Saturday, September 19, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 19, 2026 Admin

GLDR.CN ·

Golden Rapture Mining Identifies Strong Linear Anomalies throughout the Project Area from Airborne Magnetic Survey

Exploration Programs

Golden Rapture Mining IdenƟfies Strong Linear Anomalies

throughout the Project Area from Airborne MagneƟc Survey

Edmonton, Alberta, May 28, 2025. Golden Rapture Mining CorporaƟon (CSE-GLDR) is pleased to

announce the results of the recently completed low-alƟtude, high-resoluƟon drone magneƟc

surveys of its 100% owned 10,000+ acre Phillips Gold Project, Rainy River District, Ontario.

The (UAV) airborne magneƟcs survey was conducted by Rosor ExploraƟon of Burlington,

Ontario. It was flown at a height of 50 meters with a MagArrow magnetometer by Geometrics

suspended from a Matrice 300 RTK drone along 50-meter spaced lines with a total of 313 line-

kilometers covering an area of approximately 16.7 km2 in size.

The results idenƟfied new high-priority targets, confirming that the survey area is dominated by

strong linear anomalies throughout the project area, with the strongest occurring in the

northeast corner.

It was also noted by Rosor ExploraƟon in their report that there is intense deformaƟon and

folding in the eastern part of the survey area.

Figure 1. Map of property showing survey border area in green

New High-Priority ExploraƟon Targets Discovered

Richard Rivet said:

“To our surprise, strong linear anomalies were found throughout the project area, with the

strongest occurring in the northeast corner and not from the Combined Mine area itself, where

all the drilling has occurred so far with great results as high as 285.00 g/t Au.”

These significant anomalies trend E-W in the southwest corner before trending NE-SW to the

northeast and range in amplitude from 250-100 nT, with the strongest anomalies localized in a 1

km band from 426730 E 5454600N to 428175 E 5456650 N. The maximum along this belt is

located near the centre of the survey area (427130 E 5455120 N) with an amplitude of 1,800 nT.

Figure 2. Drone MagneƟc survey map (total magneƟc intensity – reduced to pole)

There are weakly magneƟc N-S trending linear anomalies located in the middle of the survey

area. Of importance is that these are overprinted by the stronger magneƟc anomalies seen in

the figures, implying that they are from a previous deformaƟon event.

There is a clear contrast on the eastern edge of the survey between the magneƟcally strong belt

and a strong magneƟc low, which is likely the boundary between the felsic volcanics to the east

and the mafic volcanics that dominate the survey area.

Figure 3. Image of the drone magneƟc survey (First verƟcal derivaƟve)

Inversion Modelling

Unconstrained magneƟc inversion models were prepared for the survey area. Inversion

modelling was conducted with the GeosoŌ VOXI Earth Modelling soŌware in Oasis Montaj

v2023.2. The process produces three-dimensional physical property distribuƟon models of

magneƟc suscepƟbility and vector magneƟzaƟon direcƟon.

Results show that horizontal magneƟc suscepƟbility slices at various depths ranging from 200 m

to 1000 m depth are also included in the data delivery. Below approximately 1000 m depth,

merge related artefacts begin to become evident due to the longer wavelength components of

each model.

Of great importance is that the suscepƟbility inversion results show the separate magneƟc highs

as surface expressions of an impressively larger magneƟc body at a 600 m depth.

The model with 0.03 SI isosurface is shown in Figure 4 below

Source of all Survey Data

Phillips Project Survey Processing Report: Authored by: Skyler Mallozzi, M.Sc, P.Geo, Senior

Geophysicist, Rosor Exploration, April 24, 2025.

Qualified Person

The technical and scientific information in this news release has been reviewed and approved

by John Archibald, P.Geo., Exploration Manager of Golden Rapture, who is a Qualified Person as

defined by NI 43-101.

Surface Sampling Program to Commence

Richard Rivet said:

“We are excited that the resulƟng dataset shows many high-priority magneƟcally acƟve areas in

many parts of the property. It is now recommended that a prospecƟng and surface sampling

program commence immediately to invesƟgate and test the rocks where the new stronger

anomalies have been idenƟfied.”

About Golden Rapture Mining Corporation

Golden Rapture Mining is a newly listed exploration company engaged in the acquisition,

exploration and development of high-potential assets. The company’s Phillips Township

Property is located in the Rainy River District of NW Ontario. It is comprised of 10,000+ acres of

highly prospective past-producing high-grade gold systems with a total of 18 mine shafts on the

property.

Golden Rapture has now been listed for over 1 year with 37,469,390 shares presently issued.

On behalf of the Board

Richard Rivet,

Chief Executive Officer

Email: [email protected]

Phone: 780-729-5395

For more info, please look at our website at https://goldenrapturemining.com

Forward-looking statements include predictions, projections, and forecasts and are often, but not always, identified by the use

of words such as “seek”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “plan”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “expect”, “potential”, “project”, “target”,

“schedule”, “budget” and “intend” and statements that an event or result “may”, “will”, “should”, “could” or “might” occur or

be achieved and other similar expressions and includes the negatives thereof. All statements other than statements of historical

fact included in this release, including, without limitation, statements regarding the Company’s planned exploration programs

and drill programs and potential significance of results are forward-looking statements that involve various risks and

uncertainties. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events

could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements are based on a number of

material factors and assumptions. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from Company’s

expectations include actual exploration results, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, results of future

resource estimates, future metal prices, availability of capital, and financing on acceptable terms, general economic, market or

business conditions, uninsured risks, regulatory changes, defects in title, availability of personnel, materials, and equipment on

a timely basis, accidents or equipment breakdowns, delays in receiving government approvals, unanticipated environmental

impacts on operations and costs to remedy same, and other exploration or other risks detailed herein and from time to time in

the filings made by the Company with securities regulators. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors

that could cause actual actions, events, or results to differ from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be

other factors that cause such actions, events, or results to differ materially from those anticipated. There can be no assurance

that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, and accordingly readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance

on forward-looking statements.