Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

KNT.TO ·

K92 Mining Inc Announces Robust Kora Stage 3 Expansion PEA

Economic Studies

Suite 488 – 1090 West Georgia Street

Vancouver, British Columbia

Canada V6E 3V7

Telephone: +1 (604) 687-7130

Facsimile: +1 (604) 608-9110

www.k92mining.com

NEWS RELEASE

K92 MINING INC ANNOUNCES ROBUST KORA STAGE 3 EXPANSION PEA

Vancouver, British Columbia, July 27, 2020 - K92 Mining Inc . (“K92” or the “ Company”)

(TSX-V: KNT; OTCQX: KNTNF) is pleased to announce the results of the Preliminary

Economic Assessment (“PEA”) on its Kora gold deposit (“Kora”), which together with its

Irumafimpa gold deposit (“Irumafimpa”) comprise the Kainantu Gold Mine Project (the “Kainantu

Project”) in Papua New Guinea. Based on the results of the study, the Company is proceeding to

a Definitive Feasibility Study (“DFS”) for the Kora Stage 3 Expansion.

Stage 3 Expansion PEA Study Highlights

• After-tax NPV5% of US$1.5 billion at US$1,500 per ounce gold, increasing to an after-

tax NPV5% of US$2.0 billion at US$1,900 per ounce gold.

• Average annual expansion run-rate production of 318,000 ounces gold equivalent

(“AuEq”)(1) per annum at 1.0Mtpa, commencing in late-2023, representing a 165%

increase from Stage 2 Expansion Life of Mine (“LOM”) average annual production.

• LOM average cash costs of US$353 per AuEq ounce and AISC(2) of US$489 per AuEq

ounce.

• Low cash costs of US$202 per gold ounce and AISC costs of US$362 per gold ounce

net of by-product credits.

• Initial pre-expansion capital cost of US$125 million and life of mine sustaining capital

cost of US$341 million with all capital costs fully funded by existing Stage 2 Kainantu

mine cash flow.

• Mine life of 12 years, including ~3 years of Stage 2 production (2021 to late-2023).

1. AuEq – calculated on the following metal prices: Au – US$1,500/oz, Ag – US$18.00/oz, Cu – US$3.00/lb.

Note that gold equivalence factors for the production estimates are different to th ose used for reporting the

Mineral Resource estimate.

2. AISC – All-In Sustaining Costs include cash costs plus estimated corporate G&A, sustaining costs and

accretion.

The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too

speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable

them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.

Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

2

John Lewins , K92 Chief Executive Officer and Director, state d, “Over the past three years,

Kainantu has delivered tremendous production and exploration growth and we are very pleased

to report the results for the next major growth plan - Stage 3 Expansion. The PEA economics are

robust, with run-rate production of ~318,000 oz AuEq per annum; low average all-in sustaining

costs net of by-product credits of $362/oz gold which benefitted from higher copper grades and

economies of scale, and; an after-tax NPV5% of US$1.5 billion at US$1,500/oz. Importantly, the

Stage 3 Expansion is a low capital intensity project and within our ability to self -fund from

scheduled mine cash flow.

As a result, we are initiating a Definitive Feasibility Study (“DFS”) for Stage 3, targeting mid -

2021. Work on the new twin incline is underway and we currently have four diamond drill rigs

operational underground focused on upgrading the resource for the DFS and expanding the known

resource to the south and at depth. Surface exploration is also rapidly expanding, from the current

3 diamond drill rigs to 5 drill rigs by year -end, adding even greater focus on resource growth

near-mine and regionally.”

PEA Overview

The Kora Stage 3 Expansion PEA considers an expansion to underground mining with on -site

treatment of mine material by conventional milling, gravity and flotation recovery through a

standalone 1-million-tonne-per annum (“ Mtpa”) process plant. The PEA is derived from the

Company’s Mineral Resource Estimate for Kora (effective date of April 2, 2020) and does not

incorporate post resource drilling results.

An updated technical report prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards

of Disclosure f or Mineral Projects (“NI 43 -101”), titled , “NI 43 -101 Independent Technical

Report and Preliminary Economic Assessment for Expansion of the Kainantu Project to treat 1

Mtpa from the Kora Gold Deposit, Kainantu, Papua New Guinea”, which will include the results

of the PEA discussed in this news release together with an updated Mineral Resource Estimate for

the Kora Deposit, will be filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com under the Company’s profile by July

31, 2020.

3

Table 1: Kainantu Stage 3 Expansion - Preliminary Economic Assessment Highlights

US Dollars unless otherwise stated

Life of Mine

(starting January 2021)

Post Stage 3 Completion

(2024 onwards)

Production

Mine life (years) 12 years

Total mill feed (000s tonnes) 9,788

Average mill throughput (tonnes per annum) 816 ktpa 1.0 Mtpa (run-rate)(1)

Total Metal Production

AuEq (000s ounces) 3,096 2,639

Gold (000s ounces) 2,642 2,229

Copper (mlbs) 195 177

Silver (000s ounces) 4,248 3,833

Average Annual Metal Production

AuEq (000s ounces per annum) 258 318 (run-rate)(1)

Gold (000s ounces per annum) 220 270 (run-rate)(1)

Copper (mlbs per annum) 16 21 (run-rate)(1)

Silver (000s ounces per annum) 354 450 (run-rate)(1)

Average Grade

AuEq grade (g/t) 10.4 g/t

Gold grade (g/t) 8.84 g/t

Copper grade (%) 1.0%

Silver grade (g/t) 18 g/t

Average Recovery

Gold Recovery (%) 95%

Copper Recovery (%) 95%

Silver Recovery (%) 77%

Costs

Mining cost per tonne (US$/t) $41.41 $40.18

Processing cost per tonne (US$/t) $25.20 $24.77

G&A cost per tonne (US$/t) $27.01 $23.84

Total operating cost per tonne of mill feed (US$/t) $93.62 $88.79

Sustaining capital per tonne of mill feed (US$/t) $34.63 $24.84

Total cost per tonne of mill feed (US$/t) $128.26 $113.63

Initial pre-expansion capital expenditure ($m) $125

Sustaining capital expenditure ($m) $341

Total capital expenditure ($m) $466

Cash cost per ounce AuEq ($/oz)(2)

All-in sustaining cost per ounce AuEq ($/oz)(3)

Cash cost per ounce gold ($/oz)(2)

$353

$489

$202

$341

$445

$177

All-in sustaining cost per ounce gold ($/oz) (3) $362 $301

Base Case Economic Analysis at US$1,500/oz Gold, US$3.00/lb Copper and US$18.00/oz Silver

After-tax NPV0% $2.0 billion

After-tax NPV5% $1.5 billion

IRR (%) and Payback Period (years) N/A (Self-Funded)

Economic Analysis at $1,900/oz Gold, US$3.00/lb Copper and US$18.00/oz Silver

After-tax NPV0% $2.7 billion

After-tax NPV5% $2.0 billion

IRR (%) and Payback Period (years) N/A (Self-Funded)

1. Run-rate excludes the final partial calendar year of production

2. Cash costs are net of by-product credits and are inclusive of mining costs, processing costs, site G&A and refining charges and royalties.

3. AISC includes cash costs plus estimated corporate G&A, sustaining costs and accretion.

4

Kora Mineral Resource Estimate

The Company’s current Mineral Resource Estimate for Kora (effective date of April 2, 2020) was

completed by H & S Consultants Pty. Ltd. (Table 2). The Kora resource estimate provides the

resource base for the PEA, while the Irumafimpa deposit was not included in the PEA.

Table 2 – Global Kora Mineral Resource (Effective Date April 2, 2020, 1 g/t gold cut-off)

Tonnes Gold Copper Copper AuEq

(Mt) (g/t) (Moz) (g/t) (Moz) (%) (kt) (g/t) (Moz)

Measured 0.66 13.34 0.28 11.6 0.25 0.51 3.4 14.14 0.3

Indicated 2.47 8.44 0.67 16.3 1.29 0.63 15.6 9.46 0.8

Total M&I 3.13 9.47 0.95 15.3 1.54 0.61 19 10.45 1.1

Inferred 12.67 7.32 2.98 19.9 8.11 1.1 139.4 9.01 3.7

• The Independent and Qualified Person responsible for the Mineral Resource Estimate is

Simon Tear, P.Geo. of H & S Consultants Pty. Ltd., Sydney, Australia.

• Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic

viability.

• Resources were compiled at 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 and 10 g/t gold cut-off grades.

• Density (t/m3) is on a per zone basis, K1 and Kora Link: 2.84 t/m3; K2: 2.93 t/m3; Waste:

2.8 t/m3.

• Reported tonnage and grade figures are rounded from raw estimates to reflect the order

of accuracy of the estimate.

• Minor variations may occur during the addition of rounded numbers.

• Calculations used metric units (metres, tonnes and g/t).

• Gold equivalents are calculated as AuEq = Au g/t + ((0.923 x Cu%)* 1.38)+ ((0.77 x Ag

g/t*0.0115). Gold price US$1,400/oz; Silver US$16.05/oz; Copper US$3.05/lb. Metal

payabilities and recoveries are incorporated into the AuEq formula. Recoveries of 92.3%

for copper and 77% for silver.

• Note that these gold equivalence fac tors for resource reporting are different to those

applied for the mine plan and production estimates.

Mining Operations

The Company engaged Australian Mine and Development Pty. Ltd. (“AMDAD”) to undertake the

PEA mine plan for Kora, which involved:

• Applying financial and processing parameters to determine cut-off grades for stope design.

• Generating three-dimensional stope shapes and mining inventory using the CAE Mineable

Shape Optimiser (MSO) program.

• Creating a conceptual development layout to suit the MSO inventory.

• Producing a project cash-flow model based on a mining schedule prepared by a third party

consultant engaged by K92.

5

The Stage 3 Expansion mine plan is designed as an incline access operation with a series of ore

passes for efficient gravity material movement amongst sublevels and ultimately to the twin incline

for material transport to surface. Life of mine tonnage from the PEA mine plan is approximately

80% from long hole open stoping and 20% from cut and fill mining methods. Both mining methods

have already been successfully applied at the Kora deposit, with long hole stoping utilizing the

AVOCA and modified AVOCA meth ods. The AVOCA methods involve backfilling from the

overcut sublevel while the long hole stope is advanced from the undercut sublevel to limit the

strike length of the open stope. By limiting the strike length of the open stope the method is

designed to maintain stability of the stope walls and backs and increase the ultimate strike length

extracted. The application of c ut and fill mining is greate st during the earlier parts of the mine

plan until the paste fill plant is constructed in 2022. Prior to the i mplementation of the paste fill

plant, fill is exclusively unconsolidated waste backfill. Once the paste fill plant is commissioned,

the AVOCA method will be replaced by longhole stoping with cemented fill.

Stopes were identified for the mine plan based on the CAE Mineable Shape Optimiser (MSO)

program at an elevated cut-off grade of 5.5 g/t AuEq . An elevated cut-off grade was selected as

this provided the greatest discounted cash flow while resulting in only a moderate reduction in

gold equivalent ounces produced. Stope shapes with uneconomic development access were

excluded. Dilution was estimated based on a 0.5m dilution skin for both the footwall and hanging

wall using the MSO program for a minimum stope width of 3.0 metres . An additional dilution

factor of 8% (12% for K1 ) was then applied to account for external dilution from backfill and

additional falloff. The overall dilution range is 21% to 41%, with K1 and K2 averaging 31% and

26% dilution, respectively. A simple mining recovery factor of 90% was applied. The life of mine

average head grade is 8.84 g/t Au, 1.0 % Cu and 18 g/t Ag or 10.4 g/t AuEq.

The mine plan involves operating at the Stage 2 400,000 -tonnes-per-annum throughput rate until

late-2023 when the Stage 3 Expansion is online. In 2024 to the end of the mine life, the designed

throughput rate is 1 Mtpa. See Table 5 for a material movement summary as part of the simplified

economic model.

See Figure 1 for a long-section of the life of mine plan lateral and vertical development.

See Figure 2 for the Mineable Shape Optimiser (MSO) shapes at 5.5g/t AuEq cut-off long-section.

Mineral Processing, Tailings and Infrastructure

K92 engaged Mincore Pty. Ltd. to complete the PEA for the expansion of Kainantu through the

design of a standalone 1 Mtpa processing plant and supporting infrastructure. The new plant is

adjacent to the existing process plant, which has a designed throughp ut of 400,000 tonnes per

annum. The existing plant will be placed on care and maintenance upon the ramp-up of the Stage

3 Process Plant.

Run-of-mine (ROM) material is trucked ~6km from the 800 Portal to the Kainantu Process Plant,

where it is either stock piled or direct tipped. The 1 Mtpa processing plant design flowsheet

incorporates a conventional single stage jaw crushing (200tph) with direct feed SAG milling circuit

(125tph), mill that includes flash flotation and a gravity circuit to capture free gold to produce gold

6

dore, followed by conventional sulphide flotation, thickening, filtering and drying for concentrate.

This circuit is based on simple conventional technology, with the flow-sheet largely similar to the

existing Kainantu processing circuit . The key differences being the Stage 3 Process Plant

implementing one-stage crush circuit (vs two -stage crushing circuit ) and SAG milling (vs ball

milling).

Tailings management upgrades are part of the Stage 3 Expansion, through the construction of a

paste fill plant to mitigate surface tailings deposition. Thickened tailings at the process plant are

designed to be pumped to the paste fill plant at the 800 Portal, with the final paste fill product

pumped underground to void stopes for fill. Residual thickened tailings report to the tailings

impoundment on surface. To support the increased processing capacity and implementation of the

paste fill plant, a new 13MW centralized standby power station will be constructed, in addition to

22kV switchyard and 11kV substation, 11kV power reticulation and 11kV overhead power line to

the 800 Portal.

See Figure 3 for the 1.0Mtpa Process Plant Flowsheet.

See Figure 4 for the location of the 1.0Mtpa Standalone Processing Plant.

Capital and Operating Costs

The initial capital cost estimate include s an overall 25% contingency and the major items are

outlined in Table 3.

Table 3: Capital Cost Estimates

US Dollars unless otherwise stated

Camp Upgrade $4.1m

Process Plant 1Mtpa $46.3m

Power Station $16.0m

Office Facilities $0.8m

Mining Fleet $25.9m

Paste fill Plant & Electricals $20.3m

Freight $11.3m

Initial Pre-Expansion Capital $124.6m

Total Life of Mine Sustaining Capital $341.3m

Totals may differ due to rounding

Table 4: Operating Cost Estimates (Life of Mine Average)

US Dollars unless otherwise stated

Mining Cost ($/t) $41.41

Processing Cost ($/t) $25.20

G&A Cost ($/t) $27.01

Total Cost Per Tonne Processed ($/t) $93.62

Totals may differ due to rounding

7

Economic Analysis

In addition to preparation of mine plan schedules, AMDAD prepared a pre-tax conceptual

cashflow and discounted cashflow derived from the schedule. Tax calculations for the after-tax

cashflow and discounted cashflow were prepared by K92. A summary is shown in Table 5 and a

sensitivity analysis to gold price is shown in Table 6.

Table 5: Simplified Financial Model at US$1,500/oz Au, US$3.00/lb Cu, US$18.00/oz Ag

Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032

Mill Throughput (ktpa) 396 401 542 872 985 1,002 1,004 992 1,001 1,000 1,000 593

Gold Grade 10.97 10.77 9.02 7.38 9.50 9.12 10.17 9.24 8.57 9.20 8.65 3.71

Copper Grade 0.56% 0.57% 0.78% 0.91% 0.93% 0.85% 0.82% 1.17% 1.15% 1.16% 1.06% 0.89%

Silver Grade 11.4 12.0 13.8 13.7 17.7 17.4 16.3 18.1 23.9 20.5 19.9 15.8

AuEq Grade 11.88 11.71 10.28 8.80 10.99 10.50 11.50 11.08 10.43 11.03 10.33 5.10

Gold Production (000s oz) 133 132 149 197 286 279 312 280 262 281 264 67

Copper Production (m lbs) 4.6 4.8 8.9 16.6 19.2 17.8 17.2 24.4 24.0 24.3 22.2 11.0

Silver Production (000s oz) 111 119 185 296 433 432 405 445 592 507 493 232

AuEq Production (000s oz) 144 143 170 234 331 321 353 336 319 337 315 92

Net Revenue (US$m)(1) $198 $198 $233 $320 $454 $441 $485 $458 $434 $460 $432 $124

Total OPEX (US$m)(1) $50 $54 $62 $82 $88 $90 $90 $86 $87 $90 $87 $50

Growth Capital (US$m) $18 $39 $54 $11 $3 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Sustaining Capital (US$m) $44 $43 $42 $32 $34 $38 $27 $25 $24 $14 $10 $6

Pre-Tax Net Cashflow

(US$m) $86 $62 $76 $196 $329 $313 $367 $348 $323 $356 $334 $68

After-tax Net Cashflow

(US$m) $54 $35 $45 $144 $238 $222 $261 $247 $229 $254 $238 $52

1. Net revenue in summary model includes the impact of royalty payments.

Table 6: After-Tax NPV5% Sensitivity to Gold Price

Gold Price After-Tax NPV5% (US$B)

$1,400 $1.3 billion

$1,500 $1.5 billion

$1,600 $1.6 billion

$1,700 $1.7 billion

$1,800 $1.8 billion

$1,900 $2.0 billion

Conference Call and Webcast to Present Results

K92 will host a conference call and webcast to present the Stage 3 Kainantu Expansion PEA at

8:30 am (EDT) on Tuesday, July 28, 2020.

• Listeners may access the conference call by dialing toll -free to 1-800-319-4610 within

North America or +1-604-638-5340 from international locations.

o The conference call will also be broadcast live (webcast) and may be accessed via

the following link: http://services.choruscall.ca/links/k92mining20200728.html

8

Qualified Person

K92 Mine Geology Manager and Mine Exploration Manager, Mr. Andrew Kohler, PGeo, a

Qualified Person under the meaning of NI 43-101 has reviewed and approved the technical content

of this news release. Data verification by Mr. Kohler includes significant tim e onsite reviewing

drill core, face sampling, underground workings and discussing work programs and results with

geology and mining personnel.

On Behalf of the Company,

John Lewins, Chief Executive Officer and Director

For further information, please contact David Medilek, P.Eng., CFA at +1-604-687-7130.

NEITHER TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT

TERM IS DEFINED IN POLICIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS

RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In this press release, we use the terms “cash costs" and "all-in sustaining costs ". These should be

considered as non-GAAP financial measures as defined in applicable Canadian securities laws and

should not be considered in i solation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in

accordance with GAAP.

Cash costs per ounce is a non-GAAP term typically used by gold mining companies to assess the

level of gross margin available to the Company by subtracting these costs from the unit price

realized during the period. This non -GAAP term is also used to assess the ability of a mining

company to generate cash flow from operations. Cash costs per ounce includes mining and

processing costs plus applicable royalties, and net of by -product revenue and net realizable value

adjustments. Total cash costs per ounce is exclusive of exploration costs.

Cash costs per ounce is intended to provide additional information only and does not have any

standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by

other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of

performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The measure is not necessarily indicative of cash

flow from operations under IFRS or operating costs presented under IFRS.

The Company adopted an "all-in sustaining costs per ounce" non-GAAP performance measure in

accordance with the World Gold Council published in June 2013. The Company believes the

measure more fully defines the total costs associated with producing gold; however, this

performance measure has no standardized meaning. Accordingly, there may be some variation in

the method of computation of "all-in sustaining costs " as determined by the Company compared

with other mining companies. In this context, "all -in sustaining costs" for the co nsolidated

Company reflects total mining and processing costs, corporate and administrative costs,

exploration costs, sustaining capital, and other operating costs.