IsoEnergy Intersects Uranium Mineralization at Thorburn Lake and Strong Basement Alteration at Radio
IsoEnergy Intersects Uranium Mineralization at Thorburn Lake and
Strong Basement Alteration at Radio
Vancouver, BC, January 5, 2017 – IsoEnergy Ltd. (“IsoEnergy” or the “Company”) (TSXV:ISO) is pleased to
report on the first stage of a two‐stage drilling program at each of its Thorburn Lake and Radio uranium projects
in the eastern Athabasca Basin of Saskatchewan. Results of Phase 1 drilling at Thorburn Lake include the
intersection of uranium mineralization in drill hole RD16‐19, and elevated radioactivity at the unconformity in
several other drill holes. The highlight of Phase 1 drilling at Radio was the discovery of a large zone of basement
clay alteration with a tenor and scale that is typically found close to significant uranium mineralization,
including the nearby Roughrider uranium deposit.
IsoEnergy is undertaking a two‐stage drilling program, where land accessible targets were drilled during the
period September to November 2016, whilst drilling of targets accessible upon ice formation will be
undertaken in Q1 2017. Thorburn Lake, located 7 kilometres east of the Cigar Lake uranium mine, is 100%
owned. IsoEnergy has an exclusive right to earn a 70% interest in the Radio property, which is located 2
kilometres east of the Roughrider uranium deposit.
Thorburn Lake – Elevated Radioactivity at the Unconformity
Six drill holes (2,587 metres) were completed at Thorburn Lake to follow up on two previous drilling campaigns
in 2008 and 2011 that identified an area of anomalous radioactivity and geochemistry at the sub‐Athabasca
unconformity. Previous results include 0.43% U3O8 over 0.6 metres in drill hole TBN11‐05A. Figure 1 shows
the drill hole locations at Thorburn Lake. Depth to the unconformity at Thorburn Lake ranges from 290 to 350
metres.
Elevated radioactivity at the sub‐Athabasca unconformity was observed in five of the six recently completed
drill holes. The highlight was TBN16‐19 where radioactivity up to 1,900 counts per second (30‐40 times
background) was measured with a hand‐held SRAT SPP2 scintillometer in an interval straddling the
unconformity. Geochemical results from the radioactive interval in TBN16‐19 returned 0.10% U3O8 over 0.5
metres. Other geochemical highlights include 524 ppm U over 0.5 metres (TBN16‐17), 71 ppm U over 0.5
metres (TBN16‐20), 55.4 ppm U over 0.5 metres (TBN16‐15) and 47 ppm U over 0.5 metres (TBN16‐16), all of
which occur immediately adjacent to the unconformity. Other encouraging features include strongly graphitic
fault zones in drill holes TBN16‐16, ‐17, ‐19 and ‐20, with zones of moderate to intense sandstone alteration in
drill holes TBN16‐17 and ‐20. This zone of mineralization, alteration, structure, and elevated radioactivity is
open along strike in both directions and is strengthening to the northeast beneath Thorburn Lake. Systematic
sampling through the sandstone column for SWIR reflectance analysis indicates that the sandstone clay
alteration zones in TBN16‐17 and ‐20 are dominated by illite and sudoite, similar to sandstone alteration zones
around many unconformity related uranium deposits in the Athabasca basin.
IsoEnergy is planning a 10 hole (4,300 metre) winter drilling program to follow up on the 2016 results. Drilling
will be carried out in conjunction with a program at the Radio property during the January to March 2017
winter drilling season. The primary target will be the northeast strike extension of the mineralization,
alteration and structural zone described above. Secondary targets include several resistivity low anomalies
observed in an 85 line‐kilometer DC‐resistivity geophysical survey completed in October 2016.
Figure 1 – Thorburn Lake Planview
Radio Property ‐ Basement Clay Alteration Zone
A total of 13 drill holes (4,946 m) were completed on the Radio property. Three main target areas were
evaluated as shown in Figure 2 below: (1) the central Roughrider Corridor of metasediments, (2) magnetic low
anomalies along the Northern Corridor of the property, and (3) weak but extensive clay alteration in 2013 drill
hole RD13‐08 along the Southern Corridor of Radio. This last target area is the location of the basement clay
alteration discovery. Depth to the sub‐Athabasca unconformity at Radio ranges from 170 to 190 metres.
Five drill holes were completed in the vicinity of drill hole RD13‐08 during the campaign. The initial target was
the up‐dip projection of weak but persistent clay alteration in RD13‐08 toward the sub‐Athabasca
unconformity on cross section 400E (Figure 3). Drill hole RD16‐11 was the first in the current program to target
the area and intersected 105 metres of moderate to strong structurally controlled grey and white clay
alteration in the basement 280 metres up‐dip of RD13‐08, and 200 metres down‐dip of the unconformity. The
zone is associated with several parallel (stacked) graphitic fault zones that are conformable with the geology
and foliation.
Drill hole RD16‐17 was subsequently collared 75 metres up‐dip of RD16‐11 (also on cross section 400E) and
intersected 130 metres of weak to strong clay alteration in the lower sandstone and upper basement,
demonstrating that the zone extends for a minimum of 75 metres along the dip direction. A fourth drill hole,
RD16‐19 was completed 75 metres up‐dip of RD16‐17. RD16‐19 intersected only 25 metres of weak alteration
in the sandstone and basement, suggesting that it over‐shot the strong portion of the alteration zone.
Drill hole RD16‐21A evaluated the along‐strike projection of the zone 200 metres to the northeast on cross
section 600E, and it intersected the strongest alteration to date, consisting of 120 metres of moderate to strong
clay alteration in the basement, beginning immediately below the sub‐Athabasca unconformity. As with
section 400E, the zone is associated with parallel (stacked) graphitic fault zones that are conformable with the
geology and foliation.
Samples of the graphitic fault zones associated with the basement alteration zone are elevated in common
uranium pathfinder elements such as molybdenum (up to 184 ppm), nickel (up to 274 ppm), cobalt (up to 45
ppm) and vanadium (up to 270 ppm). Systematic sampling through the alteration zones for shortwave infrared
(SWIR) reflectance analysis indicates that the clay alteration zone is illitic, similar to the clay alteration zone
that surrounds the nearby Roughrider deposit.
Figure 2 – Radio Planview
IsoEnergy is planning a 10 hole (4,100 metre) winter drilling program to follow up on the 2016 results. Drilling
will be carried out in conjunction with a program at the Thorburn Lake property during the January to March
2017 winter drilling season. The primary target will be uranium mineralization associated with the large zone
of basement clay alteration described above.
Figure 3 – Radio Cross Section 400E
Steve Blower, Vice‐President Exploration, commented: “Exploration success in the Athabasca basin usually
begins with the intersection of significant alteration zones, which have a much larger footprint than the bodies
of uranium mineralization they encompass. The volume and intensity of clay alteration in the southern target
area at Radio is impressive and is similar to alteration haloes around the recently discovered Roughrider, Arrow
and Gryphon basement uranium deposits. I’m also encouraged by the size of the area of elevated radioactivity
at Thorburn Lake, especially considering that alteration and structure are improving toward the northeast.
Both sites warrant additional aggressive drilling campaigns during the January to March 2017 winter drilling
season.”
Option Grant
The Company has granted the Chief Executive Officer, an aggregate of 250,000 stock options at an exercise
price of $1.00. The options are exercisable for a period of five years and vest annually in three equal
instalments commencing on the date of grant. The options will be governed by the Company’s incentive stock
option plan.
Qualified Person Statement
The disclosure of a scientific or technical nature contained in this news release was prepared by Steve Blower,
P.Geo., IsoEnergy’s Vice President, Exploration, who is a Qualified Person (as defined in National Instrument
43‐101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects). Mr. Blower has verified the data disclosed. For
additional information regarding the Company’s Radio project and Thorburn Lake project, including its quality
assurance and quality control procedures, please see the technical report dated effective August 19, 2016 and
September 26, 2016, respectively, in each case, on the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com.
This news release refers to properties other than those in which the Company has an interest. Mineralization
on those other properties is not necessarily indicative of mineralization on the Company’s properties.
About IsoEnergy
IsoEnergy Ltd. is a well‐funded uranium exploration and development company with a portfolio of prospective
projects in the eastern Athabasca Basin in Saskatchewan, Canada. IsoEnergy is led by a Board and Management
team with a track record of success in uranium exploration, development and operations. The Company was
founded and is supported by the team at its major shareholder NexGen Energy Ltd.
Craig Parry
President and Chief Executive Officer
IsoEnergy Ltd.
+1 778 379 3211
www.isoenergy.ca
Investor Relations
Kin Communications
+1 604 684 6730
www.isoenergy.ca
The TSXV has neither approved nor disapproved the contents of this press release. Neither the TSXV nor its
Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSXV) accepts responsibility for the
adequacy or accuracy of this release.
Forward‐Looking Information
This news release contains "forward‐looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities
legislation. “Forward‐looking information” includes, but is not limited to, statements with respect to the
activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future,
including, without limitation, planned exploration activities. Generally, but not always, forward‐looking
information and statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”,
“budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, or “believes” or the negative
connotation thereof or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results
“may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation
thereof.
Such forward‐looking information and statements are based on numerous assumptions, including among
others, that the results of planned exploration activities are as anticipated, the price of uranium, the anticipated
cost of planned exploration activities, that general business and economic conditions will not change in a
material adverse manner, that financing will be available if and when needed and on reasonable terms, and
that third party contractors, equipment and supplies and governmental and other approvals required to
conduct the Company’s planned exploration activities will be available on reasonable terms and in a timely
manner. Although the assumptions made by the Company in providing forward‐looking information or making
forward‐looking statements are considered reasonable by management at the time, there can be no assurance
that such assumptions will prove to be accurate.
Forward‐looking information and statements also involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and
other factors, which may cause actual events or results in future periods to differ materially from any projections
of future events or results expressed or implied by such forward‐looking information or statements, including,
among others: negative operating cash flow and dependence on third party financing, uncertainty of additional
financing, no known mineral reserves or resources, potential forfeiture of the Radio Option Agreement, the
limited operating history of the Company, the influence of a large shareholder, alternative sources of energy
and uranium prices, aboriginal title and consultation issues, reliance on key management and other personnel,
actual results of exploration activities being different than anticipated, changes in exploration programs based
upon results, availability of third party contractors, availability of equipment and supplies, failure of equipment
to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks
associated with the mineral exploration industry, environmental risks, changes in laws and regulations,
community relations and delays in obtaining governmental or other approvals.
Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those contained in the forward‐looking information or implied by forward‐looking information,
there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no
assurance that forward‐looking information and statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and
future events could differ materially from those anticipated, estimated or intended. Accordingly, readers should
not place undue reliance on forward‐looking statements or information. The Company undertakes no
obligation to update or reissue forward‐looking information as a result of new information or events except as
required by applicable securities laws.