Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

HBM.TO ·

TMX, NYSE – HBM 2017 No. 4 Hudbay Provides Update on Operations and Growth Projects

Corporate Updates

TMX, NYSE – HBM

2017 No. 4

Hudbay Provides Update on Operations and Growth Projects

Toronto, Ontario, March 30, 2017 – Hudbay Minerals Inc. (“Hudbay” or the “company”) (TSX, NYSE: HBM) is

pleased to announce an optimized mine plan for its 100% -owned Lalor mine in Manitoba, Canada as well as a

feasibility study for its Rosemont project in Arizona, United States. The company has also provided its annual mineral

reserve and resource update for all of its properties. All amounts are in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted.

Lalor highlights:

 Updated Lalor mine plan incorporates a throughput rate of 4,500 tonnes per day at the Stall concentrator, an

increase from the current 3,000 tonnes per day

 Planned Lalor zinc production increases to 90 thousand tonnes contained in concentrate in 2017 , from 71

thousand tonnes in 2016

 Feasibility work is ongoing for the Lalor gold zone and copper-gold zone targeting an additional 1,500 tonnes

per day through the New Britannia mill to fully utilize Lalor’s 6,000 tonnes per day shaft capacity

Rosemont highlights:

 Rosemont is expected to have a 19-year mine life and demonstrates robust economics with a projected

15.5% after-tax project IRR on the estimated $1.9 billion project capital cost (100% basis) at a copper price

of $3.00 per pound

 Rosemont is expected to have average annual production over the first 10 years of 127 thousand metric

tonnes of copper at an average annual cash cost of $1.14 per pound of copper and sustaining cash cost of

$1.59 per pound of copper1

 Development of Rosemont is conditional upon receipt of final permits and the approval of Hudbay's Board of

Directors

“Our enhancements to the Lalor mine plan offer low -cost, near term zinc production growth with potential future gold

production upside, and positions our Manitoba business unit to be a strong contributor to Hudbay’s results for many

years to come, ” said Alan Hair, president and chief e xecutive officer. “Our Peru and Manitoba operations are

expected to generate strong free cash flow that we can reinvest in the Rosemont project in order to grow the long -

term copper production profile of the company. The Rosemont project is expected to be one of the first new copper

mines to be built when copper prices improve and, once approved, has the capacity to generate strong returns for

Hudbay shareholders. ”

1 Cash cost and sustaining cash cost, net of by-product credits per pound of copper are not recognized under IFRS. Rosemont’s by-

product credits are calculated using $11.00 per p ound molybdenum and precious metal stream price of $3.90 per ounce silver,

subject to 1% annual inflation adjustment after three years. Cash cost include the impact of capitalized stripping. For a detailed

description of each of these non -IFRS financial performance measures, please see the discussion under "Non -IFRS Financial

Performance Measures" on page 8 of this news release.

TMX, NYSE – HBM

2017 No. 4

2

National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) technical reports in respect of the Lalor mine (“Lalor Technical Report”) and

the Rosemont project (“Rosemont Technical Report”) have been filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and will be filed

on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

Lalor Mine Plan – Stall Base Metal Mill

Hudbay’s updated mine plan for Lalor enables cost-effective production growth by optimizing the use of existing

infrastructure. When full development of Lalor was approved in 2010, the original plan was to build a new

concentrator at the mine site to process all of the material from Lalor , while utilizing Hudbay’s nearby Stall

concentrator to process base metal zone ore until the new concentrator was completed. Since then, h owever, the

performance of the Stall concentrator has exceeded expectations and , with a modest capital investment, the

optimized throughput rate for the Stall mill is expected to be 4,500 tonnes per day on a sustainable basis starting in

the third quarter of 2018. In addition, the 2015 acquisition of the New Britannia gold mill in Snow Lake is expected to

provide a low-cost solution to process the gold zone and copper -gold zone ore at optimal gold recovery rates, with

the potential to augment the base metal production from the Stall mill and utilize the full 6,000 tonnes per day

capacity of the Lalor mine shaft.

The updated Lalor mine p lan incorporates the increased base metal throughput and includes the processing of the

base metal zone, the copper-gold zone and portions of the gold zone when in contact with base metal ore at the Stall

base metal mill. Pending the completion of engineering work on the New Britannia mill, the updated Lalor mine plan

assumes that copper-gold zone reserves will be mined and processed at the Stall base metal mill at an average rate

of 130,000 tonnes per annum between 2020 and 2023 . An updated mine plan incorporating the New Britannia mill is

expected to enable the copper -gold zone and gold zone material to be processed at New Britannia, given the

significantly higher potential gold recoveries at New Britannia. The redirection of copper -gold zone material to New

Britannia would also permit accelerated processing of zinc -rich ore and higher zinc production through Stall during

those years.

A summary of the updated Lalor mine plan for the Stall mill is shown below.

Lalor Mine Plan Summary – Stall Base Metal Mill LOM1 Total / Average

Production

Total ore mined million tonnes 14.2

Peak daily throughput tonnes per day 4,500

Mine life years 10.5

Zinc grade % Zn 5.12%

Copper grade % Cu 0.69%

Gold grade g/t Au 2.61

Silver grade g/t Ag 26.50

Zinc recovery % 91.8%

Copper recovery % 86.8%

Gold recovery % 58.2%

Silver recovery % 54.0%

Average annual zinc production2 thousand tonnes 63.8

Average annual copper production2 thousand tonnes 8.1

TMX, NYSE – HBM

2017 No. 4

3

Average annual gold production2 thousand ounces 66.1

Average annual silver production2 thousand ounces 623.3

Mining unit cost3 C$/tonne mined C$78.32

Milling unit cost3 C$/tonne milled C$21.51

Cash Cost4

Cash cost $/lb Zn $0.37

Sustaining cash cost $/lb Zn $0.50

Capital Expenditures

Total project capital (2017 and 2018)5 C$ million C$117

Total sustaining capital C$ million C$220

1 Life-of-mine (“LOM”).

2 Production refers to contained metal in concentrate.

3 G&A costs related to shared services incurred in Flin Flon and allocated between 777, Reed and Lalor mines are not included in

unit costs.

4 Cash cost and sustaining cash cost are reported on per pound of zinc contained in concentrate and are net of by-product credits,

which are calculated using the following assumptions: copper price per pound - $2.60 in 2017, $2.75 in 2018, $3.00 in 2019 to 2020

and long-term; gold price per ounce - $1,300 in 2017 to 2020 and $1,260 long-term; silver price per ounce - $18.00 in 2017 to 2020

and long-term; CAD/USD exchange rate - 1.35 in 2017, 1.25 in 2018, 1.20 in 2019, 1.15 in 2020 and 1.10 long-term. Cash cost

includes on-site and off-site costs, and sustaining cash cost includes the addition of royalties and sustaining capital.

5 Includes capital spending for the paste backfill plant, $40 million of which was included in Hudbay’s previously disclosed 2017

annual growth capex guidance.

Construction of a paste backfill plant is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2018 for a total estimated cost

of $50 million (C$68 million), of which $40 million was included in Hudbay’s 2017 growth ca pital guidance as

announced on January 17, 2017. The paste backfill plant is intended to increase mining rates and maximize ore

recovery, while reducing capitalized development costs and better maintain ing the integrity of ground conditions .

Capital spending of $36 million (C$49 million) is planned for refurbishments to the Stall concentrator and underground

ore handling to enable sustainable throughput rates of 4,500 tonnes per day, of which $15 million will be spent in

2017 over and above initial 2017 guidance estimates.

Current mineral reserves for Lalor as of January 1, 2017 are summarized below . Reserves include the base metal

zone, the copper-gold zone and portions of the gold zone in contact with the base metal ore , which represent

approximately 80%, 4% and 16%, respectively, of the total reserve tonnage.

Lalor

Mineral Reserve Estimates1 Tonnes Zn Grade

(%)

Au Grade

(g/t)

Cu Grade

(%)

Ag Grade

(g/t)

Proven

4,383,000 6.76 2.37 0.76 27.33

Probable

9,849,000 4.39 2.72 0.65 26.12

Total proven and probable

14,232,000 5.12 2.61 0.69 26.50

Note: totals may not add up correctly due to rounding.

1 Mineral reserves calculated using metal prices of $1.07 per pound zinc (includes premium), $1,260 per ounce gold, $3.00 per

pound copper and $18.00 per ounce of silver, and using a CAD/USD exchange rate of 1.10.

Current mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, for the Lalor base metal zone as of September 30, 2016 are

summarized below.

Lalor Base Metal Zone

Mineral Resource Estimates1 Tonnes Zn Grade

(%)

Au Grade

(g/t)

Cu Grade

(%)

Ag Grade

(g/t)

Indicated 2,100,000 5.34 1.69 0.49 28.10

TMX, NYSE – HBM

2017 No. 4

4

Inferred

545,300 8.15 1.45 0.32 22.28

Note: totals may not add up correctly due to rounding.

1 Mineral resources calculated using metal prices of $1.19 per pound zinc (includes premium), $1,300 per ounce gold, $18.00 per

ounce of silver and $2.67 per pound copper.

Lalor Mine Plan – New Britannia Gold Mill

Hudbay’s current expectation is that a portion of the material mined from the gold zone and copper-gold zone at Lalor

will be processed through the New Britannia mi ll at a rate of up to 1,500 tonnes per day starting in 2019 . When

combined with processing capacity at the Stall base metal mill, this is expected to achieve an aggregate throughput

rate of up to 6,000 tonnes per day. The New Britannia mill is expected to achieve significantly higher gold recoveries

than the Stall mill , and Hudba y is examining the potential to install a copper pre -float facility in the mill to maximize

copper recoveries. Work on gold zone production and the New Britannia refurbishment is ongoing, and the focus of

the remaining engineering work is on finalizing the New Britannia flowsheet and optimizing the utilization of the

existing tailings management facilities.

Current mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, for the Lalor gold zone and copper-gold zone as of September 30,

2016 are summarized below.

Lalor Gold and Copper-Gold

Mineral Resource Estimates1 Tonnes Zn Grade

(%)

Au Grade

(g/t)

Cu Grade

(%)

Ag Grade

(g/t)

Indicated

1,750,000 0.40 5.18 0.34 30.61

Inferred

4,124,000 0.31 5.02 0.90 27.61

Note: totals may not add up correctly due to rounding.

1 Mineral resources calculated using metal prices of $1.19 per pound zinc (includes premium), $1,300 per ounce gold, $18.00 per

ounce of silver and $2.67 per pound copper.

Rosemont Feasibility Study

Since the acquisition of the Rosemont project, Hudbay has completed an extensive work program, including in -fill

drilling, detailed metallurgical test work, and a bottom-up approach to cost estimation, along with other feasibility-level

work, as summarized in the Rosemont Technical Report.

The Rosemont pro ject will be a traditional open pit, shovel and truck operation with an expected 19 -year mine life.

Rosemont is expected to generate an after -tax, unlevered internal rate of return of 15.5% , using a long -term copper

price of $3.00 per pound of copper.

A summary of the Rosemont mine plan is shown below . References to “tons” refer to short tons, not met ric tonnes,

except where noted.

Rosemont Feasibility Study Summary Years 1-10

Average

LOM

Average1

LOM

Total1

Production

Ore mined million tons 37 31 592

Waste mined2 million tons 95 61 1,155

Strip ratio2 waste:ore 2.5 2.0 2.0

Ore milled million tons 32 31 592

Copper grade milled3 % TCu 0.53% 0.45% 0.45%

TMX, NYSE – HBM

2017 No. 4

5

Copper recovery % 82% 80% 80%

Copper production4 thousand tons 140 112 2,129

Copper production4 thousand metric

tonnes 127 102 1,932

Total on-site unit costs5 $/ton milled $8.01 $7.92 $7.92

Cash Cost6

Cash cost $/lb Cu $1.14 $1.29 $1.29

Sustaining cash cost $/lb Cu $1.59 $1.65 $1.65

Capital Expenditures

Development capital $ million - - $1,921

Sustaining capital $ million $29 $20 $387

Capitalized stripping $ million $71 $41 $781

Total sustaining capital

(including capitalized stripping) $ million $100 $61 $1,168

Economics – Project Basis (100%)7

Net present value at 8% $ million - - $769

Net present value at 10% $ million - - $496

After-tax internal rate of return % - - 15.5%

Payback period years - - 5.2

Economics – Hudbay Basis (80%)7

Net present value at 8% $ million - - $719

Net present value at 10% $ million - - $499

After-tax internal rate of return % - - 17.7%

Payback period years - - 4.9

1 Life-of-mine (“LOM”) average and total calculated over years 1 to 19.

2 Waste and strip ratio excludes pre-stripping tons.

3 Production refers to contained metal in concentrate.

4 Total copper grade includes both the sulfide and acid-soluble copper in the ore.

5 On-site unit costs include mining, milling, G&A, reclamation and severance tax costs, and are after deducting capitalized stripping.

6 Cash cost and sustaining cash cost are reported net of by-product credits, which are calculated using $11.00 per pound

molybdenum and precious metal streaming prices of $3.90 per ounce silver and $450 per ounce gold, and include the impact of

capitalized stripping. Cash cost includes on-site and off-site costs, and sustaining cash cost includes the addition of royalties and

sustaining capital.

7 Economic analysis assumes $3.00 per pound copper, $11.00 per pound molybdenum, and precious metal streaming price of $3.90

per ounce silver, subject to 1% annual inflation adjustment after three years. Hudbay basis adjusts for joint venture partner expected

payments to earn into their minority interest and outstanding joint venture loan owed to Hudbay.

The Rosemont project capital cost estimate of $1,921 million (100% basis) was developed based on realistic

assumptions and informed by Hudbay’s recent experience in successfully building and ramping up the Constancia

copper mine in Peru. The c ost estimate is based on mid -cycle cost expectations, and does not factor in potential

savings that could be available if construction begins during the current period of muted new mine construction

activity.

Total project development capital is expected to be spent over an approximate three year construction period and will

be offset by existing funding sources. The precious metals stream agreement with Silver Wheaton (Caymans) Ltd.

provides for a payment of a $230 million deposit upon achievement of certain milestones. Up to $200 million in mobile

equipment included in the Rosemont project cost estimate is expected to be financed using conventional equipment

TMX, NYSE – HBM

2017 No. 4

6

financing. In addition, the joint venture agreement with a Korean consortium contemplates $106 million in cash

payments from the joint venture partners in order to complete their earn -in for 20% of the project and contributions of

20% of the remaining funding required net of the precious metals stream, equipment financing and joint venture earn -

in proceeds. Combined, these funding sources are expected to provide approximately $800 million in project -level

funding. Hudbay expects that a significant portion of the remaining required funding can be met through free cash

flow generation from the company’s operations in Peru and Manitoba.

The permitting process for Rosemont is well advanced and continues to progress. The key federal permits

outstanding are the Final Record of Decision from the U.S. Forest Service and the Section 404 Water Permit from th e

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. These federal permits are currently in the final stages of the review process. All State

of Arizona permits and approvals have been issued for Rosemont and remain in force and are current. The project

design included in the Rosemont Technical Report is specifically intended to meet the impacts analyzed and

commitments outlined in the federal and state permits.

Current mineral reserves and resources for Rosemont as of March 30, 2017 are summarized below.

Rosemont Project

Mineral Reserve and Resource Estimates Short Tons Cu Grade1

(%)

Mo Grade

(%)

Ag Grade

(oz/T)

Mineral Reserves2

Proven

469,708,117 0.48% 0.012% 0.14

Probable

122,324,813 0.31% 0.010% 0.09

Total proven and probable

592,032,930 0.45% 0.012% 0.13

Mineral Resources3

Measured

177,700,000 0.38% 0.01% 0.079

Indicated

413,200,000 0.25% 0.01% 0.076

Total measured and indicated 591,000,000 0.29% 0.01% 0.077

Inferred 68,700,000 0.30% 0.01% 0.046

Note: totals may not add up correctly due to rounding.

1 Total copper grade includes both the sulfide and acid-soluble copper in the ore.

2 Mineral reserves calculated using metal prices of $3.15 per pound copper, $11.00 per pound molybdenum and $18.00 per ounce

silver.

3 Mineral resources are exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral resources include oxide, mix and hypogene resources. Mineral

resources calculated using metal prices of $3.15 per pound copper, $11.00 per pound molybdenum and $18.00 per ounce of silver.

Constancia Mine

Current mineral reserves and resources for Constancia and Pampacancha as of January 1, 2017 are summarized

below.

Constancia Mine

Mineral Reserve and Resource Estimates Tonnes Cu Grade

(%)

Mo Grade

(g/t)

Au Grade

(g/t)

Ag Grade

(g/t)

Constancia Reserves1

Proven

431,300,000 0.30 95 0.037 2.88

Probable

109,900,000 0.23 62 0.034 2.55

Total proven and probable - Constancia 541,200,000 0.28 88 0.037 2.81

Pampacancha Reserves1

TMX, NYSE – HBM

2017 No. 4

7

Proven

22,800,000 0.53 149 0.299 4.44

Probable

20,200,000 0.44 164 0.250 3.85

Total proven and probable - Pampacancha

43,000,000 0.49 156 0.276 4.17

Total proven and probable 584,200,000 0.30 93 0.054 2.91

Constancia Resources2

Measured 161,800,000 0.19 55 0.031 2.26

Indicated 287,800,000 0.17 50 0.026 1.89

Total measured and indicated - Constancia 449,600,000 0.18 52 0.028 2.02

Inferred 138,100,000 0.17 40 0.018 1.70

Pampacancha Resources2

Measured 7,500,000 0.35 57 0.235 4.13

Indicated 15,200,000 0.18 90 0.180 2.85

Total measured and indicated - Pampacancha 22,700,000 0.23 79 0.198 3.27

Total measured and indicated 472,300,000 0.18 53 0.036 2.08

Note: totals may not add up correctly due to rounding.

1 Mineral reserves calculated using metal prices of $3.00 per pound copper, $11.00 per pound molybdenum, $18.00 per ounce

silver, and $1,260 per ounce gold.

2 Mineral resources are exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral resources calculated using metal prices of $3.00 per pound copper,

$11.00 per pound molybdenum, $18.00 per ounce silver, and $1,260 per ounce gold.

777 and Reed Mines

Current mineral reserves and resources for 777 and Reed as of January 1, 2017 are summarized below.

777 Mine

Mineral Reserve and Resource Estimates1 Tonnes Cu Grade

(%)

Zn Grade

(%)

Au Grade

(g/t)

Ag Grade

(g/t)

Mineral Reserves

Proven

3,080,000 1.98 4.93 2.01 31.53

Probable

1,386,000 1.16 5.09 2.04 30.96

Total proven and probable

4,466,000 1.73 4.98 2.02 31.35

Mineral Resources2

Indicated 736,000 0.99 3.53 1.82 26.24

Inferred

673,000 1.01 4.26 1.72 30.95

Note: totals may not add up correctly due to rounding.

1 Mineral reserves and resources calculated using metal prices of $2.67 per pound copper, $1.24 per pound zinc (includes

premium), $1,300 per ounce gold, and $18.00 per ounce silver, and using a CAD/USD exchange rate of 1.25.

2 Mineral resources are exclusive of mineral reserves.

Reed Mine

Mineral Reserve and Resource Estimates1 Tonnes Cu Grade

(%)

Zn Grade

(%)

Au Grade

(g/t)

Ag Grade

(g/t)

Mineral Reserves

Proven

362,000 3.35 0.68 0.39 5.35

Probable

337,000 3.95 0.31 0.52 5.26

Total proven and probable

699,000 3.64 0.50 0.45 5.30

TMX, NYSE – HBM

2017 No. 4

8

Mineral Resources2

Inferred

88,000 3.13 0.42 0.79 6.00

Note: totals may not add up correctly due to rounding.

1 Mineral reserves calculated using metal prices of $2.50 per pound copper, $1.22 per pound zinc (includes premium), $1,300 per

ounce gold, and $18.00 per ounce silver, and using a CAD/USD exchange rate of 1.28.

2 Mineral resources are exclusive of mineral reserves and are calculated using metal prices of $2.67 per pound copper, $1.24 per

pound zinc (includes premium), $1,300 per ounce gold, and $18.00 per ounce silver, and using a CAD/USD exchange rate of 1.25.

The focus for the 777 and Reed mines is maximizing value as the mines approach the end of their lives. Hudbay has

re-sequenced the 777 mine plan to prioritize stopes containing higher zinc grades in order to take advantage of

favourable expected zinc prices.

Additional detail on the Constancia, Lalor, Rosemont, 777 and Reed properties, including a year -over-year

reconciliation of reserves and resources, is included in Hudbay’s Annual Information Form for the year ended

December 31, 2016, which is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and will be filed on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

Non-IFRS Financial Performance Measures

Cash cost and sustaining cash cost per pound of copper produced are shown because the company believes they

help investors and management assess the performance of its operations, including the margin generated by the

operations and the company. These measures do not have a meaning prescribed by IFRS and are therefore unlikely

to be comparable to similar m easures presented by other issuers. These measures should not be considered in

isolation or as a substitute for measures prepared in accordance with IFRS and are not necessarily indicative of

operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined unde r IFRS. Other companies may calculate these

measures differently. For further details on how Hudbay calculates these measures in respect of its operating assets,

please refer to page 40 of Hudbay’s management’s discussion and analysis for the three months and year ended

December 31, 2016 available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

Qualified Person

The technical and scientific information in this news release has been approved by Cashel Meagher, P. Geo,

Hudbay’s Senior Vice Presid ent and Chief Operating Officer , and Robert Carter, P. Eng., Hudbay’s Lalor Mine

Manager. Messrs. Meagher and Carter are qualified person s pursuant to NI 43 -101. For a description of the key

assumptions, parameters and methods used to estimate mineral rese rves and resources, as well as data verification

procedures and a general discussion of the extent to which the estimates of scientific and technical information may

be affected by any known environmental, permitting, legal title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing or other relevant

factors, please refer to the NI 43-101 technical reports as filed by Hudbay on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

Forward-Looking Information

This news release contains forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian and United States

securities legislation. All information contained in this news release, other than statements of current and historical

fact, is forward-looking information. Often, but not always, forward -looking information can be identified by the use of

words such as “plans”, “expects”, “budget”, “guidance”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “strategy”, “target”,

“intends”, “objective”, “goal”, “understands”, “anticipates” and “believes” (and variations of these or similar words) and

statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” “occur” or “be achieved” or

“will be taken” (and variations of these or similar expressions). A ll of the forward -looking information in this news

release is qualified by this cautionary note.