probable 787.1 2,320 9.7
Total Proven and Probable 1,056.7 2,540 14.3
Notes for the December 31, 2024 Mineral Reserve:
1. The independent Qualified Person for the Mineral Reserves Estimate has been prepared
by Kevin Bahe, P.E.
2. Mineral Reserves have been converted from measured and indicated Mineral Resources
within the feasibility study and have demonstrated economic viability.
3. Reserves presented in an optimized pit at an 85% maximum ash content, cutoff grade of
858 ppm Li, and an average cut-off factor of 13.3 kg of LCE recovered per tonne of leach
ore tonne (ranged from 7.5-26 kg of LCE recovered per tonne of leach ore tonne).
4. A sales price of $29,000 US$/tonne of Li2CO3 was utilized in the pit optimization
resulting in the generation of the reserve pit shell in 2024. An overall slope of 27 degrees
was applied. For bedrock material pit slope was set at 52 degrees. Mining and processing
costs of $95.40 per tonne of ROM feed, a processing recovery factor based on the block
model, and a GRR cost of 1.75% were additional inputs into the pit optimization.
5. A LOM plan was developed based on equipment selection, equipment rates, labor rates,
and plant feed and reagent parameters. All Mineral Reserves are within the LOM plan.
The LOM plan is the basis for the economic assessment within the Technical Report,
which is used to show the economic viability of the Mineral Reserves.
6. Applied density for the ore is varied by clay type (Table 14-13 of the Technical Report).
7. Lithium Carbonate Equivalent is based on in-situ LCE tonnes with a 95% mine recovery
factor.
8. Tonnages and grades have been rounded to accuracy levels deemed appropriate by the
QP. Summation errors due to rounding may exist.
9. The reference point at which the Mineral Reserves are defined is at the point where the
ore is delivered to the run-of-mine feeder.
10. Mineral Reserves are presented on a 100% basis. LN indirectly owns the Project. Lithium
Americas owns a 62% interest in LN and GM owns the remaining 38%.
Please refer to the Technical Report for full details on the geology, mining, processing and
infrastructure of Thacker Pass.
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL
Mineral Resources
Sample names, certificate identifications and run identifications were cross referenced with the
laboratory certificates and sample assay datasheet for spot checking and verification of data. No
data anomalies were discovered during this check.
Quality Assurance / Quality Control (“QA/QC”) methodology utilized by Lithium Americas and
results of these checks were discussed between Lithium Americas’ geologists and the Mineral
Resources qualified person, as defined under NI 43-101 (“QP”), who has reviewed and verified
the Mineral Resource estimate (the “Mineral Resources QP”).
Geologic logs, Access databases and Excel spreadsheets were provided to the Mineral Resources
QP for cross validation with the Excel lithological description file. Spot checks between Excel
lithological description sheets were performed against the source data with no inconsistencies
found with the geologic unit descriptions.
Verification of the block model was performed by the creation of a geostatistical model and the
review of its various outputs. Histograms, simulation and swath plots were created and analyzed
to validate the accuracy of the block model.
Based on the various reviews, validation exercises and remedies outlined above, the Mineral
Resources QP concluded that the data is adequate for use for Mineral Resource estimation.
Mineral Reserves
A QP has reviewed and verified the Mineral Reserve estimate (the “Mineral Reserves QP”), for
the following as part of the mine planning, cost model and Mineral Reserves data verification.
Geotechnical: slope stability study completed by BARR Engineering in 2019 and 2024
was reviewed.
Mining Method: open-pit mining with limited blasting has been reviewed and assessed
with geotechnical reports.
Pit Optimization: was based on the resource pit completed in 2024. The final optimized
pit is limited by several physical features.
Mine Design: ramp, bench and face angle parameters were validated by geotechnical
reports.
Production Schedule: the production schedule was validated based on reasonability.
Labor and Equipment: estimations for equipment sizes, capacity, availability and
utilization were reviewed for reasonability.
Economic Model: model was reviewed and demonstrated economic viability for the
Project.
Facilities and Materials: facilities and materials located within the reserve pit boundary
will be re-located when access to those areas are required during mining.
QUALIFIED PERSON
The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been derived from the
Technical Report and has been reviewed and approved by Rene LeBlanc, RM-SME, Vice
President, Growth and Product Strategy of the Company, a QP as defined under NI 43-101.
Further information about Thacker Pass, including a description of the key assumptions,
parameters, sampling methods, data verification and QA/QC programs, methods relating to