Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

KNT.TO ·

K92 is pleased to provide a production update on the Kainantu Gold Mine for the March Quarter of 2017.

Production Results

Suite 488 – 1090 West Georgia Street

Vancouver, British Columbia

Canada V6E 3V7

Telephone: (604) 687-7130

Facsimile: (604) 608-9110

NEWS RELEASE

May 16, 2017 Vancouver, British Columbia

K92 is pleased to provide a production update on the Kainantu Gold Mine for the March

Quarter of 2017.

 Total production of 23,400 tonnes mined, primarily from development of the 1205

mRL, 1220 mRL and 1235 mRL, a production rate significantly above the 13,645

tonnes scheduled in the AMDAD Mine Plan

 The first stope production now mined from the remnant stopes

 The Process Plant treated just under 12,000 tonnes in March and has regularly

achieved over 600 tonnes per day, which is above design throughput

 Grade control drilling and sampling for the initial mining area, comprising stopes

and development from 1205 mRL to 1265 mRL levels and between 59450 North and

59700 North, defines 38% more tonnes and 13% more ozs than the AMDAD design

 Detailed design work incorporating all res ults from the grade control drilling and

face samples has defined a total of 35,716 tonnes at a gr ade of 6.53 g/t Au (25,446

tonnes @ 6.20g/t Au Measured Resource and 10,260 tonnes @ 7.35 g/t Indicated

Resource) as remaining to be mined from initial stopes and 1,175 tonnes at a grade

of 7.52 g/t Au (Indicated Resource) to be mined from the 1250 mRL level (see Table

3).

 As at 31 st March 2017, surface stockpiles, from mining of development material,

contained a total of 9,000 tonnes at a gr ade of 4.54 g/t Au. This material was

classified as a Measured Resource.

 Over 270 tonnes of concentrate trucked to th e port of Lae during the quarter with

shipments ongoing

Mining

The current mine plan is based upon the 3 Year Mine Plan prepared by Au stralian Mine Design

and Development (“AMDAD”) which is detailed in the “Independent Technical Report, Mineral

Resource Update and Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) of Irumafimpa and Kora Gold

Deposits, Kainantu Project, Papua New Guinea” with an effective date of March 2, 2017 (the

“Technical Report”). Formal approval to restart underground production was received from the

Mineral Resources Authority (“MRA”) in late October 2016 following the successful

rehabilitation and refurbishment of the undergr ound mine, so the effective start date for the

AMDAD Mine Plan has been taken as 1st November 2016.

The majority of mining production to date has come from development on the 1205 mRL, 1220

mRL and 1235 mRL production levels betwee n 59450 North and 59700 North, with a small

amount of approximately 1,000 tonnes recovered from remnant stopes left behind by the

previous operators on the 1250 mRL level.

The AMDAD Mine Plan based on the current Iruma fimpa Resource provided in Table 4 below,

called for a total of 13,645 tonnes at a grade of 6.69 g/t of development material containing 2,935

ozs to be mined during the quarter, with no st ope production due until month 7. This material

would be part of the Inferred Resource. In comparison K92 has mined 23,400 tonnes containing

3,400 ozs, with approximately 1,000 tonnes comi ng from existing remnant stopes based on

material processed or remaining in stockpiles. (See Table 1).

The major difference between the AMDAD Mine Plan and actual performance to date is that a

significant tonnage of material outside of defined stoping areas was originally classified as waste

within the AMDAD plan but wa s processed as lower grade material during the commissioning,

rather than being waste.

As was disclosed in the Company’s news re leases dated March 3, 2017 February 4, 2016, the

Company’s decision regarding production at th e Kaintantu Gold Mine was not based on a

feasibility study demonstrating economic and tec hnical viability and, as a result, there is

increased uncertainty and multiple technical and economic risks that are associated with this

decision. These risks include areas that are analyzed in detail in a feasibility study, such as

applying economic analysis to resources and reserves, more detailed metallurgy, and a number of

specialized studies in areas such as mining and recovery methods and environmental and

community impacts. In addition, th ere are certain specific risks associated with the Kaintantu

Gold Mine (as described in the Technical Report) including, but not limited to, inadequate water

access and access to power. Project failure may adversely impact K92 and future profitability. As

such, K92 cautions the reader that where projects are put into production without first

establishing mineral reserves, as opposed to mineral resources, supported by a te chnical report

and completing a feasibility study such projects ha ve historically had a higher risk of economic

or technical failure.

The preliminary economic assessment (the “PEA ”) contained in the Technical Report is

preliminary in nature and includ es inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative

geologically to have the economic considerations a pplied to them that woul d enable them to be

categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized. The

Technical Report contains a full description of all underlying assumptions relating to the PEA.

Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

Table 1 AMDAD Mine Plan versus Actual Mine Production

Underground Development 

March Quarter 

AMDAD1  Actual2 

Waste  m  368  169 

Mineralisation  m  460  536 

t  13,645  23,400 

Au g/t  6.69  4.52 

Ozs  2,935  3,401 

Total Development  m  828  705 

Note 1 Mineralisati on is Inferred Resource

2 Mineralisation is Measured Resource

During the quarter the Company also complete d the installation signi ficant infrastructure

underground, including two new 55 kW ventilati on fans, a leaky feeder radio communication

system and extensions to the 11 kV power supply to the upper workings of the mine.

Grade Control and Stope Design

A total of 35 grade control holes (3,200 metr es) were completed underground by two diamond

drill rigs during the qu arter. In addition, a co mprehensive program of face sampling has been

undertaken, in which almost every development face which is within the known deposit is

sampled. This has resulted in almost 300 faces being sampled on the 1205 mRL, 1220 mRL and

1235 mRL levels generating over 1,300 samples. The results from grade control drilling and face

sampling have been used to upd ate the stope design model and pr ovide an updated estimate of

the tonnage and grade of the stopes it is planned to mine in the next six months.

A comparison of the tonnage and grade of th e first stopes between between 1205 mRL and 1265

mRL levels and from 59450 North and 59700 North - an area approximately 250 metres long and

60 metres high at the extremity of the known deposit (“Initial Mining Area”) has been carried out

between the original AMDAD design and the update d designs incorporating the grade control

information is provided in the Tables 2 and 3 below. The comparison breaks down the total

tonnage from the area into development tonnes and stope tonnes.

The AMDAD design defined a total of 44,073 tonne s at a grade of 6.83 g/t Au, containing 9,679

ozs in the Initial Mining Area. This tonnage comprised 33,539 tonnes at a grade of 6.71 g/t Au to

be mined from stopes and a further 10,534 tonne s at a grade of 7.20 g/t Au mined from

development of the 1205 mRL, 1220 mRL, 1235 mRL, and 1250 mRL levels. All of the material

in this initial mining area forms part of the Inferred Resource outlined in Table 4.

The more detailed design carried out by K92 inco rporating all of the results from the grade

control drilling and face samples has defined a to tal of 35,716 tonnes at a grade of 6.53 g/t Au as

remaining to be mined from stopes and 1,175 tonnes at a grade of 7.52 g/t Au to be mined from

the 1250 mRL level. This bei ng in addition to the 25,000 tonnes at a grade of 4.23 g/t that has

already been mined during the development of the 1205 mRL, 1220 mRL and 1235 mRL levels

over the last months, giving a total of 60,809 tonnes at a grad e of 5.58 g/t Au, containing 10,914

ozs within the defined area. This material has been defined by extensive grade control drilling

and face sampling of developments and is cla ssified as Measured Resource up to the1250 mRL

level and Indicated Resource between the 1250 mRL and 1265 mRL levels (see Table 3).

In summary:

 Total tonnes defined by K92 grade control dr illing and sampling in the stopes are 6.5%

above that defined by AMDAD, while total tonnes from the above specified area are 38%

above those defined in the AMDAD model

 The stope grade defined by K92 at 6.53 g/t Au (Table 3) is 2.7% below the 6.71 g/t Au

defined in the AMDAD design (Table 2)

 The total contained ozs defined by K92 in the stopes (Table 3) is 3.6% above those

identified in the AMDAD design (Table 2), wh ile total ozs from the above specified area

are 13% above those identified in the AMDAD model.

Table 2 AMDAD Design

AMDAD Design 

Level  Classification  Volume  Tonnes  Grade  Ozs 

m3  t  g/t Au 

1205 ‐ 1220  Inferred  3,876  11,240  5.83  2,107 

1220 ‐ 1235  Inferred  3,736  10,834  5.96  2,076 

1235 ‐ 1250  Inferred  2,603  7,549  7.48  1,815 

1250 ‐ 1265  Inferred  2,330  6,757  8.36  1,816 

Sub Total ‐ Stopes  12,374  35,360  7.05  8,015 

Sub Total Development  Inferred  10,534  7.20  2,438 

TOTAL  Inferred  45,894  7.08  10,453 

Table 3 K92 Design and Actual

K92 Grade Control Design 

Level  Classification  Volume  Tonnes  Grade  Ozs 

m3  t  g/t Au 

1205 ‐ 1220  Measured  2,479  7,189  5.34  1,234 

1220 ‐ 1235  Measured  3,610  10,469  5.96  2,006 

1235 ‐ 1250  Measured  2,689  7,798  7.32  1,835 

1250 ‐ 1265  Indicated  3,538  10,260  7.35  2,425 

Sub Total Stopes  12,316  35,716  6.53  7,500 

Mined Dev to 31/3/2017  Measured  23,918  4.07  3,130 

Planned Dev 1235/1250  Indicated  1,175  7.52  284 

Sub Total Development  25,093  4.23  3,414 

Total  Meas + Indicated  12,316  60,809  5.58  10,914 

The significantly higher tonnage of development material mi ned at lower grad e than predicted

from the AMDAD model is due primarily to the mi ning of lower grade material outside of the

defined stope areas which was identified duri ng face sampling. K92 mined and treated this

material as part of the commissioning process for the process plant.

Processing

The process plant throughput has ramped from just over 2,000 tonnes treated in January to

almost 12,000 tonnes treated in Ma rch. Despite treating only devel opment material assaying at

just under 4 g/t Au, the plant pr oduced saleable grade concentrat e during the enti re month of

March, with an average grade of 111 g/t Au. The final concentrat e produced has also averaged

almost 6% copper, which is over twice that produced by the previous operators. Unlike the

previous offtake agreements, the agreement wh ich K92 incorporates payment for copper, and

this level of copper increased the revenue for this first batch by approximately 4%. A total of 270

dry tonnes of concentrate was transported to the port of Lae during the month, while a number of

additional containers were loaded with concentrate and ready for transport to the port at the end

of the Quarter.

Recoveries have been steadily increasing as th e plant has moved towards steady state operations

and averaged 72% in March, despite the relatively low head grade. The plant demonstrated the

ability to treat in excess of 600 tonnes per day, while achieving grinds of in excess of 70% minus

45 microns, with only a light ball charge in the mill. This confirms the view of the Company that

the plant has significant excess capacity.

The newly installed and commissioned drum scr ubber is now fully operational and has allowed

the plant to treat extremely we t sticky mill feed from underground which would previously not

have been able to be handled by the crushing ci rcuit. The scrubber successfully removes all fines

and clays, allowing them to bypass the crusher and report to the milling circuit, while the coarse

fraction can be easily handled through the crushing circuit.

The new configuration with the dr um scrubber also provides significant flexibility to the process

plant, allowing the milling and flotation circuits to operate on feed from only the drum scrubber

undersize, only the crushed material from the Fine Ore Bin or a combination of the two.

During the quarter the Company purchased, installed, and comm issioned two 1,250 kW diesel

generators to provide complete standby power for the process plant, offices, workshop, and

camp. A third diesel generator located at the portal provides standby po wer for the underground

mining operations.

Table 4 Irumafimpa Resource and Category

Deposit Resource

Category

Tonne Gold Silver Copper Gold

EilMt g/t MOz g/t MO % Mlb g/t MOz

Irumafimp

a

Indicate

d

0.56 12.8 0.23 9 0.16 0.28 37 13.4 0.24

Inferred 0.53 10.9 0.19 9 0.16 0.27 74 11.5 0.20

Exploration

Kora

The underground incline drive from the Irumafimpa Mine towards the Kora Deposit was

commenced during the quarter. This 5m x 5m driv e is designed to provide access to the Kora

deposit, where K92 is targeting the commenceme nt of production in First Half 2018, while also

providing the Company with the ability to drill test thereafter between Irumafimpa and Kora

from underground set ups. This area has not been previously tested due to topographical

challenges associated with drilling from the surf ace and is considered highly prospective given

the current interpretation of Irumafimpa and Kora being on the same vein structure.

Other

The Company completed the first phase of surf ace exploration work, including ridge and spur

soil sampling, rock chip sampling and creek traversing for the Pomasi Area 1 within EL’s

(Exploration Leases) 683 and 470 immediately to the north and west of the company’s ML

(Mining Lease) 150.

The exploration team have identified numerous qua rtz veins, which are potentially extensions of

the known mineralised vein systems (Irumafimpa/ Kora, Judd & Karempa) encountered within

ML 150. Selected results for this initial program are provided in Table 5.

Table 5 Pomasi Area 1 Selected Results

June Quarter

Mining in the June Quarter will focus on deve lopment along the deposit on the 1250 mRL level

between 59450 North and 59630 Nort h, together with access to, and development along, the

deposit on the 1205 mRl, 1220 mRL and 1235 mRL levels between 59700 North and 59950

North.

The mining production levels of 1,000 to 2,000 t onnes per month will be maintained in the

coming quarter from remnant stopes from the 1250 mRL and 1280 mRL levels. This will be a

combination of mining of broken material remaining from previ ous operations and blasting of

stopes which had been established or commenced by the previous operators.

New stope mining is scheduled to commence in May with material from the 1235 mRL to 1250

mRL stopes between 59450 North and 59700 North. The commencement of new stope mining

from the lower grade 1205 mRL and 1220 mRL leve ls is awaiting geotechnical input from

independent consultants to finalise the design and extraction schedules as the ground conditions

in this area is significantly different from that experienced in the rest of the deposit, requiring

modifications to the current design.

Ian Stalker, K92 Chief Executive Officer and Director, states, “The March Quarter has shown

solid progress and gives the Company confidence going forward. It is significant to note that that

three of the four stoping areas have recorded significant increases in both tonnes and contained

Prospect Sample  ID

Easting 

WGS84

Northing 

WGS84 RL ‐mS a m p l e  Type sampInterval_m FA50  Au g/t GA03  Ag g/t Cu  %D e s c r i p t i o n

Kokomo 8015 373494 9319960 872 channel 0.5 2.86 70.50 0.04 qz ‐py‐ht vein

Kokomo 8020 373377 9319395 940 channel 0.3 15.60 67.20 0.19 qz ‐py‐ht‐cal‐bn in vein

Kokomo 8022 373377 9319395 940 channel 0.3 1.30 18.10 0.29 qz ‐py‐ht‐cal‐bn in vein

Kokomo 8023 373377 9319395 940 float N/A 4.85 5.50 0.09 qz ‐py‐ht‐cal‐bn in vein

Kokomo 8028 373615 9320663 988 grab N/A 20.90 411.00 0.00

calc in common + goe, bio + 

minr dioritic qtz, ser + lim stain 

Kokomo 8029 373613 9320657 989 grab N/A 30.60 762.00 0.02

calc in common + goe, bio + 

minr dioritic qtz, ser + lim stain 

Kokomo 8030 373252 9320467 979 grab N/A 2.09 110.00 0.01

qz‐py‐ht‐cal in shear, strngly 

wthd lim stain  at contact, 

Kokomo 8031 373248 9320461 987 grab N/A 1.50 130.00 0.01

goe in common+minr  fine grain 

lim, ser+mod wthd qtz + si

Kokomo 8032 374317 9320798 814 grab N/A 1.09 47.00 0.01

py‐cpx‐bn‐late qz‐MnO‐lim, 

leached, gossan

Kokomo 8049 373278 9320344 1076 grab 0.1 1.43 242.80 0.01

moderately wthd + minr qtz, 

chalc, ser wt lim stain infill 

Kokomo 8063 373343 9319465 988 grab N/A 1.49 22.50 0.18

weakly mineralised  qtz‐dis py 

vein within silicified metsed; 

Kokomo 8064 373343 9319465 988 grab N/A 4.58 76.00 0.19

mineralisd  py‐qtz‐lim vein wt 

vugs; vein mined out

Kokomo 8070 373987 9320449 796 grab N/A 2.69 188.30 0.04

Strong qtz‐pyr amid strongly 

foliated and qtz mesothermal  

Kokomo 8071 373987 9320449 796 grab N/A 9.34 414.60 0.04

Strong qtz‐pyr amid strongly 

foliated and qtz mesothermal  

Kokomo 8072 373911 9320444 836 grab N/A 13.81 629.70 0.15

Massive qtz‐pyr vein; vein 

mined out; ~1.0m wide

Kokomo 8073 373911 9320444 836 grab N/A 19.50 670.90 0.02

Massive qtz‐pyr vein; vein 

mined out; ~1.0m wide

Kokomo 8079 373459 9319966 968 grab N/A 3.28 863.00 0.04

Mineralised qtz‐pyr; 72 054 

(dip, dip dir)

Kokomo 8086 373377 9319406 933 grab N/A 1.89 18.40 0.10 Significant  vein; ~1.0m wide

Kokomo 8087 373377 9319406 933 grab N/A 1.03 12.50 0.03 Significant  vein; ~1.0m wide

ozs in comparison to the AMDAD design and only one, the 1205 – 1220 stope area, which is at

the extremity of the known Irumafimpa deposit. While this is only the first stoping area and some

variability is to be expected within the mineral resource, it is nevertheless pleasing to see that in

this case as we move into upper stopes we consistently see more tonnes and contained ozs in our

grade control designs than from the AMDAD design, with the 1250 – 1265 stopes reporting a

50% increase in contained ozs”.

On behalf of the company,

Ian Stalker

Chief Executive Officer and Director

The TSX Venture Exchange has neither approved nor disapproved the cont ents of this press

release.

K92 Manager Geology and Underground Exploration Andrew Kohler, P.Geo, a qualified person

under the meaning of Canadian National Instrument 43-101, has reviewed and is responsible for

the technical content of this news release.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION: This

news release includes certain “forward-looking statements” under applicable Canadian securities

legislation. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and

assumptions that, while considered reasonable, are subject to known and unknown risks,

uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results and future events to differ

materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements

that address future plans, activities, events or developments that the Company believes, expects

or anticipates will or may occur are forward-looking information, including statements regarding

potential ongoing production which may or may not occur and the generation of further

production assessment work at deposits, which may or may not occur. The Preliminary

Economic Assessment (“PEA”) issued by K92 is preliminary in nature and includes inferred

mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic

considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and

there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized. Forward-looking statements and information

contained herein are based on certain factors and assumptions regarding, among other things, the

market price of the Company’s securities, metal prices, taxation, the estimation, timing and

amount of future exploration and development, capital and operating costs, the availability of

financing, the receipt of regulatory approvals, environmental risks, title disputes, failure of plant,

equipment or processes to operate as anticipated, accidents, labour disputes, claims and

limitations on insurance coverage and other risks of the mining industry, changes in national and