Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

IDEX.V ·

IDEX Metals Drills 182.25m of 0.32% Cu From Surface at the Kismet Tourmaline Breccia, Freeze Project, Idaho

Drill Results

IDEX Metals Drills 182.25m of 0.32% Cu From Surface at the Kismet Tourmaline Breccia,

Freeze Project, Idaho

Vancouver, B.C. – September 10, 2025 - IDEX Metals Corp. (“IDEX” or the “Company”) (TSXV:

IDEX; OTCQB: IDXMF) is pleased to announce that the first ever drillhole completed by IDEX on

the Freeze property (“Freeze” or the “Property”) intersected 182.25 m of 0.32% Cu , from

surface. The drill hole, KSMT25001, intersected variable intervals of oxide copper mineralization

beginning at 1.5 metres downhole, with malachite, chalcocite, and chrysocolla occurring as

supergene replacement of primary chalcopyrite and minor bornite.

KSMT25001 was targeting the Kismet Tourmaline Breccia and intervals of historical copper

mineralization drilled in 1965. The first drillhole at Kismet has expanded the historical

mineralization to a minimum depth of 3 to 4 times the historical drilling, and has confirmed the

existence of a mineralized, near-surface, magmatic-hydrothermal copper system.

Key Highlights

● Significant highlights from drill hole KSMT25001 include:

○ 182.25 m grading 0.32% Cu, 1.08 g/t Ag, from 1.5 m

■ Including 3.2 m grading 1.44% Cu, 1.11 g/t Ag from 109.0 m

■ Including 1.0 m grading 1.41% Cu, 8.34 g/t Ag from 140.0 m

○ 89.34 m grading 0.26% Cu, 2.25 g/t Ag, from 189.0 m

■ Including 7.0 m grading 1.00% Cu, 10.84 g/t Ag from 217.0 m

■ Including 5.0 m grading 1.39% Cu, 8.85 g/t Ag from 243.0 m

○ 278 m grading 0.29% Cu across the entire length of the hole, and not accounting

for internal dilution.

○ Variable oxide copper mineralization (malachite, chrysocolla, and chalcocite

replacing primary chalcopyrite) was intersected from surface and persisted

throughout the entire 278 m length of KSMT25001.

● The ground-based magnetotelluric (MT) geophysical survey outlined a NW-SE

trending structural corridor with three major high-resistivity anomalies, interpreted as

potential intrusive centers, spatially associated with Kismet and Cuddy Mine (CM) targets.

● The second drill hole at Kismet, KSMT25002, has been completed to a depth of 422.7

m, with assays expected in October 2025.

● Field programs continue to generate new targets across the broader Freeze Project

area, setting the stage for a pipeline of future drill testing.

2

Clayton Fisher, CEO of IDEX Metals commented: “From the very first meter, hole KSMT25001

has confirmed a mineralized breccia and delivered continuous copper mineralization over its

entire length. This result highlights the potential of the Freeze property, and the Idaho Copper

Belt, to host large, near-surface copper mineralization in a Tier 1 jurisdiction.”

Table 1. Significant Intercepts and Hole Locations from Kismet Drilling

*Maximum internal dilution of 5 metres was applied using a cut-off grade of 0.1% Cu

**Coordinates are UTM system, Zone 11 N, NAD83

Hole Easting Northing Azimuth Dip From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Cu

(wt. %)

Ag

(g/t)

Mo

(ppm)

KSMT25001

524481 4960816 340° -70

1.50 183.75 182.25 0.32 1.08 29.96

including 13.00 19.00 6.00 0.70 2.24 63.84

and 49.00 54.00 5.00 0.63 2.64 57.12

and 68.00 74.00 6.00 0.56 1.82 48.15

and 109.00 112.20 3.20 1.44 1.11 14.82

and 140.00 141.00 1.00 1.41 8.34 20.00

KSMT25001 189.00 278.34 89.34 0.26 2.25 135.54

including 217.00 224.00 7.00 1.00 10.84 192.07

and 230.45 231.60 1.15 0.67 2.77 1640.00

and 243.00 248.00 5.00 1.39 8.85 369.20

KSMT25002 524481 4960816 353° -50 Results Pending

KSMT25003 524455 4960884 340° -50 Drilling Ongoing

KSMT25004 524452 4960959 Proposed

3

Figure 1. Plan map showing location of Kismet drillholes KSMT25001, KSMT25002,

KSMT25003 and KSMT25004

Drillhole Summary

Hole KSMT25001 was collared in a tourmaline breccia unit with mixed clasts of porphyritic

granodiorite, tonalite, diorite and early gabbro intrusives. The breccia is matrix supported with

secondary tourmaline and magnetite overprint which transitions to a tourminalized monzonite

intrusive matrix at depth. The tourmaline bearing matrix displays patchy weak-moderate potassic

alteration, which is associated with tourmaline infill and secondary copper oxide overprint. Oxide

copper mineralization in the tourmaline breccia matrix occurs as secondary malachite, chrysocolla

and chalcocite. The copper oxides are interpreted to be derived from primary chalcopyrite. There

is an overall transition from the oxide copper assemblage to sulfide-dominant chalcopyrite

mineralization downhole; however, localized oxide copper intervals are preserved at depths

exceeding 200 m. Structurally controlled chrysocolla and malachite also occur as fracture

coatings throughout the entirety of the hole. The mineralized breccia interval was encountered

over broader intercepts in hole KSMT25002.

KSMT25001 transitions to an early tonalite intrusive that contains intermittent 10 to 20 m intervals

of mineralized magmatic breccia. The hole bottomed in an earlier phase of diorite intrusive, which

showed malachite and chrysocolla as fracture coating mineralization.

4

Figure 2. Cross Section displaying assay results from hole KSMT25001 and lithology for holes

KSMT25001 and KSMT25002

MT Results

IDEX is also pleased to announce the results of the ground-based magnetotelluric (MT)

geophysical survey at the Freeze Property. The survey was completed by Moombarriga USA Ltd.,

over the course of 5 days with a total of 31 MT stations taken across the property. The primary

goal of the MT survey was to gain an understanding of the geophysical responses of the Kismet

and CM target areas in the subsurface, and to expand the known footprint of the targets into the

subsurface.

Hole KSMT25001 was drilled to the north at a steep angle, through moderately resistive features

ranging from 200-600 Ohm-m. This moderate feature was on the flank of a major >800 Ohm-m

body. This major resistive body will be tested in future drilling; however, the focus remains on

intersecting the moderately resistive features between the main resistive bodies, as these units

may correlate with zones of moderate silicification and disseminated sulfides.

5

Figure 3. MT results showing isosurfaces of resistivity and downhole lithology

Regionally, results of the survey indicate three major high-resistivity anomalies that trend along a

NW-SE corridor. A fourth, smaller high-resistivity anomaly can be found at depth, protruding from

the northwestern-most major feature. It was found that both the Kismet and CM targets occur

along the margins of the resistive centres. This may indicate the possibility that the resistive

features are unaltered or potentially potassically altered cores of a shallow intrusive body. It

should be noted that the resolution of the MT survey is decreased in the east and south of the

property due to a lack of station data.

6

Figure 4. 1500 masl section showing resistivity (Ohm-m) across the Freeze property

Figure 5. Looking NW property scale results of the MT survey showing highly resistive deep

seated features with broad less resistive (more chargeable) isosurfaces along flanks of the

resistive features.

The existence of a third anomaly to the south of the Kismet and CM targets, was believed to be

under basalt cover. However, through follow-up fieldwork, this area was found to be a large body

B’ B

7

of quartz-diorite/tonalite. Currently the exposed MT corridor is 11 km in length and 4 km in width

and occurs along a NW trending axis. The exposure varies and can often be covered in a

moderate veneer of soil, which obscures the underlying geology; however, tonalite / diorite can

be mapped and linked in several areas, and an inference can be made on the underlying geology

between these areas. Basalt cover exists to the east and west of the MT corridor and can be

highlighted by intermediate to high-MT responses.

The tonalite-to-diorite is locally mineralized; however, these mineralized zones are currently

discrete. Large sections of the tonalite / diorite have been overprinted by tourmaline, which

replaces primary hornblende in the tonalite / diorite. The intensity of the tourmalinization increases

towards the NW, and Kismet. This overprinting pattern encourages the thesis of a large magmatic

hydrothermal event linked to the Kismet Breccia, or the large MT anomalies seen at depth.

Upcoming Catalysts

IDEX is advancing exploration at Freeze designed to generate steady news flow through the fall

and winter:

● KSMT25002 was completed to a depth of 422.70 m. Drill core has been processed and

assays are expected in October.

● KSMT25003 is currently in progress and is a 75 m step-out from hole KSMT25001. The

hole was drilled to the north and parallel to KSMT25002. At the time of writing the hole

has a current depth of 281.33 m.

● KSMT25004 is planned as a 150 m step-out from hole KSMT25001, and the drill

orientation is currently unconstrained.

● Field exploration at Freeze remains ongoing, with new drill targets identified and to be

disclosed in upcoming press releases.

Sample Analysis and QAQC

All drill core samples were prepped and analyzed at AGAT Labs Analytical in Calgary, Alberta,

and Thunder Bay, Ontario, an ISO 17025 and ISO 9001 certified laboratory. Samples were dried

and crushed to 2 mm, from which a 250 g sub-sample split was then pulverized to 85% passing

a 75 micron sieve. Following preparation, a 48 element 4-acid digestion (method 201-071) was

conducted. For this, a 0.25 g aliquot of the prepared pulp was digested in a 4-acid solution

consisting of hydrochloric, nitric, perchloric and hydrofluoric acids. 4-acid is a near total digest

and only the most highly resistant minerals are not dissolved. The resulting solution was analyzed

via ICP-OES and ICP-MS. Lower detection limits for this procedure are 0.01 ppm for silver, 0.5

ppm for copper and 0.05 ppm for Molybdenum.

Gold was analyzed by 202-051, a 30-gram fire assay fusion with AAS finish. No significant results

were reported.

8

Samples with initial results beyond the upper detection limit of the 201-071 method were analyzed

by over-limit 201-470 procedure (ICP-OES and/or ICP-MS) for Copper. For copper, the threshold

is >1%.

AGAT Labs Analytical employs internal quality control standards, duplicates and blank samples

at set frequencies. Blind certified reference materials (CRMs), blank samples and duplicate ¼

core samples were systematically inserted by the Company into the sample stream and analyzed

as part of the Company's quality assurance/quality control protocol.

Qualified Person

The scientific and technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved for

disclosure by David Hladky, P.Geo. (registered in Alberta), V.P. Exploration of IDEX Metals Corp.

David Hladky is a "Qualified Person" for IDEX Metals Corp. within the meaning of National

Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.

About IDEX Metals Corp.

IDEX Metals Corp. is a mineral exploration company focused on advancing a portfolio of base

and precious metal projects in Idaho, USA. IDEX is primarily focused on the exploration and

development of the Freeze Copper-Gold porphyry prospect located in the newly discovered Idaho

Copper Belt, Washington County, Idaho. With a strategic land position in a top-tier mining

jurisdiction and surrounded by major industry players, IDEX is committed to redefining district-

scale exploration in Idaho.

For more information, please visit https://idexmetals.com/.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Clayton Fisher, CEO & Director

For further information regarding IDEX contact:

Sharyn Alexander

Vice President Corporate Development

[email protected]

1 (604) 260-0356

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts may be forward-looking

statements. These forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that

could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-

looking statements. In addition, the forward-looking statements require management to make

assumptions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties. There is significant risk that the

forward-looking statements will not prove to be accurate, that the management’s assumptions