Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

GR.V ·

Focused ON Exploring Atlantic Canada

Corporate Updates

1

___________________________________________________________________

FOCUSED ON EXPLORING ATLANTIC CANADA

(TSXV : GR)

(FRA: PH01)

GREAT ATLANTIC RESOURCES CORP. FILES 43-101 REPORT ON

GOLDEN PROMISE PROJECT, NEWFOUNDLAND

VANCOUVER, British Columbia – December 6, 2018 - GREAT ATLANTIC RESOURCES

CORP. (TSXV.GR) (the “Company” or “Great Atlantic”) announces that it has received and

filed on SEDAR a National Instrument 43 -101 Technical Report , dated December 4, 2018

(revising a previous filed version dated November 28, 2018) (the “Report”) on the Company’s

Golden Promise Gold Property, located in the central Newfoundland gold belt. The report was

completed by Mr. Greg Z. Mosher, M.Sc. App., P.Geo., and Mr. Larry Pilgrim, B.Sc., P.Geo. The

amendments in the December 4 version of the technical report principally relate to disclosure of

QA/QC programs in Part 11 and data verification in Part 12. The material conclusions of both

versions of the Report are the same.

The Report includes the following mineral resource estimate (Inferred resources) for the Jaclyn

Main Zone, the maiden resource estimate for the Company on the property:

Resource Cutoff Au g/t Au Cap g/t Au Uncap g/t Tonnes Au Ounces Capped Au Ounces Uncapped

Total 1.1 9.3 10.4 357,500 106,400 119,900

Pit-

Constrained 0.6 11.4 14.1 157,300 57,800 71,200

Underground 1.5 7.5 7.6 200,200 48,600 48,700

2

The Golden Promise Property hosts multiple gold bearing quartz veins and is located in a region

of recent significant gold discoveries. The property is located within the Exploits Subzone of the

Newfoundland Dunnage Zone. Within the Exploits Subzone, the p roperty lies along the north -

northwestern fringe of the Victoria Lake Supergroup (VLSG), a volcano-sedimentary terrane. The

northwestern margin of the Golden Promise Property occurs proximal to, and, in part, contiguous

with a major (Appalachian-scale) collisional boundary, and suture zone, known as the Red Indian

Line (RIL). The RIL forms the western boundary of the Exploits Subzone. Recent significant gold

discoveries in this region of the Exploits Subzone include those of Sok oman Iron Corp.

(TSXV.SIC) at the Moosehead Project and Marathon Gold Corp. (TSXV.MOZ) at the Valentine

Lake Gold Camp.

3

High-grade gold is reported in quartz veins and quartz vein boulders within the Golden Promise

Property. Gold bearing quartz veins are reported in multiple areas of the property, including at

least 5 gold bearing quartz vein systems reported in one zone referred to as the Jaclyn Zone, located

in the northern half of the property. Much of the reported historical exploration within the property

has been focused on the Jaclyn Zone with gold bearing vein systems reported at the Jaclyn Main,

Jaclyn East, Jaclyn West, Jaclyn North and Jaclyn South Sub -zones. The majority of historic

drilling (2002-2010) was conducted at the Jaclyn Main Zone. Significant historical work is also

reported in the southwest region of the property at the Linda / Snow White vein, including grab

sample reported to return 105 and 232 g/t gold, a reported channel sample returning 29.7 g/t gold

/ 0.5 meters, and a diamond drillhole intersection of 19.5 g/t gold / 1.15 meter core length. Gold

bearing veins and gold bearing float are reported in other regions of the property.

The Report includes a mineral resource estimate for the Jaclyn Main Zon e, the only area within

the Property for which sufficient data exists to support a mineral resource estimate . The resource

estimate was completed by Mr. Greg Z. Mosher, M.Sc. App., P.Geo.

4

The current mineral resource estimate for the Jaclyn Main Zone is based on assays from 107

drillholes (2002 – 2010). The drill core from most of these holes has been preserved at a Provincial

Government storage facility in Buchans, NL. As part of the data verification process prior to the

resource estimate, core from five (5) holes, representing a range of contained gold grades and

locations within the zone, were examined an d six (6) quarter -core samples were collected from

three of these holes for verification of the original assay values. The six check samples were

assayed for gold in 2018 at ALS Canada in North Vancouver. The following table shows the

comparison of original and check assay values.

Drill Hole From (m) To (m) Length (m) Original Au g/t Check Au g/t Sample #

GP02-09 47.6 48.3 0.7 1.4 1.455 CNF10434

GP02-09 48.3 48.7 0.4 1.0 0.005 CNF10435

GP06-51 153.5 153.8 0.3 14.1 25.1 CNF13676

GP06-51 153.8 154.2 0.4 9.4 4.27 CNF13677

GP07-74 181.0 181.5 0.5 5.2 1.79 CNF19937

GP07-74 181.5 182.0 0.5 2.4 0.083 CNF19938

Discrepancies between the original and check assays are attributable to the fact that 1) original and

check samples were collected from different portions of the core; 2) the gold is particulate in nature

and therefore a high degree of variability exists b etween the half-core and quarter-core samples;

and 3) the original samples were assayed using screened metallics to capture any coarse particles

of gold whereas the check samples were of too small a volume to permit the use of screening and

therefore some gold particles may not have been captured by the analytical process.

Original assay certificates for approximately 60% of the Jaclyn Main Zone assays were checked

against assay values in the dataset used for the mineral resource estimate and no discrepancies

were found. The results of QA/QC monitoring of drill core samples submitted for analysis during

5

the period 2004 – 2008 and 2010 – 2011, were compiled and assessed. These measures include

use of standards, blanks and duplicate samples, although not all measures were employed in all

programs. Regardless, all QA/QC metrics fall within acceptable limits.

The zone was modelled as a single quartz vein that strikes east-west and dips steeply to the south.

Modelled vein thickness was based on true thickness derived from quartz vein intercepts. The

estimate is based on 220 assays that were composited to 135 one -meter long composites. A bulk

density of 2.7 g/cm3 was used. Blocks in the model measured 15 meters east-west, 1-meter north-

south and 10 meters vertically. The block model was not rotated. Grades were interpolated using

inverse-distance squared (ID 2) weighting and a search ellipse that measured 100 meters along

strike, two meters across strike and 50 meters vertically. Grades were interpolated based on a

minimum of two and a maximum of 10 composites with a maximum of one composite per hole so

the grade of each block is based on at least two drillholes thereby demonstrating continuity of

mineralization. For the capped mineral resource estimate, all assays that exceed 65 g/t gold were

capped at 65 g/t gold. All resources were classified as Inferred because of the relatively wide

spacing of drill holes through most of the zone.

Because part of the vein is near surface the resource estimate was constrained by a conceptual open

pit to demonstrate reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction. Generic mining costs of

US$2.50/tonne and processing costs of US$25.00/tonne were used together with a gold price of

US$1,300/ounce. A conceptual pit slope of 45° was assumed with no allowance for mining loss

or dilution. Based on the combined hypothetical mining and processing costs and the assumed

price of gold, a pit-constrained cutoff grade of 0.6 g/t was adopted. For the u nderground portion

of the resource a cutoff of 1.5 g/t was assumed. The cutoff grade for the total resource is the

weighted average of the pit-constrained and underground cutoff grades. The resource estimate for

conceptual pit-constrained and underground at various gold cutoff grades and total resource

estimate are tabulated as follows:

Jaclyn Main Zone Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate: Pit-Constrained

Cutoff Au g/t Au Cap g/t Au Uncap g/t Tonnes Au Ounces Capped Au Ounces Uncapped

10 21.9 28.5 63,300 44,600 57,900

5 16.4 20.5 101,100 53,300 66,700

4 15.2 18.9 112,300 54,900 68,300

3 14.1 17.5 124,000 56,300 69,600

2 13.7 17 128,400 56,700 70,000

1.5 13.2 16.3 134,100 57,000 70,300

1 11.8 14.6 151,500 57,700 71,000

0.8 11.5 14.2 155,700 57,800 71,100

0.6 11.4 14.1 157,300 57,800 71,200

0.4 11.4 14 157,800 57,800 71,200

0.2 11.4 14 158,200 57,800 71,200

Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.

There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources estimated will be converted into Mineral Reserves.

6

Mineral resource tonnage and contained metal have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may

not add due to rounding.

Mineral resource tonnage and grades are reported as undiluted.

Contained Au ounces are in-situ and do not include recovery losses.

Jaclyn Main Zone Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate: Underground

Cutoff Au g/t Au Cap g/t Au Uncap g/t Tonnes Au Ounces Capped Au Ounces Uncapped

10 15.7 15.7 51,100 25,700 25,800

5 11.1 11.2 111,300 39,800 39,900

4 10.1 10.2 130,800 42,600 42,700

3 9.1 9.1 155,400 45,300 45,500

2 8 8.1 184,500 47,700 47,800

1.5 7.5 7.6 200,200 48,600 48,700

1 7 7 218,500 49,300 49,500

0.8 6.7 6.7 230,400 49,700 49,800

0.6 6.5 6.5 239,300 49,900 50,000

0.4 6 6 262,100 50,200 50,400

0.2 5.2 5.2 305,100 50,600 50,800

Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.

There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources estimated will be converted into Mineral Reserves.

Mineral resource tonnage and contained metal have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may

not add due to rounding.

Mineral resource tonnage and grades are reported as undiluted.

Contained Au ounces are in-situ and do not include recovery losses.

Jaclyn Main Zone Total Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate

Resource Cutoff Au g/t Au Cap g/t Au Uncap g/t Tonnes Au Ounces Capped Au Ounces Uncapped

Total 1.1 9.3 10.4 357,500 106,400 119,900

Pit-

Constrained 0.6 11.4 14.1 157,300 57,800 71,200

Underground 1.5 7.5 7.6 200,200 48,600 48,700

7

Jaclyn Main Zone Block Model

As discussed previously in this News Release, significant recent gold discoveries in the central

Newfoundland gold belt within the Exploits Subzone include that of Sok oman Iron Corp. and

Marathon Gold Corp. Sok oman Iron Corp. (TSXV.SIC) recently announced a high grade gold

discovery on its Moosehead Property, located approximately 40 kilometers east -northeast of the

Golden Promise Property. The discovery was made during the 2018 diamond drilling program. A

drill intersection of 44.96 g/t gold over 11.90 met er core length was reported including a 1.35

meter core length quartz vein intersection of 385.85 g/t gold (Sokoman Iron Corp. News Release

of July 24, 2018). The Valentine Lake Gold Camp of Marathon Gold Corp. (TSXV.MOZ) is

located approximately 55 kilome ters southwest of the Golden Promise Property. As reported on

Marathon’s website, the Valentine Lake Gold Camp currently hosts four near-surface, mainly pit-

shell constrained, deposits with measured and indicated resources totaling 2, 691,400 oz. of gold

at 1.85 g/t gold and inferred resources totalling 1, 531,600 oz. of gold at 1. 77 g/t. Readers are

warned that mineralization at the Moosehead Property and Valentine Lake Gold Camp is not

necessarily indicative of mineralization on the Golden Promise Property.

The Report may be subject to review by the British Columbia Securities Commission.

David Martin, P.Geo., a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43 -101 and VP Exploration for Great

Atlantic, is responsible for the technical information contained in this News Release.

On Behalf of the board of directors

“Christopher R Anderson”

8

Mr. Christopher R Anderson " Always be positive, strive for solutions, and never give up "

President CEO Director

604-488-3900

[email protected]

About Great Atlantic Resources Corp.: Great Atlantic Resources Corp. is a Canadian exploration company focused

on the discovery and development of mineral assets in the resource -rich and sovereign risk -free realm of Atlantic

Canada, one of the number one mining regions of the world. Great Atlantic is currently surging forward building the

company utilizing a Project Generation model, with a special focus on the most critical elements on the planet that

are prominent in Atlantic Canada, Antimony, Tungsten and Gold.

This press release includes certain statements that may be deemed “forward-looking statements”. All statements in

this release, other than statements of historical facts, that address future exploration drilling, exploration activities and

events or developments that the Company expects, are forward looking statements. A lthough the Company believes

the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements

are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in

forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking

statements include exploitation and exploration successes, continued availability of financing, and general economic,

market or business conditions.

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX

Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Great Atlantic Resource Corp

888 Dunsmuir Street - Suite 888, Vancouver, B.C., V6C 3K4