Highland Copper Announces Preliminary Economic Assessment Results FOR Its White Pine North Project and Joint Venture Transaction with Kinterra
Page 1 of 21
July 24, 2023 TSX.V : HI OTCQB: HDRSF
HIGHLAND COPPER ANNOUNCES PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT
RESULTS FOR ITS WHITE PINE NORTH PROJECT AND JOINT VENTURE
TRANSACTION WITH KINTERRA
Vancouver, Canada, July 24, 2023. Highland Copper Company Inc. (TSXV: HI; OTCQB: HDRSF) (“ Highland”
or the “Company”) is pleased to announce the results of the Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) and
mineral resource estimate for the White Pine North project (“White Pine North ”) in Michigan, USA . The
PEA demonstrates the robust economic strength of this long-lived project.
Simultaneously, Highland is pleased to introduce Kinterra Copper USA LLC (“Kinterra”) as a joint venture
(“JV”) partner on the project. Kinterra will bring additional financial and technical strength required to
progress the project through to development. Kinterra has made a cash payment of $30 million to Highland
for a 66% stake in the White Pine North project. Additionally, the joint venture has agreed to spend a
further $30 million to advance the project through permitting, infill drilling and feasibility study.
Highland continues to make great progress in 2023. Combined, these announcements markedly improve
Highland’s prospects of advancing its larger White Pine North project while focusing on moving its
Copperwood project to construction and operation . Highland believes this is positive for all stakeholders ,
particularly the State of Michigan where Highland’s project development is aligned with the State vision of
electrification and regional support for local communities.
Key highlights of the PEA and joint venture transaction include (all figures in $USD):
• Robust PEA Results Set Path for White Pine North Advancement: With a significant increase in
resource base, an after-tax net present value (“ NPV”) 8% of $821 million and an after-tax internal
rate of return (“IRR”) of 20.8%, the project provides strong cash flow and leverage to copper price.
• Kinterra Invests $30 Million for 66% of White Pine North, Funds Available for Copperwood :
The initial $30 million proceeds from the joint venture arrangement allow Highland to initiate early
site works at the fully-permitted Copperwood project, where Highland is focused on advancing to
development and production.
• Additional $30 Million Commitment to Advance White Pine North Permitting and Feasibility
Study: Kinterra and Highland, as JV partners, have agreed on a further $30 million investment in
the project to be funded by Kinterra. This consists of $20 million representing Kinterra’s 66% pro
rata expenditure, as well as a $10 million unsecured loan to fund Highland’s pro rata expenditure.
• Highland Set to Advance Key Michigan Assets: With key assets 100% owned Copperwood, 34%
owned White Pine North, a consolidated multi-billion pound resource base, and an additional $30
million in liquidity, Highland looks forward to contributing to critically needed US domestic copper
supply through production growth with these advanced-stage projects.
“Today’s announcements are transformational for Highland Copper. While we continue to maintain our focus
on the fully-permitted Copperwood project, we have a viable path to simultaneously advance the White Pine
North project, keeping our focus on near-term value creation by creating a new US copper producer . As
Page 2 of 21
significant capital is required to develop both projects, the joint venture arrangement allows us to move
forward without having to issue any shares, and unlocks tremendous value for our shareholders. Kinterra
recognizes the quality of our asset base and i s committed to working with Highland to advance White Pine
North. We look forward to working with Kinterra as partners to progress this great asset.
We are pleased that all stakeholders, including the various Michigan communities and our shareholders , will
benefit as we surface the significant asset value at both projects. We look forward to updating the market as
we advance.” stated Denis Miville-Deschênes, President and CEO of Highland Copper.
Key Preliminary Economic Assessment Highlights1,2
The PEA provides a base case assessment of mining the mineral resources of the White Pine North Project.
The PEA considers White Pine North as a stand-alone project, where potential synergies with Copperwood
are not considered. The Project is the extension of the historical White Pine mine which operated from 1953
to 1995. The results of the White Pine North PEA demonstrate the long -lived nature of the project with
strong economics and cash flows. Key highlights include the following , with all figures being shown for
100% of the asset:
• Strong Economic Returns with Leverage to Copper Price Changes
o After-tax NPV8% of $821 million (at $4.00/pound copper price)3
o 20.8% after-tax IRR
o At $4.50/pound copper price, after tax NPV8% of $1.2 billion and IRR of 25.4%
• Improved NPV to Initial Capital Expenditure Ratio
o Initial capital expenditures of $615 million, net of pre-production revenue of $265 million
o NPV to initial capital expenditure ratio of 1.33
• Significantly Increased Resource Base
o Indicated mineral resource containing 3.5 billion pounds of copper (150.7 million tonnes at
1.05% Cu) and 65.5 million ounces of silver (13.5 g/t Ag)
o Inferred mineral resource containing 2.2 billion pounds of copper (96.4 million tonnes at
1.03% Cu) and 27.8 million ounces of silver (9.0 g/t Ag)
o From the above resource, m ineralized material included in the mine plan of 115.8 million
tonnes at 0.97% Cu and 11.09 g/t Ag, containing 2.47 billion pounds of copper and 41.3
million ounces of silver
• Long-lived Asset with Strong Cash Flows
o Mine life of 21.8 years, including 21 months of ramp-up, with average annual LOM payable
copper production of 93.5 million pounds and 1.2 million ounces of silver
o Life-of-mine (“LOM”) average C1 cash costs of $1.58/lb, net of by-product
o Undiscounted average annual operating cash flow of approximately $210 million and
annual free cash flow of approximately $160 million (excluding initial capital)
“The White Pine North project was able to operate successfully for 50 years until the mid -1990s. The results
of the PEA indicate that the project could have another 22 or more years of mining in the Upper Peninsula .
Page 3 of 21
We look forward to continuing our work with the state of Michigan , making Copperwood and White Pine
North key economic contributors in the region , becoming an important part of domestic copper supply and
aiding in the on-going goals of electrification in Michigan and the US” said Denis Miville-Deschênes, President
and CEO of Highland Copper.
1) The reader is advised that a PEA is preliminary in nature and is intended to provide only an initial, high-level review of the Project
potential and design options. The PEA mine plan and economic model include numerous assumptions and the use of Inferred
resources. Inferred resources are too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would
enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves and to be used in an economic analysis except as allowed for in PEA studies.
There is no guarantee that Inferred resources can be converted to Indicated or Measured resources, and as such, there is no
guarantee the Project economics described herein will be achieved.
2) Readers are cautioned that the PEA is an economic analysis of mineral resources. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and
do not have demonstrated economic viability.
3) White Pine North NPV includes revenue related to 88% of the unexercised Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd (“ Osisko”) silver option.
Osisko has the right to pay an additional $23 million in order to secure the rights to the balance 88% of the silver stream. If this
option was exercised, the adjusted NPV8% of White Pine North would be $634 million.
4) Included within mineralized material within the conceptual mine plan area are approximately 7 million tonnes of mineralized
material on lands that White Pine Copper LLC’s mineral title has not been confirmed.
Key Joint Venture Agreement Highlights
The joint operating agreement among Kinterra Copper USA LLC and, Highland’s wholly owned subsidiary
Upper Peninsula Copper Holdings Inc. (“UPCH”) provides financial capacity to proactively advance both key
Michigan projects. The following are the key terms of the investment by Kinterra and the joint operating
agreement:
• Initial Investment of $30 million for 66% of White Pine North Project: The initial investment reflects
Kinterra’s endorsement of the underlying asset value of White Pine North. The cash is unrestricted and
can be used at Highland’s discretion. Highland intends on assigning a portion of the proceeds to
advancing the fully -permitted Copperwood project to a construction decision in 2024. The purchase
and sale of the interest in White Pine Copper LLC has been completed and is fully funded.
• Budget of Additional $30 million to Advance White Pine North: In addition to its $30 million initial
investment, Kinterra has agreed to fund, subject to certain conditions, a further $30 million in
expenditures to advance the White Pine North project. The commitment will consist of $20 million
representing Kinterra’s 66% pro rata expenditure, as well as a $10 million unsecured loan to fund
Highland’s pro rata expenditure. This loan will be available to Highland to satisfy cash calls. The
investment will allow the joint venture project to progress quickly into permitti ng, infill drilling and a
feasibility study.
• Unsecured $10 million Loan from Kinterra: The $10 million unsecured loan to cover cash calls will be
available to Highland Copper at coupon of 10% and will mature in July 2026. A second unsecured loan
(on the same terms) will become available to Highland after this $30 million has been spent on White
Pine North, assuming any initial loan has been repaid. The second loan will have a maturity of July 2028.
The joint operating agreement contemplates that White Pine LLC will be governed by a management
committee, which will consist of three representatives appointed by Kinterra, and two by Highland.
Highland expects to continue to be involved in the development of the White Pine North project. The
management committee will propose programs and budgets for future expenditures. Highland will have
the option to elect to participate in future work programs.
Page 4 of 21
In a challenging capital markets environment, Highland is pleased to have secured funding, without issuing
any shares, to support our strategic goals at both Copperwood and White Pine North.
“The structure of the funding package, in addition to the strength of Kinterra’s balance sheet, provides critical
financial flexibility to advance Highland’s projects. The initial investment allows Highland to progress to early
site works at Copperwood and move towards construction in 2024. The additional capital of $30 million at
White Pine North ensures no contributions will be required by Highland in the near-term expenditure period.
Looking forward, the White Pine North p roject will benefit from Kinterr a’s financial strength, particularly
through funding 66% of the initial capital, should we jointly elect to construct White Pine North in the future”
said Barry O’Shea, CFO of Highland Copper.
Highland Copper Strategic Next Steps
Highland will continue towards its goal of becoming a US domestic copper producer in the near-term with
the development of the Copperwood project. Highland will then look to production and cash flow growth
from White Pine North through its joint venture partnership with Kinterra.
• Advance Copperwood to wards Construction in 2024: Key steps as the Highland progresses to
development include:
o Early works at site: With the available liquidity, Highland will initiate early works at
Copperwood for required site impacts and environmental mitigations . The majority of the
early works are considered in the initial capital as outlined in the recently published
Copperwood Feasibility Study. Importantly, this expenditure will net against initial capital.
o Feasibility Study Optimizations: Through the period leading up to a construction decision,
Highland will consider additional value creation opportunities relative to the Copperwood
Feasibility Study, particularly infill drilling and potential life of mine extensions. A significant
opportunity exists to convert inferred resources into measured and indicated resources.
• Advance White Pine North to Permitting and Feasibility Study : With the committed additional
investment from Kinterra, the joint venture partnership will proactively work toward permitting and
Feasibility Study, also advancing the White Pine North project toward development. Highland’s 34%
stake in the White Pine North project remains highly significant to Highland’s overall asset value:
o After-tax NPV8% of $279 million1 for Highland’s 34% interest in the project , ensuring it
remains a valuable component of Highland’s asset value under the joint venture partnership.
o Copper resource of 1.2 billion pounds indicated and 0.7 billion pounds inferred for
Highland’s 34% interest (indicated 51.2 million tonnes at 1.05% Cu) (inferred 32.8 million
tonnes at 1.03% Cu)
• Continue to Develop Relationship with Key Stakeholder in State of Michigan : Highland looks
forward to being a key contributor to the economy of the State of Michigan. This requires us to work
collaboratively with all key community, government, corporate and other stakeholders . Highland
understands a mutually beneficial relationship with all stakeholders is critical to success.
We look forward to updating the market as we advance towards our key strategic goals and surface the
considerable underlying asset value of Copperwood and White Pine North.
Page 5 of 21
1) NPV excludes the potential impact of Osisko exercising its silver option.
Advisors
With respect to the Kinterra joint venture transaction, the Company’s financial advisor is BMO Capital
Markets and the Company’s legal counsel is McMillan LLP.
Kinterra’s legal counsel with respect to the joint venture transaction is Bennett Jones LLP.
Preliminary Economic Assessment Detail
All amounts in this news release are in US dollars, unless otherwise indicated. Due to rounding, numbers presented
throughout this release may not add up precisely to the totals provided. Readers are cautioned that the PEA is an economic
analysis of mineral resources. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
The PEA and mineral resource estimate have been prepared by G Mining Services Inc. (“GMSI”).
White Pine North Project Geology
The White Pine deposit is located in the Ontonagon County, Michigan State. The base of the
Nonesuch Formation hosts the bulk of the copper mineralization at White Pine, which consists of
cupriferous siltstone, black shale and fine -grained sandstone beds, and low -grade siltstone,
sandstone and red shale beds.
The copper mineralization in the area of the former White Pine mine occurs in the bottom 6 m
(20 ft) of the Nonesuch Formation at the contact with the Copper Harbor conglomerate. Beds
within the lower 21 m (70 ft) of the Nonesuch Formation are laterally persistent and can be
correlated across the mine. The shale and siltstone in the lower part of the Nonesuch Formation
are divided into two sedimentary sequences, the lower “Parting Shale” and the upper “Upper
Shale”, separated by the Upper Sandstone.
Copper mineralization at the White Pine deposit occurs as two distinct styles -- very fine-grained
sulfide (chalcocite) and as native copper. Sulfide mineralization is estimated to account for 85 -
90% of the copper in the deposit, but both modes of copper are intimately associated throughout
the deposit.
Mineral Resources
GMSI prepared a Mineral Resource estimate for the White Pine Project based on data provided
up to and including September 28, 2022. The resource estimate was prepared in accordance with
CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves (adopted May 10, 2014) and is reported in
accordance with National Instrument 43 -101 (“NI 43-101”) Standards of Disclosure for Mineral
Projects. Classification, or assigning a level of confidence to Mineral Resources, has been
undertaken with strict adherence to CIM Standards o n Mineral Resources and Reserves. In the
opinion of GMSI, the resource evaluation reported herein is a reasonable representation of the
Page 6 of 21
global Mineral Resources found at the White Pine Project at the current level and spacing of
sampling.
The mineral estimate was prepared under the supervision of Réjean Sirois, P. Eng. consultant for
GMSI, and Christian Beaulieu, P. Geo. consultant for GMSI, both independent “qualified persons”
as defined in NI 43-101. Geovia GEMS™ and Leapfrog Geo™ software were used to facilitate the
resource estimation process.
The modelling of the copper mineralization horizons was based on the footwall and hanging wall
of the three selected “columns” (sedimentary sequences), namely the Parting Shale, and the Full
Column. The Parting Shale was modelled with a minimum thickness o f 2 m and the Full Column
with a minimum thickness of 3 m. In instances where the Parting Shale column was less than 2 m,
dilution was applied in the footwall to ensure that the 2 m thickness was honored. The Mineral
Resources are reported within the Full Column or the Parting Shale, based on mine engineering
considerations.
Copper and silver assays were composited to the full thickness of the column. Grade distributions
were reviewed and assay capping was not deemed necessary. Grade estimation was undertaken
using Ordinary Kriging (OK) for copper grades and Inverse Distance Squared (ID2) for silver grades
into a percentage block model based on the wireframes of the two columns. A three -pass
estimation approach was adopted, with increasing search ellipses and relaxed estimation
parameters. A 300 m buffer zone around existing workings was excised from the Mineral
Resources.
The block model was validated both visually and statistically and was found to be a good
representation of the composites. Mineral Resource classification was based primarily on
estimation passes, and other considerations such as drill spacing, quality of historical data and
confidence in grade continuity.
The White Pine North deposit’s total Indicated Mineral Resources are reported at 150.7 Mt
grading an average 1.05% Cu and 13.5 g/t Ag containing 3.50 Blbs Cu and 65.5 Moz Ag using a
lower cut-off grade of 0.90% Cu for the Parting Shale and Full Column combined. Inferred Mineral
Resources are reported at 96.4 Mt grading an average 1.03% Cu and 9.0 g/t Ag containing
2.18 Blbs Cu and 27.8 Moz Ag using a lower cut-off grade of 0.90% Cu (Parting Shale only).
Mineral Resource Estimate - White Pine Project - 0.9% Cu cut-off Grade – June 12, 2023
Ore
Column
Resource
Category
Tonnage
(Mt)
Copper
Grade
(%)
Silver
Grade
(g/t)
Copper
Contained
(M lbs)
Silver
Contained
(M oz)
Full Column
(3 m)
Indicated 37.8 1.03 10.1 857 12.3
Inferred 0 - - 0 0
Page 7 of 21
Parting Shale
(2 m)
Indicated 112.8 1.06 14.6 2,640 53.1
Inferred 96.4 1.03 9.0 2,183 27.8
White Pine
North (Total)
Indicated 150.7 1.05 13.5 3,497 65.5
Inferred 96.4 1.03 9.0 2,183 27.8
Notes on Mineral Resources:
1) Mineral Resources are reported using a copper price of US$4.00/lb and a silver price of US$25/oz.
2) A payable rate of 96.5% for copper and 90% for silver was assumed.
3) Metallurgical recoveries of 88% for copper and 73.4% for silver were assumed.
4) A cut-off grade of 0.90% copper was used, based on an underground “room and pillar” mining scenario.
5) Mineral Resources are reported within the most probable extraction scenario of Full Column or Parting Shale based on
mine engineering.
6) Operating costs are based on a processing plant located at the White Pine site.
7) A flat NSR royalty rate of $0.10/lb Cu payable was applied, which incorporates three royalties on the project (Osisko Silver
royalties, Osisko Copper royalties, and Longyear Royalty).
8) Minimum mining thicknesses of 2 m and 3 m were applied to the Parting Shale and the Full Column respectively.
9) No mining dilution and mining loss were considered for the Mineral Resources.
10) Mineralized rock bulk densities is assumed at 2.74 g/cc.
11) Classification of Mineral Resources conforms to CIM definitions.
12) The qualified persons for the estimate are Mr. Réjean Sirois, P.Eng., consultant for GMSI and Mr. Christian Beaulieu, P.Geo.,
consultant for GMSI. The estimate has an effective date of June 12, 2023.
13) Mineral Resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of Mineral
Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, or other
relevant issues.
14) Parting Shale: interval defined from the base of the Lower Transition unit to the top of the Tiger unit.
15) Full Column: interval defined from the base of the Lower Transition unit to the top of the Thinly unit.
16) The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and there has been
insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Resources as Indicated or Measured Mineral Resources.
Page 8 of 21
Mining Plan
The PEA envisions that the deposit will be mined with a mix of conventional highly mechanized,
drill and blast and continuous mining room-and-pillar mining method. The method consists of
the extraction of a series of entries and cross-cuts in the mineralization, leaving pillars in place to
support the back. The entries, cross cuts and pillars have been sized using geotechnical analysis
and experience from historical mining at White Pine.
The mine will comprise three sectors; the Eastern, Center and Western parts. The mine will be
accessed via a new covered box -cut to establish a portal at the mine entrance from the surface,
located at the western side of the deposit. The pre -production pe riod requires 18,193 m of
development to establish the main entry panel requiring four to six drifts according to the
ventilation requirements. Ground conditions are expected to be good to excellent, similar to the
historical White Pine mine. The ground support consists a 1.8 m rebar bolts on a 1.2 m by 1.2 m
pattern. At room intersection rebar bolt length is increased to 2.4 m.
The production schedule is based on mining a fixed target of 5.4 75 M tonnes/year. To achieve
this annual production, seven to fourteen production panels must be in production
simultaneously. The number of required panels depends on the tonnage from the development
as well as the height of the rooms of each panel. The mini ng of the room will be done using a
single-pass approach. In the first pass, larger pillars are left in place. The mining recovery is
approximately 57%.
Life-of-Mine (LOM) Metal Production
The LOM production for the White Pine Project is shown below. Payable copper production is
estimated at 922,803 tonnes (2,034 million pounds) with an annual average of 42,428 tonnes (93.5
million pounds) over the 23.4 -year mine life which includes a 21 -month commissioning and
ramp-up period. The average copper payable rate is 96.5%. Payable silver production over the
LOM is 26.2 million ounces with an annual average of 1,203 thousand ounces of silver.
Production Physicals Pre-production Production Total
Concentrate (k of dmt) 102.8 3,129 3,232
Cu con. Grade (% Cu) 30.5% 30.5% 30.5%
Cu metal production (M lbs) 69.3 2,108 2,177
Ag metal production (k oz) 965.9 2,9323 30,290
Cu payable metal (M lbs) 66.8 2,034 2,101
Ag payable metal (k oz) 865.5 26,165 27,031