Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

IMG.TO ·

Iamgold’S Côté GOLD Project: an Excellent Option FOR Future Growth Positive Preliminary Economic Assessment and Government Approval of Environmental Assessment

Economic Studies Permits & Approvals

NEWS RELEASE

TSX: IMG NYSE: IAG

IAMGOLD’S CÔTÉ GOLD PROJECT: AN EXCELLENT OPTION FOR FUTURE GROWTH

POSITIVE PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT AND

GOVERNMENT APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

All amounts are in US dollars, unless otherwise indicated.

Toronto, Ontario, January 26, 2017 – IAMGOLD Corporation (“IAMGOLD” or the “Company”) today

announced the positive results of a Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") for its Côté Gold Project

(Project) in Northern Ontario. The Company also received approval of the Project’s provincial

environmental assessment from the Ontario Ministry of Environment and Climate Change on January 25,

2017, which follows the positive decision on the federal environmental assessment issued by the Federal

Minister of Environment and Climate Change in April 2016. Positive decisions on the federal and provincial

environmental assessments for the Project clear the way for the Company to initiate applications on

permits to support development following the completion of a pre-feasibility study.

Steve Letwin, President and CEO of IAMGOLD, said “The Côté Gold Project provides us with an

exceptional option for future growth. Since acquiring Côté several years ago we have been focused on de-

risking the project. Our drilling program, since IAMGOLD took over the Project, has led to a nine-fold

increase in the indicated resource to eight million ounces with another one million ounce inferred resource.

The positive results of the PEA demonstrate the potential for Côté Gold to be a low-cost, 21-year mine with

attractive returns. The pre-feasibility study is in progress to validate the development concept set out in the

PEA.

“Côté Gold is one of Canada’s largest undeveloped gold deposits,” continued Mr. Letwin, “so securing

positive decisions on both the federal and provincial environmental assessments for the Project is a major

regulatory milestone that confirms we can build and operate an environmentally sustainable mine that

aligns with our Zero Harm goals. I thank all the many individuals and organizations for participating in

these environmental reviews. By considering environmental and social impacts early in the mining

process, we have been able to plan a mine that will benefit shareholders and indigenous communities,

along with other stakeholders. We will continue to closely engage our indigenous partner communities and

other stakeholders as we move the project forward, and to seek further opportunities for improvement as a

responsible miner.”

The PEA was completed jointly by IAMGOLD and Amec Foster Wheeler, with inputs from technical studies

completed by other consultants. The PEA represents a conceptual study of the potential viability of the

mineral resources that have been defined to date on the Project, where the accuracy of the cost estimates

is -30%/+50%. The purpose of the PEA study was to assess the potential development alternatives

available with an improved land position following the acquisition of additional ownership interests and

claims, and to reduce the energy requirements of the Project while minimizing infrastructure development

needs. The PEA study also identified additional testwork required to support a pre-feasibility study. We

expect the pre-feasibility study to be completed by the end of the second quarter 2017.

Based on the PEA, the Project outlines an economically viable project that at a $1,200 per ounce gold

price would generate an estimated 12.9% after-tax internal rate of return. The Project would have a 21-

year mine life, producing on average 302,000 ounces of gold a year at average total cash costs of $564/oz

and all-in sustaining costs of $686/oz.

A technical report summarizing the PEA will be filed on SEDAR within 45 days of the date of this news

release.

2

PEA HIGHLIGHTS

USD Currency used with exchange rate of: CAD$ = US$0.74

The above results of the PEA are preliminary in nature, and include Inferred Mineral Resources which are

considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them in a way that

would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be

realized. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.

MINERAL RESOURCE BASIS FOR THE PEA

The Mineral Resources used as the basis for the study are those disclosed in the Company’s current

Mineral Resource and Reserve statement (Feb. 17, 2016 news release) and are summarized below.

Mineral Resource Estimate – December 31, 2015

Classification

Cut-off Grade

(g/t Au)

Tonnes

(000)

Grade

(g/t Au)

Contained

Ounces (000)

Indicated 0.30 289,183 0.90 8,354

Inferred 0.30 66,894 0.55 1,174

Notes:

1. CIM Definition Standards were followed for classification of Mineral Resources.

2. Mineral Resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.30 g/t Au.

3. High grade assays are capped from 15 g/t to 60 g/t Au depending on sub-domain.

4. Bulk density of 2.72 t/m3 was used for all rocks.

5. The Mineral Resource estimate is constrained within a Whittle pit shell that assumes a gold price of

$1,500 per ounce and metallurgical recovery of 93.5%.

6. Mineral Resources are reported on a 100% basis. IAMGOLD owns 92.5% of the Côté Gold Project.

7. Raphael Dutaut Msc. Géo is the Qualified Person for this estimate.

Project Economics and Key Parameters

Mining Capacity

Years 1-3 60 Mtpa

Years 4-14 50 Mtpa

Years 15-18 15 Mtpa

Milling Capacity 29,000 t/d

LOM Average Annual Gold Production 302,000 oz.

Targeted Recovery Rate 91.9%

Mine Life 21 years

LOM Average Total Cash Costs $564/oz

LOM Average AISC $686/oz

Average Grade 0.97 g/t Au

Average LOM Strip Ratio 2.66

Estimated Capital Expenditures (millions)

Initial Capital $1,031

Sustaining Capital $440

Closure Costs $40

Gold Price Assumption used in financial analysis $1,200/oz

Pre-tax NPV (6%) (millions) $851

Pre-Tax IRR 15.4%

After-tax NPV (6%) (millions) $543

After-tax IRR 12.9%

Payback Period 5.2 years

3

MINERAL RESOURCES INCLUDED IN THE PEA MINE PLAN

The tonnes, grades and classification of the mineral resources captured within the PEA mine plan are

summarized below. A relatively small amount (15.3%) of the tonnes scheduled in the mine plan are

Inferred Resources.

Classification Tonnes

(000)

Grade

(g/t Au)

Indicated 187,237 1.03

Inferred 33,887 0.61

Notes:

1. Mine plan is constrained by a design pit that assumes $1,200/oz gold price and 91.9% metallurgical

recovery.

2. Mine plan uses a variable cut-off grade.

3. Assumes 1% mining losses and 5% waste dilution @ 0 g/t Au

MINING AND PROCESSING

The PEA study envisions a conventional truck and shovel open pit mining operation using a processing

circuit incorporating primary crushing, secondary crushing, tertiary High Pressure Grinding Roll crushing,

ball milling, gravity concentration and cyanide leaching, followed by gold recovery using carbon-in-pulp,

stripping and electrowinning. The crushing-grinding circuit being utilized is more energy efficient than a

standard SAG or a pre-crush circuit. A thickened tailings management facility is considered and the mine

site would be powered by a 44km tap line connection to Hydro One's Shining Tree Substation. Key

parameters that provide the basis for the PEA and other qualifications and assumptions are provided

below:

Parameter Value

Maximum Mining Capacity 60Mtpa

Stockpile Capacity 30Mt

Processing Rate 29Ktpd/10.6Mtpa

Metallurgical Recoveries 91.90%

Pit mining includes 40 Mt extracted during the one year pre-production period followed by 19 years of

production mining. Stockpile reclaim extends the operation into Year 22. The amount of rehandled mill

feed over the life of the operation is 65 Mt. The average grade scheduled is 0.97 g/t Au and the LOM

stripping ratio is 2.66:1.

Unit Production Costs

Life of mine total cash costs are estimated at $564/oz of gold and all-in sustaining costs at $686/oz of gold.

Capital Costs

Initial Capital costs are estimated at $1,031 million, life-of-mine Sustaining Capital costs are estimated at

$440 million, and Closure costs are estimated at $40 million, with details below. Costs assume leasing of

the mine production fleet and some other major equipment components.

4

Capital Cost Estimate Summary

Initial Capital $M

Mine Equipment 35

Electrical & Communications 91

Infrastructure 60

Process Plant 345

Tailings & Water Management 25

Indirects 219

Contingency (25%) 175

Mining Pre-production 81

1,031

Sustaining Capital

Mining 122

Tailings & Water Management 125

Capital Leases 193

440

Closure Costs 40

Operating Costs

Average operating costs per tonne processed are as follows:

Average Operating Costs ($/ tonne milled)

Mining 8.62

Processing 6.20

G&A 1.34

Total 16.16

Future Work

The PEA recommended the completion of a further pre-feasibility study to validate and detail the elements

of the development concept set out in the PEA, and which would include additional drilling, engineering

studies and environmental studies, including hydrological, hydrogeological and geotechnical analyses. As

previously disclosed, a feasibility study had been underway on an initial development scenario, which will

now await the outcome of the pre-feasibility study and selection of the development scenario for further

study. The recommended pre-feasibility study is underway and we expect it to be completed by the end of

the second quarter 2017. In addition, we continue to conduct exploration activities within our more than

500-square-kilometre property surrounding the Côté Gold deposit, the objective being to develop and

assess targets that could further maximize our flexibility with respect to future development decisions.

Qualified Persons

The 2016 Côté Gold PEA was prepared by Amec Foster Wheeler and incorporates the work of IAMGOLD

Qualified Persons (QP’s) (as defined under National Instrument 43-101). Amec Foster Wheeler Qualified

Persons are independent of IAMGOLD and have reviewed and approved this news release. IAMGOLD

Qualified Persons are not independent of IAMGOLD and have reviewed and approved this news release.

5

The affiliation and areas of responsibility for each Qualified Person involved in preparing the 2016 Côté

Gold PEA, upon which the technical report will be based, are:

Amec Foster Wheeler QP’s

 B. Wang, Ph.D., P. Eng., Design of surface watercourse realignments, tailings management

facility, mine rock areas and seepage collection ponds

 L. Elgert, P. Eng., Mine design, capital and operating costs

 I. A. Lipiec, P. Eng., Process design, capital and operating costs

 S. Allard, P. Eng., Economic analysis

IAMGOLD QP’s

 A. Smith, P. Geo., Exploration

 M-F. Bugnon, P.Geo., Property description, location, accessibility, climate, infrastructure,

physiography and history

 V. Blanchet, P. Eng., Geological setting, mineralization, drilling and sampling

 R. Dutaut, P. Geo., Data validation and resource estimate

Other scientific and technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by

Geoffrey Chinn P.Geo., IAMGOLD, project manager, a Qualified Person under the terms of National

Instrument 43-101. Mr. Chinn has verified the technical data disclosed in this news release.

Data Verification

IAMGOLD technicians and geologists on site follow a sample preparation protocol to ensure quality

control before sending samples to the assay laboratory. Most of the drill holes are sampled at one-metre

intervals and consist of one-half the drill core. Sample intervals are tagged by the geologist. All sample

intervals are logged with a unique number in a sample book by the geologist. The boreho le number and

sample interval are transferred to one of the tags and recorded in the logs. One tag is placed in a plastic

sample bag with the sample and the second is stapled in the core box beneath the remaining

representative half core sample. During this procedure, the location for the insertion of standards and

blanks into the sample sequence is noted. Core is sawed by geotechnicians following the orientation line

drawn by the geologist. The entire length of a drill hole is sampled. Diabase dykes that o ccur within the

sequence are not sampled, except for two one-metre shoulder samples at the upper and lower contacts of

the dyke. The remaining half of the core is stored in racks or pallets at the core farm facilities located on

site.

For quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) purposes, IAMGOLD inserts control samples after every

twelfth sample interval. The control samples consist either of a Certified Reference Material (CRM) or a

blank sample. IAMGOLD inserts control samples as a standard procedure. T he primary laboratory sets

aside the pulp from one out of every 10 samples to be sent to a second laboratory as a check assay.

Between 2012 and 2014, check assays were completed at ActLabs, Ancaster, Ontario. During the 2015

drilling campaign, check assays on pulps were completed by ALS Mineral, Val d’Or, Quebec. All of the

samples were analyzed using the FA-AA method. For samples that returned values of between 2 g/t Au

and 5 g/t Au, another pulp was taken and fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. Sample s returning values

greater than 5 g/t Au were reanalyzed by pulp screen metallic fire assay analysis .

Mr. Vincent Blanchet, P. Eng., has been involved in the Côté Gold Project drilling campaigns in 2014 and

2015, and last visited the site on July 19, 2015 and took these steps to verify the information used in his

part of the study:

 Reviewed the drill hole logging and sampling procedures; and

 Reviewed and reported upon the QA/QC procedures and results.

It is the QP’s opinion that the sample preparation, security, and analytical procedures are adequate to

support a Mineral Resource estimate on the Côté Gold deposit.

6

Mr. Raphael Dutaut, P. Geo., has visited the Côté Gold property several times since 2013; the most recent

being April 2015 to inspect data verification for the mineral resource estimate , and took these steps to

verify the information used in his part of the study:

 Reviewed exploration information, drill collar positions (using GPS spot checks), logging, and

sampling procedures. Drill core logs, outcrop mapping and geological interpretation were also

reviewed during site visits; and

 Randomly selected samples from the assay database from drill holes were compared with original

assay certificates, representing approximately 5% of the database. Additionally, the QP checked

for abnormal extreme values, missing intervals or sample numbers, interval lengths and zero

grades. Visual checks of the drill hole traces were performed to spot abnormal deviatio ns.

It is the QP’s opinion that the logging, sampling procedures, and data entries were completed to industry

standards. It is the QP’s opinion that the database is adequate to support a Mineral Resource estimate on

the Côté Gold deposit.

Dr. B. Wang, P. Eng. visited the Côté Gold Project site on May 18-19, 2016 and inspected the following

areas:

 Property mineral lease boundaries;

 Topography and geographical features – lakes, rivers, protected areas;

 Prior mine excavations, select outcrop locations, depth of overburden;

 Exploration drill sites and representative drill core, potential for acid rock drainage; and

 Proposed locations of open-pit, mine rock dumps, mill feed dumps, soil/muskeg storage, tailings

management facility, property access, mine facilities, utility corridors, and water management

structures.

Mr. L. Elgert, P. Eng. reviewed the mining design criteria, mining capital and operating cost models, and pit

and production scheduling optimization as part of his data verification.

Mr. I. Lipiec, P. Eng. took these steps to verify the metallurgical and mineral processing information used in

his part of the study:

 Reviewed the selection of the samples provided for metallurgical testwork;

 Reviewed the metallurgical test procedures used for comminution and cyanidation testwork; and

 Reviewed the test results produced from the testwork for consistency and interpretation .

Forward-Looking Information

All Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resources estimates reported by the Corporation were estimated in

accordance with the Canadian National Instrument 43-101 and the Canadian Institute of Mining and

Metallurgy Definition Standards. These standards differ significantly from the requirements of the U.S.

Securities and Exchange Commission. Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have

demonstrated economic viability.

This document contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation

and "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation

Reform Act of 1995. This information and these statements, referred to herein as "forward -looking

statements" are made as of the date of this document. Forward-looking statements relate to future events

or future performance and reflect current estimates, predictions, expectations or beliefs regarding future

events and include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to:

(i) the estimated amount and grade of Mineral Resources;

(ii) the PEA representing a viable development option for the Project;

(iii) estimates of the capital costs of constructing mine facilities and bringing a mine into production, of

sustaining capital and the duration of financing payback periods;

(iv) the estimated amount of future production, both produced and metal recovered; and,

7

(v) estimates of operating costs and total costs, net cash flow, net present value and economic returns

from an operating mine.

Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs,

plans, projections, objectives or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or

phrases such as "expects", "anticipates", "plans", "projects", "estimates", "envisage s", "assumes",

"intends", "strategy", "goals", "objectives" or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events or

results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of

these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward -looking

statements.

All forward-looking statements are based on IAMGOLD's or its consultants' current beliefs as well as

various assumptions made by them and information currently available to them. The most significant

assumptions are set forth above, but generally these assumptions include:

(i) the presence of and continuity of metals at the Côté Gold Project at estimated grades;

(ii) the geotechnical and metallurgical characteristics of rock conforming to sampled results; including

the quantities of water and the quality of the water that must be diverted or treated during mining

operations;

(iii) the capacities and durability of various machinery and equipment;

(iv) the availability of personnel, machinery and equipment at estimated prices and within the

estimated delivery times;

(v) currency exchange rates;

(vi) metals sales prices and exchange rate assumed;

(vii) appropriate discount rates applied to the cash flows in the economic analysis;

(viii) tax rates and royalty rates applicable to the proposed mining operation;

(ix) the availability of acceptable financing under assumed structure and costs;

(x) anticipated mining losses and dilution;

(xi) metallurgical performance;

(xii) reasonable contingency requirements;

(xiii) success in realizing proposed operations;

(xiv) receipt of permits and other regulatory approvals on acceptable terms; and

(xv) the fulfillment of environmental assessment commitments and arrangements with local

communities.

Although management considers these assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently

available to it, they may prove to be incorrect. Many forward-looking statements are made assuming the

correctness of other forward looking statements, such as statements of net present value and internal

rates of return, which are based on most of the other forward-looking statements and assumptions herein.

The cost information is also prepared using current values, but the time for incur ring the costs will be in the

future and it is assumed costs will remain stable over the relevant period.

By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and

specific, and risks exist that estimates, forecasts, projections and other forward-looking statements will not

be achieved or that assumptions do not reflect future experience. We caution readers not to place undue

reliance on these forward-looking statements as a number of important factors could cause the actual

outcomes to differ materially from the beliefs, plans, objectives, expectations, anticipations, estimates

assumptions and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements. These risk factors may be

generally stated as the risk that the assumptions and estimates expressed above do not occur as forecast,

but specifically include, without limitation: risks relating to variations in the mineral content within the

material identified as Mineral Resources from that predicted; variations in rates of recovery and extraction;

the geotechnical characteristics of the rock mined or through which infrastructure is built differing from that

predicted, the quantity of water that will need to be diverted or treated during mining operations being

different from what is expected to be encountered during mining operations or post closure, or the rate of

flow of the water being different; developments in world metals markets; risks relating to fluctuations in the

8

Canadian dollar relative to the US dollar; increases in the estimated capital and operating costs or

unanticipated costs; difficulties attracting the necessary work force; increases in financing costs or adverse

changes to the terms of available financing, if any; tax rates or royalties being gr eater than assumed;

changes in development or mining plans due to changes in logistical, technical or other factors; changes in

project parameters as plans continue to be refined; risks relating to receipt of regulatory approvals ; delays

in stakeholder negotiations; changes in regulations applying to the development, operation, and closure of

mining operations from what currently exists; the effects of competition in the markets in which IAMGOLD

operates; operational and infrastructure risks and the additional risks described in IAMGOLD’s Annual

Information Form filed with SEDAR in Canada (available at www.sedar.com) for the year ended December

31, 2015 and in the Corporation's Annual Report Form 40-F filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange

Commission on EDGAR (available at https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html.

IAMGOLD cautions that the foregoing list of factors that may affect future results is not exhaustive.

When relying on our forward-looking statements to make decisions with respect to IAMGOLD, investors

and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other uncertainties and potential events.

IAMGOLD does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may

be made from time to time by IAMGOLD or on our behalf, except as required by law.

About IAMGOLD

IAMGOLD ( www.iamgold.com) is a mid -tier mining company with four operating gold mines on three

continents. A solid base of strategic assets in North and South America and West Africa is complemented

by development and exploration projects and continued assessment of accretive acquisition opportunities.

IAMGOLD is in a strong financial position with extensive management and operational expertise.

For further information please contact:

Bob Tait, VP Investor Relations, IAMGOLD Corporation

Tel: (416) 360-4743 Mobile: (647) 403-5520

Laura Young, Director, Investor Relations, IAMGOLD Corporation

Tel: (416) 933-4952 Mobile: (416) 670-3815

Shae Frosst, Investor Relations Associate, IAMGOLD Corporation

Tel: (416) 933-4738 Mobile: (647) 967-9942

Toll-free: 1-888-464-9999 [email protected]

Please note:

This entire news release may be accessed via fax, e -mail, IAMGOLD's website at www.iamgold.com and through CNW Group’s

website at www.newswire.ca. All material information on IAMGOLD can be found at www.sedar.com or at www.sec.gov.

Si vous désirez obtenir la version française de ce communiqué, veuillez consulter le

http://www.iamgold.com/French/accueil/default.aspx.