K92 Awards Contract for Installation of Gravity Circuit at Kainantu Gold Mine
Suite 488 – 1090 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
Canada V6E 3V7
Telephone: (604) 687-7130
Facsimile: (604) 608-9110
NEWS RELEASE
20 February 2018 Vancouver, British Columbia
K92 MINING INC.
K92 Awards Contract for Installation of Gravity Circuit at Kainantu Gold Mine
K92 Mining Inc. (“K92”) (TSXV - KNT) is pleased to advise it has awarded the contract from the
installation of a gold gravity recovery circuit into the Proces s Plant at its Kainantu Gold Mine in
Papua New Guinea to Mincore Pty Ltd (“Mincore”).
Previous testwork carried out on samples from the Kora deposit indicated that up to 65% of the
gold could be recovered by gravity concentration. These results are supported by ongoing plant
scale testwork carried out by K92 on Kora North material curren tly being treated through the
process plant. The gravity circuit will comprise centrifugal co ncentrators and a gold room
containing a shaking table and induction furnace for the production of gold dore bars.
The cost of the gravity circuit is expected to be US$1 million and the installation of the gravity
circuit is expected to improve gold recovery by between 2% and 5% and also increase the payment
terms for the gold produced in dore form by approximately 3% to 4% giving a net increase in gold
revenue of at least 4%.
The ongoing high grades being treated through the process plant make the installation of the
gravity circuit a priority. The feed grade to the plant has ave raged almost 20 g/t Au during
February, requiring the throughput of the plant to be significa ntly reduced to ensure acceptable
recoveries are achieved. While currently gold recoveries of over 92% are being achieved, testwork
has indicated that the installation of a gravity circuit will allow design throughput to be maintained
while also achieving up to 95% recovery. Importantly the gravit y circuit being installed will be
sized to be able to treat the i ncrease in throughput envisaged in the Preliminary Economic
Assessment (“PEA”) referenced below, of 400,000 tpa.
Mincore carried out the refurbish ment of the Kainantu Processin g Plant prior to the restart of
operations and also completed the metallurgical component as re ported in the “Independent
Technical Report, Mineral Resource Update and Preliminary Econo mic Assessment of
Irumafimpa and Kora Gold Deposits, Kainantu Project, Papua New Guinea," with an effective date
of March 2, 2017.
John Lewins, K92 Chief Executive Officer and Director, states, “The award of the contract for the
installation of the gravity circui t is not only a major step in op timizing the performance of the
process plant when treating Kora North material, but also the first step in increasing the plant
capacity from 200,000 tpa to 400,000 tpa. The ant icipated payback for the US$1 million
investment, based on an improved gold recovery and payability, is less than one year. We are also
extremely pleased to be continuing our associ ation with Mincore, who completed the initial
refurbishment of the Kainantu Process Plant within a very tight budget and who are also extremely
familiar with both the process plant and the metallurgy of the Kora deposit.”
K92 has filed and made available for download on the company's SEDAR profile a technical report
titled "Independent Technical Re port, Mineral Resource Update a nd Preliminary Economic
Assessment of Irumafimpa and Kora Gold Deposits, Kainantu Project, Papua New Guinea," with
an effective date of March 2, 2017, that provides additional in formation on the geology of the
deposits, drilling and sampling procedures, lab analysis, and quality assurance/quality control for
the project, and additional details on the resource estimates.
The PEA estimates for Kora, based on the current resource estim ates (4.36 million tonnes of 7.3
g/t Au, 35 g/t Ag and 2.23 per cent Cu):
• Over a nine-year operating life, the plant would treat 3.2 mill ion tonnes averaging 7.1 g/t
Au, 25 g/t Ag and 1.7 per cent Cu (9.3 g/t AuEq (1));
• This would generate an estimated positive cash flow of $537-mil lion (U.S.) using current
metal prices if 15-metre levels are used in mining; if 25-metre levels are used, then net cash
flows are estimated as $558-million (U.S.); this cash flow includes conceptual allowances
for capital;
• Production of an estimated average of 108,000 AuEq (1) ounces per annum over an eight-
year period from year 2 through to year 9;
• An estimated pretax net present value (NPV) of $415-million (U. S.) for 25-metre levels,
or $397-million (U.S.) for 15-metre levels, using current metal prices, exchange rates and
a 5-per-cent discount;
• An estimated after-tax NPV of $329-million (U.S.) for 25-metre levels, or $316-million
(U.S.) for 15-metre levels, using current metal prices, exchang e rates and a 5-per-cent
discount;
• Initial capital cost is estimated to be $13.8-million (U.S.), including the $3.3-million (U.S.)
for the plant upgrade identified in the Mincore scoping study, but excluding the proposed
Kora exploration inclines and di amond drilling; sustaining capi tal cost is estimated to a
further $64-million (U.S.) spent over the life of the Kora mini ng for 25-metre levels, or
$83-million (U.S.) for 15-metre levels;
• Operating cost per tonne is estim ated to be $125 (U.S.) per ton ne for 25-metre levels, or
$126 (U.S.) per tonne for 15-metre mining levels;
• Excluding initial capital expend iture of $14-million (U.S.), ca sh cost is estimated to be
$547 (U.S.) per ounce AuEq (inclusive of a 2.5-per-cent net smelter return (NSR) royalty)
and all-in sustaining cost (AI SC) of $619 (U.S.) per ounce AuEq for 25-metre mining
levels, or $549 (U.S.) per ounc e (inclusive of a 2.5-per-cent N SR royalty) and AISC of
$644 (U.S.) per ounce AuEq for 15-metre mining levels.
Metal prices used were $1,300 per ounce for gold, $18 (U.S.) per ounce for silver and $4,800 per
tonne for copper.
(1) Gold equivalent calculated on above metal prices.
Kora remains open for expansion in every direction and strongly mineralized at the extent of all
drilling.
The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes inferred mineral resources that are considered too
speculative geologically to have the economic considerations ap plied to them that would enable
them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.
K92 has not based its production decisions on ongoing mine prod uction or mineral reserve
estimates or feasibility studies, and historically such projects have increased uncertainty and risk
of failure.
The technical report contains a full description of all underlying assumptions relating to the PEA.
Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Table 3.0 IRUMAFIMPA AND KORA/EUTOMPI RESOURCES
Resource by Deposit and Category
Deposit Resource
Category
Tonnes Gold Silver Copper Gold
Equivalent
Mt g/t MOz g/t MOz % Mlb g/t MOz
Irumafimpa Indicated 0.56 12.8 0.23 9 0.16 0.28 37 13.4 0.24
Inferred 0.53 10.9 0.19 9 0.16 0.27 74 11.5 0.20
Kora/Eutompi Inferred 4.36 7.3 1.02 35 4.9 2.23 215 11.2 1.57
Total Indicated 0.56 12.8 0.23 9 0.16 0.3 4 13.4 0.24
Total Inferred 4.89 7.7 1.21 32 5.06 2.0 218 11.2 1.76
M in Table is millions. Repor ted tonnage and grade figures are rounded from raw estimates to
reflect the order of accuracy of the estimate. Minor variations may occur during the addition of
rounded numbers. Gold equivalents are calculated as AuEq = Au g/t + Cu%*1.52+ Ag g/t*0.0141.
On behalf of the company,
John Lewins
Chief Executive Officer and Director
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION: Thi s
news release includes certain “forward-looking statements” under applicable Canadian securities
legislation. Forward-looking stat ements are necessarily based u pon a number of estimates and
assumptions that, while consider ed reasonable, are subject to k nown and unknown risks,
uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual res ults and future events to differ
materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-look ing statements. All statements
that address future plans, activities, events or developments that the Company believes, expects or
anticipates will or may occur are forward-looking information, including statements regarding the
realization of the preliminary economic analysis for the Project, expectations of future cash flows,
the proposed plant expansion, pote ntial expansion of resources and the generation of further
drilling results which may or may not occur. Forward-looking st atements and information
contained herein are based on certain factors and assumptions r egarding, among other things, the
market price of the Company’s securities, metal prices, exchang e rates, taxation, the estimation,
timing and amount of future exploration and development, capita l and operating costs, the
availability of financing, the r eceipt of regulatory approvals, environmental risks, title disputes,
failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated, accidents, labour disputes, claims
and limitations on insurance coverage and other risks of the mi ning industry, changes in national
and local government regulation of mining operations, and regul ations and other matters.. There
can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accur ate, as actual results and future
events could differ materially from those anticipated in such s tatements. Accordingly, readers
should not place undue r eliance on forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any
intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.